quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

http://gothamist.com/2016/02/13/teens_arm_ripped_off_after_allegedl.php

A big part of me says the little fuck got what he deserved.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

http://gothamist.com/2016/02/13/teens_arm_ripped_off_after_allegedl.php

A big part of me says the little fuck got what he deserved.

Yep. I am having a very hard time dredging up sympathy for what I consider a self-inflicted wound.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkdog

Something tells me the driver will get off on extenuating circumstances. He did not arrive at the meeting with the plan to harm someone.
(and in many areas, it is OK for a cop to hit a runner with his car)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkdog

Something tells me the driver will get off on extenuating circumstances. He did not arrive at the meeting with the plan to harm someone.
(and in many areas, it is OK for a cop to hit a runner with his car)

Once the robber exited the vehicle he was no longer a threat to the driver. The driver purposefully and vindictively drove down the street, turned around, and proceeded back to the robber in order to injure him.

Both robber and driver were ready to maim/injure the other over a pair of shoes.

quote:

ORIGINAL: satanscharmer

Why would the transaction take place in his car if he just met him? Maybe I'm just an ultra-paranoid person.
I can't see the man getting off and he shouldn't.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

quote:

ORIGINAL: Darkdog

Something tells me the driver will get off on extenuating circumstances. He did not arrive at the meeting with the plan to harm someone.
(and in many areas, it is OK for a cop to hit a runner with his car)

Once the robber exited the vehicle he was no longer a threat to the driver. The driver purposefully and vindictively drove down the street, turned around, and proceeded back to the robber in order to injure him.

Both robber and driver were ready to maim/injure the other over a pair of shoes.

The driver didn't do it over a pair of shoes. He did it because the kid was willing to harm him over a pair of shoes. The kid set the value of the shoes, not the driver.

The kid had a gun, he was still a threat.

quote:


As you can see in the (very ominous) surveillance video below, via ABC, Sam took the shoes and exited the car. Pierre sped down the block, made a U-turn, then slammed into the teen, pinning him against a metal fence.

quote:

ORIGINAL: satanscharmer

Why would the transaction take place in his car if he just met him? Maybe I'm just an ultra-paranoid person.
I can't see the man getting off and he shouldn't.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

quote:

ORIGINAL: satanscharmer

Why would the transaction take place in his car if he just met him? Maybe I'm just an ultra-paranoid person.
I can't see the man getting off and he shouldn't.

The guy had a gun and tried to take the shoes without paying. Since he had a gun (and even if he did not), Castle Law Doctrine cannot be ignored, and applies fully. The seller, and owner of that vehicle had every right under the Constitution and the Law to kill the punk and should not have been charged at all.

This is the law of the land, and I believe it is a right and good law, and anything that puts the risk into crime is a good thing. If you don't like it, then let's just get rid of all the cops too, because they are useless in a situation like this, whereas a gun is quite useful, or a car.

Since the would be victim would be justified in using deadly force with a firearm under US law, there is no reason to believe he would not be justified in using a different form of deadly force, in this case an automobile. It could have been a flamethrower, baseball bat or whatever, the fact is he was 100 % justified in using it and should not have been charged at all. But this sounds like New York where even blocking a punch from a bully in school can get you a lawsuit. Now where was it a cop charged someone for battery for breaking his (the cop's) fist with his (the suspect's) face ? Was it there ?

These fucking criminals are given a place to flourish. By assholes. Fuck rehabilitation, they should have been habilitated in the first place. If not their Mother can cry and I will tell her to her face "Next time you have a litter tell them not to fuck with other people's shit". the animals you shit out will not fuck up the human society we have going here.

At least that one won't anymore. One at a time, just make sure they're dead. Actually I was wrong, the seller/driver should be charged with littering because he didn't kill him.

T^T

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

"The robber was no longer a threat if he had exited the car, traveling the opposite direction of the driver, and the driver was able to drive "down the block". "

Yes but he had direct and irrefutable knowledge that a person with a gun and bad intent was in the area so as a good Citizen it is his duty to neutralize that thug.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
I would have used the power window control to roll down the window and blew the motherfucker's gray matter out into the street, and then dumped the carcass right there and went straight to a car wash. ...

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: satanscharmer

Why would the transaction take place in his car if he just met him? Maybe I'm just an ultra-paranoid person.
I can't see the man getting off and he shouldn't.

Craigslist? There have been a number of crimes committed recently against people who thought they were meeting someone they had contacted via that route.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

quote:

ORIGINAL: satanscharmer

Why would the transaction take place in his car if he just met him? Maybe I'm just an ultra-paranoid person.
I can't see the man getting off and he shouldn't.

The guy had a gun and tried to take the shoes without paying. Since he had a gun (and even if he did not), Castle Law Doctrine cannot be ignored, and applies fully. The seller, and owner of that vehicle had every right under the Constitution and the Law to kill the punk and should not have been charged at all.

This is the law of the land, and I believe it is a right and good law, and anything that puts the risk into crime is a good thing. If you don't like it, then let's just get rid of all the cops too, because they are useless in a situation like this, whereas a gun is quite useful, or a car.

Since the would be victim would be justified in using deadly force with a firearm under US law, there is no reason to believe he would not be justified in using a different form of deadly force, in this case an automobile. It could have been a flamethrower, baseball bat or whatever, the fact is he was 100 % justified in using it and should not have been charged at all. But this sounds like New York where even blocking a punch from a bully in school can get you a lawsuit. Now where was it a cop charged someone for battery for breaking his (the cop's) fist with his (the suspect's) face ? Was it there ?

These fucking criminals are given a place to flourish. By assholes. Fuck rehabilitation, they should have been habilitated in the first place. If not their Mother can cry and I will tell her to her face "Next time you have a litter tell them not to fuck with other people's shit". the animals you shit out will not fuck up the human society we have going here.

At least that one won't anymore. One at a time, just make sure they're dead. Actually I was wrong, the seller/driver should be charged with littering because he didn't kill him.

T^T

quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam

http://gothamist.com/2016/02/13/teens_arm_ripped_off_after_allegedl.php

A big part of me says the little fuck got what he deserved.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

"Once the driver was no longer in a life-threatening position it was his duty to inform the police, not become a vigilante. "

Not under Castle Law Doctrine. If you leave them alive they can come back when you are sleeping. Motherfuckers who think they have the right to take your stuff because they are stronger might always come back, and they might always come back to others, who might not be properly tooled up (armed) to fix the problem (kill the thug). Like your Grampa.
...

quote:

ORIGINAL: satanscharmer

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: satanscharmer

Why would the transaction take place in his car if he just met him? Maybe I'm just an ultra-paranoid person.
I can't see the man getting off and he shouldn't.

Craigslist? There have been a number of crimes committed recently against people who thought they were meeting someone they had contacted via that route.

I assume it probably was Craigslist, or an other similar site. If I were going to sell something, I would have met in a busy public place and I definitely wouldn't have let the person in my car.