RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi?

RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

TheCabal -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 2:36:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TNDommeK So this bill just signed.. Religious freedom bill. Your thoughts? Given that both Trump and Hillary are products of New York, I'm much more concerned about how effed up that state is.

Lucylastic -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 2:40:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ifmaz quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Well I did say you may be fine with that...I was making no delineation of any religion, just simple facts that over 200 bills dictating womens bodies AND as well as ANTI transgender/LGBT?etc minorities, the sick and poor. etc etc. You wanna get rid of government interference? If only capitalism, and free markets could be relied upon not to discriminate and dictate peoples lives. because they certainly do a worse job. Religion certainly isnt doing anything for equality. Because it is built on guilt and fear( again emotions and feelings) not reality. As opposed to the wonderful job government is doing dictating lives? I'd much rather have government excuse itself from most aspects of life and let an unencumbered society figure out what it will and will not tolerate. I suppose this conversation is moot given your extreme left-leaning views. Funny you should say that. If people were being treated as being equal we wouldnt need any form of government. where did womens rights come from, where did unions come from? where did healthcare come from, where did welfare come from? where did civil rights come from??? People being denied equality, fairness, justice, and all the rights guaranteed by your constitution. Denied by private, business and the elite communities sucking the lives out of people for money It wasnt from a dearth of equality. or the government wouldnt have ever been needed let alone step in. My extreme left wing views are from 54 years of living in "socialist" countries, and seeing the reality, not living in puritanical ignorance.

DaddySatyr -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 2:41:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheCabal quote: ORIGINAL: TNDommeK So this bill just signed.. Religious freedom bill. Your thoughts? Given that both Trump and Hillary are products of New York, I'm much more concerned about how effed up that state is. Actually, the anti-Christ isn't *from* New York. She's the product of the Chicago Democratic machine (growing up) that moved to Arkansas to be with her husband and carpet-bagged her way into an opening Senate seat in NY. Michael

Lucylastic -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 2:42:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheCabal quote: ORIGINAL: TNDommeK So this bill just signed.. Religious freedom bill. Your thoughts? Given that both Trump and Hillary are products of New York, I'm much more concerned about how effed up that state is. no more than texas

TheCabal -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 2:44:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr quote: ORIGINAL: TheCabal quote: ORIGINAL: TNDommeK So this bill just signed.. Religious freedom bill. Your thoughts? Given that both Trump and Hillary are products of New York, I'm much more concerned about how effed up that state is. Actually, the anti-Christ isn't *from* New York. She's the product of the Chicago Democratic machine (growing up) that moved to Arkansas to be with her husband and carpet-bagged her way into an opening Senate seat in NY. Michael Yeah, but New York adopted her when they elected her their senator. I suppose we could throw Bernie Sanders into that mess as well as he was born there. What a horribly screwed up state that is.

thompsonx -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 3:00:59 PM)
ORIGINAL: TheCabal ORIGINAL: thompsonx Without government sanction how would inhearatance work? Without government sanction how would legitimacy of hiers work? Without government sanction how would resposibility for offspring work? The same way it did before government sanction... which has only existed for a little less than a century, and came about for strictly bigoted reasons. Cite please Hell, none of those things work well WITH government sanction in the first place. Cite please. If you have a large, complicated estate, you NEED a will. No you need a trust and a will. If you have a moderately sized estate, and you don't have a will, your inheritors are going to squabble over it regardless. Thus probate. If you don't have any significant wealth, no one cares. In any event, a will costs less than a wedding. How much? No one cares about 'legitimacy' anymore anyway. How many bastards inhearet? And YOU are always responsible for your offspring, with or without government sanction. Then there are no orphan's homes in your world?[/v][8\|]

Real0ne -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 3:11:32 PM)
OMG! it escaped from the zoo again with a new world record LOL * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:27:41 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 231 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:29:22 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 232 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:30:24 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 233 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:31:33 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 234 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:36:18 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 235 RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? - 4/10/2016 1:37:50 PM No New Messages Profile [Send Private Message] Report \| Post #: 236 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:38:04 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 237 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:40:55 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 238 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:42:47 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 239 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:45:42 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 240 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:47:36 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 241 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:48:57 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 242 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:52:34 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 243 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:56:48 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 244 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:03:00 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 245 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:07:20 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 246 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:08:36 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 247 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:10:15 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 248 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:11:20 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 249 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:13:11 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 250 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:15:52 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 251 RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? - 4/10/2016 2:17:04 PM * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:18:06 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 253 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:20:14 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 254 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:23:25 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 255 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:25:19 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 256 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:26:59 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 257 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:28:04 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 258 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:29:17 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 259

