Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking Page: <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 1:23:50 AM   
CodeOfSilence


Posts: 235
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

If you do not want the attention I suggest you do as per Gretas advice.
And someone mentioned faces. Again Greta has made the point for me. She does not wear makeup when she does not want the attention.

I need to mention that in my old industry, I worked with alot of muslim men who grew up on Quran taught values, so I have to dress very carefully not attract unwanted molestation.
I hated that I have to do it, but the alternative would be, get molested, get police involve and keep getting trouble I don't want. But I fully support women's right to wear anything they want without getting derogatory comments, treated as less, or being treat disrespectfully. I dressed the way I am because it's easier, I get agitated easily and it's easier than starting a war with every man who gave me unwanted attention. I worked with bosses who would spank their female employee's butt, but they would leave me alone and never touch me. Because the energy I gave out is that I will murder them if they touched me. But there are other women who just suffers it silently and meekly. As Asian women are generally, don't like confrontation or causing commotion.

But I think it's a damn sad world that women cannot dress comfortably, and to be comfortable to me, is as little clothes as possible, as to me, bra is uncomfortable, panties is uncomfortable, clothings are uncomfortable. My most comfortable state is naked! But reality is, I can't walk out naked. So I don't do it. But I am not happy that I cannot walk out naked! But it's what majority and society wants. And sometimes you gotta manage yourself within confines of society.

I remembered a date once chastised me for not wearing a bra out with him. He was uncomfortable with it. I only wear bra to work, but ordinarily, I HATE WEARING UNDERWEAR! It's torture to me! I absolutely detest wearing any underwear and if I am on my own, I never wear underwear of any kind. And I am always naked at home. But I liked that date alot, and thanks to him, I had to wear a bra, whenever I go out with him. I accommodated. BTW, I understand some women need bra for support, but I am an A cup and sometimes even A cup is too big for me, so I have zero need for bras. I long for the day where nipples sticking out through clothings are not seen as being intentionally sexual.






Well all of that is also part of our fucked up society but going much further back.
The normal way for us to dress is naked. I mean clothes were developed for protection. Symbols and jewels, tattoos and other things like this were instead used to send various signals. I guess clothes later became more and more a way to send a signal of social status and wealth and then these rags that we wear stuck even in warm weather.

In fact when there was a ritual of war or of mating or of hunting that's when people would put on ~more~ clothes in a ceremonial way.
The world is fucked up, and your bosses are fucked up twice over and I guess your date wanted to see some boobies? I don't know what chastised means, your scenarios are so bloody unusual to me that I don't know what to add =p



< Message edited by CodeOfSilence -- 2/5/2016 1:26:25 AM >

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 221
RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 1:48:13 AM   
NookieNotes


Posts: 1720
Joined: 11/10/2013
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: crumpets


quote:

ORIGINAL: NookieNotes
THE CHEERLEADERS doing the JOB are not being sexual. The job includes sexual positions. THEY are not being sexual.
They are focused on doing their job RIGHT, as it needs to be done, in a VERY competitive field where MALE attention is part of the ROI.
Do you see now?


You don't want to hear this I'm sure, but, even though I respect you, we need to discuss whether we actually agree that adult women need to be responsible for their actions just as much as adult men.


Agreed.

quote:

ORIGINAL: crumpets
For a grown woman to endlessly practice how to suddenly twist her hips in one direction and then instantly twist her shoulder in the other, expressly so that her skirt can miraculously fly up (accidentally, of course) exposing as much of her entire bottom as she can manage, including what is cleverly designed to look like panties to the crowd, is "being sexual".

It's DIRECTLY provoking the strongest, most basal and primitive, of male drives.


But you knew that...


You're missing my point, still.

The woman is not being sexual. The cheerleader is.

Let's look at this from a different perspective. Violent sports:

  • Ice Hockey
  • Rugby
  • MMA
  • Boxing
  • American Football
  • Wrestling
  • Etc.

    Are the men who play these sports as a profession necessarily "being violent" as men? Or are they playing their sport and doing their job?

    Does playing their sport and doing their job have to be unenjoyable for them to not be considered "violent" in their personal lives? Do they have to be peaceful and considerate on the field as well as off for you to realize that what one does as part of a sport or job is different than who one is as a person?

