RE: Soc-r Update

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Soc-r Update

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Soc-r Update

Page: << < prev 1 [2]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Soc-r Update - 1/18/2016 3:32:54 PM

Aylee

Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I rarely pull out my dusty old trident, but in this case, here goes. I was a Navy SEAL officer in the 1980s,

Roflmfao

what is wrong with you?

My guess is that he is having trouble believing Phydeaux's claim to be a SEAL during the 80s. I'd also venture a guess that he is far from alone in his skepticism.

You are claiming that Phydeax's real name is Matt Bracken? And he is trying to up his readership?

Convoluted.

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to tweakabelle)

Profile

Post #: 21

RE: Soc-r Update - 1/18/2016 3:51:59 PM

PeonForHer

Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline

FR

Is there anyone, anyone at all, using these forums who was in the US military but who was *not* in one of the elite units and whose role hasn't once been portrayed by e.g. Steven Seagal or Clint Eastwood? I mean, over here, and during my adult life, I've met more 'ex-SAS soldiers' than the entire size of the SAS regiment.

How does the military function without its medical, engineering and catering corps, and given that nobody has ever been in those corps?

< Message edited by PeonForHer -- 1/18/2016 3:54:36 PM >

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com

(in reply to Aylee)

Profile

Post #: 22

RE: Soc-r Update - 1/18/2016 4:13:37 PM

bounty44

Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: bounty44

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I rarely pull out my dusty old trident, but in this case, here goes. I was a Navy SEAL officer in the 1980s,

Roflmfao

what is wrong with you?

Nothing comrade...I just find it very funny that some shit eating dog claims to be a seal.

apart from what phydeaux said to you later about it all being a quote, would you have appreciated it when you "claimed" to be a marine rifleman and had someone responded "Roflmfao" to you? never mind that you actually didn't do that...

there are indeed navy seals in the world, theres no reason to think they cannot be on a forum like this, and I cant think of any legitimate reason whatsoever, and neither can you, that phydeaux might not have been one.

but the main reason im writing, and ive corrected you on this before, maybe read more carefully this time and stimulate your memory: "comrade: a fellow socialist or communist." yeah, im a comrade...wise up.

(in reply to thompsonx)

Profile

Post #: 23

RE: Soc-r Update - 1/18/2016 4:21:05 PM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: bounty44

I rarely pull out my dusty old trident, but in this case, here goes. I was a Navy SEAL officer in the 1980s,

Roflmfao

what is wrong with you?

Nothing comrade...I just find it very funny that some shit eating dog claims to be a seal.

What is more amusing is that public school education you are so proud of, leaving you unable to note that the words are a cited quotation.

Even someone with a public school education might notice the lack of quotation marks sweetie.

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Profile

Post #: 24

RE: Soc-r Update - 1/18/2016 4:54:08 PM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: bounty44

apart from what phydeaux said to you later about it all being a quote,

Put on your glasses. There are no quote marks.

would you have appreciated it when you "claimed" to be a marine rifleman and had someone responded "Roflmfao" to you? never mind that you actually didn't do that...

Since you just said I did not do that what is your point?

there are indeed navy seals in the world, theres no reason to think they cannot be on a forum like this, and I cant think of any legitimate reason whatsoever, and neither can you, that phydeaux might not have been one.

Perhaps his complete lack of knowledge of anything relating to the military in general and the navy in particular, might have been a clue.

but the main reason im writing, and ive corrected you on this before, maybe read more carefully this time and stimulate your memory: "comrade: a fellow socialist or communist." yeah, im a comrade...wise up.

Comrade bounty perhaps you might ask a grown up to help you with a dictionary.

(in reply to bounty44)

Profile

Post #: 25

RE: Soc-r Update - 1/18/2016 4:57:20 PM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Aylee

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

ORIGINAL: bounty44

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I rarely pull out my dusty old trident, but in this case, here goes. I was a Navy SEAL officer in the 1980s,

Roflmfao

what is wrong with you?

My guess is that he is having trouble believing Phydeaux's claim to be a SEAL during the 80s. I'd also venture a guess that he is far from alone in his skepticism.

