LadyPact
Posts: 32566
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Greta75 I read a comment online about why people settle. I've never seen it from this angle before. Someone explain it that people who settle wants control and power. Little bit of a different angle or the same one with a twist. The one who cares the least is the easier person to walk away. When you are not emotionally connected to a person, there's less of all of that stuff that most people put in the "grieving the former relationship" category. quote:
Because, when you are emotionally too much into the person, you lose power and control. Maybe. I often see people less likely to end a relationship with someone they are emotionally attached to because they don't want to do the grieving, are afraid of being single/lonely, or a variety of other reasons. How many threads do we see that are roughly "my spouse doesn't provide me kink but I'm not leaving because of x, y, z?" Love, kids, money, the mortgage, etc, etc, etc. If we're interpreting those things as forms of power or control, I'm probably with you. quote:
When you settle for someone who is pretty good on all areas on textbook points, good man, reliable man, family man, all the good stuffs, except, you don't feel all the magical feelings for this person, you will never be at his mercy, as you're not that into him. You've settled for him. This part I'm a little iffy on because if that was just the criteria that made the magical "in love" feelings to happen, basically, people would just be "in love" with anybody who had the right qualities. We know that emotions don't work that way for most people. If they did, you'd be "in love" (romantically) with a bunch of people who happen to be roaming they planet as long as they were scoring high enough on your criteria card. quote:
What ya all think? I'm actually agreeing with you that *some* people settle for their monogamous or primary partners. When you ask any given person why they married their spouse, a very high majority of the time, you'll get the reply that they love them or some version that they love each other. That's awesome. It's very cool to be in love and most people want to have a romantic component to their partnership. However, it's not all. How about want to have kids, don't want to be alone, financial security, and all of the other things people want, even if love isn't involved? Sometimes, those are the primary reason. Here's where at least *some* poly people can view this differently. Why did I marry MP? Because we fell in love. That means that my romantic component is already being fulfilled, so it's not a requirement in a secondary relationship for me. It can be or it can just as easily not be. Why did we become poly? If it was for love, I'd have a vanilla boyfriend. I don't and I don't want one. Primary reason(s) to express my sadistic and D/s side. Perfect example of "not for love". (Please don't confuse me with other poly people who's primary reason is love because I'm not putting my reasons off on them.) OK, I trimmed this a bit but it's cool. quote:
ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 Nobody, unless they are either service oriented, or a fool, would go into such a relationship or think that it would be a good one to have. The only exception I have ever seen that contradicts this is where the culture is such that others are in charge of the match-making process (Islamics etc). This doesn't normally happen in western cultures - at least from my observations. I think we see this differently and there's a very good reason why we have different views. We've got more leather folks on this side of the pond (and I'm saying it as a subculture) than you guys do. The "not for love" thing has been very common in the leather community through the years. This has shifted as the years have gone along and more people are gravitating to the "in love with your s" thing, so that's more the majority now. However, there is still a certain percentage out there where the M/s is a service based relationship, which is more like employer/employee type parallels. It's just that the perks are they do it for free, you get to beat on them, and it may come with or without sexual benefits. Romance or "in love" is not necessarily a part of the job description.
_____________________________
The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie. Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread
|