Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: benghazi


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: benghazi Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: benghazi - 1/19/2016 12:01:37 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
and to the very point of "journalistic integrity", and an answer to my leading question in the post above, "can it get any better?" the answer is yes it can...

"Media Matters ignores journalistic responsibility (yet again)"

quote:

When it comes to ironic hyperbole, Media Matters tops the competition. In a dramatic diatribe of sorts, the self-described “progressive research and information center” published a blog post entitled, “FOXLEAKS: Fox boss ordered staff to cast doubt on climate science.” Media Matters’ Ben Dimiero writes,

In the midst of global climate change talks last December, a top Fox News official sent an email questioning the “veracity of climate change data” and ordering the network’s journalists to “refrain from asserting that the planet has warmed (or cooled) in any given period without IMMEDIATELY pointing out that such theories are based upon data that critics have called into question.”

As “reported” by Media Matters, the memo was sent by managing editor Bill Sammon. Interestingly, Dimiero ignores a key phrase in the original message. Here is the untainted text of Sammon’s e-mail:

…we should refrain from asserting that the planet has warmed (or cooled) in any given period without IMMEDIATELY pointing out that such theories are based upon data that critics have called into question. It is not our place as journalists to assert such notions as facts, especially as this debate intensifies.

It seems as though Dimiero purposefully chose to ignore Sammon’s note about journalistic responsibility. Whether or not you believe in the power of manmade global warming, we should all be in agreement that journalists have a responsibility to report the full scope of societal issues of importance. There are enough individuals casting doubt on human-induced global warming to compel any objective network (or, more appropriately: any network that claims to tout objectivity) to balance coverage on this important issue.


so telling the truth about things? bad!

trying to make fox news look bad? good!

http://dailycaller.com/2010/12/16/media-matters-ignores-journalistic-responsibility-yet-again/

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: benghazi - 1/19/2016 12:19:53 PM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
5 year old info.
Yeah and partsan too
Weeeee

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: benghazi - 1/19/2016 12:23:33 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/14/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi-committee/ (around 0:45, his own words)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoCVdt05HpM (right on nutsucker faux nuze, around 4:30, in his own words)

Yeah, shitting their pants and spewing their asswipe in typical nutsucker felch.

But there it is spewn from the actual felching nutsuckers and one right on Faux nuze. Both in their own unedited words.

If you cant believe your own nutsuckers who else can you felch?

So, we have another proof of the age old adage, nutsuckers always felch, and media matters always tells the truth.




< Message edited by mnottertail -- 1/19/2016 12:58:52 PM >


_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: benghazi - 1/19/2016 1:49:27 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
in fairness though to your feeble (it reminds me of the scene at the end of gladiator, where commodus ineffectually flails at maximus) attempt at defense (or is it deflection?), I took a closer look at some of the "big falsehoods" from your mediamatters link.

so I started out by saying, okay, i'll just randomly pick #7 and see where that leads.

"Breitbart's websites make baseless claim that NEA engaged in lawbreaking."

and the boldened first line to the piece reads: "BigHollywood.com claims NEA "looking to the art community to create an environment amenable to the administration's positions."

note there is nothing there that says anything about "lawbreaking." so I read a little further and heres the mention: "Posters on Breitbart's websites baselessly claim NEA broke laws"

so NOT BREITBART, but someone who commented on the piece. and guess what, the link media matters supplied to get the reader to the original article only links to the main page, not the article itself.

not so good for you or your source so far comrade. lets try again:

I thought the mao Christmas story looked good, so I went there:

"The Maoist Christmas tree ornaments"

here's the first line: "BigGovernment.com: "Transvestites, Mao And Obama Ornaments Decorate White House Christmas Tree.""

and here's media matters' beef: "BigGovernment.com suggested the White House was "making some political statements" with the ornaments and attacked it for "pegg[ing] controversial designer Simon Doonan to oversee the Christmas decorations for the White House.""

here are the actual words from breitbart:

quote:

Why let a holiday season come between the White House and making some political statements? The White House pegged controversial designer Simon Doonan to oversee the Christmas decorations for the White House. Mr. Doonan, who is creative director of Barney’s New York has often caused a stir with his design choices. Like his naughty yuletide window display of Margaret Thatcher as a dowdy dominatrix and Dan Quayle as a ventriloquist’s dummy. For this year’s White House, he didn’t disappoint.

These photos of ornaments on the White House Christmas tree in the Blue Room were taken just days ago. Of course, Mao has his place in the White House.

And, of course, it wouldn’t be Christmas without an ornament of legendary transvestite Hedda Lettuce.

