RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly!

RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

thompsonx -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 9:08:06 AM)
ORIGINAL: Phydeaux Yep, you and thompson with your insults, lacking any creditable cites. Quite often we just repost your own cite that shows that you have neither read nor understand what was on the cite. That the cite actually points out your lies. You have never been able to substantiate any of your disingenuous claims.[8\|] I'd be willing to bet that back when we were moderated you liberal posters had quite a few vacations.... You are absolutely right to point out that when sanity's bitch, mod 3, was in charge she protected all the punkassmotherfuckers who could not support thier peurile opinions by banning those who pointed out both your ignorance and stupidity. That simple minded piece of shit was found out and tossed and those of us on perma ban were invited back. It is pretty obvious why you would like to return to that but until you can acquire an accomplice that is a mod you will be forced to substantiate your ignorance in the face of literate opposition. If you cannot take the heat,sweet-cheeks, get the phoque out of the kitchen.

ImperialPath -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 11:40:13 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic FR....I read this morning that carson endorsed trump because he promised him a position later on.. any thoughts? Yes. Carson;s backing signals the start of the GOP lining up behind Trump. Carson would make a great vice president. Trump makes deals to get things done. a small bump. HINT HINT. So, what do the liberal guests here think about a Trump and Carson ticket? Unbeatable I think. They complement each other in both their opposite strengths and weaknesses.

mnottertail -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 11:44:30 AM)
LOL. Dumb and dumber. Two unelectables dont make an electable, especially with christie going off when he finds out he is donnies craven catamite.

BamaD -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 11:44:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic That you have the sheer gall to complain about PP supporters and then equate tanks to PP is puerile. This post proves one of two things. A. You didn't understand that I was not equating tanks to PP but explaining the financing shell game that is being played in both cases. or B. You understand that the shell game is being played and misrepresented my post to distract from my actual post.

ImperialPath -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 11:46:01 AM)
quote: You are absolutely right to point out that when sanity's bitch, mod 3, was in charge she protected all the punkassmotherfuckers who could not support thier peurile opinions by banning those who pointed out both your ignorance and stupidity. She was so sweet and accommodating. When I got lost she paused and showed me where the toilet was and showed me how to flush. I cannot think of a better moderator. If she bounced someone it must of been because they were evil, or maybe good or something. I did not have sex with that woman.

ImperialPath -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 11:48:56 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail LOL. Dumb and dumber. Two unelectables dont make an electable, especially with christie going off when he finds out he is donnies craven catamite. Two negatives make a positive. Always.

mnottertail -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 11:53:49 AM)
There is however no shell game. A shell game is when nutsuckers allow companies to book profits overseas to avoid our taxes, while bellying them up to the trough to receive our protections, laws and corporate welfare. All the while telling the citizenry they are lazy and that the minimum wage of 7.25 will give them a hell of a life if they only work harder. Thats a shell game.

ImperialPath -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 12:33:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic FR....I read this morning that carson endorsed trump because he promised him a position later on.. any thoughts? Yes. Carson;s backing signals the start of the GOP lining up behind Trump. Carson would make a great vice president. Trump makes deals to get things done. a small bump. HINT HINT. So, what do the liberal guests here think about a Trump and Carson ticket? Unbeatable I think. They complement each other in both their opposite strengths and weaknesses. So, you do realize Carson has signed up for this? That guy is a genius too. Kick ass ticket. Best ever. Perhaps I will even predict a general election landslide win for Trump and Carson. It is that good. Hello black American, who do you want to vote for, the wife of Mr "I did not have sex with that woman" or that white rich guy with gold all over his plane and the black doctor guy who is smarter than Bill Clinton and blacker and you know damn well that matters, black lives matter.

mnottertail -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 12:37:03 PM)
The fact you said hello black american I think, will suitcase the buffoonery of that hallucination pretty well.

ImperialPath -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 12:55:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rkfdbdsm quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick What the fuck does Planned Parenthood's finances have to do with the topic? Nothing! Actually, most of this thread is off topic. I was hoping to have a civil, if spirited, discussion of lawbreaking among the candidates, but instead, the same 5 or 6 members that have trolled all the other political threads have brought their never-ending flame war here. Good. My initial feeling is wrong about you. Sorry. So, after this discussion, what law do you think has been broken to get back to the thread topic?

mnottertail -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 1:15:13 PM)
regarding trumps speech? None.

