BamaD -> RE: Allow Guns at GOP Convention? (3/28/2016 7:36:23 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: dcnovice The Secret Service is squelching everybody's fun. A petition on the website change.org called on the arena hosting the convention, the state of Ohio and the Republican National Committee to allow attendees to the July convention to carry weapons inside, citing the Republican Party’s strong support for gun rights. * * * The petition, which has drawn more than 45,000 signatures, calls the convention gun ban “a direct affront to the Second Amendment” that “puts all attendees at risk.” But alas . . . Guns will not be permitted at the Republican National Convention this summer in Cleveland, the U.S. Secret Service said Monday in response to a petition circulated by gun rights activists. Under federal law, the Secret Service may ban firearms from sites visited by people under its protection including in so-called “open-carry states” such as Ohio, Secret Service spokesman Robert Hoback said. Leading Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump is under the agency’s protection. http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/03/28/secret-service-no-guns-at-july-gop-convention/?mod=e2fb What do you think? Should the Secret Service and the arena allow guns at the convention? Would the delegates be safer if they could exercise their Second Amendment rights? No they should not. The Secret service is doing their job. It is a bad idea for a couple of reasons. One a anti Republican nutcase would have an easier time getting in to attack someone. Two even if he was wearing vote for Hillary and death to the NRA buttons the press and every lib on here would proclaim him to be a Republican NRA member. Three NBC, ABC, CBS, and CNN would focus on the guns and not the convention. In the probable event that there were no incidences all we would hear would be how they doged a bullet.
|
|
|
|