Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/17/2016 6:49:56 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: ifmaz

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: ifmaz


ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: jlf1961


Duh, that is one of the basic first things they drill into your head in basic training,


Usually the first thing they try to teach you is which one is your left foot. The next thing is which is your right foot.




Which one of those are you trained to shoot at? ;)


The miiltary takes a dim view of that sort of behaviour. they usually charge the miscreant with destruction of government property. Had you ever been in the military you would have known that



What was your MOS?

0311

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/18/2016 10:17:18 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

What was your MOS?

0311


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
I rarely pull out my dusty old trident, but in this case, here goes. I was a Navy SEAL officer in the 1980s,


Roflmfao



http://www.collarchat.com/m_4875342/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#


< Message edited by bounty44 -- 1/18/2016 10:18:01 AM >

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/18/2016 10:44:15 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline 		What are you trying to say!


_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/18/2016 10:55:43 AM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

What are you trying to say!


I don't think he knows.

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/18/2016 12:15:43 PM   
ifmaz


Posts: 844
Joined: 7/22/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

What was your MOS?

0311


quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
I rarely pull out my dusty old trident, but in this case, here goes. I was a Navy SEAL officer in the 1980s,


Roflmfao



http://www.collarchat.com/m_4875342/mpage_1/key_/tm.htm#



This may have been thompsonx incorrectly assuming the "I was a NAVY SEAL" statement originated from Phydeaux and not the linked article.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/18/2016 4:28:12 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline 		it is primarily his inequitable position that he should be taken seriously saying he was a marine rifleman while not giving others the same or similar consideration.





< Message edited by bounty44 -- 1/18/2016 4:29:48 PM >

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/18/2016 5:27:47 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: BamaD

No it means that people are starting to see through the Democratic lies about guns that look like assault rifles.


I am pretty sure brady was raguns mouthpiece and a republicrat.

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/18/2016 5:33:43 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline 		This may have been thompsonx incorrectly assuming the "I was a NAVY SEAL" statement originated from Phydeaux and not the linked article.

Did you see any quote marks on the dawg's statement?

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/18/2016 5:39:58 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: bounty44

it is primarily his inequitable position that he should be taken seriously saying he was a marine rifleman while not giving others the same or similar consideration.


Comrade pogue, if that duce gear is a little too heavy for you just chuck it, you won't ever need it.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/18/2016 5:46:32 PM   
ifmaz


Posts: 844
Joined: 7/22/2015
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

This may have been thompsonx incorrectly assuming the "I was a NAVY SEAL" statement originated from Phydeaux and not the linked article.

Did you see any quote marks on the dawg's statement?


I read the linked article and noted Phydeaux, like you and others, did not use the quote "tag".

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/18/2016 5:54:57 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: ifmaz


ORIGINAL: thompsonx

This may have been thompsonx incorrectly assuming the "I was a NAVY SEAL" statement originated from Phydeaux and not the linked article.

Did you see any quote marks on the dawg's statement?


I read the linked article and noted Phydeaux, like you and others, did not use the quote "tag".

Really?

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban - 1/19/2016 6:37:30 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

Sieg Heil. Nobody is banning guns.

See, for example H R 4269. The fact that it failed does not mean they don't want to ban. And don't say they aren't banning all guns so it doesn't count. When they list the firearms people can still own, they are in effect saying see how nice we are, we are letting you keep some fireams, for now.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 72
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Majority OPPOSE "assault" weapons ban Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.172