Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Let's get it on... The CnC thread


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Let's get it on... The CnC thread Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 10:18:37 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
The inspiration from this thread comes from another thread. The subject: Consent/non consent.

(Promised I would. I'm going to get my @ss handed to me.)

The concept of consent/non consent dynamics, as understood by me, is as follows:

Upon entering the dynamic, the submissive/slave consents one time. From that point on, as long as the dynamic is viable, the /s has agreed to be under the other person's control. They have yielded their authority to another. To bend to their will to align with the person in charge. Decisions are no longer theirs to make.

Except one.

(This is the part that gets me in trouble with some CnC folks.)

I contend that, even in CnC relationships, the s-type holds one decision. That is, to leave the dynamic. They can withdraw their consent in exactly the way they originally gave it. The door they walked in is the same one that they can walk out. As soon as they say they are done, they are free. If they want to leave, they can. All previous agreements are null and void.

(Even more trouble from certain segments of the CnC crowd.)

On some CnC threads, there is a percentage of folks engaging in these dynamics that proclaim, if the s-type leaves, the M has every right to bring them back. This is not so! When your dynamic is over, no one has any claim on the other, and whatever M/s thing that was going on before ceases to exist. No one is entitled to "drag" the other person back against their will. (Yes, I've seen some people really say that.) There is no pulling a person back kicking and screaming. The minute they want to leave, all of the kinky reindeer games are over. That includes sex, BDSM, TPE, D/s, S/m, or any other part of the alphabet soup that we use for our little acronyms.

CnC is NOT consent for life. It is consent ONLY while the dynamic is viable.

Let the games begin!


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 10:30:41 AM   
ReMakeYou


Posts: 147
Joined: 1/20/2012
Status: offline
Conceptually, everything you say is true. Anyone who says otherwise is a fantasist and/or a Lifetime movie waiting to happen.

In practice, though, it gets muddier if the s doesn't leave themselves a way to signal that they want out. If the terms of the relationship include such items as "I will regularly brat and try to escape, I want you to collect me and put me in my place when I do", it can be impossible for the M to tell if the s is truly playing along in their prearranged roles, or if they truly want out. This can lead to some stickiness.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 10:42:12 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
Which is why those sorts of terms are a non-starter and somewhat "non sequitur".

It is too open-ended and open to mis-interpretation and abuse of the most dangerous kind.
Anything negotiated that is as loose as this needs to be tightened up so it is no longer ambiguous.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to ReMakeYou)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 10:45:15 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline
As usual LP, an excellent and succinct post.

I wholeheartedly agree with every word of it.



_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 11:52:58 AM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
But some people do have this in place and their partner has physically prevented them from leaving.

However, upon further conversation, it has only happened when someone flipped out.

Hell, The Man held me down forcibly one time after he hit a trigger we didn't know was there. I wasn't thinking clearly, just reacting out of emotions I could not control.

Had we been having problems for weeks or months, done everything we could think of to solve them, and then I rationally concluded that the relationship was beyond repair - that would have been different.

But in the moment, he prevented me from leaving.

And in that situation, it was the right thing to do.

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 11:54:58 AM   
UllrsIshtar


Posts: 3693
Joined: 7/28/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact


Upon entering the dynamic, the submissive/slave consents one time. From that point on, as long as the dynamic is viable, the /s has agreed to be under the other person's control. They have yielded their authority to another. To bend to their will to align with the person in charge. Decisions are no longer theirs to make.




I'm with you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact


Except one.

(This is the part that gets me in trouble with some CnC folks.)

I contend that, even in CnC relationships, the s-type holds one decision. That is, to leave the dynamic. They can withdraw their consent in exactly the way they originally gave it. The door they walked in is the same one that they can walk out. As soon as they say they are done, they are free. If they want to leave, they can. All previous agreements are null and void.




Still with you.

With the exception that, while a person will always retain their legal right to leave, and should retain the physical ability to do so, they may or may not retain the mental ability to do so.