    I've already said that many people say one thing and do another.

    Your examples using cheerleaders, though, are not good examples of that, because of the sports/work vs. personal point.

    It's about using professional (and pre-professional, in the case of college) sports and careers to illustrate personal viewpoints.

    It's not logical.

    Use women who don't dress in super-minis for work, but do dress in tight clothing and teetering heels when they "go out with the girls," then say they don't want to be seen as/treated as sexually available.


    _____________________________

    Nookie
    --
    https://datingkinky.com

    I Write! A few of my books on Amazon: http://amazon.com/author/msnnotes

    (in reply to crumpets)
  • Profile   Post #: 222
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 2:02:18 AM   
    CodeOfSilence


    Posts: 235
    Status: offline
    I'd answer yes to all of those questions.
    A boxer is clearly violent when boxing and he's still a man and a human or a woman and a human, same goes with a footballer and a cheerleder is a woman and a human and trying to look attractive and interesting when performing her artform.

    In fact it's been postulated that sports is one way to relieve humans of our inner frustrations and to act out our need for collective rituals. It replaces war and all of the rituals that go with it.
    Stop separating the person from the profession or from their employment. Some people are doing things they do not want to do but I'd say most cheerleaders and NHL pros are doing what they want to do.


    And Crumpet, I do not agree with your points as you thought before. I'm saying that the girls in that picture Nookie is quoting are fulfilling a societal need in a way through the charade of sorts. You're only obsessed by tits and cunts if you don't see them too much. If everyone walked around the way Greta wants to walk around and if the world was all warm and fuzzy then your dick would grow limp at some point if it were to jump up at the sigh of each new pair of tits.

    In our society though we have, as you correctly pointed out, double standards. One imposed by the hierarchy of sociopaths which imposes strict social rules and certain frames of mind and then everyones general attempt to break out of those rules, including especially the more sexually promiscuous or those employed in such fashion to dress in less and less.

    It's the circle of hypocrisy. The winner is who ever can play the game with the greatest skill, revealing the most when necessary and portraying the least. Not only when it comes to sex but everything else. Of course the sociopath reveals falsehoods only, which makes it easy for him or her to reveal and then backtrack as a jojo.


    (Of course there are those who genuinely feel a cultural or religious affinity with those strict mechanisms of control but they have historically only been imposed to divide and conquer populations and peoples, segregate them and turn them against each other)

    Case in point what's normal, and then you wouldn't have anything to get confused over crumpets.





    Ancient Pictic female warrior, the tribe that inspired the Avatar movie> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/7629181/Hollywood-turns-to-ancient-warriors-and-legends-to-win-audiences.html





    Brave many Gaelic soldiers stand naked against the hordes of the so called Roman civilization of degenerates and imperialists.
    Later they were forced to adapt.

    [image]http://www.writingforums.org/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fi236.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fff9%2FSenbecc%2FCeltic%2520stuff%2FCeltic20Fanatic.jpg&hash=7a89f2b4369f8a6f8f6f14ccfcc85591[/image]

    < Message edited by CodeOfSilence -- 2/5/2016 3:03:06 AM >

    (in reply to NookieNotes)
    Profile   Post #: 223
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 5:01:14 AM   
    CodeOfSilence


    Posts: 235
    Status: offline
    Just to add something I came to think about now after lunch. It's a complicated topic so, obviously it's not just all "sociopaths running the show". I tend to go into these extremes to make a point but there are sensible reasons for it too. Being able to take part in a certain social ritual, modern or old denotes some degree of social competence and also that you're part of the same or similar group, earlier tribe or ethnicity.
    Also there's obviously a purpose to showing of ones social standing.

    We are past the more obvious times where the guy who brought back the most meat or built the best shelter is considered a really good mate. So it's not easy to always portray ones success and thus we do it with symbols of status, including certain clothes.

    (in reply to CodeOfSilence)
    Profile   Post #: 224
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 6:47:38 AM   
    UllrsIshtar


    Posts: 3693
    Joined: 7/28/2012
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Andalusite

    Well, of course I have the right to demand that they stop!



    Of course you do. You can't prohibit it on public property, but by all means, tell them to stop.

    Unless it's a situation where I fee physically threatened, that's what I do when men are bugging me.
    As loudly and as embarrassingly for them as possible.

