RE: What's going on in Florida!

RE: What's going on in Florida! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Cinnamongirl67 -> RE: What's going on in Florida! (6/17/2016 11:05:04 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: Cinnamongirl67 Someone mentioned pit bulls. These dogs need outlawed. You always hear people say that my pitbull is the most loving docile creature. That loving docile creature statistically turns on their owners and family more then any breed of dog. This isn't an ankle biter. These dogs kill. Pit bulls get a bad rap? It's because they deserve it. It's not how they are raised either, it is in their nature. How about cocker spaniels? http://listovative.com/top-12-dog-breeds-that-bite-the-aggressive-dogs-list/ My sister owned Sam a cocker spaniel for 3 years. My nephew was quite in love with him. The dog was funny smart and quite the charmer. Out of the blue one day, he and my nephew were sharing a pillow watching tv. My nephew was petting his chest and looking at him in the eyes and the dog just attacked him, biting through his nose, his arms and hands trying to protect himself. Chows are also dangerous. I went to visit my friend and had a nursing uniform on, the dog knew me, but it had never seen me in a uniform. When I got out of the car it lunged toward my face, I held my hands up and it tore the skin and muscle off two of my fingers before I could jump on the hood of my car. It tore one of my pants legs off in the process and I still carry the scars to this day. I raised siberians for 4 years, I never saw any aggression toward people just other animals. Then I raised sweet teacup Yorkers for 8 years. Ankle biters some of them but to small to hurt anyone

blnymph -> RE: What's going on in Florida! (6/17/2016 11:26:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Shandirra quote: ORIGINAL: blnymph alligators aside - when facing a natural environment (and nature is everywhere), accomodating accordingly should be, well, natural behaviour. Use your own brain for it. Do not rely on others to do it for you. Would you expect signposts telling you to dress warmly to avoid freezing (to death if you don't) when you visit Antarctica? I'm not the one looking for signs. