PeonForHer
Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008 Status: offline
|
What I've tended to notice more and more is the bias in the setting of a focus in this or that part of the media. For instance, in the UK and for many, many years we've seen front page news items about cheating benefits claimants (especially those at the bottom of society). Over the same time scale, though, we've seen far fewer headlines about tax-fiddlers (especially those at the top of society). One result, I think, is that there are strong feelings here about benefits cheats, though people get far less exercised about tax-fiddlers. It's not that people find the latter less immoral than the former - they just don't have such strong feelings about it. They're focused on the benefits claimants, just as has been the media. If a conversation starts up on the subject of 'cheats', now, people will assume that 'cheats' is shorthand for 'benefits cheats'. They'll fume about such cheats. At some point in the convo you can then say, 'But what about tax fiddlers?' - and people will nod and say, 'Yes, we should get them too' ... but without much interest. The focus will quickly return to benefits cheats. I've witnessed this phenomenon time and again on forums, in pubs, and so on, and for decades, now.
_____________________________
http://www.domme-chronicles.com
|