RE: Muslims and Christians (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Blank101 -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 5:14:33 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Blank101
No where in the Quran does it say that the punishment for apostasy is death. The Hadith does support the killing those who apostatize, however it is second in authority to the Quran.


Capital punishment applies in the case of a person who meets any of the following conditions:

1 – The apostate. The apostate is one who disbelieves after being a Muslim, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever changes his religion, execute him.” Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 6524.
Source (one of several): https://islamqa.info/en/20824




That comes from the Hadith, freedomdwarf.

The Quran is considered to be the literal word of god. Here is a nice discussion on the topic: https://www.quora.com/Does-Islam-order-the-killing-of-one-who-wants-to-leave-Islam-for-another-religion-and-does-it-allow-freedom-to-practice-any-religion-by-anyone




Blank101 -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 6:02:15 AM)

quote:

Greta75

No authentic Islam scholar in the Muslim world would agree with you that Hadiths come second to the Quran. You cannot understand the Quran without the Hadith. They go hand in hand. Quran has vague verses. Hadith explains more indepth how to interprete the verses in the Quran by giving examples. This is exactly why, moderate muslims who desperately want to ditch the hadith and discredit it, because from the beginning of time of Islam. There has been no room for different interpretation. Thanks to the Hadith. It's not like the bible where it is the ONLY book, Quran has a secondary official books that tells you exactly how to interpret it correctly and the Hadith is where all the real nastiness starts. And for them to have more peaceful interpretation of Islam, new school Muslims wants to discredit the authenticity of the Hadith but you can't come in much later in life, in the long history of practising Islam and then decide, the hadith that has from the beginning of time been revered as THE guide to interpreting the Quran correctly and suddenly denounce it to the Muslim world as false and inaccurate! It might work convincing lefties. But not the Muslim people.

The best part is, all the hadiths are ranked according to how authentic and accurate the information are. They are annointed as super authentic officially! The top 3 ones.

And, find me a Muslim country in this world who does not punish apostasy? There is none. Not all of them is death, but it is against the law of ALL Muslim countries, and if there is no death, there is imprisonment.

Malaysia constantly have this fights, where one parents is Muslim and one parent is Hindu for example. And the child wants to convert to a Hindu. The law tells him. Sure, then face the death penalty. And they never win it. As in successfully win conversion. In the end, they battle, and lose, and give up and decide to value their life. In Malaysia, they make it super strict. If your mother or father is a Muslim, You're a Muslim whether you like it or not. Period. And that's a super moderate Muslim country.

The battle is so bad to the extent where parents battle at courts, IF their son died, and one wants to bury them Hindu way, and the other wants to bury Muslim way. And Muslim way always wins.

And worst of all, they have religious police that patrols and enforce sharia laws, even in the most modern cities like Kuala Lumpur. If you are a non Muslim, there is nothing to worry about. But if you are officially recognised by the country as a Muslim, because one of your parent is a Muslim. IF they caught you just holding hands with a woman. You must produce a marriage certificate, or you are screwed! It's jail term! Immediate arrest.

They raid hotels too and check on Muslim couples.

The oppression is soooo terrible. It just sickens me to hear the left defending this disgusting religion day after day.


I was speaking specifically of apostasy and death.

As far as the Hadith..it's considered to the second hand accounts of the prophet Muhammad, is it not? And the Quran is considered to be the literal word of God (Allah), right? https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-quran-sharia-and-hadith

It sounds like the Hadith is the equivalent to the old/new testament. Authenticity aside, they are interpretations of the word of god that came hundreds of years later. The Bible, and its old testament, has had its fair share of violence. How can you seriously defend the Hadit's teaching over the old testaments? You can't have it both ways. Why can't moderate Muslims ditch the Hadith, but Christians can ditch the old testament and establish a slightly less violent new testament? Seriously?

I really hope you're not accusing me of being a lefty. You may not like the "oppressiveness" of Islam, but you don't speak for everyone. All I've done is provide an objective opinion.




WhoreMods -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 10:28:25 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Blank101
It sounds like the Hadith is the equivalent to the old/new testament. Authenticity aside, they are interpretations of the word of god that came hundreds of years later. The Bible, and its old testament, has had its fair share of violence. How can you seriously defend the Hadit's teaching over the old testaments? You can't have it both ways. Why can't moderate Muslims ditch the Hadith, but Christians can ditch the old testament and establish a slightly less violent new testament? Seriously?