He/She even signed it:

And, so soon after collecting the Nobel Peace Prize, why wouldn’t the White House have an ornament super-imposing President Obama onto Mt. Rushmore:

All around, a very Barry Christmas!


so breitbart takes issue with communists and progressive ahem "values" and all the more so when they appear in a traditional holiday, and that means what? they lie? they are untrustworthy? the falsely claimed something?

looking pretty bad for you still, lets try one more:

so then I tried the "Platform for anti-gay Jennings smears"

way too much in the middle for me to quickly follow so I jumped to the end: "Breitbart.tv also smeared Jennings."

media matters says breitbart "grossly distorted comments Jennings made to a GLSEN audience in 2000 to claim he "criticize[d] schools for promoting heterosexuality"" and they offer as refutation to that, that Jennings had said: "...respect [for] every human being regardless of sexual orientation, regardless of gender identity, regardless of race or religion or any of the arbitrary distinctions we make among people..."

since those two positions are not mutually exclusive, and/or are amenable to simple differences of opinion and interpretation, sorry, short of the entire transcript of both sides, which they don't provide, a judgment cannot be made.

however that said, rush Limbaugh has some of what Jennings said:

quote:

JENNINGS: I find it amazing this is on the ballot for a couple reasons. First of all, we all know what's REALLY promoted in our schools. Heterosexuality is promoted in our schools. Every time in our schools. Every time kids read Romeo & Juliet or they're urged to go to the prom or whatever it is, kids are aggressively recruited to be heterosexual in this country, and you know what? It doesn't work. The reality is that if schools could affect your sexual orientation there would have been no gay people in the first place. But there's still people out there who believe that myth because, you know what? It's easy to panic people if you make them think that they're after your kids.


yeah, I can take that as a "criticism of schools promoting heterosexuality" and others did as well.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2009/10/07/safe_schools_czar_rips_schools_for_promoting_heterosexuality

out of luck again! and a straight 3 for 3 is enough confidence for me out of 11 to say sorry comrade vile critter parts, you struck out, no matter how many "nutsuckers" you toss out there.

now maybe go back and deal with the content of phydeaux's post??

< Message edited by bounty44 -- 1/19/2016 2:07:19 PM >

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: benghazi - 1/19/2016 2:26:53 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Uh, I aint going thru that ignorant asswipe as its a waste of time to speak fact to ignorant and feebleminded nutsuckers.

big hollywood com is breitbart.

Just like collarme became collarspace, it became

breitbart.com/big-hollywood/ when Breitbart quit raping and started dying.

So, end of that fucking joke, and breitbart takes down their posts all the time to avoid getting their feebleminded followers caught felching in the garish light of day.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2009/09/22/at-least-6-federal-laws-and-regulations-violated-by-the-nea-conference-call/

Not looking to good for you my bolshevik catamite cretinous lying friend.

Not going to bother further with the drool.

Nobody gives a fuck about nutsucker 'values' since they dont have any, unless they are in the airport bathrooms where they 'caucus'.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: benghazi - 1/19/2016 2:45:38 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
More than two dozen emails found on clinton's server beyond top secret.

http://news.yahoo.com/ig-emails-clintons-server-were-beyond-top-secret-194418905--politics.html


< Message edited by Phydeaux -- 1/19/2016 2:46:57 PM >

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: benghazi - 1/19/2016 3:08:52 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
i wonder how fast joe biden could enter the race if she is charged? there is absolutely no way the powers that be are going to be content to leave the nomination to Bernie sanders.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: benghazi - 1/19/2016 7:26:12 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

More than two dozen emails found on clinton's server beyond top secret.

http://news.yahoo.com/ig-emails-clintons-server-were-beyond-top-secret-194418905--politics.html

From the link:

Charles McCulllough, the intelligence community's inspector general, said in a letter to the chairmen of the Senate intelligence and foreign affairs committees that he has received sworn declarations from an intelligence agency he declined to name.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: benghazi - 1/19/2016 8:17:49 PM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

More than two dozen emails found on clinton's server beyond top secret.

http://news.yahoo.com/ig-emails-clintons-server-were-beyond-top-secret-194418905--politics.html

From the link:

Charles McCulllough, the intelligence community's inspector general, said in a letter to the chairmen of the Senate intelligence and foreign affairs committees that he has received sworn declarations from an intelligence agency he declined to name.




If you knew, like anything about how the us government operates, all kinds of things are not put out into open hearings. Aides are cleared and the intelligence committee will go into closed hearing for that kind of information.

But way to make a conspiracy..

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: benghazi - 1/20/2016 4:14:56 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux


ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

More than two dozen emails found on clinton's server beyond top secret.

http://news.yahoo.com/ig-emails-clintons-server-were-beyond-top-secret-194418905--politics.html

From the link:

Charles McCulllough, the intelligence community's inspector general, said in a letter to the chairmen of the Senate intelligence and foreign affairs committees that he has received sworn declarations from an intelligence agency he declined to name.




If you knew, like anything about how the us government operates, all kinds of things are not put out into open hearings. Aides are cleared and the intelligence committee will go into closed hearing for that kind of information.

But way to make a conspiracy..

I cited no conspiracy. I pointed out that the source was anonymous.

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: benghazi - 1/20/2016 7:10:17 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILZQSmE5Uu0

Andrew Breitbart, cockgargling at a nutsucker caucus.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 31
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: benghazi Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.141