bounty44
Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014 Status: offline
|
in fairness though to your feeble (it reminds me of the scene at the end of gladiator, where commodus ineffectually flails at maximus) attempt at defense (or is it deflection?), I took a closer look at some of the "big falsehoods" from your mediamatters link. so I started out by saying, okay, i'll just randomly pick #7 and see where that leads. "Breitbart's websites make baseless claim that NEA engaged in lawbreaking." and the boldened first line to the piece reads: "BigHollywood.com claims NEA "looking to the art community to create an environment amenable to the administration's positions." note there is nothing there that says anything about "lawbreaking." so I read a little further and heres the mention: "Posters on Breitbart's websites baselessly claim NEA broke laws" so NOT BREITBART, but someone who commented on the piece. and guess what, the link media matters supplied to get the reader to the original article only links to the main page, not the article itself. not so good for you or your source so far comrade. lets try again: I thought the mao Christmas story looked good, so I went there: "The Maoist Christmas tree ornaments" here's the first line: "BigGovernment.com: "Transvestites, Mao And Obama Ornaments Decorate White House Christmas Tree."" and here's media matters' beef: "BigGovernment.com suggested the White House was "making some political statements" with the ornaments and attacked it for "pegg[ing] controversial designer Simon Doonan to oversee the Christmas decorations for the White House."" here are the actual words from breitbart: quote:
Why let a holiday season come between the White House and making some political statements? The White House pegged controversial designer Simon Doonan to oversee the Christmas decorations for the White House. Mr. Doonan, who is creative director of Barney’s New York has often caused a stir with his design choices. Like his naughty yuletide window display of Margaret Thatcher as a dowdy dominatrix and Dan Quayle as a ventriloquist’s dummy. For this year’s White House, he didn’t disappoint. These photos of ornaments on the White House Christmas tree in the Blue Room were taken just days ago. Of course, Mao has his place in the White House. And, of course, it wouldn’t be Christmas without an ornament of legendary transvestite Hedda Lettuce. He/She even signed it: And, so soon after collecting the Nobel Peace Prize, why wouldn’t the White House have an ornament super-imposing President Obama onto Mt. Rushmore: All around, a very Barry Christmas! so breitbart takes issue with communists and progressive ahem "values" and all the more so when they appear in a traditional holiday, and that means what? they lie? they are untrustworthy? the falsely claimed something? looking pretty bad for you still, lets try one more: so then I tried the "Platform for anti-gay Jennings smears" way too much in the middle for me to quickly follow so I jumped to the end: "Breitbart.tv also smeared Jennings." media matters says breitbart "grossly distorted comments Jennings made to a GLSEN audience in 2000 to claim he "criticize[d] schools for promoting heterosexuality"" and they offer as refutation to that, that Jennings had said: "...respect [for] every human being regardless of sexual orientation, regardless of gender identity, regardless of race or religion or any of the arbitrary distinctions we make among people..." since those two positions are not mutually exclusive, and/or are amenable to simple differences of opinion and interpretation, sorry, short of the entire transcript of both sides, which they don't provide, a judgment cannot be made. however that said, rush Limbaugh has some of what Jennings said: quote:
JENNINGS: I find it amazing this is on the ballot for a couple reasons. First of all, we all know what's REALLY promoted in our schools. Heterosexuality is promoted in our schools. Every time in our schools. Every time kids read Romeo & Juliet or they're urged to go to the prom or whatever it is, kids are aggressively recruited to be heterosexual in this country, and you know what? It doesn't work. The reality is that if schools could affect your sexual orientation there would have been no gay people in the first place. But there's still people out there who believe that myth because, you know what? It's easy to panic people if you make them think that they're after your kids. yeah, I can take that as a "criticism of schools promoting heterosexuality" and others did as well. http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2009/10/07/safe_schools_czar_rips_schools_for_promoting_heterosexuality out of luck again! and a straight 3 for 3 is enough confidence for me out of 11 to say sorry comrade vile critter parts, you struck out, no matter how many "nutsuckers" you toss out there. now maybe go back and deal with the content of phydeaux's post??
< Message edited by bounty44 -- 1/19/2016 2:07:19 PM >
|