Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: reasons for being religious or atheist


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: reasons for being religious or atheist Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 2/23/2016 6:16:09 PM   
Dvr22999874


Posts: 2849
Joined: 9/11/2008
Status: offline
why do people quote somebody who lived and died thousands of years ago ? does that make that somebody somehow smarter or more intelligent ? If so, Neanderthal man must have really had a handle on the universe and all it holds.

(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 2/24/2016 4:40:40 AM   
leonine


Posts: 409
Joined: 11/3/2009
From: [email protected]
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

FR
I'm an atheist because, I don't like the God I read about in the Bible or the Quran. So I've decided that, even if they were, 101% proven to be real Gods. I still wouldn't like them! They are mean Gods, with horrible character and personalities.
I mean, sometimes when over-zealous Christians start the saving you from hell thingy.

I'm like, you want me to like someone who is gonna send me to hell, unless I suck up to him?


I don't like JHVH either, but he's not, thank the gods, the beginning and end of religion. Too many atheists assume that "religion" means only the Abrahamic religions, or that every religion is the same as them; I've completely dumbfounded some atheists simply by pointing out that not all religions believe in Hell. (Not even all Christians do: Jehovah's Witnesses don't, for instance.)

I was raised Humanist, but between school hymn-singing (I'm a sucker for a moving song,) and a romantic fascination with the Crusades, I had a brief Christian phase when I was 6 or 8. My father wisely didn't argue, just gave me a book on the origins of all the major religions and let me make my own judgement... which was that they were all good stories, but none of them meant anything more than that to me.

But that didn't do anything for my growing conviction that there was more to the world than my scientific rationality could account for. (I sometimes say that my own belief in a creator is based on the existence of temper colours on steel. That this material can be given so many different useful propeties by heating it to just the right temperature, could be pure luck. But that it turns different colours to tell you which temperature it's at... that is a gift of the gods.) Eventually my wanderings led me to neo-Paganism, and a growing devotion to a Goddess I couldn't be sure existed... until one Summer day in a green wood She came to me, and I went from believing to knowing.

And yes, as a scientist I can explain all of that psychologically. And when you're in love you can, if you wish, explain all the sexual and psychological reasons for what you feel, but you're still in love. As Rowling wisely said, "Yes, it's all happening in your head. But that doesn't mean it's not real."

_____________________________

Leo9


Gonna pack in my hand, pick up on a piece of land and build myself a cabin in the woods.
It's there I'm gonna stay, until there comes a day when this old world starts a-changing for the good.
- James Taylor

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 2/24/2016 9:33:07 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Svale


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

You have only used two facets and ignored all the others.

Broadbrush answer: Individual choice. Whatever floats your boat at the time.
Whatever other reason you want to inject into the argument is just superfluous and irrelevant.



What are the other facets?

You have only chosen "religious" and "atheist".
They are the two diametric ends of the spectrum.

What of 'agnostic' and 'spiritualist'??
Or anything else in between?

There are many reasons for anything in this world.
Where you put yourself and what label you use is purely a personal choice.
Anything else is superfluous unless you are one of the sheeple.





I suppose the main reason I have not spent a lot of time here is that the OP in his opening title presented us with what is called a 'false premise'.

religious or religion is NOT in the academic circle the 'antithesis' to atheism.

Had he said;

believer v nonbeliever
God v No-God
religious v nonreligious
religion v nonreligion
belief v nonbelief

and so forth and so on I could accept his premise as a valid starting point for debate but unfortunately that is not the case.


Atheists have beliefs, albeit 'different beliefs' than those who connect with or identify their beliefs with diety (theistic) or those who identify their religious beliefs without a deity (nontheistic), they all fall under different flavors of 'religion'.

