Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Co... - 3/24/2016 6:58:27 PM   
MasterJaguar01


Posts: 2347
Joined: 12/2/2006
Status: offline
No misogyny here.

Just a question for all strict Constitutionalists out there.

Article II of the Constitution outlines the powers of the President. It ONLY uses male pronouns. ("He", "His")

Would a female President not be entitled to those powers sans a Constitutional Amendment? We can all rationalize on WHY the Constitution was written that way, but that doesn't answer the question.

Would someone challenge it, if a woman were elected President? Keep in mind the Constitution does not say the President must be male, but rather seems to assume that it is the case.


What do you think?
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/24/2016 7:37:38 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
I could see someone making that argument but I cant imagine where it could have been intended that the El Prezee Dante' was intended to be strictly male.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 12:18:43 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01
No misogyny here.
Just a question for all strict Constitutionalists out there.
Article II of the Constitution outlines the powers of the President. It ONLY uses male pronouns. ("He", "His")
Would a female President not be entitled to those powers sans a Constitutional Amendment? We can all rationalize on WHY the Constitution was written that way, but that doesn't answer the question.
Would someone challenge it, if a woman were elected President? Keep in mind the Constitution does not say the President must be male, but rather seems to assume that it is the case.
What do you think?


That is an interesting question. I'm not sure it's ever going to be determined for 100% certainty, either. I do believe original intentions and historical definitions and usage trump current definitions and usage.

Good read from the WaPo

Interesting article from LibertyLawsite.org

Both articles bring up that the Constitution uses the male-gender forms of pronouns, and that at that time in history the male-gender pronouns referred to a male, and it also was used to refer to both genders. It is still common to use the male pronouns when referring to a group of mixed gender people.

From the second link:
    quote:

    This might seem like an odd question, but a journalist recently asked me my opinion about the matter. It turns out that Article II of the Constitution refers to the President as a him. For example: “He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years.” If this “he” meant only a male person, there would be a strong argument that the President had to be a male.

    But I believe that this interpretation is mistaken. It is my understanding that the term “he” at the time of the Constitution had multiple meanings or usages. While one of those was to refer to a male person, another was to use the term “he” to mean “he or she.” Under that usage, a female President would be constitutional.

    The same issue arises as to members of Congress as well. For example, Article I, section 2, clause 2 provides “No person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty-five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.” (Emphasis added.)


The article also points out the irony in the modern feminist movement:
    quote:

    While the original meaning appears to indicate that females can serve as members of Congress or as President, I am not sure that all versions of nonoriginalism support this result. Consider the view that we should interpret the Constitution based on the modern meaning of its terms. In an effort to induce writers not to use “he” to mean “he or she”, feminists and others have suggested that “he” always means a male person and does not have the “he or she” meaning. Suppose they have succeeded in changing the meaning of the word he. Then, under the modern meaning interpretive view, they might have had the unintended effect of prohibiting women from serving as President or in Congress. Another example that illustrates the weakness of the view that interprets the Constitution based on the modern meaning of the words.
    (emphasis added)


The WaPo link is to a blog by Robert Natelson. Here is a link to Professor Robert Natelson's qualifications.

The LibertyLaw article was written by Michael Rappaport. Here are his qualifications.

Considering that both of them are supportive of originalism, and both of them finish their writings supporting the Constitution NOT barring a female from being POTUS, I think it's pretty solid to think a woman can be President.

Excellent topic! I can say that by 3:18am (Eastern Time Zone), I had already learned something today.

_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 12:53:34 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline
Regardless of what the framers intended - we are a long way from that ever actually mattering, now aren't we.
The Supreme court would hold that the equal protection clauses would take precedence.

(in reply to DesideriScuri)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 5:41:26 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
ditto! who needs amendments when we have the creemeeo supreeemeeo's? LOL

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 5:44:16 AM   
satanscharmer


Posts: 376
Status: offline
Good question. Maybe about a decade ago, I would have thought this question to be ridiculous.

