RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


PeonForHer -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/1/2016 3:16:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

quote:

If I know that my crime will get me the chair, what have I got to lose? It would suddenly make sense to kill anyone and everyone who might help to get me put in jail and awaiting the inevitable sentence. Nobody would want a violent killer to get it into his head that he has nothing to lose by killing as many people - cops included - as he wants, surely?

I really don't understand this as a reason against death penalty. The same scenerio will happen whether it's imprisonment for life or death penalty. I think life sentence also means the guy's life is over. Life is about freedom, not staying in a cell forever. For that same reason, the guy also have nothing to lose and will destroy everything on his path since his gonna be lock up forever and be unable to do anything anymore. And all this does is, we feed and clothe and house someone undeserving for free, when this money could be use for some struggling poverty line person to feed, cloth and house them.


Apparently capital punishment works out more expensive than imprisonment:

http://www.economist.com/node/13279051




thompsonx -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/1/2016 6:07:16 AM)


ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


Apparently capital punishment works out more expensive than imprisonment:

http://www.economist.com/node/13279051

Since when have facts had any appeal to the bloodthirsty?




vincentML -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/1/2016 9:37:01 AM)

Peon:

quote:

At risk of the usual crowd turning up to whinny about lefties and 'political correctness gone mad' - I'm not even sure that 'evil' is a useful concept, ultimately. I'm only sure that there are some people around who are so dangerous to the rest of us that they need to be taken outside of society in some way.
We agree on both points. Evil is so ill-defined and layered with religious fervor and condemnation it is useless in my mind. Society needs to be protected from the bizzerkos no matter the cause of their actions. However, the DP is an extreme sanction unworthy of a civilized people, and so obviously filled with systemic errors and prejudices.

quote:

Eichmann's case takes the whole subject to a different level. Hannah Arendt read him as a 'bureaucrat' who was 'just doing his job' and 'only following orders'. The truly radical point Arendt made, for me, was that here was someone who was a monster not because of his hateful rage but just because he wanted to be 'efficient'. His feelings and emotions weren't the problem, per the usual image of evil monsters - but almost exactly the opposite: he *had* no feelings and emotions. Other than the desire to be 'efficient', that is.
Arandt was at the trial and did not remain for all of it, I understand, and apparently she had not read his messages from the Nuremberg Jail. He suited her philosophy or she derived her philosophy from his apparent character.. She portrayed him as an egocentric, ambitious man who was unconcerned with the people he affected as long as his efficiency was seen as merit. So, she may have portrayed him inaccurately. But he is of a bureaucratic type quite common, I should think, in middle management all about today. I wonder what his feelings were, if any, toward Jews before he was caught up in the Reich. I guess we can wonder on that about the entire German populace.




thompsonx -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/1/2016 9:44:49 AM)


ORIGINAL: vincentML

But he is of a bureaucratic type quite common, I should think, in middle management all about today. I wonder what his feelings were, if any, toward Jews before he was caught up in the Reich. I guess we can wonder on that about the entire German populace.


One might say something similar about the enthusiam trumph has attracted.
My point is that if you do not have a predisposition to hate the targeted group then you will not join in making that hatred more effecient.




kdsub -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/1/2016 9:45:30 AM)

quote:

unworthy of a civilized people


Evil is defined quite nicely by the very society and civilization you desire. It is outside of religion and centered with majority thought… So once the majority decides capital punishment is not civilized it will end… Until the next society decides it is needed. Civilized has nothing to do with it.

Butch




vincentML -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/1/2016 9:47:12 AM)

quote:

Vince... you do know that some convicted murderers manage to kill again don't you? Will if they are dead that won't happen. Myself the Death penalty is simply a punishment not a deterrent. But it will certainly deter the murderer from killing again.
Butch . . . only in prison or if they are set free back into society. Ted Kaczynski hasn't been to the post office lately, right?

quote:

There is no doubt this man is mentally ill... but sane or crazy he was still a murderer... he was not killing out of personal fear. Just as the mentally challenged should not be forgiven murder, they are just dumb murderers, neither should he even though he is certainly nuts.
Not saying they should be forgiven; saying they should be removed to a place where they can do no harm to others. Removal; not retribution. What does retribution satisfy before a loving god?




