RE: Its over (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Termyn8or -> RE: Its over (1/27/2016 11:21:37 AM)

FR

First of all note that this is not Cliven Bundy here, they have not sent in the navy Seals to get him as some here would advocate.

First rule of this shit though is you don't occupy government buildings. What is the exit strategy ? You BOMB government building, if that is your desire. He who kills and runs away lives to kill another day.

this is not Iraq where you got millions of warriors and not much government. Local college security forces could defeat most of these people who protest these days. Even with rubber bullets they killed four in Ohio.

It is nice that someone has the balls to stand up to the government, I just wish they had more brains. this whole fucking thing was pointless in the first place. What was the goal, to create a few martyrs ?

I guess I can understand somewhat. Those people are not used to the government treading on them at will. They believe this is a free country and are very discontent with how things are, and how they are getting worse. And I mean worse as in government getting its tentacles into every part of life. If anything moves, tax it. If it pollutes, tax it, if it doesn't pollute, tax it. If it doesn't move charge rentes. And no more competition for the big agra. No more competition for their buddies. It keeps coming and coming with no signs of slowing down, in fact the advance of tyranny is accelerating.

I have had exposure to people from other countries. People from Russia and Poland ask me "Where is the freedom ?". In Russia you do not need a fishing license, and once you qualify with a firearm you hunting license is good for life. Not like here where you have to pay the state of Montana thousands upon thousands of dollars just in case you hit something. And, in some of the more civilized countries fishing is simply illegal.

Bottom line is that the US government thinks it owns every blade of grass, as well as the fruits of your labor. They do not. As proven by a couple friends of mine you do not have to pay income tax. As proven by those with patented titles to land, you really don't have to pay property taxes. And, as proven by a friend, at considerable expense, if you actually buy a car and have the MSO, the state cannot take it. When they tow your car and you don't go and get it soon they dispose of it. Well my buddy with the MSO got towed and refused to go get it out. Note that he had bought the car new and paid cash. That car sat there until the day he died and then some.

Most of the rights you lose to the government are by contract. Like if I drive without a license they cannot charge me with not having insurance. If I build something without a permit in one of those anal jurisdictions and they order me to tear it down, all they can do is fine me. They could fine me a million dollars a day but they'll never see that money. I state, officially that they do not have jurisdiction over me. then they have to prove jurisdiction and it has been proven time and time again that lines on a map do not create, nor even define jurisdiction. For example if you are on probation in Cleveland, they say you can't drink or get high, and that means everywhere. How is that possible ? In fact, how can Julian Assange be wanted in the US when he has never fucking set foot here ?

So, learn a lesson from these people. Actually their strategy should have been to surround the building and not let anyone in or out. Made their own perimeter like some said the government should've. At least there is an exit strategy.

Thing is, until shit gets really bad, so that the boiling frog really cannot get used to it, all we can do is become an annoyance. A pain in the ass. That is what some people do in court, but there are better ways.

But it really is getting to the point where it is not going to happen in court. We got courts telling people they will be held in contempt if they mention the Constitution at trial. We got judges ruling summarily, I mean without even tinking about it, that doctors may not discuss the ramifications of poisoning by fracking fluids with their patients who have been poisoned by fracking fluids. The shit wrecks your kidneys and you end up on dialysis. They got a law to keep them from getting sued, like the Monsanto Protection Act but actually better.

People who know things are fed up with this shit. Every day, more and more get fucked over and the time will come when there will be enough. And we will have guns. And nobody is going up to government buildings for a standoff. Wait until they come out.

That is the future history of this country. If any.

T^T




mnottertail -> RE: Its over (1/27/2016 11:33:45 AM)

LOL, government treading on them at will. They are fucking terrorists.





BamaD -> RE: Its over (1/27/2016 12:08:19 PM)

FR

It isn't over.
They apprehended some people in route to a meeting that was supposed to relive tensions.
And they apprehended a couple of others who were outside the bird refuge.
The "occupation" continues.
Maybe Joe will get his wish and the Army will be illegally called in to kill most of them and crucify the rest. Maybe he would like some public beheadings. That would teach people better than to oppose the forces of tolerence and reason.




mnottertail -> RE: Its over (1/27/2016 12:15:08 PM)

wont need an army. it wouldnt be illegal, as I have demonstrated in the law.

couple of kids with a bb gun could take out al_SheBubba.

