Men vs women who can't support their kids

Men vs women who can't support their kids (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

respectmen -> Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/28/2016 9:55:48 PM)
https://www.google.com.au/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fstarecat.com%2Fcontent%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fpublic-housing-for-women-who-cant-financially-support-their-children-for-men-prison.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fstarecat.com%2Fcategory%2Fmen%2Fpage%2F9%2F&docid=ATU_Y_YKR7GO7M&tbnid=RKjpGxGxJq-brM%3A&w=735&h=731&bih=754&biw=1638&ved=0ahUKEwiF3IDMvv7MAhVBj5QKHdJ5CEUQMwgtKBEwEQ&iact=mrc&uact=8 So much for all this male privilege. lolz

stef -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/28/2016 10:06:35 PM)
[image]http://mashable.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/crying-waterfalls.gif[/image]

respectmen -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/28/2016 10:08:31 PM)
Hey stef, would a male be considered a misogynist if he acted the same way as you towards an injustice and double standard against women?

stef -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/28/2016 10:13:12 PM)
My post refers only to you, not to any perceived injustice that you may be feeling on behalf of your fellow whiny babymen.

respectmen -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/28/2016 10:26:55 PM)
So when feminists complain, they are whiny babywomen? Oh that's right, you have double standards.

stef -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/28/2016 10:28:36 PM)
Nope. You should stop using that word until you understand the definition. Until then, keep crying whiny babyman. [image]https://media.giphy.com/media/ylyUQl1kgM9TV4yPss/giphy.gif[/image]

respectmen -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/28/2016 10:36:58 PM)
So it isn't having a double standard to have one standard, a positive standard, when women complain about their gender grievances while having another standard, a negative standard, when men complain about their gender grievances? Riight I think you are the one who needs to learn what double standards mean. You seem so damn dumb that you don't even understand your own mindset. When women complain about gender issues that affect women, they are poor victims standing up for their rights. When men complain about gender issues that affect men, they are whiny babymen lol. Gotta larf at your version of equality.

stef -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/28/2016 10:47:16 PM)
If that was my version of "gender equality", you might have a point. It's not, whiny babyman. [image]https://media.giphy.com/media/BcF7P2fOYyKJO/giphy.gif[/image]

respectmen -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/28/2016 10:52:59 PM)
So feminists are whiny babies too? If not, that's a double standard, dummy. [:D]

stef -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/28/2016 11:35:20 PM)
No, to both. Again, you really shouldn't use words you don't understand whiny babyman.

respectmen -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/28/2016 11:39:24 PM)
It's you who doesn't seem to understand what double standards mean. It's you who doesn't even understand what you are actually doing.You seem borderline retarded.

Termyn8or -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/28/2016 11:40:37 PM)
FR There goes a minute of my time I'll never get back. T^T

respectmen -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/28/2016 11:42:53 PM)
Termy, thank Stef for that. I've never seen her post anything relevant or intelligent in discussion for all these years I've observed this forum. Her posts are usually silly one liners, or not if that, pictures.

Blank101 -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/28/2016 11:42:55 PM)
[sm=coffee_pc.gif]

Termyn8or -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/29/2016 1:12:11 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: respectmen Termy, thank Stef for that. I've never seen her post anything relevant or intelligent in discussion for all these years I've observed this forum. Her posts are usually silly one liners, or not if that, pictures. She actually used to be a moderator. Not no mo, but she does have her moments. But I am sure she qualifies under most of the tenets of feminism. We got the physical strength and usually the guns. We bestow rights on others, not the other way round. White Men built half of what is good in this world, despite being a minority. We stole half of what we got, diamonds from South Africa, Cadmium from Bosnia or whatever, Milesovic country, phosphorus from Nam. Next up is gold in Mali. It is coming. T^T

WhoreMods -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/29/2016 4:33:47 AM)
I'm just feeling smug that I'd suggested the 'fathers for justice" nonsense as part of his issues with women before he started this thread. [sm=banana.gif]

WickedsDesire -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/29/2016 5:30:27 AM)
Do I need to come out with the whole Ops’ thread is a classical example of dangerous(ish) sophistry. Please refrain for doing so, you do it almost all the time. As so do some of the rest of you - you know whom you are. Besides you(s) have a brain consider trying to make a better contribution >90% of the time, ranting <10% is acceptable. Whence I was a lad I was well aware of my father avoiding paying maintenance, a pittance back in those days. I am also aware of a guy I used to work with said to me if he had to pay maintenance to his wife, who had a higher paying job and her new boyfriend. He would be left with almost no money and not able to house himself even in a wretched hovel – so he gave up his job. I am also aware some women who basked in being knocked up by many men so they could get the 3-4 bedroom house and a set of benefits, to the max. That allowed them to live a reasonably well off life where they did not work and had no intention of ever doing so and were able to go out partying every day at the weekends and more and they had the latest 500inch tvs and brand new kitchens with the gold plated sinks and butlers (okay maybe not the last bit). Anyhoos I can cite a whole mixed bag of stories

Lucylastic -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/29/2016 6:49:57 AM)
Its a bit like the rape figures..cept the rape figures are worse Half the parents that fuck over their kids, will never see the inside of a jail.

WhoreMods -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/29/2016 7:11:45 AM)
Myself, I'm wondering why somebody who spends all of his posts bitching about women usurping men's rightful role as earners and breadwinners and the people who are meant to hold down a proper job is whining about men being being expected to pay child support if they can't keep it in their pants or use a rubber?

Greta75 -> RE: Men vs women who can't support their kids (5/29/2016 7:20:08 AM)
I'm pretty sure a house husband would get the house instead of jail for being unable to pay child support too. And the woman who is responsible for his alimony and child expenses will be put to jail. I'm pretty sure this is true for my country. So tell you what. Be a house husband! Find a wife to support you financially. Be the one staying at home taking care of the kid. You won't end up in jail for refusing to pay child support as long as you are gonna personally hands on take care of the child all the way. I know at least 5 house husbands in my life time personally with wives who earn over 100k per annum and they don't work, they just stay at home and take care of kids. So I know they aren't going to jail if they divorce and can't pay child support. They are financially reliant on their wives. And I know their wives won't even want custody of the kids in the divorce, they would get custody of the kids. As they marry career minded women.

Page: [1] 2 3 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125