Internal enslavement/capture bonding/Stockholm syndrome are real things. They happen to people.

Sometimes somebody else's will is so overpowering to your own, that they can put you in a mental state where you are no longer able (though still legally entitled, and hopefully physically cable) to withdraw consent.

When that happens, you can argue till the cows come home about whether or not the person should be allowed the right to revoke consent, and that they have the legal right to revoke consent, and that they have the physical ability to walk out the door and never look back, but the fact remains that if they if they're mentally submitted to the stronger will of another to the point that they cannot conceive of disobedience, they will not leave without without permission, even if they want to.

You see this in abused women sometimes, where they are mentally bound to their abuser to the point of not being able to disobey him, even when it's pointed out to them that they legally have every opportunity to do so. Of course, in these types of situation, the foundation for the mental bondage is fear, which one would hope wouldn't be the case in a consensual non-consent BDSM relationship.

This state of mental bondage can be broken, usually by external forces who are stronger than the commanding dominant, or by the subject themselves -by means of personal growth-, or by the dominant force -because of a failure to maintain dominance-, or by an extreme change in circumstances. But even though the state can be broken, until it is broken, the subject lacks the ability to revoke consent, because they cannot conceive of disobedience.

Some people want this type of mental bondage, and so they go looking for people who will deliberately attempt to induce such a state, with varying degrees of actual success.
Lots of people who claim that they've achieve this type of mental bondage are full of shit, and are kidding themselves because it's something they'd like to be true.

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact



On some CnC threads, there is a percentage of folks engaging in these dynamics that proclaim, if the s-type leaves, the M has every right to bring them back.




Using physical force to bring back a person who rejects your authority over them isn't cool. It's illegal, and I also consider it immoral.







< Message edited by UllrsIshtar -- 2/9/2016 12:00:17 PM >


_____________________________

I can be your whore
I am the dirt you created
I am your sinner
And your whore
But let me tell you something baby
You love me for everything you hate me for

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 12:31:35 PM   
CodeOfSilence


Posts: 235
Status: offline
And here I was hoping to read about kinky people into gaming (Command and Conquer) .


Dayyyy ruined.

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 12:54:23 PM   
crumpets


Posts: 1614
Joined: 11/5/2014
From: South Bay (SF & Silicon Valley)
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CodeOfSilence
And here I was hoping to read about kinky people into gaming (Command and Conquer) .
Dayyyy ruined.


You think your day was ruined? Your dayyyyy?

I came here hoping to read about kinky people into Numerical Control Machines! (Computerized Numerical Control).


(in reply to CodeOfSilence)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 12:55:21 PM   
CodeOfSilence


Posts: 235
Status: offline
Oh man, give me one of those and a 3D printer and I'm set for Life.

(in reply to crumpets)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 12:58:52 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CodeOfSilence
And here I was hoping to read about kinky people into gaming (Command and Conquer) .

Dayyyy ruined.

Pfffft. I play WoW.



_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to CodeOfSilence)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 2:52:36 PM   
CodeOfSilence


Posts: 235
Status: offline
I remember viewing a WoW-findom here. Absolutely no iRL gifts, only wow gold and pvp-slaving was the request. roflmao. :)

Ah WoW is such a terrible game to roleplay in though. Much more fun in games like Ultima Online or Eve Online where you can lose Everything and win it back.

Long time since I played any MMORPG tho, no more time to grind.

< Message edited by CodeOfSilence -- 2/9/2016 2:54:22 PM >

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 2:54:00 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
Thank you for your patience. I was on another thread.
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesFIP
But some people do have this in place and their partner has physically prevented them from leaving.

However, upon further conversation, it has only happened when someone flipped out.

Definitely, a point worth exploring.

quote:

Hell, The Man held me down forcibly one time after he hit a trigger we didn't know was there. I wasn't thinking clearly, just reacting out of emotions I could not control.

Having hit that trigger, could you have competently, driven away, with reasonable safety?

