Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: So.. what moron said...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: So.. what moron said... Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/6/2016 3:21:25 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

As well they should. In many places, the utility for transmitting power has been separated from the plants supplying power.

How many places?


IF you wish to have access to power at night, or in an emergency, you should be willing to pay your fair share of the infrastructure necessary to support you getting power.

Pay attention dumbass...that is what batteries are for.

Prior to the netmeetering charges, in places like california, hawaii, nevada, the cost of maintinging the trasmission lines was included in the power rate.

half truth...the customer is paying for both the electriity and the line it comes on.

Whole lie...When the role of vendor and customer is revrsed you still want the home producer to pay for the line.


As far as I know there is no obligation to hook up to the powergrid. So you always have the option of not paying those connection/maintenance fees.

I don't pay those fees since I am not connected to the grid. Should the grid come to me I see no advantage in hooking up to it.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 321
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/6/2016 6:30:58 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

As well they should. In many places, the utility for transmitting power has been separated from the plants supplying power.

How many places?


IF you wish to have access to power at night, or in an emergency, you should be willing to pay your fair share of the infrastructure necessary to support you getting power.

Pay attention dumbass...that is what batteries are for.

Prior to the netmeetering charges, in places like california, hawaii, nevada, the cost of maintinging the trasmission lines was included in the power rate.

half truth...the customer is paying for both the electriity and the line it comes on.

Whole lie...When the role of vendor and customer is revrsed you still want the home producer to pay for the line.


As far as I know there is no obligation to hook up to the powergrid. So you always have the option of not paying those connection/maintenance fees.

I don't pay those fees since I am not connected to the grid. Should the grid come to me I see no advantage in hooking up to it.




How cute - you think "you" refers to you personally.

Of course I think if you want to sell electricity to the grid you show also pay your fair share of the maintenance cost. I don't care which way the power goes - you want a connection, pay your fair share of the costs to have one.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 322
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/6/2016 6:38:10 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
ORIGINAL: thompsonx

As well they should. In many places, the utility for transmitting power has been separated from the plants supplying power.

How many places?


IF you wish to have access to power at night, or in an emergency, you should be willing to pay your fair share of the infrastructure necessary to support you getting power.

Pay attention dumbass...that is what batteries are for.

Prior to the netmeetering charges, in places like california, hawaii, nevada, the cost of maintinging the trasmission lines was included in the power rate.

half truth...the customer is paying for both the electriity and the line it comes on.

Whole lie...When the role of vendor and customer is reversed you still want the home producer to pay for the line.


As far as I know there is no obligation to hook up to the powergrid. So you always have the option of not paying those connection/maintenance fees.

I don't pay those fees since I am not connected to the grid. Should the grid come to me I see no advantage in hooking up to it.


How cute - you think "you" refers to you personally.

To those of us who speak english it does.

Of course I think if you want to sell electricity to the grid you show also pay your fair share of the maintenance cost.

Logic would dictate otherwise. If they sell to me I must pay for both the electricity and the transmission of it. If I sell to them they pay for the electricity and the transmission of it.
Jesus you are phouing stupid.


I don't care which way the power goes - you want a connection, pay your fair share of the costs to have one.

Actually you have stated that you do.
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 323
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/7/2016 12:08:35 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
To those of us who speak english it does.



So when you eventually take lessons, you will learn that 'you' is used as both singular and plural; as well as third person usage.

Eg:
quote:


You is usually a second person pronoun. In formal written English, the indefinite pronoun one can be used in the third person to refer to an indeterminate person. However, English speakers usually use you.

Example: "One cannot learn English in a day" or "You cannot learn English in a day

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 324
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/7/2016 12:12:33 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline 		New study out published in Nature that says the extreme weather predictions of the IPCC are, in a word, wrong.
What a surprise

https://www.yahoo.com/news/climate-forecasts-may-flawed-says-study-184006557.html

Quoting: Paris (AFP) - Predictions of unprecedented rainfall extremes in the 20th century driven by global warming turned out wrong, a study said Wednesday, casting doubt on methods used to project future trends.

A massive trawl of Northern Hemisphere rainfall data for the last 1,200 years revealed there had been more dramatic wet-dry weather extremes in earlier, cooler centuries before humans set off fossil fuel-driven global warming.

This is problematic, said a study in the journal Nature, as the same data models used to anticipate that global warming would cause record rainfall extremes in the 1900s, are the basis for projections of things to come.

"It might be more difficult than often assumed to project into the future," the study's lead author Fredrik Ljungqvist of Stockholm University told AFP of the findings.

"The truth can be much, much more complicated."

The UN's climate science panel, the consensus authority, contends that dry areas will become ever drier and wet ones wetter as the global temperature rises in response to greenhouse gas emissions.

But the new work said sky-high temperatures in the 20th century did not directly translate into record extremes between wet and dry weather, as many had expected.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 325
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/8/2016 11:41:31 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
ORIGINAL: thompsonx

As well they should. In many places, the utility for transmitting power has been separated from the plants supplying power.

How many places?





For one, the State of California.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 326
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/8/2016 11:47:29 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
ORIGINAL: thompsonx



Logic would dictate otherwise. If they sell to me I must pay for both the electricity and the transmission of it. If I sell to them they pay for the electricity and the transmission of it.
Jesus you are phouing stupid.




