MrRodgers
Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Phydeaux quote:
ORIGINAL: Awareness quote:
ORIGINAL: Admin We made a mistake in removing this thread “Milo Yiannopolous "A Dangerous Faggot". This action was taken due to our incorrect assumption that this posting contained derogatory content directed towards the gay community. So you pulled it because you thought it was derogatory toward the gay community. But being derogatory to men (any of realone's threads) or conservatives is ok, eh? Sounds like a double standard. quote:
We do our best to provide an open platform for dialogue and debate on a wide spectrum of issues while at the same time trying to minimize gratuitous attacks on particular individuals or groups. You're joking right? quote:
In this case we got it wrong and, to be clear, the decision to remove this content was made by the site itself and not by our moderators. If in the future, we make similar mistakes kindly point them out to us as was done here. This thread has been restored and moving forwards, we'll try to pause a bit longer before removing content in situations of this character and will try harder to make sure that we make the right call. Please feel free to voice criticisms you might have of our website at any time. That being said we ask users of our forums to kindly refrain from ad hominem comments directed towards moderators or other users. In the past, present and future quote:
the moderation has been outrageously biased ... This one is pretty easy: Being derogatory or insulting toward sexual disposition is a form of discrimination based on a human psychological/sexual orientation...similar to race. It is bigotry and reflects badly on the commentator. However, slamming conservatives and liberals so-called, is a comment or judgment and insults based on what is most predominantly ones political beliefs which is fair game. Ad hominem also, is a general term short for argumentum ad hominem, which offers a logical fallacy in which an argument is rebutted by attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the correspondent. I am thinking this is used way too often as far too many want to go right after those aspects felt...about a source. These kinds of attacks are meaningless. I never insult (I'll use words/descriptors of a poster used in a comment toward me...against them) or do I go after a messenger. If anything, when I debate and research, I learn.
_____________________________
You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite. J K Galbraith
|