I agree with what DS shared and would contend that the use of 'he' in the constitution was meant as 'he or she', which is often the case in writing when the gender is unknown. Such as the case in other languages (I'm would almost assume all others, but I really do not know), so it's not an odd or special-to-English rule. It wasn't until rather recently (maybe 30 or so years ago) that the use of 'he' when it may include a female may be considered controversial.

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 6:26:18 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
Geraldine ferraro was the vp candidate in 84. To be next in line for the presidency would seem to indicate that her elgibility for the presidency is settled precident thirty years ago.

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 8:08:20 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
The same issue arises as to members of Congress as well. For example, Article I, section 2, clause 2 provides “No person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty-five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.” (Emphasis added.)

Always perplexed me that still does to this day.

In Scotland (UK) Elected MP house or parliament malareky at 20 and a she, a feeble women, at that. Minimum age limit is currently 18. Seems to make perfect sense that.
Now, for the Scottish Election you can vote at 16.... I wonder let me look it up..cannot find it but I seem to think its still 18 which seems abit daft.

I am no expert in you constitution, but wasn't it wrote by men, and probably a few Scottish men at that.

Keep in mind the Constitution does not say the President must be male I presume that does not preclude apes either so who cares,.

And no no-one will challenge it - save perhaps buffoonery(trump) I suppose. Mind you was there not a furore regarding your Obama birth certificate and those who alluded to him sailing down the Kerio in a banana boat.... Mind you even I found the unearthing of his birth certificate somewhat suspect. And I never thought i see the day with a man, or women condoleezza rice is gorgeous way more so than hilary, with darker skin than mine, rule over your lands, which you nicked from backward savage natives who dwelt in wig wam bams

Perhaps what rags are left of your constitution should be amended.

1918
Political movement towards women's suffrage began during the war and in 1918, the Parliament of the United Kingdom passed an act granting the vote to: women over the age of 30 who were householders, the wives of householders, occupiers of property with an annual rent of £5, and graduates of British universities. Well we gave some of them the vote in 1918 i guess we got there eventually

Uk constitution rules, no idea (do any of you know?) regarding feeble women, and let us never forget Margaret Thatcher who was as mad as bag of owls

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 8:42:58 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
snorts WD...that actually made me laugh:)mad as a bag of owls, yeah she was that!!!

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 9:20:49 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

No misogyny here.

Just a question for all strict Constitutionalists out there.

Article II of the Constitution outlines the powers of the President. It ONLY uses male pronouns. ("He", "His")

Would a female President not be entitled to those powers sans a Constitutional Amendment? We can all rationalize on WHY the Constitution was written that way, but that doesn't answer the question.

Would someone challenge it, if a woman were elected President? Keep in mind the Constitution does not say the President must be male, but rather seems to assume that it is the case.


What do you think?

When the gender was unspecified male pronouns were used to mean "a person".

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 9:44:08 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Since women were not allowed to vote, its a horse apiece. the first federal congresswoman was elected 4 years previious to their getting the vote.



_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 10:04:07 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline
Lucylastic she died all alone did you know that and after that idiots were decrying a state funeral. She was not nice person, fixed in here ways, who dismantled the primary industry of our lands..i have so many other words that do not belong here....why do you remember her (never forget i am actually 46) canadian?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 10:08:10 AM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

In Scotland (UK)


Is there another Scotland?

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 10:10:59 AM   
Lucylastic


Posts: 40310
Status: offline
Im born and bred in the uk.
Nw london.
Came to canada in 88. Been here since. Im 54, i remember her reign only too well.

_____________________________

(•_•)
<) )╯SUCH
/ \

\(•_•)
( (> A NASTY
/ \

(•_•)
<) )> WOMAN
/ \

Duchess Of Dissent
Dont Hate Love

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 10:26:02 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
Im 54

I have shoes older than that.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 10:54:22 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
One could make a contest of it in the courts; but I think the courts would rule that 'He' and 'His' is simply 'old school talk' for 'Us' and 'Them'. There are sections of the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights that would need modifying if we brought it up to a modern day understanding of language. For instance, the 7th amendment allows for a trial by jury for a case in which damages could exceed $20. Back in the late 18th century, $20 was the equivalent of ~$20,000. Do we really need a 3rd amendment given all the empty buildings we have in the nation right now?

