RE: Who is it gonna be?

RE: Who is it gonna be? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

WhoreMods -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 6:37:32 AM)
Good point. You think he might try to stand as his own, veep, then? That probably wouldn't be much dafter or more unlikely than some of his performance this election cycle to date, I suppose...

DesideriScuri -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 6:49:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods Good point. You think he might try to stand as his own, veep, then? That probably wouldn't be much dafter or more unlikely than some of his performance this election cycle to date, I suppose... You're not the first one to post something like that. [:D]

Lucylastic -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 7:59:49 AM)
well after reading some news this morning, seems palin is going to support Paul Ryans running mate. so shes a trump arm, but pretty useless as always

Lucylastic -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 8:03:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Like palin whining narcissist with an overdeveloped sense of entitlement we have a couple in this forum on the right who would fit perfectly.

WhoreMods -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 8:26:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods Good point. You think he might try to stand as his own, veep, then? That probably wouldn't be much dafter or more unlikely than some of his performance this election cycle to date, I suppose... You're not the first one to post something like that. [:D] Mea culpa. Sorry, sport, I missed that.

WhoreMods -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 8:27:42 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Like palin whining narcissist with an overdeveloped sense of entitlement we have a couple in this forum on the right who would fit perfectly. [sm=jaw.gif] Really? I can't say I've noticed...

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 10:54:18 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Like palin whining narcissist with an overdeveloped sense of entitlement we have a couple in this forum on the right who would fit perfectly. And some on the left as well.

Lucylastic -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 1:46:10 PM)
Lol I didnt say otherwise. I can think of more than a couple

DesideriScuri -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 2:12:15 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Lol I didnt say otherwise. I can think of more than a couple Technically, you didn't say otherwise, but by leaving that little tidbit out, that's the way it comes across.

Lucylastic -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 2:17:10 PM)
As we( that is me n WM) were discussing palin and trumps veep pick, you are reaching.

Lucylastic -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 2:21:54 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Lol I didnt say otherwise. I can think of more than a couple Technically, you didn't say otherwise, but by leaving that little tidbit out, that's the way it comes across. Im only responsible for what i say, not what you think i should or shouldnt say, add or not add. Now i have , and did clarify before you posted, would you like to tell me what I really mean?

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 2:36:46 PM)
quote: As we( that is me n WM) were discussing palin and trumps veep pick, you are reaching. No he isn't. he is spot on. quote: Now i have , and did clarify before you posted, would you like to tell me what I really mean? He never said a thing about what you mean, only the way you chose to express whatever you mean and how it was perceived.

Lucylastic -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 2:49:23 PM)
Thats your opinion. I had already clarified my comment to you by saying i could name a couple on the left.He used my own clarification post. As a reason to tell me i left a tidbit out.... Derp

DesideriScuri -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 3:06:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic Lol I didnt say otherwise. I can think of more than a couple Technically, you didn't say otherwise, but by leaving that little tidbit out, that's the way it comes across. Im only responsible for what i say, not what you think i should or shouldnt say, add or not add. Now i have , and did clarify before you posted, would you like to tell me what I really mean? Yes, you clarified, but I said you leaving out that tidbit (the clarification) changes the way it (the unclarified statement) comes across.

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 3:42:53 PM)
quote: I had already clarified my comment to you by saying i could name a couple on the left.He used my own clarification post. As a reason to tell me i left a tidbit out.... Wow, you really do have trouble understanding what is written at times don't you. Derp indeed.

Lucylastic -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 3:58:32 PM)
And the same goes for you both, pissed because i didnt diss both sides at once. Dafuq! Indeed Nuff said

Blank101 -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 4:36:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri quote: ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam Remember that over the last few decades, it has been typical for a candidate to pick someone that is even more unacceptable than they are as "life insurance". Gonna be a long search. Palin? Alex Jones. Bam! Oh God. I will move to China if its Alex Jones.

Hillwilliam -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 5:42:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic because i didnt diss both sides at once. That's my job.

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/9/2016 6:19:15 PM)
quote: And the same goes for you both, pissed because i didnt diss both sides at once. No.

DesideriScuri -> RE: Who is it gonna be? (5/10/2016 2:35:29 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick quote: And the same goes for you both, pissed because i didnt diss both sides at once. No. She's already decided. This discussion is closed on her end.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875