LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction?

LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

mnottertail -> LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/2/2016 9:49:20 AM)
http://occupydemocrats.com/2016/04/01/just-trump-now-facing-criminal-charges-bribing-carson-endorsement/ I guess we got facts in this one, meanwhile, the 150 FBI agents are resting up for the weekend, ready to take Hillary down at any second. Observing the influx of suits at quantico going for the gym.......they aint taking this lightly.

BamaD -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/2/2016 10:23:26 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail http://occupydemocrats.com/2016/04/01/just-trump-now-facing-criminal-charges-bribing-carson-endorsement/ I guess we got facts in this one, meanwhile, the 150 FBI agents are resting up for the weekend, ready to take Hillary down at any second. Observing the influx of suits at quantico going for the gym.......they aint taking this lightly. So both leading candidates could be under arrest by Nov? There's hope for the country yet.

Real0ne -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/2/2016 11:23:11 AM)
where is the part about billary? I dont see anything coming out of the trump accusations but lots of publicity.

Phydeaux -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/2/2016 12:05:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail http://occupydemocrats.com/2016/04/01/just-trump-now-facing-criminal-charges-bribing-carson-endorsement/ I guess we got facts in this one, meanwhile, the 150 FBI agents are resting up for the weekend, ready to take Hillary down at any second. Observing the influx of suits at quantico going for the gym.......they aint taking this lightly. So the man that calls breitbart nutsucker blogs believes the occupydemocrats blog is a creditable, newsworthy source. Uh huh. Mind you, I have no beef with occupy as a newsource. Just the hypocrisy. Now, to the meat of this argument: the democrat front group filed law suit. They have no evidence, so they will lose. Although, if they judge shop as per usual it may take an appeals court to quash. As opposed to hillary, where hillary is facing an investigation by the FBI. To say these things are the same is to whistle past the grave.

WickedsDesire -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/2/2016 12:14:41 PM)
I am full of facts myself and cheap bed wetting Chardonnay and the ability to smote souls from existence itself...I do the universe a favour from time to time, for that is my way...and has Hilary been shagged with the man with the cigar calling himself mcscottishloonbigmanpartswhowreckutterdestruction- no siree smacks real0ne into last week, and Op to kingdom come I am fact and non fiction I have to clarfiy myself to the idiots above me from time to time as almost all of the seem keen to sit in disparity judgement talking psih

mnottertail -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/2/2016 12:40:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Phydeaux quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail http://occupydemocrats.com/2016/04/01/just-trump-now-facing-criminal-charges-bribing-carson-endorsement/ I guess we got facts in this one, meanwhile, the 150 FBI agents are resting up for the weekend, ready to take Hillary down at any second. Observing the influx of suits at quantico going for the gym.......they aint taking this lightly. So the man that calls breitbart nutsucker blogs believes the occupydemocrats blog is a creditable, newsworthy source. Uh huh. Mind you, I have no beef with occupy as a newsource. Just the hypocrisy. Now, to the meat of this argument: the democrat front group filed law suit. They have no evidence, so they will lose. Although, if they judge shop as per usual it may take an appeals court to quash. As opposed to hillary, where hillary is facing an investigation by the FBI. To say these things are the same is to whistle past the grave. Nope, your nutsucker slobberblogs like the proven asswipe shit out by brietbart and felched by nutsuckers does not have the veracity of an admission by a person involved across all the mainstream media. Again, nutsuckers are to fucking busy gobbling up the contents of their Felchfuhrers asses. So, it will come down to do they believe Ben Carson and will the FBI investigate that. No, one is a direct quote from a party involved (the actual Trump/nutsucker cockgargler) and The other, Hillary is the regurgitation of every last gob of felch any nutsucker can gobble up.

bounty44 -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/2/2016 12:42:59 PM)
i think I have said this before---I seriously suspect brain damage. and sorry there vile critter parts, apart from this being clearly understandable & explainable in a broad and non-illegal sort of way---having a "complaint filed" is not equivalent to "facing criminal charges." by your own two-faced standards, let us know when ABC, CBS and NBC cover this.

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/2/2016 12:43:15 PM)
quote: So both leading candidates could be under arrest by Nov? There's hope for the country yet. LOL Wouldn't that be something?

MasterJaguar01 -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/2/2016 7:51:22 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Phydeaux quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail http://occupydemocrats.com/2016/04/01/just-trump-now-facing-criminal-charges-bribing-carson-endorsement/ I guess we got facts in this one, meanwhile, the 150 FBI agents are resting up for the weekend, ready to take Hillary down at any second. Observing the influx of suits at quantico going for the gym.......they aint taking this lightly. So the man that calls breitbart nutsucker blogs believes the occupydemocrats blog is a creditable, newsworthy source. Uh huh. Mind you, I have no beef with occupy as a newsource. Just the hypocrisy. Now, to the meat of this argument: the democrat front group filed law suit. They have no evidence, so they will lose. Although, if they judge shop as per usual it may take an appeals court to quash. As opposed to hillary, where hillary is facing an investigation by the FBI. To say these things are the same is to whistle past the grave. Not a lawsuit. That is a civil matter. I don't see how they have any legal standing to file a civil lawsuit. (Where are their damages?) Rather, they filed a criminal complaint with DOJ. It will go absolutely nowhere, unless somehow, Trump is our next President, and Carson ends up in his cabinet.