vincentML -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/1/2016 9:57:10 AM)

Term . . .

quote:

This might be a case of reverse post hoc ergo propter hoc. Did it occur to you that states that have the death penalty need it ? There is a big difference in people in this country. Got someone from Texas, San Fransisco and Chicago they are likely to be very different. The environments are very different, and so are their attitudes.
I cannot agree. You might find cultural differences between 'classes' but not by geography, not with all the inner migration and the ubiquitous, homogenized popular arts; theatre, television, internet, etc.




vincentML -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/1/2016 9:58:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

unworthy of a civilized people


Evil is defined quite nicely by the very society and civilization you desire. It is outside of religion and centered with majority thought… So once the majority decides capital punishment is not civilized it will end… Until the next society decides it is needed. Civilized has nothing to do with it.

Butch

Sorry, I guess I missed that election.




kdsub -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/1/2016 9:59:13 AM)

I think we can leave God out of the DP argument... it is supported and decried by both the religious and atheists.... And...within these groups.

Butch




kdsub -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/1/2016 10:04:15 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

unworthy of a civilized people


Evil is defined quite nicely by the very society and civilization you desire. It is outside of religion and centered with majority thought… So once the majority decides capital punishment is not civilized it will end… Until the next society decides it is needed. Civilized has nothing to do with it.

Butch

Sorry, I guess I missed that election.


Not to worry I voted for you... But really... in this age of computers wouldn't it be nice if we had issues like these to vote on... even if periodically. But i wonder... would the minority be satisfied and honor the results?

Butch




PeonForHer -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/1/2016 10:08:59 AM)

quote:

One might say something similar about the enthusiam trumph has attracted.
My point is that if you do not have a predisposition to hate the targeted group then you will not join in making that hatred more effecient.


I'd say that it doesn't require *much* hate, though. Per what I said about flies and Eichmann: I don't hate flies much. I just want them cleaned out of my house.




BamaD -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/1/2016 10:16:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Vince... you do know that some convicted murderers manage to kill again don't you? Will if they are dead that won't happen. Myself the Death penalty is simply a punishment not a deterrent. But it will certainly deter the murderer from killing again.
Butch . . . only in prison or if they are set free back into society. Ted Kaczynski hasn't been to the post office lately, right?

quote:

There is no doubt this man is mentally ill... but sane or crazy he was still a murderer... he was not killing out of personal fear. Just as the mentally challenged should not be forgiven murder, they are just dumb murderers, neither should he even though he is certainly nuts.
Not saying they should be forgiven; saying they should be removed to a place where they can do no harm to others. Removal; not retribution. What does retribution satisfy before a loving god?

He may have been, but Iunderstand that prison post offices are very careful.




vincentML -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/1/2016 10:32:13 AM)

Good afternoon here in the East, LadyPact :)

quote:

That's kind of an issue, isn't it? When looking at a facts of a case, one must concentrate on that particular case. Not person B got a harsh sentence or person C *must* have done it but got off scott free.
Sure. When looking at the facts of a case. But one is not prohibited in generalizing from there to invoke concerns about a larger issue, I would hope. As to the specific case, we are limited. We don't really know all the facts. We have only a glimpse through news articles.

quote:

I'll offer my apologies if I missed where this particular defendant was impoverished. I only read the two links posted and nothing on this particular person's financial status.
Again, LP, I was generalizing on the umbrella issue.

quote:

My point with my prior comment is that some defense attorneys are looking for that opportunity to make a name for themselves, just as much as prosecutors. Various types of cases can be that 'big break' to argue something in front of the Supreme Court. It might not be the road to Congress that a DA might see, but it is the way to notoriety, the big office, and the lucrative billing hours.
You make a good point. I don't doubt that legal misconduct occurs on both sides. The salient question is to whom the attorney owes her primary duty. Defense counsel has a duty to advocate for her client and a duty to avoid violating the rules of the bar. The prosecutor has a duty, in my opinion, to present the facts of the case as she sees them and as she can support with evidence. Prosecutorial misconduct can result in grave harm to the innocent, and has in many cases. The burden of fairness is on the prosecutor and on the state with all of its resources.

