Termyn8or
Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Nnanji
I
quote:
ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:
ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
Does anyone think anything out ?
First of all, this information comes from the applicant or a government that has been all blowed up and is in shambles.
What's more, these governments want rid of these people.
Let me ask this, if you own rental property and want rid of a tenant, why give a bad reference ? You want him out, you want someone else to accept him so you can go back to a peaceful existence. So it it in your best interest to give a bad tenant a good reference to get the fuck rid of them.
This ever occur to anyone ?
If we had a serial rapist, killer and white slaver and he got off on a technicality and wanted to emigrate to Iran, what kind of reference would you give him ? You would say he is a fine upstanding member of the community and pays his taxes and what the fuckever else.
Go. And when you see that Uhaul pull out then crack open that brewski, that asshole is someone else's problem.
It is all in which side of the game you are on.
T^T
Belaboring (albeit perhaps necessarily) the obvious.
My point is that if you can't verify what you are getting why let them in.
In the case of the Ca couple they found, after the fact, that her facebook was full of Anti American , pro terrorist postings. They didn't even do the interview that they were suppossed to. You do agree don't you that untill we do everything we can just swining the doors open is asking for trouble. I will take what you said one step further. If a Irainian terrorist is trying to get in here what kind of reference will we get from Iran?
Actually Iran's support of terrorism is much overstated.
No it's not. Iran supplies/supplied most of the IED's that went to Iraq. It provides funds to Syrian who then spends them on terrorism is Lebenon, Isreal, Egypt and other places. It just had a general killed in Jordan that was working with terrorists there. Syria would not have been able to control Lebenon without Iranian support.
You don't see to know the definition of terrorism. Terrorism is when they blow up the Boston Marathon. When WE got THERE and fuck with THEIR COUNTRY, defending themselves is not terrorism. And countries that support them are totally allowed to do so, but the US government thinks it can ruin the whole world and say what is right and wrong everywhere.
To the US and Israeli governments, huminitarian aid to the Palestinians is terrorism. This is one of the major things Iran has supported. Also, Israel has attacked Iran several ties and in several different way but Iran has never attacked Israel.
Now if you want to say that a can of beans kept a Palestinian rebel alive long enough to shoot a bottle rocket into some Jew's swimming pool is terrorism, well then they're guilty.
Another thing, the US is giving material support to terrorists in Syria, and Assad did NOT use the gas as proven by the company that sold it to him.
No, they have fed you a bunch of bullshit.
Their definition of terrorist has seemed to expand greatly. I would guess McVeigh was a terrorist, he wanted to instill terror, but at least he had the right target, the biggest terrorists on the planet - the US government.
to put it right, Iran never funded terrorism at all. Iran funded human rights causes with which the US government disagrees with because it would hurt their financial interests.
Most of this shit is all about the pipeline wars. Who controls the pipelines that supply Europe ? Of course there are seemingly tertiary issues, but those could be useful to that effect. Exxon and BP want control of the natural gas and oil, all of it. DO YOU UNDERSTAND ? They use the US military as their tool to try to achieve that. The problem is all these countries are not just laying down and taking it. Would you ?
If Gazprom (Russian oil company) came to the US and wanted to take over all the oil wells and other natural resources of the US, would you want that ? Or would you want soldiers in there to kill them if they did not leave when asked ? What's more, they shut down your production to keep the prices high and your people starve, but they bribe your government officials to allow them to keep on doing it.
YOU would be a terrorist if you have any goddamn backbone.
Seems like the people running the show have never been in a fight. At least with someone their own size.
Actually they haven't. The cold war was a ruse to get public support for a military buildup. The Russians did more than the US in WW2, and notice how big a country Germany is. Look how big Japan is.
Next time, Russia is not going to be with the US. They do not spend $400 on a toilet seat. They do not have their weapons built in China. And their people are now happy. Go ahead and fuck with them. You seriously fuck with Russia they won't even have to institute a draft.
And China, as bad as it is kinda, it is better. They will fight for their country.
Now over here, the only people who go into the military are those with absolutely no future. And when they get there, one a day commits suicide and a third of them are on antidepressant or other psychotropic drugs.
Well you have to keep them high if you want them to commit terrorist acts. and that is what they do. They go to other countries with which we are not at war and kill people.
You think that's OK ?
One government's terrorist is another's freedom fighter.
T^T
|
RE: History of US not wanting immigrants - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread