RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


vincentML -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/30/2016 11:35:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Do all things physical contain spirit or are all an aspect of spirit?
If not, how do you distinguish which does and does not?

You asked, are we to assume that rocks have consciousness? I think that sets up consciousness as a straw man. I do not think that rocks are conscious. But who is to say that matter at all levels does not possess a degree of interior subjective experience, however dim. And what line can be drawn that isn't purely arbitrary? Some material organizations are animate and some are not, but that distinction speaks only to a capacity for responsiveness. It does not address the presence or absence of interior subjective experience. We are made from the same earthly materials as rocks. To say that awareness "emerges" in certain conditions is simply to state that it becomes evident, without explaining how something that wasn't there before can become "evident" in the first place. I can't claim to hold any firm beliefs on the question, but I don't find it unreasonable to view the situation as a matter of degrees and capacities.

K.

It was not my intent to set up consciousness as a straw man. You dwelt on it in your OP; I was following your lead.

I fully understand that matter has energy, or is a manifestation of energy, at all levels but I don't understand how one can even speculate that inanimate materials have an internal subjective experience without sensory contact with the external world. Evidently, it depends on how you define "degree of internal subjective experience." I cannot imagine it is very enriched. I am curious to know what were the precursors in your thinking that lead to such speculation.

quote:

We are made from the same earthly materials as rocks. To say that awareness "emerges" in certain conditions is simply to state that it becomes evident, without explaining how something that wasn't there before can become "evident" in the first place

The organization of those earthly materials are different. The carbon in rocks may be found for example in the salts calcium carbonate and calcium chloride, among other inorganic compounds, while the carbon in the human body is found abundantly in fats, amino acids, proteins, and carbohydrates which are far more complex molecules. The evolutionary emergence of consciousness springs from the self-organizing organic structures. Some experiments (a few cited above) have demonstrated the cross over from inorganic compounds to organic compounds. The emergence is due to the structures not to the materials, how the materials are organized into varying structures, and importantly how the structures are self-organizing through the activity of the nucleic acid chains which provide templates for new structures. Emergence is not evident in the primitive stages of organization, but seems to be evident in the late stages.

I agree the situation may be a matter of degrees and capacities once organic structures are "alive."




kdsub -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/30/2016 11:36:25 AM)

Not really Termy...you then have to explain the origins of the energy...and if you found that then the origins of your new discovery and so on. Until you reach the beginning where nothing existed...and then it did.

Butch




Kirata -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/30/2016 11:38:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

What you do not seem to realize is that you cannot argue the matter from purely a material stand point.

What you do not seem to realize is that I am not arguing anything.

K.





Kirata -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/30/2016 11:50:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Substances as you describe are inanimate...lacking perception and volition and are not sentient. The state of being sentient is characterized by sensation and consciousness, also defined as life that is aware of its own existence and substances can not...'experience.'

Why would an awareness of being require sensory inputs? Is not existence itself an experience?

K.




Kirata -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/30/2016 12:27:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

I agree the situation may be a matter of degrees and capacities once organic structures are "alive."

Well, I think that any definition of what constitutes "life" would at this point be somewhat arbitrary, though certainly a mere interior awareness of being would not qualify if the definition required responsiveness and reproduction. But we may be drawing lines where there are none.

K.





vincentML -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/30/2016 12:33:45 PM)

Butch . . .

The laws of physics as we know them apply only within our own universe (we have not experienced other universis)

I suspect that Kirata did not have cosmogony in mind when he proposed the OP so I will be brief. We can view your question through several assumptions:

1. Maybe nothing existed before the big bang and the start of time. It was all started by a mindful creator.

2. Maybe there was a singularity (an intensely dense black hole) that exploded.

3. Maybe there exists a Multiverse in which our universe is one of a population of universes.

4. Maybe matter/energy always existed.

The first three beg the question what came before the creator, the singularity, or the multiverse?

Saying that matter/energy is eternal in both time directions is similar to saying the Creator is eternal in both directions.