I've hit unexpected triggers before. I mean no offense to any bottom out there, but y'all can be messed up when that happens. That's "I'm not letting you on the road because you are a danger to yourself and other people".

There's a catch...

I'm not being your Dominant when that happens. I'm certainly not being your top. Play ceases. There absolutely won't be any sex. All of that stuff stops, because even if it *might* just be a trigger, if you really withdrew your consent at that point, I'm going to have to respect it. If I attempted to continue on a relationship/dynamic type level and you didn't want it, I would be violating you.

(Btw, I probably wouldn't let you drive anyway. I remember your night vision.)

quote:

Had we been having problems for weeks or months, done everything we could think of to solve them, and then I rationally concluded that the relationship was beyond repair - that would have been different.

I promise that I'm trying to do my best. I suppose it's in the realm of possibilities, but I can't think of anybody that I know that wanted to end a relationship where the other person was completely clueless.

Really? The whole thing was sunshine and roses and the other person was just blindsided?

In such a circumstance, I'd say give it a month. Start looking through the lenses of hindsight. Were both of you really happy in the relationship? If one person was and the other wasn't, that's not really a relationship.

quote:

But in the moment, he prevented me from leaving.

And in that situation, it was the right thing to do.

In that moment, if you were a mess, I would tend to agree.

However, if you still wanted to leave in the morning, he should have held the door open for you.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to DesFIP)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 3:07:54 PM   
LilJuly76


Posts: 1245
Joined: 1/9/2016
Status: offline
excellent way of putting it, this is how I was taught. it's like any other relationship if any party wishes to end it, end it, simple as that.

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 3:36:47 PM   
mousekabob


Posts: 187
Status: offline
Our relationship is exactly as you stated. I've consented once and once only and if I change my mind, I'm free to walk out the door BUT once the door closes, there's no coming back through it.





_____________________________

aka littlewonder
------------------------
Nothing has changed
Everything has changed

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 3:49:12 PM   
DocStrange


Posts: 1076
Joined: 6/10/2015
Status: offline
CnC is part of the beauty for submission. Submission is a gift not a right. That gift is part of the dynamic of the relationship. The s is giving up control to the M willingly. Take away the willingly, then there is no relationship anymore. It becomes a 1 way dynamic. I have always been a firm believer everyone has the right to no and walk away.

_____________________________

Master of the Mystic Arts
Proprieter Verließ Von Strange
Rubber Fetishist
SciFi Fanatic

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 3:57:02 PM   
UllrsIshtar


Posts: 3693
Joined: 7/28/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DocStrange

CnC is part of the beauty for submission. Submission is a gift not a right. That gift is part of the dynamic of the relationship. The s is giving up control to the M willingly. Take away the willingly, then there is no relationship anymore. It becomes a 1 way dynamic. I have always been a firm believer everyone has the right to no and walk away.


If everybody has the right to say 'no' and walk away, then submission cannot be a gift.

A gift is something you freely give to somebody for them to keep for as long as they want. Once you give it, you cannot take it back, because it's theirs now, and you no longer have a right to take it back. Taking back a gift without permission is stealing.
When giving a gift, you also don't expect anything in return. You don't give somebody a gift to then say: "now you have to give me something of equal value back!". Doing so is an exchange, not the giving of a gift.

Submission is an exchange. It's saying "I'll submit to you as long as you dominate in a way that is compatible with how I wish to be dominated."
Unlike a gift, it is dependent on the condition that both parties are getting what they want out of the exchange. When either of the parties are no longer getting what they want, the exchange is over, and there's no 'stealing' back of gifts.



_____________________________

I can be your whore
I am the dirt you created
I am your sinner
And your whore
But let me tell you something baby
You love me for everything you hate me for

(in reply to DocStrange)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 5:00:10 PM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
Working on this with a headache, folks. Flipping barometric pressure and that junk.
quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar
Still with you.

With the exception that, while a person will always retain their legal right to leave, and should retain the physical ability to do so, they may or may not retain the mental ability to do so.