That is why Buddhism and other nontheistic systems of belief are considered a religion.




quote:

Nontheistic religions
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nontheistic religions are traditions of thought within religions—some otherwise aligned with theism, others not—in which nontheism informs religious beliefs or practices.[1] Nontheism has been applied to the fields of Christian apologetics and general liberal theology, and plays significant roles in Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism.



quote:

Metaphysical questions

On one occasion, when presented with a problem of metaphysics by the monk Malunkyaputta, Buddha responded with the Parable of the Poison Arrow. When a man is shot with an arrow thickly smeared with poison, his family summons the doctor to have the poison removed, and the doctor gives an antidote:[7]

But the man refuses to let the doctor do anything before certain questions can be answered. The wounded man demands to know who shot the arrow, what his caste and job is, and why he shot him. He wants to know what kind of bow the man used and how he acquired the ingredients used in preparing the poison. Malunkyaputta, such a man will die before getting the answers to his questions. It is no different for one who follows the Way. I teach only those things necessary to realize the Way. Things which are not helpful or necessary, I do not teach.



quote:

Nontheist Friend

A nontheist Friend or an atheist Quaker is someone who affiliates with, identifies with, engages in and/or affirms Quaker practices and processes, but who does not accept a belief in a theistic understanding of God, a Supreme Being, the divine, the soul or the supernatural. Like theistic Friends, nontheist Friends are actively interested in realizing centered peace, simplicity, integrity, community, equality, love, happiness and social justice in the Society of Friends and beyond.





that said atheism in practice is simply another religion, hence the OP premise is nonsequitor.


quote:

Non sequitur (Latin for "it does not follow"), in formal logic, is an argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises.[1] In a non sequitur, the conclusion could be either true or false, but the argument is fallacious because there is a disconnection between the premise and the conclusion. All invalid arguments are special cases of non sequitur. The term has special applicability in law, having a formal legal definition. Many types of known non sequitur argument forms have been classified into many types of logical fallacies.


< Message edited by Real0ne -- 2/24/2016 9:38:08 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 2/24/2016 9:49:38 AM   
Charles6682


Posts: 1820
Joined: 10/1/2007
From: Saint Pete,FL
Status: offline
I consider myself to be Spiritual, non-religious. I believe in Mother Goddess as my Higher Power. I have friends who are from different religions and friends who are Agnostic. I believe Spirituality and Science can work together. I don't need any organized religion or dogma to tell me how to believe in a Higher Power. I support history, facts and science. I have some Agnostic friends who do not believe in any Higher Power at all. That's fine, that is their right. However, that is where I part with my Agnostic friends. While I support science and I agree that humanity has caused wars in the name of religion and beliefs. However, I still believe there is a loving, caring Higher Power through it all and I certainly believe there is life after death. I don't think that this world is the only world we have. There is more than "meets the eye".

< Message edited by Charles6682 -- 2/24/2016 9:53:30 AM >


_____________________________

Charley aka Sub Guy

http://www.Facebook.com/SubGuy

https://Twitter.com/SubGuy6682

(in reply to Hillwilliam)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 2/24/2016 11:18:16 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
The problem with the word religion is that if you believe murder is wrong therefore you do not kill someone that is your religion regardless of the source. Hence satanism is a religion and even human sacrifice. If the reason someone does not kill someone else is because the state would hang them, then it merely transfers the source of their religion from one to another. In other words from God, or yourself to the state. Everyone has a religion unless they are completely without morals or conscience, and atheists have both morals and conscience, which I why I posted the notation regarding the false premise given in the title that seems to have carried forward into the posts.



_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Charles6682)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 2/24/2016 7:20:12 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

The problem with the word religion is that if you believe murder is wrong therefore you do not kill someone that is your religion regardless of the source. Hence satanism is a religion and even human sacrifice. If the reason someone does not kill someone else is because the state would hang them, then it merely transfers the source of their religion from one to another. In other words from God, or yourself to the state. Everyone has a religion unless they are completely without morals or conscience, and atheists have both morals and conscience, which I why I posted the notation regarding the false premise given in the title that seems to have carried forward into the posts.



Not true at all. To decide to not do something is a moral decision irrespective of anyone's 'religion.' Whatever that is ? Morals can be arrived at without any input from any religion.