    Just don't assume that because you're entitled to tell them to stop that they somehow have an obligation to actually stop (again, except for in the exceptions defined by law).


    _____________________________

    I can be your whore
    I am the dirt you created
    I am your sinner
    And your whore
    But let me tell you something baby
    You love me for everything you hate me for

    (in reply to Andalusite)
    Profile   Post #: 225
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 7:07:55 AM   
    UllrsIshtar


    Posts: 3693
    Joined: 7/28/2012
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: NookieNotes

    You're missing my point, still.

    The woman is not being sexual. The cheerleader is.



    You're the one missing the point in this case Nookie.

    In order to say that the woman behind the cheerleader isn't also sexual, you would have to pose that the woman doesn't know the cheerleader is sexual.

    Yes, the woman isn't out there wanting to be sexual. She's there wanting to be a cheerleader, and she just accepts that "being sexual" is part of the package of "being a cheerleader", just like a stripper generally isn't wanting to be sexual, but is wanting to "make a lot of money" and accepts that "being sexual" is the way that a stripper achieves that goal.

    Nobody (including Crumpets I think) is saying that she's standing on the field, dripping wet, ranging with hormones, just dying to act like a wanton vixen... but at the same time, she still accepts that acting as if she is is part of the job, whereas there are droves of women out there who wouldn't be a cheerleader precisely because "acting as is she's sexual" is part of the job description.
    There are tons of women who, even if they had the talent, got the opportunity, and were offered boatloads off cash, would still turn down the opportunity to be a cheerleader, because of how explicit the job is.

    I think it's therefore quite reasonable to assume that, even though the woman behind the cheerleader might not desire to be sexual as part of her job (just like strippers usually don't desire to be sexual), she still accepts (just like a stripper) that acting as if she desires to be sexual is one of her main job descriptions , and the fact that you know that every cheerleader on the field is accepting of a job that portrays her as a vixen says about them that the cheerleaders are more open about being viewed as sexual objects in public than a woman who wouldn't be caught death cheerleading in public would be.

    No matter what she's intending, or wanting, while she's out there on the field, the fact that she's willing to accept a job where part of her main job description is "acting as if she desires to be sexual" says something about her (just like it does about a stripper) in contrast to a woman who would never take such a job because it's too sexual (and that "something" it says isn't negative, but it's still there).

    It's not the fact that she's taking on sexual poses that makes her a sexual woman, it's the fact that she is the type of woman who will accept a job which requires her to take sexual poses in public which makes her a sexual woman. Highly non-sexual women would never accept such requirements from a job, and wouldn't be cheerleading to begin with.





    < Message edited by UllrsIshtar -- 2/5/2016 7:15:28 AM >


    _____________________________

    I can be your whore
    I am the dirt you created
    I am your sinner
    And your whore
    But let me tell you something baby
    You love me for everything you hate me for

    (in reply to NookieNotes)
    Profile   Post #: 226
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 7:29:17 AM   
    Andalusite


    Posts: 2492
    Joined: 1/25/2009
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


    quote:

    ORIGINAL: Andalusite

    Well, of course I have the right to demand that they stop!



    Of course you do. You can't prohibit it on public property, but by all means, tell them to stop.

    Unless it's a situation where I fee physically threatened, that's what I do when men are bugging me.
    As loudly and as embarrassingly for them as possible.

    Just don't assume that because you're entitled to tell them to stop that they somehow have an obligation to actually stop (again, except for in the exceptions defined by law).


    I occasionally go with loud and embarrassing, if they really deserve it. I told the drunk guy who drooled "I want your pussy!" at me that "The only pussy you'll ever get is from the SPCA." Usually, I take the opposite tack, and go smarmy-Southern polite at them. "Sorry, I'm not interested, please add me to your Do-Not-Catcall List!", "No, thank you!" or "Well bless your teeny little heart! with a big, fake, cheezy grin almost always leave them befuddled enough for me to exit their sphere of influence before they can recover.

    However, if they do persist, then yep, I will call the police (in extreme circumstances when I felt physically threatened), their job, event security, or get male friends of mine to yell at them for me, depending on the venue. I wouldn't say they're obligated to stop, but I do everything in my power to convince them it's a good idea!

