Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


meatcleaver -> Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 3:31:19 AM)

So the Israeli government doesn't believe in terrorism? Well only terrorism that doesn't serve Israel. First link.

The other hyperlinks are for pollux who thinks my figures are somewhere between Disneyland and the moon.

It is also interesting to see how the New York Times perceives the conflict compared to European countries.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2277717,00.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/syria/story/0,,1824750,00.html

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/article1187004.ece

http://www.nrc.nl/buitenland/article392135.ece

http://www.volkskrant.nl/buitenland/article332109.ece/Libanon_beleeft_bloedigste_oorlogsdag

http://www.lemonde.fr/web/article/0,1-0@2-734511,36-796680@51-759824,0.html

http://www.elpais.es/articulo/internacional/aviacion/israeli/mata/libaneses/dia/bombardea/primera/vez/centro/Beirut/elpporint/20060720elpepuint_1/Tes/

http://www.elpais.es/articulo/internacional/aviacion/israeli/mata/libaneses/dia/bombardea/primera/vez/centro/Beirut/elpporint/20060720elpepuint_1/Tes/

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/20/world/middleeast/20mideast.html?hp&ex=1153454400&en=c9b26163f93ed42f&ei=5094&partner=homepage




puella -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 3:41:44 AM)

Oh dear...

meatcleaver.. you better sit back and watch the bashing that's going to occur with this post.

Having lived all over Europe as well as here in the states... we do not have the perspective of this conflict that other countries do...and the reason for that is something that should be looked into by people of this country...

Anyway...

There is very little in American media which reports anything 'Anti-Israel' ... btw I hate to use that term as it is not actually what I mean, and plays very heavily into the frenzy of  "any criticism of Israel or actions taken by Israel = Nazism and anti Semitic behavior"... which is ridculous...

Anyway... good luck with this one... it should be a hot topic.




meatcleaver -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 4:04:13 AM)

I'm sort of expecting a reaction. But if a country purports to be civilised and says it is fighting for civilised values, it should rise above acts of terrorism it accuses its enemies of. Defending itself is one thing, killing innocents through intent or criminal negligence, is another thing.

More evidence about my figures for pollux. Modern Germany rarely criticises Israel for obvious reasons.

http://www.welt.de/data/2006/07/18/964561.html




twistedlink -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 4:46:56 AM)

I'm afraid I have to agree with puella on this one. North Americans have been conditioned to be sympathetic to the plight of Jews and the state of Israel, to the point where any criticism is looked upon as hate. I read a column in a mainstream newspaper here once that stated, "You can stand on a soapbox, and claim that the Koreans started WWII, and people will dismiss you as crazy. But, if you suggest that maybe less than six million Jews were killed by the Nazis, you have the JDL all over you in a heartbeat."
Why are we all aware of every detail of the Jewish holocaust in WWII Germany, but virtually no one is aware that Uncle Joe Stalin killed 8-30 million Ukrainians in two engineered famines?  Perhaps there aren't enough Ukrainian film producers?




pollux -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 4:59:50 AM)

If you'd kindly respond to my actual arguments, and not shift the goalposts, I'd appreciate it.

I've taken issue with two of your posts, one of which claimed that Israel receives 3 times as much aid from the US as Egypt.  The other claimed that 8 Israeli civilians had been killed in the recent fighting.  Both of these claims are demonstrably false, but hey what's a little exaggeration or misstatement between friends when you've got an anti-Israel point to make?

You seem to think the argument is over the differences in perception of Israel between Europe and the US.  Nice strawman, but I'm not biting.






meatcleaver -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 5:04:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux

If you'd kindly respond to my actual arguments, and not shift the goalposts, I'd appreciate it.

I've taken issue with two of your posts, one of which claimed that Israel receives 3 times as much aid from the US as Egypt.  The other claimed that 8 Israeli civilians had been killed in the recent fighting.  Both of these claims are demonstrably false, but hey what's a little exaggeration or misstatement between friends when you've got an anti-Israel point to make?

You seem to think the argument is over the differences in perception of Israel between Europe and the US.  Nice strawman, but I'm not biting.



No YOU ARE SHIFTING THE GOAL POSTS!!!!!

1. I updated and posted this mornings death toll according to the BBC World News and agreed by Dutch news and CNN Europe. 29 Israeli dead, 14 of them soldiers.

2. The amount of aid the US gives to Israel. My last post on this subject gave a link to an American site that gave detailed figures and I said I was wrong but too tired to do the Math.