Laws of the 'state' provide for society's advised proscription of a crime...murder or not.

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 2/25/2016 8:23:08 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

The problem with the word religion is that if you believe murder is wrong therefore you do not kill someone that is your religion regardless of the source. Hence satanism is a religion and even human sacrifice. If the reason someone does not kill someone else is because the state would hang them, then it merely transfers the source of their religion from one to another. In other words from God, or yourself to the state. Everyone has a religion unless they are completely without morals or conscience, and atheists have both morals and conscience, which I why I posted the notation regarding the false premise given in the title that seems to have carried forward into the posts.



Not true at all. To decide to not do something is a moral decision irrespective of anyone's 'religion.' Whatever that is ? Morals can be arrived at without any input from any religion.

Laws of the 'state' provide for society's advised proscription of a crime...murder or not.



What I said is absolutely true.

You have your recipe reversed.

Religion does not the creates the moral or ethic, the moral or ethic creates the religion.

Ok from the top: With respect to religion; The sole act of making just the 'decision' and going no further can fall under either "ethics or moral" (in its broadest sense), and at that point is not yet a religion. However as soon as a person acts upon a moral decision or a decision as a result of a matter of conscience it then becomes religion.

Religion is the last step of the process not the first.

Generally the distinction between ethics and morals is understood to be ethics is the philosophy of morals.

So ethics can never be a religion as it has no action attached, whereas a moral on the other hand is.

This can (almost) be shown by definition alone.


quote:


religion

a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices

the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices

the practice of religious beliefs

something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience

strict faithfulness; devotion




A matter of conscience in which a direction is chosen is a moral decision.



quote:

moral

of, relating to, or concerned with the principles or rules of right conduct or the distinction between right and wrong; ethical: moral.

founded on the fundamental principles of right conduct rather than on legalities, enactment, or custom

capable of conforming to the rules of right conduct: a moral being.

conforming to the rules of right conduct (opposed to immoral )

of, relating to, or acting on the mind, feelings, will, or character:



When a state makes a moral decision and enforces it, then you are subject to the state religion. the state must be morally neutral to ALL religions to conform the constitution. Making any law that conforms with any religion, unless (and here is the caveat) it is 'universal' amongst 'ALL' religions.

When the state remains totally neutral to all religions in its lawmaking then and only then is it not a religious state. (or with the exception of a law being universal and then with that should any group come up with an exception they need to be given the right to exercise their religion within 'their own sect')

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 2/25/2016 8:27:52 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 2/25/2016 8:34:05 PM   
TallClevDom


Posts: 54
Joined: 1/1/2004
Status: offline

quote:

When a state makes a moral decision and enforces it, then you are subject to the state religion.


I would disagree with the use of the term "religion" in this case. Definitions I know of either require some form of a supernatural deity and/or claim a source of absolute knowledge (in other words, requires some form of "faith"). Government does neither of these, and could not be consider as a religion even if it invokes morality in its legislation. This is simply an ethic or moral code, but does not meet the definition of a religion.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 2/25/2016 9:28:29 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: TallClevDom


quote:

When a state makes a moral decision and enforces it, then you are subject to the state religion.


I would disagree with the use of the term "religion" in this case. Definitions I know of either require some form of a supernatural deity and/or claim a source of absolute knowledge (in other words, requires some form of "faith"). Government does neither of these, and could not be consider as a religion even if it invokes morality in its legislation. This is simply an ethic or moral code, but does not meet the definition of a religion.



First the distinctions between ethics and morals are very subtle and when using them in the same sentence as you did without distinguishing the sense you are using each invariably lands you squarely into using one or the other incrorrectly.


Now the problem you have with your perspective is:

the definition of 'religion' does not stop at deities and faith there are several more which is why I posted the several more to avoid any confusion.

quote:


religion

a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices

the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices

the practice of religious beliefs

something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience

strict faithfulness; devotion


The reason I posed the several more is because your version does not take into consideration non-theistic religions.

quote:

Nontheistic religions
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nontheistic religions are traditions of thought within religions—some otherwise aligned with theism, others not—in which nontheism informs religious beliefs or practices.[1] Nontheism has been applied to the fields of Christian apologetics and general liberal theology, and plays significant roles in Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism. While many approaches to religion exclude nontheism by definition, there are some inclusive definitions that show how religious practice and belief do not depend on the presence of god(s). For example, Paul James and Peter Mandaville distinguish between religion and spirituality, but provide a definition of the term that avoids the usual reduction to "religions of the book":



So you need to come up with a good explanation why these other religions without deities are not religions? Especially since they operate the same way and consider themselves such?



"supernatural deity"


government does deity, they themselves become the deity, and government also does supernatural, since metaphysics is the secular version of supernatural.

Therefore the government does in fact 'establish' a religion and itself as the deity of the religion of its creation that it enforces through laws that violate our personal religion(s). (when it fails to remain neutral to all parties)







< Message edited by Real0ne -- 2/25/2016 9:30:12 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to TallClevDom)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 2/26/2016 1:26:02 AM   
freedomdwarf1


Posts: 6845
Joined: 10/23/2012
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
Atheists have beliefs, albeit 'different beliefs' than those who connect with or identify their beliefs with diety (theistic) or those who identify their religious beliefs without a deity (nontheistic), they all fall under different flavors of 'religion'.

That is why Buddhism and other nontheistic systems of belief are considered a religion.

that said atheism in practice is simply another religion, hence the OP premise is nonsequitor.

This is something that I fundamentally disagree with.
Not having a deity of any sort (theist belief) makes it non-religious by definition.



quote:

Definition of religion
religion
rɪˈlɪdʒ(ə)n/
noun: religion

the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.
"ideas about the relationship between science and religion"
synonyms: faith, belief, divinity, worship, creed, teaching, doctrine, theology; More
sect, cult, religious group, faith community, church, denomination, body, following, persuasion, affiliation
"the right to freedom of religion"
a particular system of faith and worship.
plural noun: religions
"the world's great religions"
also
quote:

Classical sociologist Emile Durkheim ([1915] 1965:62) provided a definition of religion that is still widely used: religion is a “unified system of beliefs and practices related to sacred things, that is to say, things set apart and forbidden – beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community.”


There are many forms of "belief systems" that are non-religious and cannot be affirmed or considered to be "a religion".

For example, Paganism and Buddhism can be adequately argued that they are not a religion but a way of life.

And if you are anti-theist (Atheist), that also doesn't make it a religion in and of itself.
The same can also be said about various spiritualists too.


If you want to class them as alternative religions, that would be an individual personal position not shared by many anti-theists.


_____________________________

If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.
George Orwell, 1903-1950


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 2/26/2016 7:51:37 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
Atheists have beliefs, albeit 'different beliefs' than those who connect with or identify their beliefs with diety (theistic) or those who identify their religious beliefs without a deity (nontheistic), they all fall under different flavors of 'religion'.

That is why Buddhism and other nontheistic systems of belief are considered a religion.

that said atheism in practice is simply another religion, hence the OP premise is nonsequitor.

This is something that I fundamentally disagree with.
Not having a deity of any sort (theist belief) makes it non-religious by definition.



quote:

Definition of religion
religion
rɪˈlɪdʒ(ə)n/
noun: religion

the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods.
"ideas about the relationship between science and religion"
synonyms: faith, belief, divinity, worship, creed, teaching, doctrine, theology; More
sect, cult, religious group, faith community, church, denomination, body, following, persuasion, affiliation
"the right to freedom of religion"
a particular system of faith and worship.
plural noun: religions
"the world's great religions"
also
quote:

Classical sociologist Emile Durkheim ([1915] 1965:62) provided a definition of religion that is still widely used: religion is a “unified system of beliefs and practices related to sacred things, that is to say, things set apart and forbidden – beliefs and practices which unite into one single moral community.”


There are many forms of "belief systems" that are non-religious and cannot be affirmed or considered to be "a religion".

For example, Paganism and Buddhism can be adequately argued that they are not a religion but a way of life.

And if you are anti-theist (Atheist), that also doesn't make it a religion in and of itself.
The same can also be said about various spiritualists too.


If you want to class them as alternative religions, that would be an individual personal position not shared by many anti-theists.




well I dont see what you posted as holding water, and in reverse I see it as your personally opinion which appears to be opposition to our understanding and meaning of religion.



Saṃsāra (Buddhism)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Realms of existence
Buddhist cosmology typically identifies six realms of existence: gods, demi-gods, humans, animals, hungry ghosts and hells.
[a] These realms can be understood both as psychological states and as aspects of Buddhist cosmology.[c]

These six realms are typically divided into three higher realms and three lower realms: the three higher realms are the realms of the gods, demi-gods, and humans; the three lower realms are the realms of the animals, hungry ghosts and hell beings. These realms can be described briefly as follows:[d]

God realm: the gods lead long and enjoyable lives full of pleasure and abundance, but they spend their lives pursuing meaningless distractions and never think to practice the dharma. When death comes to them, they are completely unprepared; without realizing it, they have completely exhausted their good karma (which was the cause for being reborn in the god realm) and they suffer through being reborn in the lower realms.

Demi-god realm: the demi-gods have pleasure and abundance almost as much as the gods, but they spend their time fighting among themselves or making war on the gods. When they make war on the gods, they always lose, since the gods are much more powerful. The demi-gods suffer from constant fighting and jealousy, and from being killed and wounded in their wars with each other and with the gods.

Human realm: humans suffer from hunger, thirst, heat, cold, separation from friends, being attacked by enemies, not getting what they want, and getting what they don't want. They also suffer from the general sufferings of birth, old age, sickness and death. Yet the human realm is considered to be the most suitable realm for practicing the dharma, because humans are not completely distracted by pleasure (like the gods or demi-gods) or by pain and suffering (like the beings in the lower realms).

Animal realm: wild animals suffer from being attacked and eaten by other animals; they generally lead lives of constant fear. Domestic animals suffer from being exploited by humans; for example, they are slaughtered for food, overworked, abused, and so on.

Hungry ghost realm: hungry ghosts suffer from extreme hunger and thirst. They wander constantly in search of food and drink, only to be miserably frustrated any time they come close to actually getting what they want. For example, they see a stream of pure, clear water in the distance, but by the time they get there the stream has dried up. Hungry ghosts have huge bellies and long thin necks. On the rare occasions that they do manage to find something to eat or drink, the food or water burns their neck as it goes down to their belly, causing them intense agony.

Hell realm: hell beings endure unimaginable suffering for eons of time. There are actually eighteen different types of hells, each inflicting a different kind of torment. In the hot hells, beings suffer from unbearable heat and continual torments of various kinds. In the cold hells, beings suffer from unbearable cold and other torments.

Notes

Earlier Buddhist texts refer to five realms rather than six realms; when described as five realms, the god realm and demi-god realm constitute a single realm.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sa%E1%B9%83s%C4%81ra_%28Buddhism%29


So you will need to show us how something that looks like a duck and quacks like a duck is somehow not a duck.






_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to freedomdwarf1)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 3/21/2016 6:22:56 AM   
blnymph


Posts: 1600
Joined: 11/13/2010
Status: offline
not every atheist is a Buddhist


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 3/21/2016 6:49:54 AM   
crazyml


Posts: 5568
Joined: 7/3/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

First the distinctions between ethics and morals are very subtle and when using them in the same sentence as you did without distinguishing the sense you are using each invariably lands you squarely into using one or the other incrorrectly.


The distinction is demonstrably too subtle for you to get your head around it.

