RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi?

RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Lucylastic -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:09:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: ifmaz quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Every civilized country has government involved in marriage. Everyone else is doing it so that makes it ok? It's a private relationship, why does government need to sanction it? quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic WHy are so many republicans governments so intent on putting themselves in charge of womens bodies? Government should not be dictating what one can and cannot do with one's own body. I agree that I wonder why government is interested. In marriages at all. I wonder if Lucy would agree that since most governments in the world ban same sex marriage that should be the law of the land here? I don't understand her arguement. Im so sorry for your lack of ability to understand.

Nnanji -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:13:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: ifmaz quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Every civilized country has government involved in marriage. Everyone else is doing it so that makes it ok? It's a private relationship, why does government need to sanction it? quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic WHy are so many republicans governments so intent on putting themselves in charge of womens bodies? Government should not be dictating what one can and cannot do with one's own body. I agree that I wonder why government is interested in marriages at all. I wonder if Lucy would agree that since most governments in the world ban same sex marriage that should be the law of the land here? I don't understand her arguement. thats easy because the countries IM thinking about have "unbanned" same sex marriage. How long has your government been " registering marriages"? How long has your government been giving tax breaks to married people? I see, so when you say most, you really mean those you are interested in. Then those who unbanned went against the "most" argument and you either have to pick the most argument or admit you only use it to buttress your arguments. I have the same opinion of registering marriage and giving tax breaks for marriage. I don't see it mentioned in the constitution nor do I see why the government should be involved. You're arguement here is just more fodder to fuel my speculation that the government gets way to involved in all of our lives. I haven't the faintest desire for the government to discriminate against anyone. Whether that be unmarried people or same sex people who wish to marry.

Marini -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:13:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: ifmaz You realize I am a rather devout and practicing atheist, right? you have a right to your religion, just like everyone else. [;)] [:D] Having seen and witnessed the ferocity and venomous attitudes of many atheists, when speaking about Christianity, I have to agree. Atheism can be considered a religion, based on the thought, time and energy many put into promoting their ideas. lol

ifmaz -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:14:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Well I did say you may be fine with that...I was making no delineation of any religion, just simple facts that over 200 bills dictating womens bodies AND as well as ANTI transgender/LGBT?etc minorities, the sick and poor. etc etc. You wanna get rid of government interference? If only capitalism, and free markets could be relied upon not to discriminate and dictate peoples lives. because they certainly do a worse job. Religion certainly isnt doing anything for equality. Because it is built on guilt and fear( again emotions and feelings) not reality. As opposed to the wonderful job government is doing dictating lives? I'd much rather have government excuse itself from most aspects of life and let an unencumbered society figure out what it will and will not tolerate. I suppose this conversation is moot given your extreme left-leaning views.

Nnanji -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:15:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: ifmaz quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Every civilized country has government involved in marriage. Everyone else is doing it so that makes it ok? It's a private relationship, why does government need to sanction it? quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic WHy are so many republicans governments so intent on putting themselves in charge of womens bodies? Government should not be dictating what one can and cannot do with one's own body. I agree that I wonder why government is interested. In marriages at all. I wonder if Lucy would agree that since most governments in the world ban same sex marriage that should be the law of the land here? I don't understand her arguement. Im so sorry for your lack of ability to understand. Thank you Lucy. You are so sweet.

Real0ne -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:20:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ifmaz quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Well I did say you may be fine with that...I was making no delineation of any religion, just simple facts that over 200 bills dictating womens bodies AND as well as ANTI transgender/LGBT?etc minorities, the sick and poor. etc etc. You wanna get rid of government interference? If only capitalism, and free markets could be relied upon not to discriminate and dictate peoples lives. because they certainly do a worse job. Religion certainly isnt doing anything for equality. Because it is built on guilt and fear( again emotions and feelings) not reality. As opposed to the wonderful job government is doing dictating lives? I'd much rather have government excuse itself from most aspects of life and let an unencumbered society figure out what it will and will not tolerate. I suppose this conversation is moot given your extreme left-leaning views. with a neutral gubmint there would be freedom to the point of near anarchy and the 62million laws now on the books would be reduced to less than a million through out the states and law would be case by case rather than the one shoe fits all democracy which tramples the rights of the 49.9%, in which this gubmint was never designed to becom.

ifmaz -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:22:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Marini quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: ifmaz You realize I am a rather devout and practicing atheist, right? you have a right to your religion, just like everyone else. [;)] [:D] Having seen and witnessed the ferocity and venomous attitudes of many atheists, when speaking about Christianity, I have to agree. Atheism can be considered a religion, based on the thought, time and energy many put into promoting their ideas. lol I guess that would depend on how one defines religion, which is commonly defined as "the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods." Thus atheism is not a religion. If one defines religion as a set of beliefs one follows, would political parties count as religions? It would certainly seem that way to some, notably a few on this very forum.

Real0ne -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:22:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Marini quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: ifmaz You realize I am a rather devout and practicing atheist, right? you have a right to your religion, just like everyone else. [;)] [:D] Having seen and witnessed the ferocity and venomous attitudes of many atheists, when speaking about Christianity, I have to agree. Atheism can be considered a religion, based on the thought, time and energy many put into promoting their ideas. lol it is, the supreme court handles it that way (rightfully in that respect wrongfully that hey have anything to do with anything religious in the first place) and I laid out the philisophical proofs in my freedom from atheists thread.

thompsonx -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:23:39 PM)
ORIGINAL: Real0ne yeh lots of atheists have become militant against theists in attempts to establish their own flavor of religious supremacy. Cite please

ifmaz -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:25:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote: ORIGINAL: ifmaz As opposed to the wonderful job government is doing dictating lives? I'd much rather have government excuse itself from most aspects of life and let an unencumbered society figure out what it will and will not tolerate. I suppose this conversation is moot given your extreme left-leaning views. with a neutral gubmint there would be freedom to the point of near anarchy and the 62million laws now on the books would be reduced to less than a million through out the states and law would be case by case rather than the one shoe fits all democracy which tramples the rights of the 49.9%, in which this gubmint was never designed to becom. [image]https://i.imgur.com/PoKq89Xm.jpg[/image] (Clicky for biggy)

thompsonx -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:27:41 PM)
ORIGINAL: Real0ne the constitution 'GRANTS' you NOTHING as in NO as in NADA as in ZIPPO as in ZERO rights and the fact that you think it does shows that you have no legal background what so ever. Actually it show you have less knowledge than you believe you do.

thompsonx -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:29:22 PM)
ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr My goodness! We have a president that sees a video of a Christian getting his head sliced off and goes on a rant about how evil Christians *used to be* (He referenced the Crusades). I wonder how that would go, if a retired porn actress accused a guy of rape and a president with an "R" after his name said something like: "Well, I saw the video of her rape and she used to do much more crazy stuff, by her own choice"? Like that makes it alright? It is pretty obvious that you do not understand the difference between forcible rape and consensual sex. Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

thompsonx -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:30:24 PM)
ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr I could agree with that. However, Christians seem to be a system-wide "open target", these days. I don't hear many loons railing against Hindus and, let's face, Muslims have become a protected class, as far as the PPLs are concerned. You sent your son off to kill muslims. How does that make them a protected class? People can say just about anything they want about Christians and try to create laws (Obummercare, anyone?) that violate Christian ethics. Maybe it's prophetic that ol' Dumbo Ears referenced the Crusades. It could happen, again. Christians only have so many cheeks to turn. Why don't you take your punk ass down and enlist? I think *all* religions should be "hands off" for the government. Surely, that's what the first amendment is supposed to be about. That said, Christians seem to be held in the same esteem that homosexuals *used to be* (about forty years ago or so). Where are christians in amerika being beaten and murdered for their beliefs?