You are claiming that Phydeax's real name is Matt Bracken? And he is trying to up his readership?

Convoluted.

I believe a claim might logically be made that you have trouble reading english.

< Message edited by thompsonx -- 1/18/2016 4:59:54 PM >

(in reply to Aylee)

Profile

Post #: 26

RE: Soc-r Update - 1/18/2016 6:24:01 PM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

I rarely pull out my dusty old trident, but in this case, here goes. I was a Navy SEAL officer in the 1980s,

Roflmfao

what is wrong with you?

My guess is that he is having trouble believing Phydeaux's claim to be a SEAL during the 80s. I'd also venture a guess that he is far from alone in his skepticism.

You are claiming that Phydeax's real name is Matt Bracken? And he is trying to up his readership?

Convoluted.

for someone who gets so much aerobic excercise jumping to conclusions, and building strawmen by calling people pedophiles, you could shut the fuck up.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Aylee)

Profile

Post #: 27

RE: Soc-r Update - 1/18/2016 7:26:06 PM

Lucylastic

Posts: 40310
Status: offline

Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
What is more amusing is that public school education you are so proud of, leaving you unable to note that the words are a cited quotation.

You mean like you did? in your OP????
no quotes, the only quotes are around the "strayed into Iranian waters" bit

A.)In post 8 of the flint thread, I stated at the top of the post.

quote:

update if anyone is interested

Before the paste and link
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4873203

B.) In post 9, http://www.collarchat.com/postnumber.asp?id=4873248
TJ posted this at the top of her response

quote:

Micheal Moore lives there and has been drinking the water too, apparently.. and he aint happy..

then goes on to post a link to MMs words. But pastes it IN ITALICS to show it is a linked post.

C.) Neither were our own words, yet phydeaux states they are our own words in post 14 http://www.collarchat.com/postnumber.asp?id=4874483

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux
Yanno,
When you say things like:

quote:

Over the weekend, for example, the editorial board of the Detroit Free Press turned its attention directly to Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder (R), who’s facing calls for his arrest from protestors, comparing his handling of the Flint crisis to George W. Bush’s handling of Hurricane Katrina.

It sure sounds partisan.

D.) I responded in post 18 http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4874496

quote:

Im responsible for my words, not quotes, not other peoples responses or your intentional misundeerstandings. Im not responsible for what you dont understand.

E.) To TJ he stated...
http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=4874617

quote:

You posted it without editing it out. Means you thought it was worth saying. IF you didn't, edit it out. Own up to your quotes.

So, now we have him trying to suggest its everyone else that is wrong.
And you wonder why you have as much credibility as palin.
I dont have you on hide, but I sure as hell refuse to read your links after you lie and obfuscate.
More people than Thompson had the same reaction.
For the same reason too.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Profile

Post #: 28

RE: Soc-r Update - 1/18/2016 9:22:36 PM

Phydeaux

Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

in reply to lucy: LOLOLOLOLOL

Update:

Ships returned - minus the sim cards.

You know - those cards that would show the location of the boat where it was intercepted. Now, if they were in Iranian waters - what motivation would the iranians have to steal the cards? They would bruit the coordinates to the whole world.

But now, if what happened was that the americans were on the high seas - both the americans and the iranians would want that covered up now. .wouldn't they. ...

(in reply to Lucylastic)

Profile

Post #: 29

RE: Soc-r Update - 1/19/2016 2:49:33 AM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

But now, if what happened

If the dawg hadn't of stopped to take a shit he would have caught the rabit.

was that the americans were on the high seas - both the americans and the iranians would want that covered up now. .wouldn't they. ...

Why would the amerikans want that?

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Profile

Post #: 30

RE: Soc-r Update - 1/19/2016 3:13:28 AM

thompsonx

Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

But now, if what happened

If the dawg hadn't of stopped to take a shit he would have caught the rabit.

was that the americans were on the high seas - both the americans and the iranians would want that covered up now. .wouldn't they. ...

Why would the amerikans want it covered up?

(in reply to Phydeaux)

Profile

Post #: 31