You owe me an apology so stop wriggling and give me one.




LadyEllen -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 5:13:18 AM)

Hi All

First time I've tried to use these fora, so here goes! Before I start, I would just like to say that I am not an anti-Semite, and though I do own a pair of shiny boots I'm not a nazi either!

The modern state of Israel was founded just after the second world war, through a campaign of terrorist activities. Whether the land of Palestine belonged historically to the Jewish nation, and therefore the establishment of Israel by this means was justified, is something which could be and has been argued. However, by that same reasoning I should be allowed to perform terrorism in northern Germany and Denmark since those lands belong historically to my English nation and I should be allowed to recover them. And whilst I'm at it, I'll have the Russian steppe too since my Indo-European ancestors seemed to have lived there once too!

In short, in my opinion it was a mistake to allow Israel to be established where it is now, regardless of any historical claim, because the problems which have plagued it since were obvious consequences from the start. This was not a fight for freedom against an oppressor even, but conquest and displacement of a population who had lived in those lands since the time of the Roman empire when the Jews were expelled. If I were to conquer Denmark and put all the Danes out of their homes and treat them as sub-humans, then could I not expect their hatred and violence in return? Given what happened to the Jews under the nazi hell, then Israel should have been established not in Palestine, but in some of the lands expropriated from Germany after the war.

However we must deal in the here and now. As could be expected the state of Israel has since its founding suffered a lot of attacks, both open war and terrorism. I cant say that such violence is justified, but it is understandable that those displaced and those who sympathise with them, would take such action. Israel of course strikes back as is equally understandable but unjustifiable. Neither side sees its actions as terrorism, although to outside observers that is what it is.

It is only once we throw into the pot the extraneous and damaging ingedients of religion and culture that the whole recipe becomes what it is. The whole thing is moved from what it actually is, to a "glorious struggle" between whose version of religion and culture is right, when in fact both sides' religion and culture is right for them and the situation is one not of religion and culture but of conquest and occupation and resistance to it. After nearly sixty years of this, surely the time must have come for both to realise the futility of it all and to sit down and sort it out by accomodation? But no, both sides are sufficiently arrogant to believe themselves so superior to the other that this has only recently been done, and I'm sorry to say that since the Israelis hold most of the cards in this game, the responsibility has fallen to them to start with the pull-out from Gaza, but in return, being perceived as weak for doing this, they met with the kidnap of a soldier. For hotheads on both sides it would seem, only the total humiliation and preferably annihalation of the other will do - and the reason for their elevated cerebral temperatures is not the actual situation but their religion and culture.

Meanwhile to us in the west it is all just a mess. We find ourselves backing Israel because its culture is more familiar to us and we identify with them as people like us, (not to mention collective Christian guilt for anti-Semitism down the ages perhaps) - but at the same time we find ourselves sympathising with the Palestinians and their allies because of the hateful way the Israelis treat them.

We need to remove from this mess the whole notion of Judaism vs Islam, Jew vs Arab and the notion of anti-Semitism if we are ever to sort it out. Both peoples and both religions are equally valid, so this distraction is just a sideshow. We need to exclude those who peddle these distractions from the entire scene - on both sides. Religion teaches us to respect others, so how can it be used in this way in any case? But at the same time we must also remove all the injustices perpetrated by the stronger side in this situation - one should not expect peaceful relations with people who are excluded and treated less favourably, as Northern Ireland demonstrated. Remove the injustice and one removes the basis for antagonism from the majority - leaving only the religious hotheads shouting and making them obvious to all, so enabling their removal. Such a methodology takes time to work and will of course be difficult and dangerous, but the status quo is going nowhere and is also dangerous.

My solution? Immediate, full rights Israeli citizenship for all Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza - not many know that many Arabs are already Israeli citizens and there is no trouble from them, which suggests that it is not the existence of Israel which is objected to but exclusion from it which is. Israel should be perceived as a multi-ethnic, multi-cultural state like everywhere else in the western world, rather than as a Jewish bastion against which waves of anti-Semitism from all directions can crash and excite the zealotry of those within.

Now to await the crash of waves against my bastion, though I will try not to get too excited!

E









Level -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 5:20:28 AM)

Very nice first post, E. [:)]




pollux -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 5:24:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux

If you'd kindly respond to my actual arguments, and not shift the goalposts, I'd appreciate it.