thompsonx -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:31:33 PM)
ORIGINAL: thishereboi How about this...Gay goes to therapist. Therapist welcomes gay into office because the law says he has to and sets up multiple sessions. After a few months, Gay realizes that therapist really thinks being gay is the disease and starts to add up how much money and time he has wasted on a therapist who isn't trying to fix the actual problem and is more concerned with changing his sexuality. Gay still has problem but can't find a new doc because his insurance will only cover so many appointments and he wasted them all on the first doc. Pretty simple...sue the therapist for malfeasence

thompsonx -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:36:18 PM)
ORIGINAL: thishereboi I don't see what anit-right wingers are saying? They are saying everyone on the right is a homophobic racist little asshat. Actually you are the only one saying that. They also seem to think there are no LGBT on the right and no christians on the left. Again you are the only one saying that. They can't stick with facts and have to exaggerate everything they say to make their point. Which is exactly what you are doing. Then they wonder why people don't trust what they say. Not sure how you missed that. Not sure how you missed that either? I've said it enough times. But then again you seem to think I have always been on the right so I shouldn't be too surprised you got that wrong also. The overwhelming majority of your post are so what are we to take away from that?

Nnanji -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:37:50 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: Real0ne yeh lots of atheists have become militant against theists in attempts to establish their own flavor of religious supremacy. Cite please Dude...or sorry, young sir, you've been googling your own made up facts for, as you say, ten years now. You also never provide citations. Nobody is going to respect your demand for a citation.

thompsonx -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:38:04 PM)
ORIGINAL: thishereboi I don't know why, I had a racist come into my store and I threw him out on his ignorant ass and told him never to come back. Of course you did sweetie.[8\|] I wasn't forced to tolerate him or the crap that came out of his mouth. Now I assume he pays taxes, but honestly didn't even think about it when it happened and I am not sure why I would have cared. Westboro baptist gets it's money from sueing fools like you.

thompsonx -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:40:55 PM)
ORIGINAL: thishereboi And to be honest, if I owned a bakery and I was forced to bake a cake for say westborough, I might forget to cover my mouth when I sneezed or something else nasty might happen to it, but they would never know, would they? wink wink That would be a felony. Cameras are ubiquitous today. Maybe you could find a friend in the joint to pass the time with.

thompsonx -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:42:47 PM)
ORIGINAL: Real0ne Virtually everything is in the name of 'religion' and now days the atheist religion is the problem child. Are you going to bogart or are you going to share? People can cite religious wars like the crusades but all theist based religious wars combined you are looking at less than a couple hundred thousand dead from the beginning of time compared to the ATHEIST religious wars where you are looking at a COUPLE HUNDRED MILLION in this century alone. Cite please.

thompsonx -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 1:45:42 PM)
ORIGINAL: Real0ne the constitution 'GRANTS' you NOTHING as in NO as in NADA as in ZIPPO as in ZERO rights and the fact that you think it does shows that you have no legal background what so ever. FAIL! I can save you some time, but no where in law will you find a contractual stipulation defined as a 'grant' FROM the gubblemint with respect to the BoR. It is an 'ACKNOWLEDGED' of rights by the crookocracy what the crookocracy will not violate or infringe. In the case of the constitution the crookocracy both recognized and agreed by stipulation (so they could exist) to the reservation of rights, which are not UNDER the laws of the unoted states but set aside from the laws of the united states since it has no jurisdiction over religion, speech, and arms etc. The rights 'recognized' in the Bor are PREEXISTING rights. You dont ask the gubblemint to grant to you what you already have. On the other hand the gubblemint was GRANTED it 'authority' from the people PROVIDED it respects our reserved rights. The PEOPLE ARE THE GRANTORS the gubblemint is the grantee The people never granted to the gubblemint the authority to infringe on our reserved rights either individually or severally Hence DEMOCRACY IS IN VIOLATION of our rights when it uses ITS mob pressure, LEGISLATION, COURT DECISIONS, CITIES or MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS to stomp the rights of individuals Without the government you have no rights.

Page: << < prev 10 11 [12] 13 14 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625