But here you go again for the people who havent actually read the posse comitatus law....which legally leads to the insurrection law.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/332

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/333




jlf1961 -> RE: Its over (1/27/2016 1:20:25 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

It isn't over.
They apprehended some people in route to a meeting that was supposed to relive tensions.
And they apprehended a couple of others who were outside the bird refuge.
The "occupation" continues.
Maybe Joe will get his wish and the Army will be illegally called in to kill most of them and crucify the rest. Maybe he would like some public beheadings. That would teach people better than to oppose the forces of tolerence and reason.



Like the Republican governor of Maine who suggested the use of the Guillotine?




BamaD -> RE: Its over (1/27/2016 1:24:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

wont need an army. it wouldnt be illegal, as I have demonstrated in the law.

couple of kids with a bb gun could take out al_SheBubba.

But here you go again for the people who havent actually read the posse comitatus law....which legally leads to the insurrection law.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/332

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/333

And if you had paid attention you would know that it is Joe advocating bringing in the army. I was saying it would be illegal and ridiculing Joe's tyranical approach to the problem.




BamaD -> RE: Its over (1/27/2016 1:25:58 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

It isn't over.
They apprehended some people in route to a meeting that was supposed to relive tensions.
And they apprehended a couple of others who were outside the bird refuge.
The "occupation" continues.
Maybe Joe will get his wish and the Army will be illegally called in to kill most of them and crucify the rest. Maybe he would like some public beheadings. That would teach people better than to oppose the forces of tolerence and reason.



Like the Republican governor of Maine who suggested the use of the Guillotine?


Doesn't matter what party someone is in, that kind of illegal, unconstutional approach is disgusting.




mnottertail -> RE: Its over (1/27/2016 1:26:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

wont need an army. it wouldnt be illegal, as I have demonstrated in the law.

couple of kids with a bb gun could take out al_SheBubba.

But here you go again for the people who havent actually read the posse comitatus law....which legally leads to the insurrection law.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/332

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/333

And if you had paid attention you would know that it is Joe advocating bringing in the army. I was saying it would be illegal and ridiculing Joe's tyranical approach to the problem.


I have been paying attention. The prez can put the army on it.

I dont have a tyrannical approach, I believe we should put the torch to the rightist nutsucker terrorists. We wouldnt need an army, just a couple guys, let the fucking terrorists burn.




Phydeaux -> RE: Its over (1/27/2016 2:56:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

It isn't over.
They apprehended some people in route to a meeting that was supposed to relive tensions.
And they apprehended a couple of others who were outside the bird refuge.
The "occupation" continues.
Maybe Joe will get his wish and the Army will be illegally called in to kill most of them and crucify the rest. Maybe he would like some public beheadings. That would teach people better than to oppose the forces of tolerence and reason.



Like the Republican governor of Maine who suggested the use of the Guillotine?



quote:

Maine Gov. Paul LePage says the guillotine should be brought back so there can be public executions of drug traffickers.
In a radio interview Tuesday on WVOM, LePage said legislative proposals to increase prison sentences for drug traffickers do not do enough.
Story Continued Below
“I think the death penalty should be appropriate for people who kill Mainers,” LePage said. “We should give them an injection of the stuff they sell.”


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/paul-lepage-guillotine-drug-traffickers-218236#ixzz3yUKpzdMM


Yeah, I don't have a problem with that.

I think all this controversy over the method of electrocution is ridiculous. Why in hell is lethal injection better than electrocution better than firing squad better than hanging better than guillotine.





PeonForHer -> RE: Its over (1/27/2016 4:14:08 PM)

quote:


Yeah, I don't have a problem with that.

I think all this controversy over the method of electrocution is ridiculous. Why in hell is lethal injection better than electrocution better than firing squad better than hanging better than guillotine.


