RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution

RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/10/2016 5:01:36 AM)
quote: why not vote for an alternative Oh that's easy, because they have bought the corporate parties' bullshit about a two-party system and how voting anything but the two main corporate parties is somehow wasting your vote.

mnottertail -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/10/2016 6:14:20 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MasterDoc1 Back to the subject, I'm still looking to know: if (apparently in the minds of many) Trump vs Hillary is a choice of two terrible candidates, why not vote for an alternative (assuming you intend to vote). I will vote for an alternative, I have since Carter. It will not be Gary Johnson.

MrRodgers -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/10/2016 7:46:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: joether If my choices were: Gary Johnson, Donald Trump, or Hillary Clinton; I still take Clinton. Given then choice between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, I'd take Sanders. If all else fails, I'll just vote Barrack Obama. Imagine if 60+ million people in all the states voted for Barrack Obama? Would be a loophole in the 22nd, since he wasn't running for a consecutive 3rd term. Which would open a court battle that would rise up to the US Supreme Court. The 4 conservatives would say "no, he can not", and the 4 liberals stating "yes he could be a president under these circumstances". Since it is a tie, it would revert to the next lower court: Appellate Court of D.C. What is amusing about that? Pres. Obama placed the judges there; so they would rule in his favor. So we get President Obama, a known quantity and very classy guy in the White House for another four years. If it all made it that far and the SCOTUS is 4-4, it would then go to the house and they'd hold their nose and put in Trump.

WickedsDesire -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/10/2016 9:38:28 AM)
OP Leicester City I have followed all season and I am from north of the wall...and in no way can we compete population ratio 10:1 tv money spread forces of light Celtic winning the league £2-4, bottom of the English premier league(20 teams) £95 million...ratio 25:1 minimum. So much can be inferred from that one sentence: disparity, dichotomy, greed, gluttony. poverty. therefore I will go with poverty and all Leicester city have proved this season is the utter poverty within your league no matter how much money is chucked at it (more than any other country) As for voting, they are a wee bit worse than the English (disparity v Scotland and indeed all of Europe)- and you lot are dire, but they are entitled to chose their candidate. Sanders I actually liked but he was declared a communist for the pea brain ones across the ocean, and that's about all it takes, across there, like in your land, to appeal to the vacuous I do not think buffoon will beat Hilary her a women scorned Buffoon, who hears the voice of god (well they all do across there & god commands them nutteers, always) - but he will make America great with things and stuff such political acumen - no political experience and 3 x chapter 11, or is it 12, and not paying of what he owed - the fuking weasel. As for sheople I have no time for them and Buffoons scorched earth policy does intrigue me and the end times imminent But remember more than those two candidates stood at the beginning and the American electorate have spoken

Phydeaux -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/10/2016 10:02:43 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: joether If my choices were: Gary Johnson, Donald Trump, or Hillary Clinton; I still take Clinton. Given then choice between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, I'd take Sanders. If all else fails, I'll just vote Barrack Obama. Imagine if 60+ million people in all the states voted for Barrack Obama? Would be a loophole in the 22nd, since he wasn't running for a consecutive 3rd term. Which would open a court battle that would rise up to the US Supreme Court. The 4 conservatives would say "no, he can not", and the 4 liberals stating "yes he could be a president under these circumstances". Since it is a tie, it would revert to the next lower court: Appellate Court of D.C. What is amusing about that? Pres. Obama placed the judges there; so they would rule in his favor. So we get President Obama, a known quantity and very classy guy in the White House for another four years. You're smoking ether again.

Phydeaux -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/10/2016 10:07:09 AM)
Trump is up 4 points on hillary in ohio. Down by one point in pennsylvania. Hold on to your lunches liberals. Your world view is about to get severely disturbed...

mnottertail -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/10/2016 10:14:07 AM)
LOL. Bernie Sanders in his losses nearly met or in some cases did exceed the entire vote for all three nutsuckers in his losses to Hillary. Yeah, nutsuckers are severely disturbed, there is no doubt of that.

Lucylastic -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/10/2016 10:37:07 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Phydeaux Trump is up 4 points on hillary in ohio. Down by one point in pennsylvania. Hold on to your lunches liberals. Your world view is about to get severely disturbed... How come you didnt mention he is also down by one in florida? My World view is this is the most fucked up election clusterfuck ever. Disturbed covers a whole range of emotions.

