RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


samboct -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/17/2016 2:29:12 PM)

Here's Catherine MacKinnon's exact quote:

Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence (1983) Signs Vol. 8 No. 4[edit]

”Perhaps the wrong of rape has proven so difficult to articulate because the unquestionable starting point has been that rape is definable as distinct from intercourse, when for women it is difficult to distinguish them under conditions of male dominance.”

While my paraphrase is by no means an exact quote- I do think it gets the point across. She'd be cheering this verdict. Catherine MacKinnon's tortured sentence suggests that it is difficult for women to tell the difference between rape and sex. Is this really a line we want the law to decide? Why isn't it difficult for men to make the same distinction? Clearly, Catherine MacKinnon is not advocating gender blind law- but I am.

To Wayward Soul: "If it was a man lying passed out being violated by a woman, that's criminal as well, and should be prosecuted."

Here's the problem as I see it....and I'll freely admit I'm guessing here- most men wouldn't prosecute someone else under these conditions. I wouldn't- there's too much culpability on both sides. Doesn't matter whether the person violating me is male or female. When something is considered a crime by one gender, but not another- I think we've got a problem on our hands that legal remedies (which are often awful) are unable to cure. In other words- there's too much after the fact discussion. Most crimes are simple- you were either robbed or you weren't. This case hinges on was she conscious or wasn't she. It's the reason that I have a lot of trouble thinking of Brock Turner as a criminal- he clearly wanted to get laid, but I haven't seen any evidence that he wanted to force anyone to have sex with him. Crimes imply planning. The definition of rape when I grew up was that rape was not about sex- rape was about inflicting your will on an unwilling victim. If they left the party together to have sex- I have problems with calling it rape because she passed out. Catherine MacKinnon would have no trouble calling this rape- but she has lots of trouble around sex too.


Sam









crazyml -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/17/2016 2:38:15 PM)

You called me on my statement that Andrea Mk never said that.

You asked for an apology if I were proved wrong.

I have provided a couple of links that show that my statement was justofied and if you were prepared to do your own research you could find many more.

I didn't expect you to have the integrity to apologise when your false assertion was proven wrong.

As to your second false assertion that the all sex is rape lie was a cornerstone of rad feminism, thst''s horseshit too. It is true that an exceedingly small number of nutty rad fems held that view but to state that it represented a cornerstone of the entire movement is just shit.





crazyml -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/17/2016 2:40:45 PM)

Oh no. Wait a fucking second? She did not say "all sex is rape" then?

Marvellous. So glad we cleared that one up.

And.. yes, I think she would be cheering the verdict. Alongside all those people who don't think it's OK to rape.




Wayward5oul -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/17/2016 3:13:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: samboct
Here's the problem as I see it....and I'll freely admit I'm guessing here-


Your posts have made it clear that you are guessing about a lot of things, despite evidence indicating your assertions are incorrect.

quote:

most men wouldn't prosecute someone else under these conditions
.
You don't know that. But the fact remains that they would have the option to do so, if they wanted to. That is how the law is written.

quote:

When something is considered a crime by one gender, but not another

Where has anyone but you suggested that it would be a crime by one gender but not another? Please show me. Seriously, I would like to see that.

quote:

Most crimes are simple- you were either robbed or you weren't.

In what world do you live in? We have an incredibly complicated legal system due to the fact that most crimes are not that simple.

quote:

This case hinges on was she conscious or wasn't she.


And all available evidence states that she was not. Which constitutes rape. Greater minds than yours have established that as a reasonable expectation all across the nation.

quote:

Crimes imply planning.

Bullshit. Lots of crimes are unplanned. Doesn't make them any less of a crime.

quote:

The definition of rape when I grew up was that rape was not about sex- rape was about inflicting your will on an unwilling victim.

What you learned is an oversimplification of an incredibly complex issue and if that encompasses all that you know about it, then you need to go back and do some reading because you are apparently completely ignorant about what rape is.


quote:

I have problems with calling it rape because she passed out.


So sex with an unconscious person should be legal. Got it.

I seriously thought that the human race had evolved beyond this sort of thinking. The fact that people that think this way still exist is seriously disturbing to me, and I am grateful that almost every other man that has posted on this thread has condemned this act, because that is what I will try to take away from it, and tell myself that cretins like you are the minority.