I've taken issue with two of your posts, one of which claimed that Israel receives 3 times as much aid from the US as Egypt.  The other claimed that 8 Israeli civilians had been killed in the recent fighting.  Both of these claims are demonstrably false, but hey what's a little exaggeration or misstatement between friends when you've got an anti-Israel point to make?

You seem to think the argument is over the differences in perception of Israel between Europe and the US.  Nice strawman, but I'm not biting.



No YOU ARE SHIFTING THE GOAL POSTS!!!!!

1. I updated and posted this mornings death toll according to the BBC World News and agreed by Dutch news and CNN Europe. 29 Israeli dead, 14 of them soldiers.


So that business about 8 Israeli civilians was incorrect, no?

quote:

2. The amount of aid the US gives to Israel. My last post on this subject gave a link to an American site that gave detailed figures and I said I was wrong but too tired to do the Math.


Well, I did the math..  And the math shows that Israel gets about 1/3 more than Egypt -- even if you use the figures from that blatantly anti-Israel website AND you allow for Julia's famous "building grants".

quote:

You owe me an apology so stop wriggling and give me one.


Apology for what?  Pointing out the errors in your posts?




Lordandmaster -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 5:26:43 AM)

That cuts both ways though.  I certainly agree that it's a common and disreputable tactic to railroad any anti-Israel opinion as anti-Semitic.  But what I see a lot of these days (especially on so-called "libertarian" blogsites and such) is real anti-Semitism clothed in anti-Zionism.  In the long run, I don't really see how Israel is going to get by without extending full and equal citizenship to all Palestinians, but I don't expect that to happen before there is much more discord and bloodshed.

quote:

ORIGINAL: twistedlink

North Americans have been conditioned to be sympathetic to the plight of Jews and the state of Israel, to the point where any criticism is looked upon as hate.




meatcleaver -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 5:37:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux

If you'd kindly respond to my actual arguments, and not shift the goalposts, I'd appreciate it.

I've taken issue with two of your posts, one of which claimed that Israel receives 3 times as much aid from the US as Egypt.  The other claimed that 8 Israeli civilians had been killed in the recent fighting.  Both of these claims are demonstrably false, but hey what's a little exaggeration or misstatement between friends when you've got an anti-Israel point to make?

You seem to think the argument is over the differences in perception of Israel between Europe and the US.  Nice strawman, but I'm not biting.



No YOU ARE SHIFTING THE GOAL POSTS!!!!!

1. I updated and posted this mornings death toll according to the BBC World News and agreed by Dutch news and CNN Europe. 29 Israeli dead, 14 of them soldiers.


So that business about 8 Israeli civilians was incorrect, no?

quote:

2. The amount of aid the US gives to Israel. My last post on this subject gave a link to an American site that gave detailed figures and I said I was wrong but too tired to do the Math.


Well, I did the math..  And the math shows that Israel gets about 1/3 more than Egypt -- even if you use the figures from that blatantly anti-Israel website AND you allow for Julia's famous "building grants".

quote:

You owe me an apology so stop wriggling and give me one.


Apology for what?  Pointing out the errors in your posts?



Why don't you get a life. Before you even posted your post I had updated the figures and posted an American website with financial figures. You tried to prove yourself to be so smart and failed, you are now reduced to pettiness.

Nice post E




meatcleaver -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 5:42:57 AM)

I was just looking in the archives for pollux and found this which is an interesting read and not altogether off topic.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1445288,00.html




Alumbrado -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 6:43:08 AM)

If you are going to use the word 'terrorism' to mean 'any military operation that opposes our political views', perhaps you would be so kind as to provide a link to an authoritative source defining it the same way? 

Otherwise people are liable to presume that you think a bunch of dead people is great good fun as long as you can toss around labels to make yourself feel big.




meatcleaver -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 6:48:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

If you are going to use the word 'terrorism' to mean 'any military operation that opposes our political views', perhaps you would be so kind as to provide a link to an authoritative source defining it the same way? 



I think you are getting it all wrong. I'm pointing out there is no difference between either side.




MrRodgers -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 8:41:04 AM)

I must have a say myself here. E you took a lot of time and effort but you are for the most part, historically wrong. The modern state of Israel was formed by 2 UN resolutions. Now if you put no credence in UN resolutions then you as others, could believe that Israel is occupying Palestinian land, I do not and here is why.
 