MrRodgers -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/2/2016 7:54:12 PM)
Well all we know for sure is that if this were Hillary, we know she'd be guilty.

thompsonx -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/2/2016 9:55:56 PM)
ORIGINAL: bounty44 i think I have said this before---I seriously suspect brain damage. Well since you have self diagnosed why don't you seek professional help?

Phydeaux -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/2/2016 10:14:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Well all we know for sure is that if this were Hillary, we know she'd be guilty. And Bill deBlasio endorsing Clinton was purely from the bottom of his heart eh? When his political leanings are well left of Mrs Clinton, and indeed closer to Bernie?

PeonForHer -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/3/2016 1:52:20 AM)
Sigh. Never mind.

KenDckey -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/3/2016 3:32:08 AM)
If convicted put him under the jail. Plain and simple. Same with Hilary. Makes no difference. you break the law, you go to jail.,pay the fine, or whatever the law calls for in the form of punishment,. As for if I think he may have done it, sounds reasonable. Sounds reasonable because that is how so many appointed officials get their job in my opinion.

thompsonx -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/3/2016 4:48:38 AM)
ORIGINAL: KenDckey If convicted put him under the jail. Plain and simple. Same with Hilary. Makes no difference. you break the law, you go to jail.,pay the fine, or whatever the law calls for in the form of punishment,. As for if I think he may have done it, sounds reasonable. Sounds reasonable because that is how so many appointed officials get their job in my opinion. Opinions are a lot like assholes...everyone has one and most everyone feels their's works best for them.

KenDckey -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/3/2016 10:42:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: KenDckey If convicted put him under the jail. Plain and simple. Same with Hilary. Makes no difference. you break the law, you go to jail.,pay the fine, or whatever the law calls for in the form of punishment,. As for if I think he may have done it, sounds reasonable. Sounds reasonable because that is how so many appointed officials get their job in my opinion. Opinions are a lot like assholes...everyone has one and most everyone feels their's works best for them. So are you suggesting that if convicted that they (or one or the other) not be punished according to the law?

mnottertail -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/3/2016 12:20:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 i think I have said this before---I seriously suspect brain damage. and sorry there vile critter parts, apart from this being clearly understandable & explainable in a broad and non-illegal sort of way---having a "complaint filed" is not equivalent to "facing criminal charges." by your own two-faced standards, let us know when ABC, CBS and NBC cover this. Thats sort of a mincing, aint it. I mean what does 'facing criminal charges' mean? nothing......other than nutsucker slobber bloiggng by felchsucker44. Nothing. Empty phrase, disticntion without a difference. Only nutsuckers have cockgargled this 'facing criminal charges' those who could charge her, have not written up any charges, and said, you know, OI have to go jack my dick, but right after, she is going to be 'facing criminal charges'.

mnottertail -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/3/2016 12:22:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Phydeaux quote: ORIGINAL: MrRodgers Well all we know for sure is that if this were Hillary, we know she'd be guilty. And Bill deBlasio endorsing Clinton was purely from the bottom of his heart eh? When his political leanings are well left of Mrs Clinton, and indeed closer to Bernie? Well the celebration here is not the advancement of democracy, but that nutsuckers are imploding.

thompsonx -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/3/2016 2:30:30 PM)
ORIGINAL: KenDckey ORIGINAL: thompsonx If convicted put him under the jail. Plain and simple. Same with Hilary. Makes no difference. you break the law, you go to jail.,pay the fine, or whatever the law calls for in the form of punishment,. As for if I think he may have done it, sounds reasonable. Sounds reasonable because that is how so many appointed officials get their job in my opinion. Opinions are a lot like assholes...everyone has one and most everyone feels their's works best for them. So are you suggesting that if convicted that they (or one or the other) not be punished according to the law? This boarders on fido stupid. Try again.

mnottertail -> RE: LOL. Which one is fact, which is fiction? (4/3/2016 3:29:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: bounty44 i think I have said this before---I seriously suspect brain damage. and sorry there vile critter parts, apart from this being clearly understandable & explainable in a broad and non-illegal sort of way---having a "complaint filed" is not equivalent to "facing criminal charges." by your own two-faced standards, let us know when ABC, CBS and NBC cover this. I have proved this before, a retard and a felcher. They wont cover it until its news, in the meantime nutsuckers can gulp at the toilet of knaves who vend the ridiculous factless shit that nutsuckers gulp like manna from the toilet.

Page: [1] 2 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875