BamaD -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/17/2016 4:12:39 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

You called me on my statement that Andrea Mk never said that.

You asked for an apology if I were proved wrong.

I have provided a couple of links that show that my statement was justofied and if you were prepared to do your own research you could find many more.

I didn't expect you to have the integrity to apologise when your false assertion was proven wrong.

As to your second false assertion that the all sex is rape lie was a cornerstone of rad feminism, thst''s horseshit too. It is true that an exceedingly small number of nutty rad fems held that view but to state that it represented a cornerstone of the entire movement is just shit.



No, I called you on your proclimation was never made. I it makes sense that you know more about the U S, what with you living there and all ,with me being thousands of miles away . BTW what about the term feminazis made you think for one moment that I was talking about mainstream femenism .
BTW part 2 how can you pretend that radical femmenists are anything but extremests?




WinsomeDefiance -> RE: RRE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/17/2016 4:19:44 PM)

BamaD wrote:
quote:


Sounds like you got two bad judges. One got carried away on a traffic fine, maybe you are in one of those community financed by sticking it to drivers.
And one who thinks that you are at fault or he wouldn't have beaten you. He should have, based on what you said done some time.


Just to clarify, it was a single judge and I wasn't the victim. I just had the misfortune of being the person the judge saw after he ruled on the domestic violence case. So, I had been sitting there listening to what transpired and how the judge ruled.

I think you are correct. Our county does seem to benefit from high fines for minor infractions.

I've given up trying to understand how judges think.




Lucylastic -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/17/2016 5:05:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: samboct

Lucy

I must admit, I don't appreciate the ad hominem attacks. If you feel the need to call me names after I've tried in good faith to respond to your question- then maybe you shouldn't have asked it?

My views on laws are that they should be gender blind. This one doesn't seem to be. Your concern over battered women is noted. What about battered men? Why is one gender more important than the other? Why not just battered individuals who are victims of domestic violence? Didn't we learn from Plessy v. Ferguson that "Separate is inherently unequal."?

It seems that Catherine MacKinnon's view that all heterosexual sex is an act of rape is having its day. There is a lack of tolerance here for other viewpoints that is disheartening.


Sam

Quite Honestly Sam, I really dont give a damn
Did you notice I actually said
quote:

DO you feel that way about battered women? And even larger, Domestic abuse?

That includes men, Im sorry you automatically think I only meant women. WHo has the blinders???
I have always advocated for homeless men, and DV male victims.
Many times on here even so dont even attempt that hominem bs with me that I only care about women.
Apparently CM said that in 1983? WOW Ive never read her, BUT I was raped three years before she wrote it, so I think I will stick to what I know from personal experience, education and real life work experience.

you also said....
quote:

People have commented about the "heart" of the accuser. I don't see it. What would show compassion and maturity is to drop the charges-Brock Turner's life is already in disarray- but that would also involve taking responsibility for her own actions. I see her as vindictive.


You havent once mentioned what happens to her.
Its all about the boy.
go peddle your ignorance elsewhere.




Lucylastic -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/17/2016 5:06:59 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml


quote:

ORIGINAL: samboct

Lucy

I must admit, I don't appreciate the ad hominem attacks. If you feel the need to call me names after I've tried in good faith to respond to your question- then maybe you shouldn't have asked it?

My views on laws are that they should be gender blind. This one doesn't seem to be. Your concern over battered women is noted. What about battered men? Why is one gender more important than the other? Why not just battered individuals who are victims of domestic violence? Didn't we learn from Plessy v. Ferguson that "Separate is inherently unequal."?

It seems that Catherine MacKinnon's view that all heterosexual sex is an act of rape is having its day. There is a lack of tolerance here for other viewpoints that is disheartening.


Sam


I think that you'll find that there's an intolerance for rape. And yeah, alongside that there's a fair bit of intolerance towards people who seek to defend rape.

I am pretty sure that no-one on this thread has said anything intolerant about consensual sex.

And, just so you know. ..Catherine Mk never stated that view. .. it''s a piece of bullshit propoganda produced by opponents of feminism.



Lucy is right, it was not only said but put into print. Although I thought someone else said it Lucy if very good at research. I know that as early as the 70' this was a cornerstone of radical femmenism. If she and I are agreeing you might as well apologize for your mistake and move on as this is a once in a blue moon occurance.

