RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol

RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

WhoreMods -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/14/2016 11:35:59 AM)
If you don't want people responding to you dog whistling, change your avatar.

Nnanji -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/14/2016 11:41:30 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick quote: doesn't contribute anything to the discussion, that I can see, except decent. Decent what? Never claimed I was a champion speller. I did notice that though and wondered if anyone else would. You get the brass ring.

BamaD -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/14/2016 11:47:27 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods If you don't want people responding to you dog whistling, change your avatar. A briliant and pointless personal insult. You think I claimed that Clinton was convicted, or that the fact he wasn't proves that Bush was, or that a knee jerk and irrelevant response should be treated as if it was reasonable response?

WhoreMods -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/14/2016 1:45:43 PM)
So how do you expect to have a comment about "when was Bush convicted" treated when you come out with that in a discussion about Clinton?

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/14/2016 2:38:26 PM)
quote: Never claimed I was a champion speller. I'm sorry, I didn't realize it was a typo, I thought you had just forgot to finish your sentence. Sometimes I earn my nickname. [:)]

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/14/2016 2:45:21 PM)
quote: When was W convicted in an American court. 1976. Though I am sure that since he plead guilty, you are going to claim he was technically "not convicted".

BamaD -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/14/2016 3:40:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods So how do you expect to have a comment about "when was Bush convicted" treated when you come out with that in a discussion about Clinton? Did you pay attention to the post I was responding to? If you had done that you could have avoided the whole thing.

BamaD -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/14/2016 3:44:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick quote: When was W convicted in an American court. 1976. Though I am sure that since he plead guilty, you are going to claim he was technically "not convicted". I am quite certain that he is not the only president convicted of a non felony. I am sure that lots of them have had at least traffic tickets.

DesideriScuri -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/14/2016 4:27:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 It won't happen in my country as we let them legally sharia patrol their own people. And allow them to execute their own sharia rules to their own Muslims. We anticipated something exactly like this, so we actually compromise with them to have a law that, no places are allowed to sell any alcoholic drinks within 200metres circumference from a mosque, so called sharia zone. And let them regulate their own little sharia zone. Why do you let them create their own laws? Isn't equal justice a consideration there? quote: But in the west, where there is no room for Sharia. This is how I imagine eventually, slowly, small pockets of Muslim community will try to have it going anyway. I actually think the Danish integration Minister should seek the London Mayor advice on how to deal with this. I'd love to hear his solution. We have the idea of equality before the law (doesn't always work out that way, but at least we have that for a goal to aim for). What happened, too, wasn't about a group policing itself, but a group attempting to impose it's version of law on others that didn't have any representation in that law actually being the law.

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/14/2016 4:33:49 PM)
I really don't give a fuck, you asked a question and I supplied the answer. The correct response from you would be "Thanks for the answer Dizzy".

BamaD -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/14/2016 4:51:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick I really don't give a fuck, you asked a question and I supplied the answer. The correct response from you would be "Thanks for the answer Dizzy". At least you know that part of the answer. Thatis better than a lot of people. It does not adress the sillyness of the original post. Thanks for the answer. Dizzy.

Greta75 -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/14/2016 4:52:59 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri Why do you let them create their own laws? Isn't equal justice a consideration there? We are a tiny nation, where I can walk from the north end to the south end of my country on foot in 4 hours. We are surrounded by two huge Muslim countries much larger than us who are allies with other and who want us to fail as a country. We used to be part of Malaysia, a Muslim Nation, who cast us out to die, when we refused to adhere to their law of giving Muslim people priority and first rights. Alot of diplomatic decisions towards Muslims, are given to stay in peace with our neighbours and not antagonize them. I don't agree with it, but our government did what they believed was best for our region. And it has kept the peace. So yes, the Muslims do get special privileges and they don't totally have to adhere to the same laws as we do. We do things in special ways very unique to our nation. None politically correct. We just do what we feel is the practical prevention and solution. For example, even our military, we refused to put any Muslims in combat positions, and let them be like medics instead, basically, all the less confrontational positions, because their religion clearly say that they aren't allowed to fight with or kill their own fellow Muslims. So their religious belief goes against their duty as a combat soldier in the military, thus they can't be in combat, as our most immediate enemies are the Muslim countries surrounding us.

BamaD -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/14/2016 5:26:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 quote: ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri Why do you let them create their own laws? Isn't equal justice a consideration there? We are a tiny nation, where I can walk from the north end to the south end of my country on foot in 4 hours. We are surrounded by two huge Muslim countries much larger than us who are allies with other and who want us to fail as a country. We used to be part of Malaysia, a Muslim Nation, who cast us out to die, when we refused to adhere to their law of giving Muslim people priority and first rights. Alot of diplomatic decisions towards Muslims, are given to stay in peace with our neighbours and not antagonize them. I don't agree with it, but our government did what they believed was best for our region. And it has kept the peace. So yes, the Muslims do get special privileges and they don't totally have to adhere to the same laws as we do. We do things in special ways very unique to our nation. None politically correct. We just do what we feel is the practical prevention and solution. For example, even our military, we refused to put any Muslims in combat positions, and let them be like medics instead, basically, all the less confrontational positions, because their religion clearly say that they aren't allowed to fight with or kill their own fellow Muslims. So their religious belief goes against their duty as a combat soldier in the military, thus they can't be in combat, as our most immediate enemies are the Muslim countries surrounding us. Are you familiar with the term Finlandization?

ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/15/2016 2:30:10 AM)
You're welcome. [:)]

Politesub53 -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/15/2016 4:31:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 quote: ORIGINAL: Politesub53 Instead of your bullshit Russian source, try reading a Danish one. http://www.thelocal.dk/20160512/sharia-zone-copenhagen-minister-get-job-nazi Both sources says the exact same thing, so what's your point? My latest point is you have failed to comprehend the differences in either report. Read them both again, slowly, very very slowly.

Greta75 -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/15/2016 11:57:26 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD Are you familiar with the term Finlandization? When you are that tiny. You don't have alot of choices. Sometimes it's good to be big and strong and to have larger populations. We tried to build strength through our wealth. We are wealthier. But that's all we can do. I think even going by military force, those two neighbouring countries has far superior numbers. I often wondered what a different world US would be IF the entire South America was Muslim runned. But fortunately for them, they are dealing with fellow Catholics or Christians or whatever they wanna be called.

BamaD -> RE: Vigilante Sharia Patrol (5/16/2016 9:42:19 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Greta75 quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD Are you familiar with the term Finlandization? When you are that tiny. You don't have alot of choices. Sometimes it's good to be big and strong and to have larger populations. We tried to build strength through our wealth. We are wealthier. But that's all we can do. I think even going by military force, those two neighbouring countries has far superior numbers. I often wondered what a different world US would be IF the entire South America was Muslim runned. But fortunately for them, they are dealing with fellow Catholics or Christians or whatever they wanna be called. Exactly what a Fin would say. Denmark doesn't have that excuse.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875