From what you're saying, I'm not sure you understand thevphysics or the business of electricity. Regardless, what you're saying isn't true.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 327
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/9/2016 7:06:23 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


ORIGINAL: thompsonx
To those of us who speak english it does.



So when you eventually take lessons, you will learn that 'you' is used as both singular and plural; as well as third person usage.

Eg:

You is usually a second person pronoun. In formal written English, the indefinite pronoun one can be used in the third person to refer to an indeterminate person. However, English speakers usually use you.

Example: "One cannot learn English in a day" or "You cannot learn English in a day


Example:
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 328
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/9/2016 7:07:59 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Nnanji
ORIGINAL: thompsonx

As well they should. In many places, the utility for transmitting power has been separated from the plants supplying power.

How many places?


For one, the State of California.

Which one is exempt from the puc?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 329
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/9/2016 7:09:37 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Nnanji
ORIGINAL: thompsonx


Logic would dictate otherwise. If they sell to me I must pay for both the electricity and the transmission of it. If I sell to them they pay for the electricity and the transmission of it.
Jesus you are phouing stupid.


From what you're saying, I'm not sure you understand thevphysics or the business of electricity. Regardless, what you're saying isn't true.

The only thing you know for sure is that you have your foot in your mouth and your head up your ass.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 330
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/9/2016 10:27:39 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Nnanji
ORIGINAL: thompsonx

As well they should. In many places, the utility for transmitting power has been separated from the plants supplying power.

How many places?


For one, the State of California.

Which one is exempt from the puc?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.



Wow, your ignance is showing again. Similar to other threads. I'm calling BS on you again. You don't understand the electricity business or the physics of electricity. You've been googling again. Just enough to get your 12 year old jollies. Too funny.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 331
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/9/2016 10:29:30 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Nnanji
ORIGINAL: thompsonx


Logic would dictate otherwise. If they sell to me I must pay for both the electricity and the transmission of it. If I sell to them they pay for the electricity and the transmission of it.
Jesus you are phouing stupid.


From what you're saying, I'm not sure you understand thevphysics or the business of electricity. Regardless, what you're saying isn't true.

The only thing you know for sure is that you have your foot in your mouth and your head up your ass.



Chin music because your googling hasn't given you enough information to spout off. You're not familiar enough with the subject to be sure of yourself so instead you just offer up chin music.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 332
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/9/2016 10:33:11 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Nnanji
ORIGINAL: thompsonx


Logic would dictate otherwise. If they sell to me I must pay for both the electricity and the transmission of it. If I sell to them they pay for the electricity and the transmission of it.
Jesus you are phouing stupid.


From what you're saying, I'm not sure you understand thevphysics or the business of electricity. Regardless, what you're saying isn't true.

The only thing you know for sure is that you have your foot in your mouth and your head up your ass.



This aspect was, actually, the subject of a State of California Supreme Court decision. Which you'll have to go google to see you're wrong. Though, by this time, everyone knows you're mostly wrong and a blow hard. Google is your friend. Go figure out what you don't know that makes your statement here absurd.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 333
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/9/2016 10:38:00 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Nnanji
ORIGINAL: thompsonx

As well they should. In many places, the utility for transmitting power has been separated from the plants supplying power.

How many places?


For one, the State of California.

Which one is exempt from the puc?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.




Whether a transmission supplier or a generator, what does being subject to the "CPUC" not the puc, have to do with the two being separate. That was the topic. You're obfuscating while you frantically google to figure out why you sound so phoquing stupid. Wherever you post you seem to not know the first thing about the topic, yet not let that bother you. You're so funny. A 12 year old in his mother's basement.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 334
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/9/2016 10:42:38 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux



IF you wish to have access to power at night, or in an emergency, you should be willing to pay your fair share of the infrastructure necessary to support you getting power.

Pay attention dumbass...that is what batteries are for.




I need another laugh this morning. Tell me about your magic bean batteries. (Read...Set...Google)

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 335
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/9/2016 2:55:23 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline 		That can shoot the toe of a foot 25 miles away.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 336
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/10/2016 5:26:55 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline 		As for..

Why should a utility want to buy your power at $.12 when it can make its own at $.035?

Good article about evolution of natural gas power plants, good conclusions: http://www.forbes.com/sites/judeclemente/2016/04/10/u-s-natural-gas-electricity-efficiency-continues-to-improve/2/#28439f421e73

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 337
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/10/2016 5:49:07 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Nnanji


This aspect was, actually, the subject of a State of California Supreme Court decision. Which you'll have to go google to see you're wrong.


You were going to tell us which part of that is not under the control of the puc...did you forget?

Though, by this time, everyone knows you're mostly wrong and a blow hard.

Then why is it that I post facts that contradict your mindless rambling?



(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 338
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/10/2016 5:51:08 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Nnanji


I need another laugh this morning. Tell me about your magic bean batteries. (Read...Set...Google)


Batteries are those little boxes that we store electricity in. Didn't you get the memo?

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 339
RE: So.. what moron said... - 4/10/2016 5:53:33 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

As for..

Why should a utility want to buy your power at $.12 when it can make its own at $.035?

I make electricity for free.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 340
Page:   <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: So.. what moron said... Page: <<   < prev  15 16 [17] 18 19   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109