RE: 25 Violations of law. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


bounty44 -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/13/2016 2:34:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

But you were the one cockgargling cloture. you are right, it means nothing.

looks like old bern is about 50-50 in his votes with the nutsuckers.
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/bernard_sanders/400357

Lieberman voted to block healthcare plan by Reid, (who is a dem) Lieberman voted against Iran deal. Lieberman supported McCain. There is tons more, but I aint wasting a great deal of time on lying toiletlikers.



given that he's a socialist, its laughable to even suggest that. and there is nothing explicitly on the main page of the link you put forth saying "50/50" or giving any numbers or percentages for that matter but then I can understand how youd have problems with sources what with being a plagiarist and all.

looks like old bern is not 50-50 comrade major vile critter parts:

"Votes with party 95% of 366 votes 112th Congress 91% of 484 votes"

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/S000033/

possible im misunderstanding the site, seems unlikely though...





mnottertail -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/13/2016 2:56:41 PM)

Uh, given that you are fucking stupid, you are laughable.

He is a democratic socialist. Even the nutsucker slobber blog daily caller got real close on that.


Yup, you comrade nutsucker toiletlicker, you do misunderstand. First it was the 111th congress under discussion due to the mincing words of nutsuckers, and it looks like he votes himself.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/bernard_sanders/400357

He was all up behind the old nutsucker no child left behind, and has sponsored bills with nutsucker colleagues, and sp on.

Yeah, jeeze he voted for veterans, which the nutsuckers are constantly skulking away from.

but looks like his ideology has some red in it.

https://ballotpedia.org/Bernie_Sanders#Like-minded_colleagues

but do not ever confuse nutsuckers with conservatives or republicans, cuz they are neither.




Phydeaux -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/13/2016 3:31:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/bernard_sanders/400357

but looks like his ideology has some red in it.


https://ballotpedia.org/Bernie_Sanders#Like-minded_colleagues



Nothing in your link says that. All his influences are blue; one link say he was the most liberal member.....




mnottertail -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/14/2016 7:46:34 AM)

https://ballotpedia.org/Bernie_Sanders#Issues

Try to stay away from such stupid, easily refutable comments, you are already in epic fail, but if you don't keep saying ignorant lying shit, then some may forget, and you might be able to hoodwink some feebleminded person another day.

Now, I know you would have to actually invest some thought in this, and that aint your simpleton style, but check this chart:


Bernard Sanders - Ideology Breakdown

Yeah, you may actually have to look at that page, rather than pronounce your asswipe without fact, yanno?

Let go of the lying, hallucinatory propaganda of the nutsucker slobberblog shiteating.




Phydeaux -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/14/2016 2:47:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

https://ballotpedia.org/Bernie_Sanders#Issues



Yeah I read your link again. It doesn't say he has any gop or conservative leanings. So we can be on the same page - do please quote whatever point you're trying to assert.




mnottertail -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/14/2016 3:06:14 PM)

it is the fucking chart, twatwaffle. I cant make it any clearer even for a fucking imbecile.

Ideology.

What I am saying is as you spewed your asswipe about supermajorities, you were wrong, as your nutsucker friend came in and you both jacked each others dicks, he was wrong.

You are factless buffoons.

There is no credible citation in history of it.


And do not equate any nutsucker with republican or conservative leanings, they dont have them, they just slobber asswipe and nazism.




Phydeaux -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/14/2016 3:12:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

it is the fucking chart, twatwaffle. I cant make it any clearer even for a fucking imbecile.




Provide a copy, so that your brilliance can be see by all the world. The chart I'm seeing shows him on the borders of the farthest left grid.




mnottertail -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/14/2016 3:18:12 PM)

Yeah, learn to scroll nitwit. Reading might also help. I know this is factual information, so its tough for you, but I am sure you are going to ge this in less than 50 trys.

The title of the chart is:

Ideology Breakdown

It will be a bar chart of more than one page. I believe it is like the 5th or more chart down.

Oh, you say? There's more than the little screen? Yeah.