Well, the way to work out an answer to that is to consider what you, yourself, would prefer, were it to be you who was about to be legally killed by Uncle Sam. I know it's difficult - because righties such as yourself always assume that such things only ever happen to a different and lower category of person, quite unlike yourself - but that's how you have to consider it. Just saying.




Lucylastic -> RE: Its over (1/27/2016 4:22:13 PM)

You may never commit a crime, that doesnt mean you wont be accused. OR found guilty....
Or ruined for life...or die.




BamaD -> RE: Its over (1/27/2016 4:23:36 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

wont need an army. it wouldnt be illegal, as I have demonstrated in the law.

couple of kids with a bb gun could take out al_SheBubba.

But here you go again for the people who havent actually read the posse comitatus law....which legally leads to the insurrection law.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/332

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/333

And if you had paid attention you would know that it is Joe advocating bringing in the army. I was saying it would be illegal and ridiculing Joe's tyranical approach to the problem.


I have been paying attention. The prez can put the army on it.

I dont have a tyrannical approach, I believe we should put the torch to the rightist nutsucker terrorists. We wouldnt need an army, just a couple guys, let the fucking terrorists burn.

Then you know I didn't say you were tyranical, however you are bloodthirsty.




Aylee -> RE: Its over (1/27/2016 5:57:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

It isn't over.
They apprehended some people in route to a meeting that was supposed to relive tensions.
And they apprehended a couple of others who were outside the bird refuge.
The "occupation" continues.
Maybe Joe will get his wish and the Army will be illegally called in to kill most of them and crucify the rest. Maybe he would like some public beheadings. That would teach people better than to oppose the forces of tolerence and reason.



Like the Republican governor of Maine who suggested the use of the Guillotine?


Doesn't matter what party someone is in, that kind of illegal, unconstutional approach is disgusting.


It is such a public health menace with the blood flying everywhere and all. Good entertainment for the kiddies though.




Termyn8or -> RE: Its over (1/27/2016 8:20:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

It isn't over.
They apprehended some people in route to a meeting that was supposed to relive tensions.
And they apprehended a couple of others who were outside the bird refuge.
The "occupation" continues.
Maybe Joe will get his wish and the Army will be illegally called in to kill most of them and crucify the rest. Maybe he would like some public beheadings. That would teach people better than to oppose the forces of tolerence and reason.



Like the Republican governor of Maine who suggested the use of the Guillotine?


Doesn't matter what party someone is in, that kind of illegal, unconstutional approach is disgusting.


You mean the guillotine ? From what I understand (which does not yet include personal experience with the device) it is a quite humae way to go. I have pondered what the executed felt, and with the shock factor it is probably nothing. But the brain can function for a time after. There have been reports of people trying to talk. Maybe we should do this and get deaf people there to read lips.

T^T




Phydeaux -> RE: Its over (1/27/2016 9:23:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:


Yeah, I don't have a problem with that.

I think all this controversy over the method of electrocution is ridiculous. Why in hell is lethal injection better than electrocution better than firing squad better than hanging better than guillotine.


Well, the way to work out an answer to that is to consider what you, yourself, would prefer, were it to be you who was about to be legally killed by Uncle Sam. I know it's difficult - because righties such as yourself always assume that such things only ever happen to a different and lower category of person, quite unlike yourself - but that's how you have to consider it. Just saying.


And obviously, I wouldn't give a rat's ass.




mnottertail -> RE: Its over (1/28/2016 2:10:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

wont need an army. it wouldnt be illegal, as I have demonstrated in the law.

couple of kids with a bb gun could take out al_SheBubba.

But here you go again for the people who havent actually read the posse comitatus law....which legally leads to the insurrection law.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/332

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/333

And if you had paid attention you would know that it is Joe advocating bringing in the army. I was saying it would be illegal and ridiculing Joe's tyranical approach to the problem.


I have been paying attention. The prez can put the army on it.

I dont have a tyrannical approach, I believe we should put the torch to the rightist nutsucker terrorists. We wouldnt need an army, just a couple guys, let the fucking terrorists burn.

Then you know I didn't say you were tyranical, however you are bloodthirsty.



Then you know I didnt say you were bloodthirsty. Tyrannical? You are that.