    < Message edited by Andalusite -- 2/5/2016 7:32:32 AM >

    (in reply to UllrsIshtar)
    Profile   Post #: 227
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 7:33:49 AM   
    Andalusite


    Posts: 2492
    Joined: 1/25/2009
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: crumpets

    If they truly are complaining about having to endure too much unwanted female attention, then you would have convinced me that I must agree that they are doing the same thing I am trying to understand that women do.

    I see where you're going with this, and I should be wary as you're one of the rare few outstandingly smart enough to not only know precisely how to convince me where I'm wrong, but to easily lead me by the nose (mentally) in any direction you want, in effect, totally changing my mind without me even being aware of what was going on until it is too late

    Notwithstanding the presumably large gay component involved, someone else will have to explain to me what men such as Nureyev or Baryshnikov think when women approach them sexually, and then we can discuss whether their thinking is actually aligned with what they're doing, or not.


    There’s a reason football players are called “tight ends!” Seriously, some pro athletes, and *LOTS* of rock stars and popular actors have to have security keep the groupies out of their dressing rooms and living quarters. They literally get panties thrown at them, as well as having women more metaphorically throw themselves at them.I do know a few Dominant men who’ve had women get too pushy for their tastes the first time they played. They mentioned to me that they didn’t like it, and it made them feel awkward to have to reject them. Some of the ladies did get a little verbally out of line, though they didn’t make the guys feel physically unsafe. However, they aren’t likely to make the sort of comments you posted, because a) it wouldn’t fit their macho image, b) most women aren’t as crude and vulgar as men are in similar circumnstances, and c) women aren’t likely to get physically violent if they’re rejected, and are generally not viewed as being threatening.

    < Message edited by Andalusite -- 2/5/2016 7:34:59 AM >

    (in reply to crumpets)
    Profile   Post #: 228
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 7:41:56 AM   
    Andalusite


    Posts: 2492
    Joined: 1/25/2009
    Status: offline
    You didn't respond to my Lindy Hop examples that you'd requested via PM earlier, and I think the following three samples make my point a lot better. The first two clips, and your cheerleader pics, actually don’t feel sexual to me at all. They evoke a rather abstracted “she’s so pretty, I wish I was that strong and flexible, that’s a really cool move!” not “rawwwwrrrrr I want her!” Intellectually, I understand that some guys find it sexual, but it doesn’t really hit me on a gut level, I suppose. Even though you feel differently about them than I do, you should know better than to try to claim that all women who disagree with you are just naive or oblivious. Since a lot of people on the Autism/Aspergers spectrum have trouble with reading body language and expression, it could be just that you are interpreting it that way, rather than men in general. You truly don’t see any difference in the level of sexiness, passion, mood, body language, expressions, etc. between these three videos? Even though the dancers all share chemistry, connection, and love, and have similar moves/positions, they feel so different to me. The costumes serve to emphasize the contrast, but even if they were all wearing identical clothes, they still would evoke different emotions for me.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QptfLFKZ2iY warm, flirty, goofy, lighthearted, affectionate
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsTqmEeBKhw cool, serene, elegant, pride, tradition, sinuous, ethereal, willowy, focused, “still waters run deep”
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWxdK525n0Q smoking hot!, making love without getting completely naked, passionate intensity, desire, lust, hormones, definitely sexual!

    (in reply to Andalusite)
    Profile   Post #: 229
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 7:42:18 AM   
    NookieNotes


    Posts: 1720
    Joined: 11/10/2013
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: CodeOfSilence
    Stop separating the person from the profession or from their employment. Some people are doing things they do not want to do but I'd say most cheerleaders and NHL pros are doing what they want to do.


    What they want to do, perhaps. That does not make them the job. Nor does it make them sexual or violent people, anymore than the fact that I worked for Kinko's makes me a printer at heart.

    For MOST people, you can separate the employment from the person. Whether they love their job or not, they are more complex than one dimension.


    quote:

    ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: NookieNotes

    You're missing my point, still.

    The woman is not being sexual. The cheerleader is.



    You're the one missing the point in this case Nookie.


    Not at all.

    You are all talking about sex like it's something magical. It's not.

    The cheerleader HAS to perform. Feeling good? Excellent! Perform sexually. Feeling like ass? Too bad! Perform sexually.