TheCabal -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 3:12:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: TheCabal ORIGINAL: thompsonx Without government sanction how would inhearatance work? Without government sanction how would legitimacy of hiers work? Without government sanction how would resposibility for offspring work? The same way it did before government sanction... which has only existed for a little less than a century, and came about for strictly bigoted reasons. Cite please New York Times quote: The American colonies officially required marriages to be registered, but until the mid-19th century, state supreme courts routinely ruled that public cohabitation was sufficient evidence of a valid marriage. By the later part of that century, however, the United States began to nullify common-law marriages and exert more control over who was allowed to marry. By the 1920s, 38 states prohibited whites from marrying blacks, “mulattos,” Japanese, Chinese, Indians, “Mongolians,” “Malays” or Filipinos. Twelve states would not issue a marriage license if one partner was a drunk, an addict or a “mental defect.” Eighteen states set barriers to remarriage after divorce. The entire purpose of marriage licenses were to keep the white race pure. quote: Hell, none of those things work well WITH government sanction in the first place. Cite please. If you have a large, complicated estate, you NEED a will. No you need a trust and a will. If you have a moderately sized estate, and you don't have a will, your inheritors are going to squabble over it regardless. Thus probate. If you don't have any significant wealth, no one cares. In any event, a will costs less than a wedding. How much? Probate doesn't really help without a will. As for the cost of a will, it depends on how complicated the estate is. Simple ones can easily be had for less than $100. quote: No one cares about 'legitimacy' anymore anyway. How many bastards inhearet? Given the percentage of out of wedlock births in this country, I'd imagine almost all of them. quote: And YOU are always responsible for your offspring, with or without government sanction. Then there are no orphan's homes in your world?[8\|] They're called 'foster homes' in my world. But if you're in one, it's either because your parents are dead (and thus whether or not they were married is irrelevant). Or your parents are fundamentally irresponsible (and thus likely not married to begin with).

Nnanji -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 3:20:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheCabal quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: TheCabal ORIGINAL: thompsonx Without government sanction how would inhearatance work? Without government sanction how would legitimacy of hiers work? Without government sanction how would resposibility for offspring work? The same way it did before government sanction... which has only existed for a little less than a century, and came about for strictly bigoted reasons. Cite please New York Times quote: The American colonies officially required marriages to be registered, but until the mid-19th century, state supreme courts routinely ruled that public cohabitation was sufficient evidence of a valid marriage. By the later part of that century, however, the United States began to nullify common-law marriages and exert more control over who was allowed to marry. By the 1920s, 38 states prohibited whites from marrying blacks, “mulattos,” Japanese, Chinese, Indians, “Mongolians,” “Malays” or Filipinos. Twelve states would not issue a marriage license if one partner was a drunk, an addict or a “mental defect.” Eighteen states set barriers to remarriage after divorce. The entire purpose of marriage licenses were to keep the white race pure. quote: Hell, none of those things work well WITH government sanction in the first place. Cite please. If you have a large, complicated estate, you NEED a will. No you need a trust and a will. If you have a moderately sized estate, and you don't have a will, your inheritors are going to squabble over it regardless. Thus probate. If you don't have any significant wealth, no one cares. In any event, a will costs less than a wedding. How much? Probate doesn't really help without a will. As for the cost of a will, it depends on how complicated the estate is. Simple ones can easily be had for less than $100. quote: No one cares about 'legitimacy' anymore anyway. How many bastards inhearet? Given the percentage of out of wedlock births in this country, I'd imagine almost all of them. quote: And YOU are always responsible for your offspring, with or without government sanction. Then there are no orphan's homes in your world?[8\|] They're called 'foster homes' in my world. But if you're in one, it's either because your parents are dead (and thus whether or not they were married is irrelevant). Or your parents are fundamentally irresponsible (and thus likely not married to begin with). Just ignore him. It gets him hard if you respond to him.

Nnanji -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 3:23:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Real0ne OMG! it escaped from the zoo again with a new world record LOL * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:27:41 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 231 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:29:22 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 232 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:30:24 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 233 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:31:33 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 234 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:36:18 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 235 RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? - 4/10/2016 1:37:50 PM No New Messages Profile [Send Private Message] Report \| Post #: 236 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:38:04 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 237 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:40:55 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 238 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:42:47 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 239 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:45:42 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 240 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:47:36 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 241 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:48:57 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 242 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:52:34 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 243 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 1:56:48 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 244 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:03:00 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 245 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:07:20 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 246 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:08:36 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 247 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:10:15 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 248 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:11:20 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 249 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:13:11 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 250 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:15:52 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 251 RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? - 4/10/2016 2:17:04 PM * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:18:06 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 253 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:20:14 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 254 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:23:25 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 255 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:25:19 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 256 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:26:59 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 257 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:28:04 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 258 * IGNORED * - 4/10/2016 2:29:17 PM No New Messages thompsonx This user is on your "hidden" list and the post has been hidden. Click here to unhide this user and view the post. Report \| Post #: 259 Ya, he came out all butt hurt from the drubbing he's been getting. He's lying and pretending nothing happened. But, nothing he's saying is worth paying attention to.

TheCabal -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 3:26:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Nnanji quote: ORIGINAL: TheCabal quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: TheCabal ORIGINAL: thompsonx Without government sanction how would inhearatance work? Without government sanction how would legitimacy of hiers work? Without government sanction how would resposibility for offspring work? The same way it did before government sanction... which has only existed for a little less than a century, and came about for strictly bigoted reasons. Cite please New York Times quote: The American colonies officially required marriages to be registered, but until the mid-19th century, state supreme courts routinely ruled that public cohabitation was sufficient evidence of a valid marriage. By the later part of that century, however, the United States began to nullify common-law marriages and exert more control over who was allowed to marry. By the 1920s, 38 states prohibited whites from marrying blacks, “mulattos,” Japanese, Chinese, Indians, “Mongolians,” “Malays” or Filipinos. Twelve states would not issue a marriage license if one partner was a drunk, an addict or a “mental defect.” Eighteen states set barriers to remarriage after divorce. The entire purpose of marriage licenses were to keep the white race pure. quote: Hell, none of those things work well WITH government sanction in the first place. Cite please. If you have a large, complicated estate, you NEED a will. No you need a trust and a will. If you have a moderately sized estate, and you don't have a will, your inheritors are going to squabble over it regardless. Thus probate. If you don't have any significant wealth, no one cares. In any event, a will costs less than a wedding. How much? Probate doesn't really help without a will. As for the cost of a will, it depends on how complicated the estate is. Simple ones can easily be had for less than $100. quote: No one cares about 'legitimacy' anymore anyway. How many bastards inhearet? Given the percentage of out of wedlock births in this country, I'd imagine almost all of them. quote: And YOU are always responsible for your offspring, with or without government sanction. Then there are no orphan's homes in your world?[8\|] They're called 'foster homes' in my world. But if you're in one, it's either because your parents are dead (and thus whether or not they were married is irrelevant). Or your parents are fundamentally irresponsible (and thus likely not married to begin with). Just ignore him. It gets him hard if you respond to him. Meh... I'm bored and feeling sadistic.

thompsonx -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 3:30:00 PM)
ORIGINAL: Nnanji Ya, he came out all butt hurt from the drubbing he's been getting. He's lying and pretending nothing happened. But, nothing he's saying is worth paying attention to. Pointing out your half truths and whole lies is sooooo much fun. Jesus you are phoquing stupid

thompsonx -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 3:33:59 PM)
ORIGINAL: Real0ne For someone who has me on hide you sure seem to notice when I light a fire under your punk ass. You post walls of mindless crap and expect people to believe the mindless drivel you spout. You claim to be a gunslinger but cant tell the difference between a .22 autoloader and an auto mag. You cannot tell the difference between a .22 long rifle and a .22 wrm. Took you 400+ post and a slap up side the head to get you to notice. Now you have a case of he sore butt...put some hoppes#9 on it[:D] Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

TheCabal -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 3:38:03 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: TheCabal quote: ORIGINAL: TNDommeK So this bill just signed.. Religious freedom bill. Your thoughts? Given that both Trump and Hillary are products of New York, I'm much more concerned about how effed up that state is. no more than texas As I pointed out, New York is about to saddle the rest of this poor country with a choice between Hillary Clinton (or maybe Bernie Sanders) and Donald Trump for President of the US. A felon, a lunatic and a scam artist. ALL courtesy of New York. What has Texas done that has you so worried? Ted Cruz isn't exactly my pick either, but it's the cluster-f of New Yorkers that has made him the least-bad alternative.

mnottertail -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 3:49:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: TheCabal quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: TheCabal quote: ORIGINAL: TNDommeK So this bill just signed.. Religious freedom bill. Your thoughts? Given that both Trump and Hillary are products of New York, I'm much more concerned about how effed up that state is. no more than texas As I pointed out, New York is about to saddle the rest of this poor country with a choice between Hillary Clinton (or maybe Bernie Sanders) and Donald Trump for President of the US. A felon, a lunatic and a scam artist. ALL courtesy of New York. What has Texas done that has you so worried? Ted Cruz isn't exactly my pick either, but it's the cluster-f of New Yorkers that has made him the least-bad alternative. Yet the nutsuckers from all the poor red welfare states gonna tell us how to have a small government and how we all are spending money.. They dont mention that we are spending the money on those lazy nutsucker bastards or that they vote so they dont have a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of, but by god for wanting a small government, there sure are a lot of nutsuckers felching corporations, and lobbyists to get into it.