Some do. The argument over whether the Koran or the Hadiths take precedence is a big part of the pissing match between the Sunnis and the Shi'ites, in fact.




Greta75 -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 10:43:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Blank101
As far as the Hadith..it's considered to the second hand accounts of the prophet Muhammad, is it not? And the Quran is considered to be the literal word of God (Allah), right? https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-quran-sharia-and-hadith

It sounds like the Hadith is the equivalent to the old/new testament. Authenticity aside, they are interpretations of the word of god that came hundreds of years later. The Bible, and its old testament, has had its fair share of violence. How can you seriously defend the Hadit's teaching over the old testaments? You can't have it both ways. Why can't moderate Muslims ditch the Hadith, but Christians can ditch the old testament and establish a slightly less violent new testament? Seriously?



The old testament is a different material from the New Testament.

Quran = Allah's words
Hadith = Gives more indepth historical details to the circumstances surrounding as to why Allah said those things in the Quran, in relations to what incident, or what situation

Hadith is a Guide to understand Allah's correct interpretation.

Compared to

Old Testament = What happened in the older times of Christianity
New Testament = Jesus time

Two completely different things.




WhoreMods -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 10:52:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75


quote:

ORIGINAL: Blank101
As far as the Hadith..it's considered to the second hand accounts of the prophet Muhammad, is it not? And the Quran is considered to be the literal word of God (Allah), right? https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-quran-sharia-and-hadith

It sounds like the Hadith is the equivalent to the old/new testament. Authenticity aside, they are interpretations of the word of god that came hundreds of years later. The Bible, and its old testament, has had its fair share of violence. How can you seriously defend the Hadit's teaching over the old testaments? You can't have it both ways. Why can't moderate Muslims ditch the Hadith, but Christians can ditch the old testament and establish a slightly less violent new testament? Seriously?



The old testament is a different material from the New Testament.

Quran = Allah's words
Hadith = Gives more indepth historical details to the circumstances surrounding as to why Allah said those things in the Quran, in relations to what incident, or what situation

Hadith is a Guide to understand Allah's correct interpretation.

Compared to

Old Testament = What happened in the older times of Christianity
New Testament = Jesus time

Two completely different things.


Not quite.
The old testament was compiled from older Jewish texts (mostly the Torah, and it's illuminating to compare a Biblical old testament to that to see what's been altered), at the same time as the new testament was assembled from the four gospels that contradicted each other the least and all of Paul's horseshit. You just need to look at the apocrypha to see how much stuff was considered unbecoming for the official bible, and there's stuff like the Book of Enoch that didn't even make it into the Apocrypha.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 10:55:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Blank101
As far as the Hadith..it's considered to the second hand accounts of the prophet Muhammad, is it not? And the Quran is considered to be the literal word of God (Allah), right? https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-quran-sharia-and-hadith

It sounds like the Hadith is the equivalent to the old/new testament. Authenticity aside, they are interpretations of the word of god that came hundreds of years later. The Bible, and its old testament, has had its fair share of violence. How can you seriously defend the Hadit's teaching over the old testaments? You can't have it both ways. Why can't moderate Muslims ditch the Hadith, but Christians can ditch the old testament and establish a slightly less violent new testament? Seriously?

I really hope you're not accusing me of being a lefty. You may not like the "oppressiveness" of Islam, but you don't speak for everyone. All I've done is provide an objective opinion.

According to religionfacts (and others) -
quote:

In Islam, the sacred text called the "Hadith," which is Arabic for "narrative" or "report," is a record of Islamic tradition: it is a record of the words and deeds of the prophet Muhammad, his family, and his companions. It is the second most important text in Islam next to the Quran. Although not regarded as the spoken Word of God like the Quran, the Hadith is an important source of doctrine, law, and practice.

It is "revered in Islam as a major source of religious law and moral guidance" and has been studied in Muslim religious colleges since the Middle Ages by both male and female scholars.


So, the Quran is the 'spoken word of God' and the Hadiths are the recorded words and deeds of the prophet Muhammad.
In essence, they are not second-hand accounts like they are in a christian bible.
And from everything I've read, the Hadiths are as important as the Quran itself.




Greta75 -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 11:10:02 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods
Not quite.
The old testament was compiled from older Jewish texts (mostly the Torah, and it's illuminating to compare a Biblical old testament to that to see what's been altered), at the same time as the new testament was assembled from the four gospels that contradicted each other the least and all of Paul's horseshit. You just need to look at the apocrypha to see how much stuff was considered unbecoming for the official bible, and there's stuff like the Book of Enoch that didn't even make it into the Apocrypha.

