quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


If the anti-Christ (Hillary) gets the nomination, I strongly support an "outside" run by Bernie. I think it's a capitol idea!

Feel the Bern!



Michael

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko

I'm a huge supporter of Bernie Sanders. I was lucky enough to be just a few feet away from him in a small venue during one of his speeches over the summer and so there was no way that I could miss him saying that no matter what, even if he doesn't wind up getting the nomination, that there is no way we can let a Republican in the White House; that we must support the democratic candidate.

I'm conflicted. I want to act on my disapproval for superdelegates just like everyone else does. But, I feel like that's a childish reaction. And no, I'm not so certain at all that he would win a write-in.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Crouchingtiger77

State by State requirements for Write Ins

I think that Sanders supporters are pissed off at the DNC for the Super Delegates and also
how Bernie was treated coming out of Iowa

Also I think this is one election cycle that a write in campaign could work.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

"The Reagan people didn't like H.W. Bush and his people at all. Bush ridiculed Reagan's economic policy as Voodoo Economics. "

Yeah, and we got Hillary bitching publicly about the big banks and she got the most money from them than anyone. Lying cheating bitch.

They'll say whatever needs to be said.

T^T

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Until people are ready to accept the fact that there a singularity to the establishment...there will be no progress at all.

The Reagan people didn't like H.W. Bush and his people at all. Bush ridiculed Reagan's economic policy as Voodoo Economics. Bush & Co. were the Ivy League know-it-all's. But when it came to getting money to defeat the incumbent, the 'establishment' told Reagan...take H.W. Bush as VP.

Reagan once elected, still didn't want to play ball. You know what happened and [he] got real lucky. Then the 'establishment's' poster boy Bush I followed up and became pres. and continued their policies, war, spending, tax cuts and deficits.

Now, soon as B. Clinton got the numbers as did Reagan in 1980 and with Perot, the 'establishment' got to [him] right away and he rolled over like the whore he was. Reformed welfare, don't badger the fed, ride the dot.com boom, passed NAFTA and signed the 'reform' of Glass-Steagall.

Obama was going to steamroll McCain, Hillary was already in the fold, Obama immediately played ball and now you have Trump and Sanders the outliers. Sanders has no chance and Trump becomes the real target. So watch very, very closely and you will notice how every establishment outlet, fixture and potential will go after Trump so even if nominated, his fate will be that of McCain.

Here's a good indicator, take a very close look at whoever Trump's choice for VP is. Let's see if he really or is not...'establishment.'

quote:

ORIGINAL: captive4ever

IMO he should have run as an independent in the first place. He never was and had never been a Democrat until he wanted the DNC's election machine to help him try (unsuccessfully) to beat Hillary. So much for his integrity. He changed parties just to run.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Crouchingtiger77

How can those of you who support Bernie even think of voting for a woman,
who if she were like most women of moral character would have divorced
her husband after she learned he had raped Juanita Broderick or
how he sexually abused Kathleen Willey. And, yes he had a history
of raping women long before Hillary married the sleaze bag.


Hillary does not care about the welfare of women when it concerns
being abused by men.

And, then she after she signed the no disclosure agreement, she
then proceeded to break the law, and has had super top secret
material in her e mails, so secret that even some in the House and
the Senate with high clearances are not permitted to read the
e mails in question.

I am serious about this write in and am encouraging students
at the University of Iowa to begin the campaign.