<div class="ftb-widget" data-width="600" data-height="400" data-widget-id="aZI8Zef6laB" data-href="http://members-of-congress.insidegov.com/l/32/Bernard-Sanders" ><a href="http://members-of-congress.insidegov.com/l/32/Bernard-Sanders" target="_blank" style="font:14px/16px arial;color:#3d3d3d;">Bernard Sanders - Ideology Breakdown | InsideGov</a></div><script async src="https://s.graphiq.com/rx/widgets.js"></script>


it doesnt copy.




bounty44 -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/14/2016 3:37:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

it is the fucking chart, twatwaffle. I cant make it any clearer even for a fucking imbecile.

Ideology.

What I am saying is as you spewed your asswipe about supermajorities, you were wrong, as your nutsucker friend came in and you both jacked each others dicks, he was wrong.

You are factless buffoons.

There is no credible citation in history of it.


And do not equate any nutsucker with republican or conservative leanings, they dont have them, they just slobber asswipe and nazism.



just reported this post, I hope others will too, and you find yourself on a temporary, if not permanent, vacation again.




Phydeaux -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/14/2016 3:52:08 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Yeah, learn to scroll nitwit. Reading might also help. I know this is factual information, so its tough for you, but I am sure you are going to ge this in less than 50 trys.

The title of the chart is:

Ideology Breakdown

It will be a bar chart of more than one page. I believe it is like the 5th or more chart down.

Oh, you say? There's more than the little screen? Yeah.

<div class="ftb-widget" data-width="600" data-height="400" data-widget-id="aZI8Zef6laB" data-href="http://members-of-congress.insidegov.com/l/32/Bernard-Sanders" ><a href="http://members-of-congress.insidegov.com/l/32/Bernard-Sanders" target="_blank" style="font:14px/16px arial;color:#3d3d3d;">Bernard Sanders - Ideology Breakdown | InsideGov</a></div><script async src="https://s.graphiq.com/rx/widgets.js"></script>


it doesnt copy.



Yeah, I'm still not seeing any evidence of GOP leanings.

I do see where 8 conservative organizations give him an average rating of 8%. You're aware that that a rating of 50 in that circumstance would be "neutral" a result of more than 50 would indicate a leaning in support of.

Ratings of 8 mean opposed... Showing that Sanders is opposed to GOP aligned groups.

So whenever you find something saying Sanders has GOP leanings.. you be sure to let me know...




DominantWrestler -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/14/2016 7:20:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Yeah, I'm still not seeing any evidence of GOP leanings.

So whenever you find something saying Sanders has GOP leanings.. you be sure to let me know...



Bernie Sanders' career in politics originated from Vermont. His state has some of the highest gun ownership rates and one of the lowest homicide by firearm, often with murder rates in the single digit range for a state with a population of about 600,000. That means they have hit less than 1 death per 100,000 by firearm in a high firearm possession rate state. He also helped sponsor the veterans bill. He understands the pressure of bipartisan politics and has demonstrated an ability to find common ground between parties. This could bring us from the brink that we have reached; a separation of parties not seen since the civil war. And as interesting as anti-statism is, the United States would be taken over in less than two years by a combination of foreign powers. Divided and punished. It would be a messy atrocity




Phydeaux -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/14/2016 9:01:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

Yeah, I'm still not seeing any evidence of GOP leanings.

So whenever you find something saying Sanders has GOP leanings.. you be sure to let me know...



Bernie Sanders' career in politics originated from Vermont. His state has some of the highest gun ownership rates and one of the lowest homicide by firearm, often with murder rates in the single digit range for a state with a population of about 600,000. That means they have hit less than 1 death per 100,000 by firearm in a high firearm possession rate state. He also helped sponsor the veterans bill. He understands the pressure of bipartisan politics and has demonstrated an ability to find common ground between parties. This could bring us from the brink that we have reached; a separation of parties not seen since the civil war. And as interesting as anti-statism is, the United States would be taken over in less than two years by a combination of foreign powers. Divided and punished. It would be a messy atrocity



Where do you get the idea that I'm opposed to *any* state.

The problem is - we have a BLM that confiscates private properties, denies water rights, and acts in an arbitrary fashion.
We have an epa that threatens a mine owner with 10,000 a day fine if he doesn't let them drill a holl in a retaining wall - and leaks 3 mil gals and tries to cover it up.
We has a justice department that walks gun to the cartel and tries to pin it on a gun dealer.
We have an agrigulture deparment that gives money to farmer not to growth things
And a CDC that spend 1/3 on promoting healthy school lunches .