I know we disagree a lot, but thankyou!




BamaD -> RE: RRE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/17/2016 5:58:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance

BamaD wrote:
quote:


Sounds like you got two bad judges. One got carried away on a traffic fine, maybe you are in one of those community financed by sticking it to drivers.
And one who thinks that you are at fault or he wouldn't have beaten you. He should have, based on what you said done some time.


Just to clarify, it was a single judge and I wasn't the victim. I just had the misfortune of being the person the judge saw after he ruled on the domestic violence case. So, I had been sitting there listening to what transpired and how the judge ruled.

I think you are correct. Our county does seem to benefit from high fines for minor infractions.

I've given up trying to understand how judges think.

Some small towns wouldn't function without thier fines, particularly with outsiders. Sounds like you got a judge with a poor sense of priorities.




crazyml -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/17/2016 10:16:44 PM)

You really are a bit of a stupid clown aren't you.

You make your pompous demand for an apology, you're schooled and then you lack the moral strength to own up to your error. How pathetic.

Then you respond with this babbling shit?

Are you really so stupid that you think feminism is an exclusively American thing? And having lived in America for a couple of years I was able to pick up one or two bits and bobs.

Your statement that the idea that all sex is rape was a conerstone of radical feminism is bullshit. You are either stupid or a liar for saying it is.

Fuck, you can't even spell feminism. You stupid little turd.





LadyPact -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/17/2016 10:41:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: samboct
To Tweak and Lady P

If the facts of the case were as you outlined- odds are we wouldn't be having this discussion. My understanding of the law is that Brock Turner could have taken a selfie with his accuser at 12:30 and said "we're going to have sex" with her nodding yes- and it wouldn't matter in terms of the conviction because under the California statute- if the accuser is unresponsive- that's rape. So the questions the prosecutor asked Turner was- "were you checking that she was responsive?" The jury decided that Turner was lying- that he hadn't been checking to see if she was responsive- but there's no suggestion that they didn't leave the party together to go have sex. There's really not a lot of evidence either way- the witnesses are drunk and unreliable. So I don't think we're discussing the case of Turner coming along and finding a passed out woman lying on the ground and attempting to have sex with her. I think we are discussing what is appropriate punishment given the situation. Effectively, the consent issue boils down to asking a drunk 18 y.o. to recognize that consent has been withdrawn when his date passes out.

You've got three points that I want to address. I highlighted them above.

If the cell photo had in any way been any indication that the woman was displaying her acknowledgement of they were going to, by agreement, have sex, Turner has an idiot for a lawyer. Any proof of said picture, or testimony of anybody who saw it who could confirm there was any kind of consent could have testified at trial. Such a witness wouldn't have been able to be established to any solid testimony about how drunk the girl was because unless there were such obvious signs that she was too intoxicated to consent, such as significantly slurred speech or being unable to stand, it could have worked. Anything that would have contributed to reasonable doubt would have been used unless it confirmed the prosecution's case. Don't think of the sentence that Turner got. Think about the up to fourteen years that he could have received.

Leaving the party together, even if there had been prior discussion of having sex, is moot. Part of what made this case at all is CA's statue of too intoxicated to consent and her unconscious state when found. (Please pay particular attention to attempts to revive her in the ambulance as well as the ER after the attack.)

California does have the "yes means yes" law regarding sexual assault. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2014/09/29/352482932/california-enacts-yes-means-yes-law-defining-sexual-consent It only was signed into law in 2014 and was specifically adopted to help address this problem at colleges and universities. Institutions of higher education that receive CA state funding must have specific policies covering sexual assault and/or domestic violence. This is over and above Stanford's own Honor Code, https://communitystandards.stanford.edu/student-conduct-process/honor-code-and-fundamental-standard and any education provided by their Sexual Assault & Relationship Abuse (SARA) division on campus. https://sara.stanford.edu/prevention-education-and-outreach

quote:


I have a lot of trouble with this farcical- "was she responsive" nonsense. Basically we're asking a drunk 18 y.o. to have good judgement.
From my perspective, there's an element of hypocrisy in how we treat people this age. On the one hand, we tell them that they have the right to vote and to go out and join the Army to kill or be killed- pretty awesome responsibilities. On the other hand, we tell them that they're not old enough to drink. Why? Because they have bad judgement around alcohol and they're more likely to wrack up cars, themselves and others. Having been an 18 y.o. boy once- many moons ago, I can recall that most of the time, I thought about sex. Oh, sometimes studies intruded- but I was really concerned about getting laid. So were my friends. I'm pretty sure that most 18 y.o. boys are this way. A chance at sex? Sure!!! So when a drunk cougar comes along, what red blooded 18 y.o boy is supposed to pass this up? Add in drinking- and any judgement has gone out the window. And here's my problem with the prosecution....If a someone like me (I'm a 55 y.o guy) is found attempting to have sex with a passed out 22 y.o.who was found lying unconscious- do I agree this is rape? Close enough as makes no difference.. But I'm a 55 y.o. guy who doesn't get drunk- so my judgement generally isn't impaired under those circumstances. If I'm the one doing the kanoodling of a passed out person- then I can say- OK, throw the book at me- I deserve it. But how is this even close to a drunk 18 y.o.? In short- if we're expecting good judgement out of an 18 y.o boy under these circumstances- well, we're being irresponsible- and I think hypocritical. So I understand why the judge did what he did. I would have been happier if he'd have tossed the case entirely, but I'm not sure that was within his range of options.

This is about to get real interesting. More highlights for points.

No. What we are asking the 18 year old to follow the law just like any other adult that can be prosecuted if he violates the law. We don't change the law to lesser charges due to the perpetrator's intoxication. Had this guy rammed your car when he was drunk, he actually would have received heavier charges.

If, at 18, you were concerned about getting laid, I hope you meant with consensual partners. I will cut you a break on this one. At our age, consent has evolved over time into a more thorough definition, which I hope benefits us.

You lost points on calling a 22 year old a "cougar" in relation to an 18 year old man. That's not the definition of a cougar. Here is what is provided by the Urban Dictionary:

quote:

An older woman, typically early thirties to mid-forties, who has abandoned traditional rules of romantic engagement and taken as her mission the seduction of as many game young men as she can possibly handle.


Tossing the case entirely wouldn't have flown with the evidence involved. There was sufficient physical evidence, a rape examination, and eye witnesses. The only thing more the prosecution could have asked for would have been any point of lucidity during the attack.

quote:

People have commented about the "heart" of the accuser. I don't see it. What would show compassion and maturity is to drop the charges-Brock Turner's life is already in disarray- but that would also involve taking responsibility for her own actions. I see her as vindictive.

Ummm... It doesn't work that way, either.

You seem to be confused on this. It's not a case of a victim filing a complaint after the fact. The police were called by the two guys on bicycles, it was determined that a crime was possibly committed once arriving on the scene, and charges went from there through the legal process. The victim is not the person who determines to prosecute. The state of California does that. The victim could have requested not to testify at trial but this was pretty much going forward just the way a domestic violence charge would have because it's not based on victim testimony.

quote:

And to the people who feel like attacking me for my viewpoint- Do any of you have 18 y.o boys? (No, I don't- but I do like children- I enjoy borrowing other peoples.) Are you really certain that they'd never find themselves in Brock Turner's situation?

My son will be 25 next week. He's been 18 during my time as a poster here. This is the third thread I have asked him about regarding sexual assault since I've been a member. The first was about six years ago about a case of assault where there were "onlookers" who were taking cell phone pics during the assault. (We lived in CA at the time.) I wanted to be sure my kid would know the right thing to do, so I did what parents do. I asked him. Yes, he knows the proper thing to do is call 911. (He mentioned wanting to beat the crap out of people who would perpetrate the actions, so I'm convinced.) I tried to find that thread through the search feature. I came up empty.

I have also discussed the Steubenville, OH sexual assault case of 2012 and now this case. When I asked about this case today, my son gave the reply with his military service (one tour) in mind. Uncle Sam actually has a higher standard than the state of California. It's not the greater of "too intoxicated to consent". It's "has been drinking". I have no idea how often that is prosecuted.