This was touched on in the other discussion, too. I maintain that the law supersedes BDSM, D/s, M/s, TPE, and whatever other alphabet soup, sexy fun times that we get up to. As I reside in the United States, I really do have to understand that a person wanting to leave my company has the legal right to do so AND I could be wearing prison orange if for some reason I decide I'm bigger and badder than criminal law. (Always know who the bigger Dominant is. It's a smart way to live.)

quote:

Internal enslavement/capture bonding/Stockholm syndrome are real things. They happen to people.

I agree, they are real things. However, of the three, only one of those on your list deals with consent. The other two are associated with prisoner type situations, so I can't acquaint them with voluntary D/s. I see where you are trying to go with the parallel. I'm just having trouble making that leap from consent.

quote:

Sometimes somebody else's will is so overpowering to your own, that they can put you in a mental state where you are no longer able (though still legally entitled, and hopefully physically cable) to withdraw consent.

Your position is a good one. This, very specifically, is why I mention in the original that the person wants to leave. Wanting to leave the other person is the first steps of someone taking their own will back.

quote:

When that happens, you can argue till the cows come home about whether or not the person should be allowed the right to revoke consent, and that they have the legal right to revoke consent, and that they have the physical ability to walk out the door and never look back, but the fact remains that if they if they're mentally submitted to the stronger will of another to the point that they cannot conceive of disobedience, they will not leave without without permission, even if they want to.

This part is very good because I think you know me well enough to know that I'm prone to say 'submission isn't always about what you want to do'. At the same time, unless somebody's kink is to be miserable. I'd have a hard time keeping them that way. (Don't think I wouldn't indulge in their misery from time to time. Oh, sorry, my sadist is showing.)

When does "I don't want to" get to a high enough percentage of the time that a person is not happy and the relationship is no longer viable?

quote:

You see this in abused women sometimes, where they are mentally bound to their abuser to the point of not being able to disobey him, even when it's pointed out to them that they legally have every opportunity to do so. Of course, in these types of situation, the foundation for the mental bondage is fear, which one would hope wouldn't be the case in a consensual non-consent BDSM relationship.

This is a problem. It is exactly why those of us who engage in consensual dynamics and/or BDSM are going to have trouble with legal matters. So much of what we do can look exactly what an abusive relationship looks like and the only difference that we have is about the concept of consent.

Have you ever heard of this thing called the Superman complex? It's pretty much like what it sounds. The abused party really starts to think that their abuser has Superman like powers. As in, even if s/he stabs him in the chest while the person is asleep, that person will get up and (non con sensually) beat the person who stabbed them. With the way your mind works, you might find it fascinating reading. You'd get into the psychological aspects.

quote:

This state of mental bondage can be broken, usually by external forces who are stronger than the commanding dominant, or by the subject themselves -by means of personal growth-, or by the dominant force -because of a failure to maintain dominance-, or by an extreme change in circumstances. But even though the state can be broken, until it is broken, the subject lacks the ability to revoke consent, because they cannot conceive of disobedience.

I'm still leaning towards, when a person wants to leave, and makes the attempt to do so, it has been broken.

I've mentioned this before. One of the things I very much respect about Gorean culture is, if a person has not been Mastered, they encourage the kijara to run. Can be a smart move in some cases.

quote:

Some people want this type of mental bondage, and so they go looking for people who will deliberately attempt to induce such a state, with varying degrees of actual success.

Agreed. Some people do. It's not just the M-types that I've heard/read (knowing them in real life, not internet BS) giving these opinions. Just as often, I hear this desire from the s-type as well. They honestly want the M to come and get them back.

In the back of my mind, I am always thinking... Yes, you say that now, because everybody is happy and you are where you want to be. Right up until, you don't.

quote:

Lots of people who claim that they've achieve this type of mental bondage are full of shit, and are kidding themselves because it's something they'd like to be true.

I'm with you. When I don't know people, I take the stuff they spout online with a grain of salt. At least 80% and I'm seriously low balling.