I leave the pondering to you.

quote:

Neither of the experiments in your examples produced life and consciousness. If we manage to produce life then it will be the result of existing intelligence not natural progression of inanimate objects.
No, of course not. That would have been magical. I supplied those experiments only to show some support for the theory of Abiogenesis (which is not about our creating life. . we do that through fornication)




kdsub -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/30/2016 12:37:03 PM)

All we can do is ponder...but that does not change the fact that there was magic...and because of this all things are possible.

Butch




Termyn8or -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/31/2016 3:39:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Substances as you describe are inanimate...lacking perception and volition and are not sentient. The state of being sentient is characterized by sensation and consciousness, also defined as life that is aware of its own existence and substances can not...'experience.'

Why would an awareness of being require sensory inputs? Is not existence itself an experience?

K.



That is approaching the abortion argument, whether it is actually murder or not.

T^T




bounty44 -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/31/2016 5:35:06 AM)

im reminded of the line in the star trek opening monologue "to seek out new life..." and the smattering of episodes where they had to wrestle with the question of "is this a life form or not?"




dcnovice -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/31/2016 5:57:52 AM)

FR

[image]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/08/95/82/089582f34357a977c19af5b452498b8a.jpg[/image]




MrRodgers -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/31/2016 6:10:47 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

Substances as you describe are inanimate...lacking perception and volition and are not sentient. The state of being sentient is characterized by sensation and consciousness, also defined as life that is aware of its own existence and substances can not...'experience.'

Why would an awareness of being require sensory inputs? Is not existence itself an experience?

K.


No, not in objects inanimate as they are or substances and even in some animal life. Without being sentient, there is no awareness of existence. Without that awareness...there is no experience. Don't know of any insects for example, that are aware that there is life as they are not aware of their own...or that they even exist.




vincentML -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/31/2016 6:46:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

All we can do is ponder...but that does not change the fact that there was magic...and because of this all things are possible.

Butch

The fact that there was magic? And you know this how?




kdsub -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/31/2016 8:18:29 AM)

I know it because there was once nothing... then everything. Something from nothing is true magic in my book. If this did happen and... then you start with nothing and create...there are infinite possibilities of what can be created. There would be no absolute laws of physics because they could be created in infinite ways. This would make any reality possible.

If there were no point of creation this is no less incomprehensible and still magic... or any adjective you choose to assign this inescapable fact.

Butch




vincentML -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/31/2016 10:09:41 AM)

You are assuming there was once nothing. Your mind will not allow the possibility that matter/energy always existed. Why is that? We pretty much know that matter/energy within a system cannot be destroyed (at least not in our experience) So, why should we not accept that all the matter/energy that now exists did not always exist?

The only option as I see it is to assume that energy entered from another system, which begs the question how did energy get into that other system in the first place. We are then confronted once again with the "first cause" problem.




WhoreMods -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/31/2016 10:13:29 AM)

I think he's talking about creation myths, rather than the big bang theory, sport.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/31/2016 10:16:46 AM)

quote:

Without being sentient, there is no awareness of existence.

How do you know?




vincentML -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/31/2016 10:23:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

I think he's talking about creation myths, rather than the big bang theory, sport.

Creation myths are hard to shake but to be fair I did offer that as one alternative.




WhoreMods -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/31/2016 10:24:58 AM)

A fine gesture.
[;)]




kdsub -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/31/2016 10:26:51 AM)

You did not read the second paragraph of my post...Which would be less of a miracle...all from nothing... or all with no beginning? No difference to me both are beyond comprehension and always will be.

Butch




WhoreMods -> RE: Let's try leaving religion out of it.... (5/31/2016 10:31:31 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

You did not read the second paragraph of my post...Which would be less of a miracle...all from nothing... or all with no beginning? No difference to me both are beyond comprehension and always will be.

Butch

So wat was created from nothing in your world? The Christian creation myth involves God imposing order on formless chaos, rather than creating any matter from scratch.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.700089E-02