I might be amused if the Republicans tried this tactic if Hillary was elected in the general elections. Their 'last ditch effort' to 'protect the nation' from Hillary Clinton. Being soundly and totally defeated in the courts. Not to mention being made the center of jokes for a few months.


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 11:00:41 AM   
Phydeaux


Posts: 4828
Joined: 1/4/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire


Uk constitution rules, no idea (do any of you know?) regarding feeble women, and let us never forget Margaret Thatcher who was as mad as bag of owls




A bag of owls doesn't sound mad at all. To the contrary it seems quite a hoot.

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 11:27:57 AM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

No misogyny here.

Just a question for all strict Constitutionalists out there.

Article II of the Constitution outlines the powers of the President. It ONLY uses male pronouns. ("He", "His")

Would a female President not be entitled to those powers sans a Constitutional Amendment? We can all rationalize on WHY the Constitution was written that way, but that doesn't answer the question.

Would someone challenge it, if a woman were elected President? Keep in mind the Constitution does not say the President must be male, but rather seems to assume that it is the case.


What do you think?
Some may argue it depends on whether you're Supreme Court Judge who interprets the Constitution literally or as a living document.

Scalia was an originalist but I think even he would struggle to interpret the Constitution as disbarring a candidate for President on the basis of gender.

You also have to remember that the Constitution was written at a time when all political power was invested in male landowners. Ordinary men and women who did not possess property (and former slaves) did not possess the right to vote. Conditions have changed.

Article Two of the constitution defines the qualifications of for Office:

"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

Since women are not disqualified by this section, it would be an uphill battle to try and convince the Supreme Court otherwise.

It would also be political suicide - so the entire question is moot.


_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to MasterJaguar01)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 1:06:25 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterJaguar01

No misogyny here.

Just a question for all strict Constitutionalists out there.

Article II of the Constitution outlines the powers of the President. It ONLY uses male pronouns. ("He", "His")

Would a female President not be entitled to those powers sans a Constitutional Amendment? We can all rationalize on WHY the Constitution was written that way, but that doesn't answer the question.

Would someone challenge it, if a woman were elected President? Keep in mind the Constitution does not say the President must be male, but rather seems to assume that it is the case.


What do you think?
Some may argue it depends on whether you're Supreme Court Judge who interprets the Constitution literally or as a living document.

Scalia was an originalist but I think even he would struggle to interpret the Constitution as disbarring a candidate for President on the basis of gender.

You also have to remember that the Constitution was written at a time when all political power was invested in male landowners. Ordinary men and women who did not possess property (and former slaves) did not possess the right to vote. Conditions have changed.

Article Two of the constitution defines the qualifications of for Office:

"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

Since women are not disqualified by this section, it would be an uphill battle to try and convince the Supreme Court otherwise.

It would also be political suicide - so the entire question is moot.


This is much simpler than most people try to make it.
If it went to SCOTUS it would be laughed out.
And no the Republicans would not try this, however many Dems are serious in the equally stupid attempt to disqualify Cruz, and they could be dumb enough to try this ploy if he wins.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: Can a woman be President of the United States sans ... - 3/25/2016 1:41:05 PM   
DaddySatyr


Posts: 9381
Joined: 8/29/2011
From: Pittston, Pennsyltucky
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Phydeaux

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

Uk constitution rules, no idea (do any of you know?) regarding feeble women, and let us never forget Margaret Thatcher who was as mad as bag of owls



A bag of owls doesn't sound mad at all. To the contrary it seems quite a hoot.



Well played, sir. Well played, indeed!



Michael


_____________________________

A Stone in My Shoe

Screen captures (and pissing on shadows) still RULE! Ya feel me?

"For that which I love, I will do horrible things"

(in reply to Phydeaux)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> Can a woman be President of the United States sans a Constitutional Amendment? Page: [1] 2 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094