thompsonx -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 3:51:25 PM)
ORIGINAL: TheCabal ORIGINAL: thompsonx Without government sanction how would inhearatance work? Without government sanction how would legitimacy of hiers work? Without government sanction how would resposibility for offspring work? The entire purpose of marriage licenses were to keep the white race pure. So these were state actions and not federal actions. Now the fed has stepped in and called bullshit...no? Or would you rather go back to the bigotry? Hell, none of those things work well WITH government sanction in the first place. Cite please. If you have a large, complicated estate, you NEED a will. No you need a trust and a will. If you have a moderately sized estate, and you don't have a will, your inheritors are going to squabble over it regardless. Thus probate. If you don't have any significant wealth, no one cares. In any event, a will costs less than a wedding. How much? Probate doesn't really help without a will. You are mistaken. Probate occures with or without a will. It determines if the will is valid. If there is no will the probate court does the job of a will. This will give you a fuller description of just how probate works https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probate As for the cost of a will, it depends on how complicated the estate is. Simple ones can easily be had for less than $100. No one cares about 'legitimacy' anymore anyway. How many bastards inhearet? Given the percentage of out of wedlock births in this country, I'd imagine almost all of them. So now you are imagining...when you quit imagining and know what you are talking about let me know. And YOU are always responsible for your offspring, with or without government sanction. Then there are no orphan's homes in your world?[8\|] They're called 'foster homes' in my world. What do you call the place where those not in foster care live? But if you're in one, it's either because your parents are dead (and thus whether or not they were married is irrelevant). Or your parents are fundamentally irresponsible That still makes you an orphan and the state feels it is in the interest of society to take care of them rather than let them die...do you think it is better for them to die? (and thus likely not married to begin with). Dude do you have any idea how phoqued up you are to say that kind of shit?

Phydeaux -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 3:59:21 PM)
quote: The entire purpose of marriage licenses were to keep the white race pure. Only in the mind of a liberal racist.

mnottertail -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 4:09:10 PM)
what then is the purpose of a government issued marriage license, Ms Kim Davis? Walk me thru it in detail.

thompsonx -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 4:30:21 PM)
ORIGINAL: Phydeaux The entire purpose of marriage licenses were to keep the white race pure. Only in the mind of a liberal racist. So you are infavor of making it against the law for a white person to marry a non white person?

TheCabal -> RE: Thoughts about backwoods Mississippi? (4/10/2016 4:30:41 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: TheCabal ORIGINAL: thompsonx Without government sanction how would inhearatance work? Without government sanction how would legitimacy of hiers work? Without government sanction how would resposibility for offspring work? The entire purpose of marriage licenses were to keep the white race pure. So these were state actions and not federal actions. Now the fed has stepped in and called bullshit...no? Or would you rather go back to the bigotry? The only way to end the bigotry is to force the government out of the business of deciding who can and can't get married. There are several poly households that use this website. Should they not be allowed to get married? I think they should. Because love is love. quote: Hell, none of those things work well WITH government sanction in the first place. Cite please. If you have a large, complicated estate, you NEED a will. No you need a trust and a will. If you have a moderately sized estate, and you don't have a will, your inheritors are going to squabble over it regardless. Thus probate. If you don't have any significant wealth, no one cares. In any event, a will costs less than a wedding. How much? Probate doesn't really help without a will. You are mistaken. Probate occures with or without a will. It determines if the will is valid. If there is no will the probate court does the job of a will. This will give you a fuller description of just how probate works https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Probate Ok, if that's what you need to believe, then that ends the need for government sanctioned marriage because the probate court will sort it out. quote: As for the cost of a will, it depends on how complicated the estate is. Simple ones can easily be had for less than $100. No one cares about 'legitimacy' anymore anyway. How many bastards inhearet? Given the percentage of out of wedlock births in this country, I'd imagine almost all of them. So now you are imagining...when you quit imagining and know what you are talking about let me know. It's a figure of speech. Let me know when you're ready to address the point that given the massive number of out of wedlock births and single parent households that exist in this country, no one seems to be having any problem making sure their children inherit. Hell, when it comes to children, it's basic biology. Doesn't need to have anything at all to do with legalisms. And YOU are always responsible for your offspring, with or without government sanction. quote: Then there are no orphan's homes in your world?[8\|] They're called 'foster homes' in my world. What do you call the place where those not in foster care live? Well, there are various options... boarding schools, 'group foster homes,' etc. Traditional orphanages are all but gone in the US. quote: But if you're in one, it's either because your parents are dead (and thus whether or not they were married is irrelevant). Or your parents are fundamentally irresponsible That still makes you an orphan and the state feels it is in the interest of society to take care of them rather than let them die...do you think it is better for them to die? (and thus likely not married to begin with). Dude do you have any idea how phoqued up you are to say that kind of shit? How is it effed up to say that if your children have been taken away from you by the state, you're probably not very responsible? And what's the likelihood that if your children ARE wards of the state because you're irresponsible, you're probably NOT married.

Page: << < prev 12 13 [14] 15 16 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.09375