thompsonx -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 1:47:07 PM)
ORIGINAL: ImperialPath You are absolutely right to point out that when sanity's bitch, mod 3, was in charge she protected all the punkassmotherfuckers who could not support thier peurile opinions by banning those who pointed out both your ignorance and stupidity. She was so sweet and accommodating. When I got lost she paused and showed me where the toilet was and showed me how to flush. Your candor is appreciated. Not often that a sock will admit that they are too stupid to flush the toilet.

thompsonx -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 1:51:58 PM)
ORIGINAL: ImperialPath Two negatives make a positive. Always. Two morrons make a simpleton. Always.

thompsonx -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 1:56:41 PM)
ORIGINAL: ImperialPath Perhaps I will even predict a general election landslide win for Trump and Carson. You did that for mittins too. It is that good. Hello black American, who do you want to vote for, the wife of Mr "I did not have sex with that woman" or that white rich guy with gold all over his plane Would that be the rich white guy with three bankruptsies and numerous failed businesses? and the black doctor guy who is smarter than Bill Clinton This would be your ignorant unsubstantiated peurile opinion. and blacker and you know damn well that matters, black lives matter. Glad to see you giving lip service to that. If you could dance you could take that act on the road .

Lucylastic -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 2:04:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic FR....I read this morning that carson endorsed trump because he promised him a position later on.. any thoughts? Yes. Carson;s backing signals the start of the GOP lining up behind Trump. Carson would make a great vice president. Trump makes deals to get things done. a small bump. HINT HINT. So, what do the liberal guests here think about a Trump and Carson ticket? Unbeatable I think. They complement each other in both their opposite strengths and weaknesses. I see that you didnt look into it after all. Carson said in a newsmax article that trump offered carson a job for his endorsement. http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/carson-trump-administration/2016/03/14/id/719044/#ooid=d2Y3cxMjE6sC1wiw8B8mk0lAiYk_cKJV Some people pointed out that endorsing trump for a job violated this federal law. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/599 18 U.S. Code § 599 - Promise of appointment by candidate Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.) US Code Whoever, being a candidate, directly or indirectly promises or pledges the appointment, or the use of his influence or support for the appointment of any person to any public or private position or employment, for the purpose of procuring support in his candidacy shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if the violation was willful, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Does anyone have information saying otherwise? I would be very happy to see an argument against it. Of course given trump AND carsons copious changes of mind, will this quietly fade away, and be glossed over, Is it factual, is it something they thought about?

mnottertail -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 2:16:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ImperialPath quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail LOL. Dumb and dumber. Two unelectables dont make an electable, especially with christie going off when he finds out he is donnies craven catamite. Two negatives make a positive. Always. We are not talking signs but dildos in neckties. It is maths and fucksticks. One of these things is not like the other.

Lucylastic -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 2:24:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: rkfdbdsm Nothing! Actually, most of this thread is off topic. I was hoping to have a civil, if spirited, discussion of lawbreaking among the candidates, but instead, the same 5 or 6 members that have trolled all the other political threads have brought their never-ending flame war here. As i am from the UK and live in Canada, it would be seen as inciting violence. Of course there are those people that think the chicago "rally that wasnt" was set up for violenct confrontations. He put out ten times more tickets than space in the arena, lots of protesters had tickets. The chicago police deny giving donald advice not to appear and to shut it down. The fact that people have picked up on his cries of fear mongering about violence if he doesnt get the nominee, is yes a threat not so carefully disguised as a threat. he is unstable and so are his base. Regarding other lawbreaking candidates... apart from clintons cloud of doom, just that they are all liars. unfortunately its not against political law...

ImperialPath -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 2:24:53 PM)
quote: I see that you didnt look into it after all. Carson said in a newsmax article that trump offered carson a job for his endorsement. http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/carson-trump-administration/2016/03/14/id/719044/#ooid=d2Y3cxMjE6sC1wiw8B8mk0lAiYk_cKJV I read the article and listened to the full recording. Carson does not say he was offered a job for his endorsement. The headline "Ben Carson: Trump Promised Me a Job" does not imply much less say that. If you read the article you find that Carson and Trump met and at the end of it Trump asked him to join his administration and Carson says he endorsed Trump only because none of the other candidates are capable of doing the job. Since the article actually does not support you post, is it possible you projected your own desires to do see another candidate facing charges besides the wife of Bill "I did not have sex with that woman" Clinton?

mnottertail -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 2:26:55 PM)
but the interview recording is more damning, I mean if you are going to figure out the emails and violations of the law, there is good evidence on carson and trump.

Lucylastic -> RE: Trump's speeches criminal? Very possibly! (3/18/2016 2:27:33 PM)
well thats your right wing scummy sites for you. Never give you the truth.:)

Page: << < prev 11 12 [13] 14 15 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.078125