WE have a federal government that thinks nothng of writing regulatons that will force 1/4 of the electricy generation off line over five years - costing their owners more than 500 billion dollars- in the costs of the plants that they built with the fair expectation of being able to make a profit.

We have politicans that are spending $400 billion we don't have - and a fed that is inventing $200 bil a year in new money.

I'm all for roads, military, post office. Its the overweening power of the government that needs to be trimmed back, dialed down.




DominantWrestler -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/15/2016 6:21:01 AM)

Exactly, hence Bernie. He is on the left, but he is not the corrupt business as usual that clinton or trump would promote. And before you say trump wouldn't continue as usual, he will continue the party line of extremism. Probably would be the best recruiter ISIS ever got if he is elected. Bernie on other hand is aware of the business as usual state of affairs




mnottertail -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/15/2016 7:32:29 AM)

I just reported your posts about 45 times and I got sick of looking, hope others report you too.

Good luck with your asswipe.




mnottertail -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/15/2016 7:36:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Yeah, learn to scroll nitwit. Reading might also help. I know this is factual information, so its tough for you, but I am sure you are going to ge this in less than 50 trys.

The title of the chart is:

Ideology Breakdown

It will be a bar chart of more than one page. I believe it is like the 5th or more chart down.

Oh, you say? There's more than the little screen? Yeah.

<div class="ftb-widget" data-width="600" data-height="400" data-widget-id="aZI8Zef6laB" data-href="http://members-of-congress.insidegov.com/l/32/Bernard-Sanders" ><a href="http://members-of-congress.insidegov.com/l/32/Bernard-Sanders" target="_blank" style="font:14px/16px arial;color:#3d3d3d;">Bernard Sanders - Ideology Breakdown | InsideGov</a></div><script async src="https://s.graphiq.com/rx/widgets.js"></script>


it doesnt copy.



Yeah, I'm still not seeing any evidence of GOP leanings.

I do see where 8 conservative organizations give him an average rating of 8%. You're aware that that a rating of 50 in that circumstance would be "neutral" a result of more than 50 would indicate a leaning in support of.

Ratings of 8 mean opposed... Showing that Sanders is opposed to GOP aligned groups.

So whenever you find something saying Sanders has GOP leanings.. you be sure to let me know...



Yeah, nobody cares. a rating of 8 would mean, not opposed, but that 8% of the time..........see, thats the problem with nutsuckers, they are innumerate. Also whatever 90% or 94% vote is that means somewhere in the 4% to 10% range he doesnt vote with the democrats, and just waltz me through this, who else is there besides the nutsuckers down there? And if democrats vote one way on something, which way do you think the nutsuckers vote, for that or against.

There was no supermajority, he does side with republicans, and as always your lying cretinous factless propaganda is displayed and seconded by your own mouth.





Phydeaux -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/15/2016 11:06:04 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DominantWrestler

. And before you say trump wouldn't continue as usual, he will continue the party line of extremism.


Here's the problem you don't see or acknowledge, outlined in several points.


A. You see the GOP as extreme, far out. But what you fail to see is that extreme is relative. Trump is extreme to you - you are exactly as extreme to trump.
Your position has no more inherent validity than his does.

B. In the latest polls, trump is supported by 65% of the republican electorate - and 20% of the democrat electorate has indicated they will vote for him.
This means that you have just labelled the vast majority of republicans as extremists - and a good number of democrats as well.

C. You throw the accusation of extremity and partisianship around so freely - but 70% of the american people support trumps call to build a wall. When you label everything as "extreme" or "nazi" as joeether does - words stop having meaning and relevance and stop having the ability to convey meaning or to conduct a conversation.

No, trump is not a nazi, no matter how often joether says it. And Trump falls much closer to the normative standards of american politicians than Sanders does.

So check your bias.




mnottertail -> RE: 25 Violations of law. (1/15/2016 11:13:07 AM)

There is no GOP. There is no republican. You as always have no fact, but mumble and slobber some numbers.

1) Trump will not be elected dogcatcher.
2) 70% of Americans do not want to build any wall. Who will pay for it?
3) if Americans were so goddamned concerned about illegal immigrants they would be down their legislatures throats to incarcerate and sell out the corporations who hire them. We know where they are.


Sanders falls far more normative. Check your bias. Get some facts. Hallucinations you spew out here day in and out are shopworn and proven incorrect repeatedly and constantly.






Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875