I do have one point of conjecture. It's my theory on why Turner rolled the dice at trial, rather than knowing he was busted/guilty and taking a plea. Since you mentioned compassion, I do have to tell you that it's my belief that if Turner had compassion, he would not have put the victim through the wait for the court date and the ordeal of the trial. That process is hell. Also, Turner's statement, even after conviction, does not admit his wrong doing for the assault. Only for areas related to drinking. Again, painful for the victim.

So, why the gamble? It wasn't the sentence from the court. I don't even think it was the having to be on the sexual offenders list. The conviction has led to USA Swimming to the decision of determining that Turner is ineligible for membership, which means no amateur swimming competitions, including the Olympics.





BamaD -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/17/2016 11:03:35 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

Oh no. Wait a fucking second? She did not say "all sex is rape" then?

Marvellous. So glad we cleared that one up.

And.. yes, I think she would be cheering the verdict. Alongside all those people who don't think it's OK to rape.

You do understand that knowing there are people who insist that violation in a synonym for intercourse does not mean that you think that rape is ok don't you? I don't see how anyone can be happy with 6 months for rape but if you think that is fair...........




BamaD -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/17/2016 11:06:03 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

You really are a bit of a stupid clown aren't you.

You make your pompous demand for an apology, you're schooled and then you lack the moral strength to own up to your error. How pathetic.

Then you respond with this babbling shit?

Are you really so stupid that you think feminism is an exclusively American thing? And having lived in America for a couple of years I was able to pick up one or two bits and bobs.

Your statement that the idea that all sex is rape was a conerstone of radical feminism is bullshit. You are either stupid or a liar for saying it is.

Fuck, you can't even spell feminism. You stupid little turd.



I didn't make a demand for an apology, you did.




Awareness -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/18/2016 1:55:40 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml
Gosh. Who made the claim that one in five women on college campuses is raped?
Every feminist here. Over and over and over again.

quote:


You see, your reply was to this statement:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic
You were failed by a culture on our college campuses where one in five women is sexually assaulted


Have an adult read this through with you carefully. Let's see if they can infer that Lucylastic was making the claim that one in five women on college campuses is raped?
That would be difficult since she was quoting the vice president. If you actually were comprehending what you'd read, you'd know that. Oh, wait - your infamous inability to understand what the fuck is going on rears its ugly head again. Never mind.

quote:


Oh no. We cannot, because... well because that is not what she said.
She didn't say anything. Again, she quoted the vice president.

quote:

Your response was to say
quote:

"Jesus wept, this is utterly false and has been debunked over and over, for fuck's sake"
Which it has. Comprehensively.

Then you posted a link to an article, which - If you re-read it carefully, points out that the one in five figure does not refer to rape, but instead to sexual assault.
It clearly says that it refers to both. Is English your second language?

quote:


Now, here's where the magic happens... You claimed to be "debunking" a statement that one in five women is subjected to a sexual assault in college.... by posting a link that carefully explains that one in five women are not raped, but are sexually assaulted.
From the study - "If you’ve followed the discussion about sexual assault on college campuses in America, it’s likely you’ve heard some variation of the claim that 1 in 5 women on college campuses in the United States has been sexually assaulted or raped. Or you may have heard the even more incorrect abbreviated version, that 1 in 5 women on campus has been raped."

The authors make clear that attempting to use 1 in 5 for either claim is invalid. This is from the authors themselves - never mind the fact that their methodology itself is riddled with flaws.

quote:


Oh my.
Prissy, aren't you.

quote:

You, either through poor comprehension skills, or in the bully's hope that if you tell a lie loudly enough it will become true, managed to misrepresent what had been said.
You, through being manifestly unable or unwilling to understand even the first paragraph of the article are attempting to salvage some semblance of self-respect by lying through your ass.

You also asserted that some sexual assaults are "innocuous". I said kissing is innocuous. If you think otherwise, then you probably think that micro-aggressions are a real thing and spend Fridays on a therapist's couch trying not to cry while recalling traumatic paper cuts you've endured.


quote:

Well, many people will differ. Unlike you, I don't think that any sexual assault is innocuous, but since you're clearly ok with some sexual assaults, I guess we should agree to differ.
You're lying again. I said kissing was innocuous. Ye Gods, you're a dense, obtuse little fucker.

quote:


Ironically, I'm not the one doing the misrepresentation here
Oh, I'm afraid you are. Still, that's what I expect from you weak-minded male feminists. You're not very good with the thinking and the manhood.
quote:

It's you.
Beaten up by the jocks in school,eh? Hardly surprising.

quote:

Perhaps because you're stupid, perhaps because you're a simple troll, or perhaps because you're so terrified of the idea of equality that you lose control. I don't know, nor do I care.
Of course you care. You're somewhat obsessed with this topic and you're clearly carrying a chip on your shoulder when it comes to men who make you feel inferior. It's so blatantly obvious.

quote:


At no stage have I said anything about the appropriateness or otherwise of "forced kissing and unwanted groping". I'm simply highlighting the author's own statements that the 1 in 5 figure is incorrect for all the reasons which they mention.


quote:


Actually, you stated that it is "innocuous". Here... on this board. You stated it. That was a silly lie, wasn't it!
A lie is a misrepresentation of fact. Still having trouble with the English language, I see.

quote:


You assert that you're highlighting the author's own statements that the one in five figure is incorrect, but while - since you assure me that you have - I have to believe that you've read the link, it is clear that you did not understand it.

You're misrepresenting what the author said.
No. You're just basically incompetent. Why you even bother is beyond me. You're clearly utterly crap at the thinking.

quote:


The author made it plain that one in five women on college camupses is subjected to a sexual assault of some kind. This accords 100%, by the way, with LucyLastic's statement that.... erm... one in five women on college camupses is subjected to a sexual assault of some kind.
Wrong. The authors made it clear that the 1 in 5 figure is problematic due to their methodology and anyone with even a basic understanding of scientific method could draw that conclusion for themselves. Which is why you're having trouble. Have someone explain the science to you - there's a good chap.


quote:


You're misrepresenting what you said, what Lucy said, what the author said. Are you doing this for charity?
No, you're just an idiot who's clearly unable to comprehend what he reads, let alone think about it. That you'll try and paper over the gaping holes in your argument with a bunch of lies is a clear indicator of just how weak you are.

quote:


Well done! Now where did Lucylastic make the claim that forced kissing is rape? Nowhere... so you're now inventing stuff.
For the 3rd fucking time, she was quoting the vice president you cretin.

quote:


Where did I claim that forced kissing or unwanted touching are equivalent to rape? Nowhere. You're making things up. It's pathetic.
You haven't done much of anything other than squeal like a bitch and demonstrate your inability to read.

quote:


More baseless misrepresentation. You will find no evidence to support this pitiful ad hom. On the other hand, there is abundant evidence of your puerile attempts to characterise feminism as a sinister, sceeery, anti-male conspiracy.
No, you idiot, third-wave feminism is an intellectually lazy, victim-hood narrative which promotes women's rights while infantilising them and insisting on avoidance of their concomitant responsibilities.

quote:


Your little ad-hom is telling though - Nice how you think that using a gender based slur is likely to have any kind of impact on an adult.
It sure had an impact on you. You didn't ignore it. And while you might consider yourself an adult, lad - there's no doubt you're weaker than any adult male has a right to be - so I'm sticking with the "bitch pretending to be a man" diagnosis. Because if you are a man, you're sure as shit one of the sorriest fucking specimens around.

quote:


But let me be clear - Strong men have nothing to fear from gender equality,
Let me be clear - you have no fucking idea what it is to be a strong man. None. That is patently obvious.


quote:

strong men don't have to force themselves on women
That's idiocy. Strength enables you to do exactly that. Trying to draw a correlation between strength and moral or upright behaviour is a common mistake that many in the kink community make. Like you, they are ignorant fools.

While I'm at it, if you had the faintest and I mean FAINTEST clue on how to attract women, you'd know full well they expect a man to lead and a vast majority of them are turned off by men who "ask permission" to kiss them.

Again, since you're too weak to actually take the lead, you have no idea what I'm talking about.

quote:


strong men are ready and able to compete in a society without needing the privilege that they enjoy because they're men.
What privilege, you babbling idiot. If women are equal to men, then why do they need special privileges and exceptions to enable them to compete with men? The idea that men gained their dominance through some kind of confidence trick and it's the only reason they're in charge is stark raving insanity. Men dominate society because they're better at it.

quote:


Weak men fear gender equality, pitiful losers who would be nothing without their male privilege.
No, weak men say they "need feminism" and think pandering to women is how they get laid. Which is why the dominant men in the kink world get laid at a far greater rate than the sub men do.

quote:


I feel sorry for them, mostly, the ones that whine constantly - not so much.
Oh, you don't need to. They're winning the game, dude. You're the evolutionary dead end with the limited options. Trust me, dominant men are doing just fine.

quote:


If you say that something is "innocuous" .... Oh... you don't understand what that word means do you?