DesideriScuri -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/10/2016 2:56:14 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: Phydeaux Trump is up 4 points on hillary in ohio. Down by one point in pennsylvania. Hold on to your lunches liberals. Your world view is about to get severely disturbed... How come you didnt mention he is also down by one in florida? My World view is this is the most fucked up election clusterfuck ever. Disturbed covers a whole range of emotions. Aw, whining because he left something out you think he should have included? Contradict much? [8\|]

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/10/2016 2:57:02 PM)
+10!

Lucylastic -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/10/2016 10:05:24 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: Phydeaux Trump is up 4 points on hillary in ohio. Down by one point in pennsylvania. Hold on to your lunches liberals. Your world view is about to get severely disturbed... How come you didnt mention he is also down by one in florida? My World view is this is the most fucked up election clusterfuck ever. Disturbed covers a whole range of emotions. Aw, whining because he left something out you think he should have included? Contradict much? [8\|] Lol, as usual, he mentioned a pol a quinniapac pol with no link, no source, Not an opinion, as mine was in va thread that was talking a hypthetical situation. You both have done the same Fuck you both. Hypcrite back atcha

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/10/2016 10:49:43 PM)
LOL

Lucylastic -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/10/2016 11:19:33 PM)
oh I sense you are leaving something out.....[8\|]

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/10/2016 11:24:47 PM)
LOL

Lucylastic -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/11/2016 12:02:44 AM)
As you dont seem to have anything but mirth to share. would you like to get back to the topic of trump vs clinton , with trump being ahead in one poll in a race where he is the republican supposed nominee, and comparing the ONE poll with bernie and hils race still to be decided? Or figuratively that bernie is still beating trump in polls in a "hypothetical race", now why on earth would anyone seriously take his(fido) uncited claim of "liberal world view being disturbed" as well as being on poll, the week AFTER he wins the nomination, (no bump there at all eh?) as being relevant this far out of the actual race.

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/11/2016 8:38:07 AM)
I take very little of what he says as relevant.

Phydeaux -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/11/2016 2:55:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick I take very little of what he says as relevant. Yes, you are willing to discard the point of view of between a third and a half of the world, because it doesn't fit your preconceived notions. Too bad. You might learn something.

Lucylastic -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/11/2016 2:58:09 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Phydeaux quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick I take very little of what he says as relevant. Yes, you are willing to discard the point of view of between a third and a half of the world, because it doesn't fit your preconceived notions. Too bad. You might learn something. 2-3 billion people agree on what you think? please clarify...

mnottertail -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/11/2016 2:59:04 PM)
Closer to a third if that. Chances of learning something are zero, they dont know anything. We have all read the book and seen the movie on that.

Phydeaux -> RE: Leicester City and Trump vs Clinton: The Solution (5/11/2016 3:04:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic As you dont seem to have anything but mirth to share. would you like to get back to the topic of trump vs clinton , with trump being ahead in one poll in a race where he is the republican supposed nominee, and comparing the ONE poll with bernie and hils race still to be decided? Or figuratively that bernie is still beating trump in polls in a "hypothetical race", now why on earth would anyone seriously take his(fido) uncited claim of "liberal world view being disturbed" as well as being on poll, the week AFTER he wins the nomination, (no bump there at all eh?) as being relevant this far out of the actual race. Sure. Amazing how just a few weeks ago people were cooing that clinton would wrap up her race soon; the republicans were imploding; going to be a contested republican convention. I said, correctly, that there would not be a contested republican convention; that if there was going to be a contested convention it would be democrat. Sanders is going to run all the way through to the convention so long as money keeps coming in. Y'll liberals were predicting no way trump could win - and then the GOP would get crushed. I said there was still a chance of a republican wave election that essentially would be evidence only by the fact that republicns held on to the dim seats they gained 6 years ago. Trump went through a trough, but he's learning, and is on the upswing at the moment. Him going tot he RNC for fundraising is smart. He ought to go to cruz for ground game organization - cruz's organizational skills are better than anyone in the games except Clinton. I said hold on to your lunches liberals - because you view of reality is going to be severely disturbed by the next several weeks. High likelihood of it, anyway. Trump, 'the misogynist, the racist, the bigot, blah blah blah' is out performing your candidate. Oh - as for sanders - so long as there is the chance hillary gets indicted - Sander's runs. Because if hillary gets to the convention under indictment and the primary delegates are close - Sanders is going to say "Who do you want to be your candidate - someone under indictment - or me - who has more grassroots support". Powerful argument. And if the democrats stick with hillary in those circumstances - theylose. period.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875