    The JOB or ROLE is not the same as the person.

    I HAVE to write and think about promotion and edit and record and do accounting and all of those things, even when I don't feel like writing. Because that's my job.

    In fact, I even have to write about an immerse myself in sex, because that is my job. Even, when it's my cranky day, or I'm pissed off, or whatever.

    The JOB is a living. Not a life. Even when I love it, it is still only one facet of who I am.

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar
    Yes, the woman isn't out there wanting to be sexual. She's there wanting to be a cheerleader, and she just accepts that "being sexual" is part of the package of "being a cheerleader", just like a stripper generally isn't wanting to be sexual, but is wanting to "make a lot of money" and accepts that "being sexual" is the way that a stripper achieves that goal.


    You used the words "being sexual," while I would say "acting sexual."

    Which, again, is NOT the same thing as a PRIVATE woman in her private life saying, "I don't want to be seen as a sex object," then dolling up blatently sexual clothing.

    Showing cheerleaders in poses and outfits required by their job as refuting "some women say this and do that" is ridiculous. It's a job. And acting sexual is different from being sexual.

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar
    I think it's therefore quite reasonable to assume that, even though the woman behind the cheerleader might not desire to be sexual as part of her job (just like strippers usually don't desire to be sexual), she still accepts (just like a stripper) that acting as if she desires to be sexual is one of her main job descriptions , and the fact that you know that every cheerleader on the field is accepting of a job that portrays her as a vixen says about them that the cheerleaders are more open about being viewed as sexual objects in public than a woman who wouldn't be caught death cheerleading in public would be.


    This, I agree with.

    However, crumpets has yet to post ONE cheerleader saying she does not want to be viewed as a sexual object IN HER JOB OR ROLE, and yet, keeps posting pictures of cheerleaders supporting his claim.

    It's a disconnect,and it takes away from the argument. It does not add to it.

    _____________________________

    Nookie
    --
    https://datingkinky.com

    I Write! A few of my books on Amazon: http://amazon.com/author/msnnotes

    (in reply to CodeOfSilence)
    Profile   Post #: 230
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 8:23:12 AM   
    DeviantlyD


    Posts: 4375
    Joined: 5/26/2007
    From: Hawai`i
    Status: offline
    F/R

    After 12 pages, who gives a *bleep* what women think?

    Beating this dead horse any further is just going to vaporize it.

    _____________________________

    ExiledTyrant's groupie. Catering to his ego since May 26, 2007. :D

    (in reply to NookieNotes)
    Profile   Post #: 231
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 8:25:17 AM   
    CodeOfSilence


    Posts: 235
    Status: offline
    I reralise I just go too far in discussions like this. I missed a meeting last night because of it. Fuck me, was about to delete my account here, lol. O.O


    But to keep it simple, no Nookie. I don't think you can separate the two although there's obviously a difference.
    The ideal is doing what you love to do, meaning doing what you want to do.

    I know people that literally have as part of their reason for doing kickboxing to get aggression out of them and to practice fighting. That's violence.
    And in a way, that should be the goal, I mean it's better that the violent person is there fighting the other violent person than fighting on the street just like we have a good thing going here with sadists and masochists as long as it doesn't turn into abuse.

    < Message edited by CodeOfSilence -- 2/5/2016 8:26:24 AM >

    (in reply to NookieNotes)
    Profile   Post #: 232
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 8:39:31 AM   
    Lucylastic


    Posts: 40310
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: DeviantlyD

    F/R

    After 12 pages, who gives a *bleep* what women think?

    Beating this dead horse any further is just going to vaporize it.

    It would have been much more interesting had this been a cheerleader forum, and not a BDSM site that is obviously swarming with people who enjoy exploring sex, in whatever capacity, gender or orientation.


    _____________________________

    (•_•)
    <) )╯SUCH
    / \

    \(•_•)
    ( (> A NASTY
    / \

    (•_•)
    <) )> WOMAN
    / \

    Duchess Of Dissent
    Dont Hate Love

    (in reply to DeviantlyD)
    Profile   Post #: 233
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 10:53:39 AM   
    crumpets


    Posts: 1614
    Joined: 11/5/2014
    From: South Bay (SF & Silicon Valley)
    Status: offline
    I haven't been able to even get to my mail or respond to the many valuable posts lately, and right now II have to leave my mountaintop redoubt to get supplies for a superbowl party down in the valley, but I wish to note that the main reason for employing cheerleaders in opening this thread was merely the temporal aspect of the superbowl being near and, in fact, within only a few miles away, which is a big deal in this town.