quote:

Nice try. Has nothing to do with a father shooting his own children.
I think there is a case to be made. We are a mighty nation who has a long history of foreign belligerence and intrusion. We are a nation that recently legalized torture of captives. The cowboy arrogance and violence of the nation sets the tone for individuals with deadly weapons readily available to perform harmful acts.




vincentML -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/1/2016 10:33:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Vince... you do know that some convicted murderers manage to kill again don't you? Will if they are dead that won't happen. Myself the Death penalty is simply a punishment not a deterrent. But it will certainly deter the murderer from killing again.
Butch . . . only in prison or if they are set free back into society. Ted Kaczynski hasn't been to the post office lately, right?

quote:

There is no doubt this man is mentally ill... but sane or crazy he was still a murderer... he was not killing out of personal fear. Just as the mentally challenged should not be forgiven murder, they are just dumb murderers, neither should he even though he is certainly nuts.
Not saying they should be forgiven; saying they should be removed to a place where they can do no harm to others. Removal; not retribution. What does retribution satisfy before a loving god?

He may have been, but Iunderstand that prison post offices are very careful.

Exactly!




PeonForHer -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/1/2016 1:41:11 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

unworthy of a civilized people


Evil is defined quite nicely by the very society and civilization you desire. It is outside of religion and centered with majority thought… So once the majority decides capital punishment is not civilized it will end… Until the next society decides it is needed. Civilized has nothing to do with it.

Butch


That's probably correct - and why most here in the UK don't want capital punishment. In respect of capital punishment, what's considered 'civilised' this side of the pond is different to that side of the pond.

Me, when I watch US courtroom dramas, especially, I find myself feeling somewhat repulsed by the fact of all the people in sharp but tastefully subdued suits, being so intelligent, thoughtful and rational - against the backdrop of the State killing someone. It seems somehow so revolting. I remember I first felt like that as a small kid when I watched a boxing match on the TV and saw everybody in the front row seats wearing their finest evening wear: "There's a *mismatch* here" (though I didn't have the words for that at the time).

I suppose that for me, as the average Brit, you just *cannot* have all the highest achievements that humans have reached - organised societies, care for fellow humans, reason, morality - all that stuff - and a state that kills its own people. At some very, very basic level, that feels so perverse to me. Like: what is the point of humans striving to better ourselves and our world, if we still find things like that to be acceptable? Hey well, YMMV. I find the average American outlook ever so slightly frightening, on occasion, that's all.




vincentML -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/2/2016 7:31:47 AM)

quote:

I find the average American outlook ever so slightly frightening, on occasion, that's all.


It is possible that the "average American" considers the issue only in passing as it is not a salient factor in our lives. I pretty much agree with your well-stated position on the ugliness of a civilized nation killing its own people. However, as I said above my nation's international behavior sets that tone. Maybe that is a simplistic statement. At the very least I see parallels between our history of frontier justice and our international intrusions.

Actually, 19 states do not permit capital punishment while 31 still do. Here is a map for your interest:

http://deathpenalty.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=001172




LadyPact -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/3/2016 9:18:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
Good afternoon here in the East, LadyPact :)

Good Morning, Vincent.

I have to say I blew this one on a couple of things. First was that I typed up a reply to be more prompt. Somehow, I got it to go *poof* into the internet nether. My apologies.

Second, I missed something the first time I read the articles. Hopefully, bringing it in will add something to this case. We'll see.

quote:

Sure. When looking at the facts of a case. But one is not prohibited in generalizing from there to invoke concerns about a larger issue, I would hope. As to the specific case, we are limited. We don't really know all the facts. We have only a glimpse through news articles.

Granted, we only know a bit. Those associated with the case will know more. However, I don't think we can say that our foreign policies should prevent our criminal justice system to prosecute someone to the fullest extent of the law. If we did that, we'd never incarcerate anybody.

quote:

Again, LP, I was generalizing on the umbrella issue.