Yes but you don't use the New Testament to understand or reference to what the old Testament is saying. Or the other way round at all. They are two different books, telling two different stories of a different era in Christian History.

Whereas a Hadith and Quran are on synchronized timeline.




WhoreMods -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 11:13:21 AM)

True, tough there's plenty of alleged "Christians" who seem a lot more interested in the few lines of Genesis and Leviticus they can use to justify their prejudices than anything Christ had to say.

As for the other: that's what happens when you have an illiterate "writing" your holy book. "Oh, I forgot to mention that the Prophet said this in the koran! I'll just write another hadith or two..."




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 11:23:11 AM)

No, not illiterates.
In those days, the only people able to actually write were usually highly educated scholars and clerics.

Not sure where you get the remotest idea that they were written by illiterates.




WickedsDesire -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 12:17:17 PM)

Greta75 I find many of your threads, posts are racist.

Be more tactile please. Only draw out the knobkerrie for the worst of them or those who ask for it.

Personally I would ban all religions for a variety of reasons eg not knowing scripture, ancient texts, plagiarism and loch ness monsterism, never to be confused with the monster that inhabits my Pantaloon region

So what figure of Islam would you care to cite. Do tell me and do in conjunction with Christianity, not Buddhism...but for tang never forget to add in the war warmongering aspect

Personally, I heathen, will date anyone of any religion




TallClevDom -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 12:20:44 PM)

Actually Mohammed was said to be illiterate and had the Koran dictated to him by an archangel.




Awareness -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 12:30:29 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

True, tough there's plenty of alleged "Christians" who seem a lot more interested in the few lines of Genesis and Leviticus they can use to justify their prejudices than anything Christ had to say.
Oh really? What lines and what prejudices?




WhoreMods -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 12:37:50 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1

No, not illiterates.
In those days, the only people able to actually write were usually highly educated scholars and clerics.

Not sure where you get the remotest idea that they were written by illiterates.


Mostly from the fact that there's a fair bit of historical documentation that Mohammed was illiterate, and so dictated the Koran to one of his sidekicks.




freedomdwarf1 -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 12:39:22 PM)

Aaaaanddd..... Mohamed didn't write the hadiths, or the Quran.
At least, not that I'm aware of.

So, my point stands; not written by illiterates.




dcnovice -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 12:39:29 PM)

quote:

What lines and what prejudices?

You really don't know?




WhoreMods -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 12:40:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

True, tough there's plenty of alleged "Christians" who seem a lot more interested in the few lines of Genesis and Leviticus they can use to justify their prejudices than anything Christ had to say.
Oh really? What lines and what prejudices?


Leviticus 18:32 and 20:13.
Twats who have no problem wearing mixed fibres, getting inked or screwing outside of wedlock are very fond of parroting those lines. Have you never noticed?




dcnovice -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 12:53:15 PM)

Perhaps a visual aid might help. [:)]

[image]https://jerrymireland.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/tattoos.jpeg[/image]




WhoreMods -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 12:58:49 PM)

!8:22 not 18:32, then. I don't have my King James to hand.




dcnovice -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 1:10:43 PM)

Typos happen to us all. [:)]

But you did spur me to look at Leviticus 18 and 19. Came across a commandment that makes an interesting lens for viewing the rhetoric of the 2016 election:

When an alien resides with you in your land, you shall not oppress the alien. The alien who resides with you shall be to you as the citizen among you; you shall love the alien as yourself, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God. (Lev. 19:33-34, NRSV)





PeonForHer -> RE: Muslims and Christians (5/17/2016 1:41:50 PM)

quote:

When an alien resides with you in your land, you shall not oppress the alien. The alien who resides with you shall be to you as the citizen among you; you shall love the alien as yourself, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God. (Lev. 19:33-34, NRSV)


Why even bother, DC? You of all people must, by now, be used to people looking at you blankly when you cite sections of the Bible, then carry on saying and believing exactly what they've always said and believed, as though you'd said nothing at all. The people you're arguing with are stuffed full of prejudices, don't like to think, and will only do so when someone they assume to be an authority tells them to. And even then it makes their brains ache. Get some quack group of zany religious fruitcakes to give you a clerical title, get fat, grow hairs out of your nostrils, learn to roll your eyes and flare your nostrils, buy a big limo, shag lots of underage people and appear frequently on TV, and you might have a chance.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875