Nevertheless, you are also wrong. The Prez can put the army to it if he wants.

Its the law.




Lucylastic -> RE: Its over (1/29/2016 7:34:16 AM)

tarpmans kids are the ones I feel sorry for




Staleek -> RE: Its over (1/29/2016 7:54:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

LOL, government treading on them at will. They are fucking terrorists.




They weren't terrorists, and you know it m'good friend mnottertail. Terrorists attack and seek to create disruption in a civilian population in order to get their political aims noticed and to drive a wedge between citizens.

This was a bunch of feeble-minded gun enthusiasts/anti-government loons who, due in no small part to the endless stream of anti-government horseshit pumped out by the likes of Fox News and others, earnestly believed that Obama was the next Hitler and decided to hold protests.

The villains here are the mass media and the absolutely terrible level of non-private education in the USA. Address one or both of these and events like this wouldn't happen.

For anyone outside the USA who doesn't quite understand this situation here is an impartial explanation that will take up 5 minutes of your time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5e7-7vWWW6Y




joether -> RE: Its over (1/29/2016 8:20:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
The military may have signed a contract with the US Government (or State government) but there is nothing about illegally shooting their fellow citizens in it.


The President signs off on it; it becomes pretty damn legal. It would not be an executive order either. A section in the law allows for a sitting US President to sign a declaration of intention during a period of uncertain and chaos to protect American lives with US Forces.

If those military men were given orders to shoot at fellow citizens, those men could resist. In which case they too are arrested and put on trial. You think that this is all a game or fantasy? The moment those men resist the order, they cease to be standing soldiers in the US Military. They only regain it if they are found not guilty. By then, its very unlikely those soldiers would get anything but a 'cold shoulder' to any unit they join in the future. And their chance of promotion? Yeah, that will not happen.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
The fact that you think military personal would be hunky-dory with following such an illegal order, says a lot about you that is not very nice.


So you are saying our military men were all "....hunky-dory...." about attacking an enemy strong point in either Iraq or Afghanistan then? That shows right away how little you understand soldier's viewpoints when confronted by conflict. No, they would not have enjoyed the idea let alone the action; but they would do it if ordered. Because that is their job; to be a professional soldier.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
The idea that you think combatants should be treated better than your fellow citizens also says a lot of not very nice things about you.


Those that took over the buildings are citizens only in legal standing. The moment they tresspassed on federal land and took those buildings over; they become LAW BREAKERS. These law breakers, were....ARMED....

....Therefore (using logic), they were hostile combatants. As seen with the arrests of the militia men and the one fatal killing video. Yes, there is a video. Shows the guy was reaching for a semi automatic pistol in his pocket when police officers killed him. For twenty minutes, that guy was given every opportunity to surrender peacefully.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
Military personal are NOT automatons. And they are certainly NOT a Praetorian Guard, you twit!


No shit moron. If this nation treated our soldiers better, several things would be true:

1 ) Pay increased by quite a bit
2 ) Free tuition to college for them, or their families if they were killed
3 ) State-Of-The-Art healthcare and health facilities nationwide
4 ) They are not used when ever a Republican in the White House wants to 'go play in the sand' with the Arabs

Yeah, the GOP has mishandled our Military in ways that are evil and unethical. Or did you forget....how....those 'enemy combatants' were originally taken from Afghanistan and Iraq?

The problem you have, is accepting the notion that if we needed the US Military to help defend the country from evil people; they would do so. That includes 'thugs with guns' trying to masquerading around that they are 'honest and law abiding' Americans with guns.




joether -> RE: Its over (1/29/2016 8:32:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
On top of the fact that it would have been illegal.


You really should check those law books.....

Very much allowable under the US Constitution. Before there were standing public police forces in the late 19th century; militias handled all the domestic injustices. Those militias formed the backbone of any armed defense to the young nation. I know this is all hard for you to understand, since you often ignore the first half of the 2nd amendment:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State,..."

Notice the part of "...A free State...."? How is that achieved?

A ) Thugs with Guns (i.e. right wing conservatives)
B ) A well regulated Militia

Even a 4th grader could figure this one out....




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
9.765625E-02