The Palestinians are 'cannon fodder' for the larger Arab goal of the destruction of the state of Israel. The arab community cares not a wit about the plight of the Palestinians as reflected by not insisting on transparency in government (only the PLO for most of the time since 1948 and Arafat died nearly a billionaire...how?) and employing them as an underclass janitors, shoe shiners and laborers. Where is the modern Palestinian middle class...crushed under the foot of the larger goal of crushing Israel.
 
Amazing how some think that the modern state of Israel was formed on the land where Palestians have lived thruout history when it was British Palestine that was ceeded to Israel with those UN resolutions. It was land upon which the British assumed control after the fall of the Ottoman Empire. The Palestinians in 1948 were invited to live with the Jerws and in Jerusalem...the Palestinians and many Arab extremists chose war. Even before the 6 day war of 1967, Arafat and others celebrated the bombing of an Israeli ship in 1965 and still is celebrated to this day.
 
Why diplomacy fails and a solution:
Diplomacy here is at best, a very specious argument. Uniliaterism is going it yourself while diplomacy is what we all seek rather than military action or violence of any kind. The goal of diplomacy is primarily to preserve the peace. The problem lies in the 'liberal European' thinking and far too many others...the freeloaders...who always call for diplomacy, seek the weight and prestige of the US then hide offstage. These nations also do not grasp that the Palestinians are not the issue here...the issue is the Arab goal of destroying the nation of Israel.

From this new violence, even the 22 nation Arab league issued an unprecedented communique admonishing Hezbollah for instigating it. It was in fact UN res. 1559 that confirmed Israel's exit of Lebenon the last time the Arabs tried this. Why again now...and how is it any different ? 1000 rockets and more have been thrown at Israel and the number of dead is a superfulous argument...this is real terrorism.

Even at the UN, diplomacy since is vacuous and serves only to codify some members own belligerence. So why the surprise when Israel or anybdy else must resort to the military option ? If East and West need an agreement, it will have to be consumated after all the violence stops...all of it...once and for all....no matter the grievances.
 




meatcleaver -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 9:11:15 AM)

While I wouldn't argue that the original aim of the Arabs was the destruction of Israel and they care not a jot for the Palastinians. This situation has long since changed with Egypt accepting peace with Israel and Jordan also. Many other Arab countries have more than hinted that they would follow suit if Israel offered peace with justice. Even Saudi Arabia has offered that tentatively but can't do it too openly without something concrete because in the eyes of its own conservative population, they are already seen as too close to the USA and have had internal terrorism themselves because of that.

As for liberal Europe refusing to do anything. The USA has prevented Europe from doing anything. As France has said on many occasions, the USA refuses to use its power and influence to try and solve the issue but refuses to allow anyone else to interfere. The USA used its power to prevent condemnation of Israel's over reaction and Bush has been quoted as willing to give Israel time to complete its military objectives. Blair licked Bush's arse as usual. Bush has also being trying to blame Syria and Iran. Obviously for his next step in the Project For The New American Century.

Liberal Europe is not lining up asking the USA to use its prestige. Tony Blair, although always first in line, is not liberal Europe. France is moving closer to Russia on this issue because it has given up on the US as are rumoured other countries too.

In 1948 my friend's father, a Christian Palastinian was forced to give up his home at gunpoint. So much for the invitation to live together.




Moloch -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 9:25:01 AM)

quote:


In 1948 my friend's father, a Christian Palastinian was forced to give up his home at gunpoint. So much for the invitation to live together.


That is simply put is wrong and unfair we can agree on that, keep in mind thats how things went in palestine area since before the roman empire. Israelis pushed out Palestenians and formed Israel, Europeans pushed out native Americans in North America and formed USA, thats just the cycle of life. Do keep in mind Im not denfending that or saying its right to do that to a group of people.




meatcleaver -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 9:34:28 AM)

I agree Moloch but there are people still alive that remember being forced to give up their homes at gunpoint. You simply don't forget an experience like that, it leaves you humiliated and without any feelings of worth. It is still an open wound and that is the problem and that is why there is a need for justice so people can accept peace and live as neighbours even if the ignore each other.




meatcleaver -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 1:17:09 PM)

Read this by Sandy Tolan. If you don't know her, google her name.

If you can't be bothered to read it all start at the sub-heading Catastrophe.

http://www.motherjones.com/commentary/columns/2006/07/palestinian_catastrophe.html?welcome=true




pollux -> RE: Israel doesn't believe in terrorism (7/20/2006 1:32:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

Read this by Sandy Tolan. If you don't know her, google her name.



Sandy Tolan is a man.




Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125