    We see the same issues in almost every facet of life, with the exception perhaps of the professional workplace where all that matters is what you can accomplish.

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: NookieNotes
    THE CHEERLEADERS doing the JOB are not being sexual. The job includes sexual positions. THEY are not being sexual.

    At least we agree on one thing, which is that the sport involves overtly sexual positions (which is something that other people here still disagree with, and that is their right - but which I find perplexing in its sheer naivety since even I, who probably miss most social cues, can't possibly miss that one!). < Maybe my overly testosterone-fueled brain wiring overrides one of my senses to make it more acute? >

    BTW, someone not on this thread sent me this reference which folks may simply find interesting, without further need of comment (since politics isn't what this thread is about) ...
  • Cheerleaders - What to do about them.
    quote:


    The Texas state legislature set aside small matters like the implementation of the death penalty last month to consider a far more arcane ritual: cheerleading. The state's cheerleaders, it seems, have become indistinguishable from exotic dancers—or so says a bill submitted by Al Edwards, a representative from Houston. Edwards' legislation would divert money from high schools that allow cheerleaders to perform overly suggestive lunges and inside-hitch pyramids. "It's just too sexually oriented, you know, the way they're shaking their behinds and going on, breaking it down," Edwards explained.




    (in reply to Lucylastic)
  • Profile   Post #: 234
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 11:54:17 AM   
    SinFix


    Posts: 866
    Joined: 4/1/2011
    Status: offline
    Crumpets, the problem with your logic is that you are putting what "one" group of women said and applying it to a separate group of women... Show where the "cheerleaders" have said they are being sexualized, then turning around and wearing the outfit. Do not mistake the "voice" of a few women and apply that voice to every women..

    (in reply to crumpets)
    Profile   Post #: 235
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 12:05:44 PM   
    crumpets


    Posts: 1614
    Joined: 11/5/2014
    From: South Bay (SF & Silicon Valley)
    Status: offline

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar
    and she just accepts that "being sexual" is part of the package of "being a cheerleader", just like a stripper generally isn't wanting to be sexual, but is wanting to "make a lot of money" and accepts that "being sexual" is the way that a stripper achieves that goal.


    As usual, there's more for me to learn from what you write than I can possibly impart.
    However, to simply repeat that point about, one might find that the prior references doesn't disagree with your salient concept of the cheerleader's goals...
  • Cheerleaders - What to do about them.

    To illustrate that end, we find these germane snippets...
    quote:


    Life as a student athlete suits the cheerleader better than the quarterback. While he studies his playbook, she mingles with well-monied alumni on the team airplane. Her grades are higher and she thinks more about life after college. She uses her high kicks and devastatingly sexy outfit to hide Wall Street-style chutzpah. The University of Alabama's cheerleading sponsor tells her charges, ... What better payback for a century of leering and sexual degradation than career advancement?"


    According to the article, just as the traditional German garb didn't always show full teats, it wasn't always that way with female cheerleaders:
    quote:


    The [post-WWII] cheerleader dressed as a pillar of moral rectitude: colorful hair bows, an ankle-length skirt, and saddle oxfords. She was, by unanimous acclaim, one of the most popular girls in school and also one of the most beautiful—and her elevation to the squad was usually determined by a schoolwide vote. She wasn't a jock. She demonstrated little athletic ability, rarely performing a move more daring than a modest jump or a split—certainly nothing like the pyramidal artistry that would come later.


    Apparently, the topic of this thread started, for cheerleaders anyway, in the 70's...
    quote:


    The modern cheerleader was forged in 1972 when she was waylaid by two distinct cultural forces.


    Where the athletics was exemplified...
    quote:


    Cheerleading morphed from a purely social enterprise into part of a young woman's athletic regimen


    Yet, at the same time, the complex conundrum began ...
    quote:


    Their emergence signaled not the sexualization of the cheerleader—she was already plenty sexualized—but her evolution into a sex object that had nothing to do with the sports team.