Here is one definition - "harmless, safe, non-dangerous, non-poisonous, non-toxic, non-irritant, non-injurious, innocent;"

So.. you claimed, here on this board, that forced kissing, which is a sexual assault, is harmless. You probably didn't know that was what you were saying, because you didn't know what the word means.

Don't use words that you don't understand, it makes you look foolish.
*grin* Anyone who thinks kissing is sexual assault is something of a mental case. If you think a woman who's been kissed is suffering, you need to get therapy.

Now while I'm at it, I'll throw in some bonuses:

This article quotes the lead author of the study who says 1 in 5 is not a nationally representative statistic

And here is the DOJ study which shows that the rate of rape and sexual assault for college students is lower than that for non-students. For reference, the rate for students was 6.1 in 1,000.

Yeah... that's what I thought - that's nowhere near 1 in 5. But I'm sure you won't be able to accept DOJ statistics because patriarchy. And vagina.

But hey, you do you, girl. If you need to pretend that 20% of all women attending college are being raped and sexually assaulted just so you can fuel your anti-male outrage, then you do that. Just don't expect anyone with a scrap of intelligence to believe it.





respectmen -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/18/2016 2:05:12 AM)

Campus sexual assault: Bad statistics don't help victims

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q5XMuTAomNk&list=PLytTJqkSQqtr7BqC1Jf4nv3g2yDfu7Xmd&index=6




blnymph -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/18/2016 2:12:10 AM)

In case you missed to notice:
this thread is about a victim's statement (see post no. 1), not about statistics which are not likely to help anyone concerned (neither good nor bad ones).




Awareness -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/18/2016 2:16:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml
Of course. If it turns out that Mkinnon said that, I will happily apologise for my mistake.
Oh, I fucking bet you won't.

MacKinnon said:

"Women and men are divided by gender, made into the sexes as we know them, by the social requirements of heterosexuality, which institutionalizes male sexual dominance and female sexual submission."

And she also said:

"Perhaps the wrong of rape has proven so difficult to articulate because the unquestionable starting point has been that rape is definable as distinct from intercourse, when for women it is difficult to distinguish them under conditions of male dominance."

So, heterosexual sex institutionalises male dominance and women can't tell the difference between sex and rape when men are dominating them (IE: during heterosexual sex).

Yes, that pretty much says all heterosexual sex is rape, but I know for a fact that you'll try and weasel out of your apology.




crazyml -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/18/2016 2:51:12 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml
Of course. If it turns out that Mkinnon said that, I will happily apologise for my mistake.
Oh, I fucking bet you won't.

MacKinnon said:

"Women and men are divided by gender, made into the sexes as we know them, by the social requirements of heterosexuality, which institutionalizes male sexual dominance and female sexual submission."

And she also said:

"Perhaps the wrong of rape has proven so difficult to articulate because the unquestionable starting point has been that rape is definable as distinct from intercourse, when for women it is difficult to distinguish them under conditions of male dominance."

So, heterosexual sex institutionalises male dominance and women can't tell the difference between sex and rape when men are dominating them (IE: during heterosexual sex).

Yes, that pretty much says all heterosexual sex is rape, but I know for a fact that you'll try and weasel out of your apology.



It does not say that all heterosexual sex is rape. Thanks for going to such great lengths to show the quotes. I'm am afraid that your "pretty much says" doesn't actually equate to "says".

Thanks though.




crazyml -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/18/2016 3:03:14 AM)

Boring.

I am really happy that I've made all the points that I want to make on your nonsense, and that your repetition of your lies and your changing of your story is plain for all to see.

I understand that in your weakness and fear you're lashing out, that's ok - feel free, I hope it makes you feel better.








crazyml -> RE: Victim Statement from Stanford Rape Victim (6/18/2016 3:11:38 AM)

You fucking clown. Read your posts.




Page: <<   < prev  6 7 8 [9] 10   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625