This probably isn't the case where that works. In this case, the evidence was so overwhelming that it took a jury twenty minutes on capital murder charges. There isn't really any doubt he did it.

quote:

You make a good point. I don't doubt that legal misconduct occurs on both sides. The salient question is to whom the attorney owes her primary duty. Defense counsel has a duty to advocate for her client and a duty to avoid violating the rules of the bar. The prosecutor has a duty, in my opinion, to present the facts of the case as she sees them and as she can support with evidence. Prosecutorial misconduct can result in grave harm to the innocent, and has in many cases. The burden of fairness is on the prosecutor and on the state with all of its resources.

Here's where we part ways. I'm not pinning legal misconduct on anyone. Cases like this can further the career of attorneys on either side. Prosecutors have their sights set on things like political careers. Defense attorneys are looking for the bigger firms and the higher billing hours. I don't think we can look at professional aspirations as necessarily bad or only able to be achieved by misconduct.

I'd have to think anybody going into criminal law should probably come to terms with something right from the start. There will be cases where innocent people are convicted and there will be cases where guilty people will go free. The best the defense was going to hope for here was to hopefully avoid the death penalty. That was it.

There really isn't a burden of fairness on the prosecution. Just burden of proof. It's not the prosecution's job to make sure the defense is doing theirs. The prosecution's job is to the state and to the victims of the crimes.

quote:

I think there is a case to be made. We are a mighty nation who has a long history of foreign belligerence and intrusion. We are a nation that recently legalized torture of captives. The cowboy arrogance and violence of the nation sets the tone for individuals with deadly weapons readily available to perform harmful acts.

Foreign policy doesn't excuse or endorse people murdering their own children. If we're torturing captives, does that mean our citizens should torture their families?

Here's what I missed in the first reading of the articles. The state of Texas failed in this but it didn't fail the defendant. It failed the two little girls and the ex.

The defendant had a DV conviction. When he assaulted his ex in front of those children, the charge should have automatically been domestic violence. A relationship or cohabitation does not have to be current for a case to be DV, if the parties have children together. He was on probation from this conviction, so he shouldn't have been legal to be in possession of a firearm anyway. That's not even counting the violations of the PPO held by his ex.

We've got a pretty big hole when it comes to taking the firearms out of the hands of people like this. Anybody with a history of DV, stalking, threatening, violation of a PPO or RO, in my opinion, forfeits their right to bear arms. If we did better at that, maybe the number of these kinds of cases wouldn't happen.





thompsonx -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/3/2016 2:24:09 PM)


ORIGINAL: Greta75


Obviously to get death penalty, there has to be evidence you murdered.

The record shows clearly that there have been numerous mistakes and innocent people have been wrongly convicted

And someone insane who commit murder is not innocent.

There is a difference between innocent and not responsible for ones actions.

Personally, to me there is no difference between someone who systematically cold bloodedly plot and executed a string of mass murders, and does it for pleasure, as someone who has schizophrenia or whatever.

This would be a verbilazion of your utter ignorance



Look, OJ got free.

In amerika we have a jury system and he was acquited of the charges against him. Should he have been executed becaus you think he was guilty and the jury who saw and heard all of the evidence disagree with you?[8|]





Termyn8or -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/3/2016 3:59:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Term . . .

quote:

This might be a case of reverse post hoc ergo propter hoc. Did it occur to you that states that have the death penalty need it ? There is a big difference in people in this country. Got someone from Texas, San Fransisco and Chicago they are likely to be very different. The environments are very different, and so are their attitudes.
I cannot agree. You might find cultural differences between 'classes' but not by geography, not with all the inner migration and the ubiquitous, homogenized popular arts; theatre, television, internet, etc.


I agree to disagree. I have run around a bit, pretty much an Ohioan, Clevelander actually. Been to New Mexico and of course what is in between, and Florida and of course all that stands between, in fact took two different routes down there, on I-75 and I-95.

Since you made that statement, I assume you have been around. Perhaps you simply aren't picking up what I am. I find attitudes different, but then discovering that would depend on how a conversation goes. In general I can say this, you get outside of greater Cleveland it seems people are more friendly. Actually been up east as well and they seem more friendly, but different. Actually that New England accent is easier to understand sometimes than the hillbillies.

But then these were mostly middle class people, back when we had a middle class. I was not out trying to score some crack. If I did I guess people in that socio-economic strata (if you can call it a strata lol) would have been largely the same.