    And finally, to ...
    quote:


    The cheerleader-as-slut myth, which had been around for decades, was given new prominence...


    With the final conclusion of that slate article being ...
    quote:


    A message to the representative from Texas: The cheerleader doesn't want to torment you. She wants your job.


    (in reply to UllrsIshtar)
  • Profile   Post #: 236
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 12:52:47 PM   
    Lucylastic


    Posts: 40310
    Status: offline


    _____________________________

    (•_•)
    <) )╯SUCH
    / \

    \(•_•)
    ( (> A NASTY
    / \

    (•_•)
    <) )> WOMAN
    / \

    Duchess Of Dissent
    Dont Hate Love

    (in reply to crumpets)
    Profile   Post #: 237
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 3:43:30 PM   
    Andalusite


    Posts: 2492
    Joined: 1/25/2009
    Status: offline
    If Edwards is aroused by high school girls, no matter what positions they're in or what they're wearing, he's the one with the problem.

    (in reply to Lucylastic)
    Profile   Post #: 238
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 5:21:18 PM   
    dreamlady


    Posts: 737
    Joined: 9/13/2007
    From: Western MD
    Status: offline
    quote:

    ORIGINAL: crumpets

    However, this thread is mainly about what people DO versus what they SAY, so, we'd have to look at what those men are THINKING and SAYING when they do those things wearing those clothes.

    At the same time that they're prancing around on the field all muscular and jock'ular, are they telling women...
  • "Stay away from me, you creeps!"
  • "Don't touch me!"
  • "Don't you dare look at me with those leering eyes!"

    If they truly are complaining about having to endure too much unwanted female attention, then you would have convinced me that I must agree that they are doing the same thing I am trying to understand that women do.

  • There's been some thread drift, but you still haven't made a case for the behavioral incongruencies you've observed beyond the obvious.

    quote:

    ORIGINAL: SinFix
    Crumpets, the problem with your logic is that you are putting what "one" group of women said and applying it to a separate group of women... Show where the "cheerleaders" have said they are being sexualized, then turning around and wearing the outfit. Do not mistake the "voice" of a few women and apply that voice to every women..

    crumpets, have you ever taken note of DarkSteven's tag line?

    "You women.... The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...
    Quit fretting. We men love you."
    Why do (some) only children wish they had siblings?
    Why do (some) people who come from large families wish they had been an only child or else the only child of their gender?
    And so on.

    As for the other part, ever heard of an "eyeball fucking"? It's not a pleasant experience, unless you are the type of person who enjoys being randomly sexually objectified by strangers.


    quote:

    ORIGINAL: crumpets

    Notwithstanding the presumably large gay component involved, someone else will have to explain to me what men such as Nureyev or Baryshnikov think when women approach them sexually, and then we can discuss whether their thinking is actually aligned with what they're doing, or not.

    Speaking of target audience then, you posted in another thread how uncomfortable it made you feel to get hit on and followed by gay men.
    They aren't your target audience, and so you found their conduct to be "creepy" to you.
    Now, if a group of lesbians had followed you down that path in the woods, you wouldn't have felt threatened, now would you? Not unless they were wielding weapons or acting in a threatening manner.

    The overall difference is that males can present a physical threat to females which can escalate rapidly into harassment and/or bodily harm, that women ordinarily don't to men. Simples.


    DreamLady

    _____________________________

    Love is born with the pleasure of looking at each other, it is fed with the necessity of seeing each other, it is concluded with the impossibility of separation. ~José Marti

    (in reply to crumpets)
    Profile   Post #: 239
    RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking - 2/5/2016 7:11:47 PM   
    DeviantlyD


    Posts: 4375
    Joined: 5/26/2007
    From: Hawai`i
    Status: offline


    _____________________________

    ExiledTyrant's groupie. Catering to his ego since May 26, 2007. :D

    (in reply to dreamlady)
    Profile   Post #: 240
    Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>
    All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Someone please explain to me what women are thinking Page: <<   < prev  9 10 11 [12] 13   next >   >>
    Jump to:





    New Messages No New Messages
    Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
    Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
     Post New Thread
     Reply to Message
     Post New Poll
     Submit Vote
     Delete My Own Post
     Delete My Own Thread
     Rate Posts




    Collarchat.com © 2025
    Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

    0.125