It is certainly utter nonsense to argue that the only source of either is "religion"

quote:



Now the problem you have with your perspective is:

the definition of 'religion' does not stop at deities and faith there are several more which is why I posted the several more to avoid any confusion.

quote:


religion

a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices

the body of persons adhering to a particular set of beliefs and practices

the practice of religious beliefs

something one believes in and follows devotedly; a point or matter of ethics or conscience

strict faithfulness; devotion


The reason I posed the several more is because your version does not take into consideration non-theistic religions.

quote:

Nontheistic religions
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nontheistic religions are traditions of thought within religions—some otherwise aligned with theism, others not—in which nontheism informs religious beliefs or practices.[1] Nontheism has been applied to the fields of Christian apologetics and general liberal theology, and plays significant roles in Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism. While many approaches to religion exclude nontheism by definition, there are some inclusive definitions that show how religious practice and belief do not depend on the presence of god(s). For example, Paul James and Peter Mandaville distinguish between religion and spirituality, but provide a definition of the term that avoids the usual reduction to "religions of the book":



So you need to come up with a good explanation why these other religions without deities are not religions? Especially since they operate the same way and consider themselves such?


The term religion can encompass a broad spectrum of belief systems, but "Atheism" is not a system of belief, it's a simple belief. Atheism is not a religion.



"supernatural deity"


government does deity, they themselves become the deity, and government also does supernatural, since metaphysics is the secular version of supernatural.


So, let's add "metaphysical" to the list of terms you don't understand.

quote:


Therefore the government does in fact 'establish' a religion and itself as the deity of the religion of its creation that it enforces through laws that violate our personal religion(s). (when it fails to remain neutral to all parties)



No, in passing laws that meet the moral or ethical demands of the time (neither of which is dependent on religion), the government steers clear of establishment.



_____________________________

Remember.... There's always somewhere on the planet where it's jackass o'clock.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 3/21/2016 11:27:45 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
I dealt with your quantum load of shit in the above post here

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to crazyml)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 3/21/2016 11:39:40 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
And you failed miserably as always, since it is not only factless, it is mentally defective.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 3/21/2016 11:52:10 AM   
blnymph


Posts: 1600
Joined: 11/13/2010
Status: offline
could it be possible that your equation/definition of atheism as anti-theism is not shared by everyone?

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 3/21/2016 12:12:43 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
Oh yes it certainly could and is, however, everyone is not entitled to their own facts, which require a series of logical and reasoned arguments to accept, not ow my balls butthurt opinion as I have demonstrated is the core of their rational with mountains of explanation in the other thread.

That said if they want to argue that the words used to define these constructs over the centuries are somehow incorrect, I have no problem with that, but its a nonstarter if they cant prove it with a logical reasoned 'argument'. So far all they have given us is their inapproprite [strawman] use of a 'single', as in one of many variants of the definition of religion in pretense its the only possible applicable definition. Fine, then they can prove it by giving us 'reasoned' arguments. I'm still waiting.

They can defeat it only if they can provide their alternative definition and set of proofs that more accurately suits the condition(s) and premises of the argument.

Emotional unqualified outbursts that I have seeen so far simply do not cut it.





< Message edited by Real0ne -- 3/21/2016 12:21:55 PM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to blnymph)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 3/21/2016 12:21:13 PM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

My understanding is that an agnostic while you didn't write that...is a belief in a creator and doesn't need to make [him] a god in the biblical sense.

Your understanding is wrong

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 3/21/2016 12:26:38 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
@ blnymph

"Your understanding is wrong"

See blnymph, in philosophy and the academic world the above quote is known as 'beer farts and belches', that is with few exceptions all I have seen.


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: reasons for being religious or atheist - 3/21/2016 12:27:26 PM   
blnymph


Posts: 1600
Joined: 11/13/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr

It's pretty interesting (to me) that some of the greatest thinkers the world has ever known (Socrates, Aristotle, et al.) agreed that creation logically implies a creator.
 
In other words, I think the case has been "proven" as much as it can be.




Except that it can't be "proven" that way at all, even with the Greek philosophers as witnesses.

It is a classical circle. If creation needs a creator, the creator first needs a creator to be created to create ... ad infititum.


(in reply to DaddySatyr)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: reasons for being religious or atheist Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109