Yet, I am the same person who, just today, was reminiscing about dragging someone around my kitchen floor. It was one of those "I'll put you where I want you and you'll like it" moments. Huge turn on. But, if he would have actually wanted to walk out the front door, I'd have let him go.

quote:

Using physical force to bring back a person who rejects your authority over them isn't cool. It's illegal, and I also consider it immoral.

Again, I agree. I know, sometimes, I have some odd outlooks on consent. However, isn't that pinnacle of consent the difference between us and criminals?






_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 5:30:50 PM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
Devil's advocate though, if I've agreed (as I have) that he is the better decision maker, then that also says that he's going to be better at making this decision

Which gives him the right to decide if I'm making the right decision or not by ending it

Some of the m/s or o/p groups on fet have had this discussion, you might find it enlightening reading

In almost all the times people have brought up not being allowed to leave, it's been clear that it was not a thought out decision

And yeah, why do I even own a car when nobody ever lets me drive? Between him and my daughter, I might as well give up the license

Which is another decision of this magnitude: if someone has authority over your money, if they can demand you cut up your license, make you quit your job or take one you don't want, and you trust them enough to believe they are making the right decision even when you don't agree with them, then why is it that the only time it's the wrong thing to do is when you are upset and decide on the spur of the moment to end the relationship?

As far as relationships where one person is unhappy and the other thinks things are fine - they happen all the time
You've never known a man to say he didn't see it coming when he got served with divorce papers? Because I have

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 6:55:58 PM   
Cell


Posts: 409
Status: offline
I could see myself running into some problems wih CnC one day... but at the moment this isn't really an issue for me. If it did become an issue I'm almost certain it wouldn't be because of my partner wanting to leave me, but more likley her friends or family getting wind of the relationship not being 'normal' and deciding to call the police when issues of non-consent become apparent.

Resident Sadist, if you happen to read this thread could you explain a bit around your thinking on putting a phone in your slave cage?

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Let's get it on... The CnC thread - 2/9/2016 7:35:02 PM   
DocStrange


Posts: 1076
Joined: 6/10/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: UllrsIshtar


quote:

ORIGINAL: DocStrange

CnC is part of the beauty for submission. Submission is a gift not a right. That gift is part of the dynamic of the relationship. The s is giving up control to the M willingly. Take away the willingly, then there is no relationship anymore. It becomes a 1 way dynamic. I have always been a firm believer everyone has the right to no and walk away.


If everybody has the right to say 'no' and walk away, then submission cannot be a gift.

A gift is something you freely give to somebody for them to keep for as long as they want. Once you give it, you cannot take it back, because it's theirs now, and you no longer have a right to take it back. Taking back a gift without permission is stealing.
When giving a gift, you also don't expect anything in return. You don't give somebody a gift to then say: "now you have to give me something of equal value back!". Doing so is an exchange, not the giving of a gift.

Submission is an exchange. It's saying "I'll submit to you as long as you dominate in a way that is compatible with how I wish to be dominated."
Unlike a gift, it is dependent on the condition that both parties are getting what they want out of the exchange. When either of the parties are no longer getting what they want, the exchange is over, and there's no 'stealing' back of gifts.



The gift of submission is not a physical gift. It is not a physical object that can be taken, hoarded, put on a shelf or thrown away. The gift of submission is a gift of trust. And when that trust is broken, the s has every right to walk away.

The predication that the M has all rights and the s has none is a faulty argument. The ability for the s to walk away is his/her right. No one can take that away. You make the presumption that all M’s know what is best. The reality is the world is full of people who make bad decisions. There are many M’s who make bad choices for their s’s. There are many M’s that harm their s’s.

When someone puts their love, life, happiness, and unwavering trust in you and you violate that trust, then you have no rights at all. You gave up your gift and have no right to it.


_____________________________

Master of the Mystic Arts
Proprieter Verließ Von Strange
Rubber Fetishist
SciFi Fanatic

(in reply to UllrsIshtar)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> Let's get it on... The CnC thread Page: [1] 2 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.172