And the rich are pretty much region free. They are their own type and really do not hold any loyalty to a city, state or even country. There is a reason they used to call them the jet set.

The middle class is who I meant. the people you meet in local bars. Not the bars with the live bands, can't really talk in those. In fact if I owned a bar there would be no jukebox in it. Not in the regular sense anyway. I would want it conducive to conversation. Hey, I can buy some beer and just go home and save a shitload of money.

And this is the crux of many of the problems in the US, other than the rigged elections. People don''t talk, houses no longer have front porches. It was really corny but people really did make an excuse to meet their new neighbors by pretending to need to borrow a cup of sugar. Well some did. they wanted to know the neighbors. Now you move in and maybe a year later you know a couple of their names.

So now all your information about current events comes from the media. Although there are exceptions. Like here, I know people who have made the news and it was all corrupted. And then recently a guy who owned a gas station got killed in an armed robbery, why ? I'll tell you why, because he did not shoot to kill. A trained CCW holder but unfortunately a "good person" who didn't want to kill. A good enough shot to shoot the thug in the arm and the leg, the thug turned around and did shoot to kill and killed the guy.

I won't make that mistake.

I do have a problem with the government administering the death penalty because the screw so much up. They are known to have executed the innocent. Bad enough they do it in other countries, but you would think they would be more careful here. They executed a 13 year old kid, who most likely was innocent. He was Black. And you wonder why they're pissed off ? Hell yeah, I would be pissed off.

So, while I advocate the death penalty, I also advocate a much higher standard of guilt. The physical evidence must be irrefutable and hopefully there were a ton of witnesses. I mean a ton, like 5, 200 pound people. Oh wait, that's only half a ton. OK then, a half a ton of witnesses would do alright I think, and EACH ONE OF THEM has to take the stand. In fact they should take it not in the presence of the others so we can make sure their stories match. And I also advocate the death penalty for forcible rape. Even feminists don't, but I see the world a different way.

In other words, not all people are people. You cross a certain line, do certain things and you prove you are an animal. A dangerous animal.

What do we do with dangerous animals ? What did we do when a pack of wolves were eating our sheep ? What do they do when mountain lions are eating their cows ? What do they do when a fox eats the hens ?

I am fully aware that this is a harsh and quite unpopular way to look at it, but I firmly believe it is necessary to get this world to be a better place to live. I believe we have no other choice.

Instead of don't do the crime if you can't do the time it is don't do the crime unless you want to die. We ain't feeding you for free no mo. (or giving you a sex change operation for free either after you commit murder) Fuck all that.

T^T




Termyn8or -> RE: Appeals Court Stays Execution of Father Who Murdered His Own Daughters (4/3/2016 4:10:06 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

unworthy of a civilized people


Evil is defined quite nicely by the very society and civilization you desire. It is outside of religion and centered with majority thought… So once the majority decides capital punishment is not civilized it will end… Until the next society decides it is needed. Civilized has nothing to do with it.

Butch


That's probably correct - and why most here in the UK don't want capital punishment. In respect of capital punishment, what's considered 'civilised' this side of the pond is different to that side of the pond.

Me, when I watch US courtroom dramas, especially, I find myself feeling somewhat repulsed by the fact of all the people in sharp but tastefully subdued suits, being so intelligent, thoughtful and rational - against the backdrop of the State killing someone. It seems somehow so revolting. I remember I first felt like that as a small kid when I watched a boxing match on the TV and saw everybody in the front row seats wearing their finest evening wear: "There's a *mismatch* here" (though I didn't have the words for that at the time).

I suppose that for me, as the average Brit, you just *cannot* have all the highest achievements that humans have reached - organised societies, care for fellow humans, reason, morality - all that stuff - and a state that kills its own people. At some very, very basic level, that feels so perverse to me. Like: what is the point of humans striving to better ourselves and our world, if we still find things like that to be acceptable? Hey well, YMMV. I find the average American outlook ever so slightly frightening, on occasion, that's all.



What's that law that says Andrew Breivik can only be locked up for something like 17 years for killing how many people ? He should have been nutted and gutted on TV.

T^T




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625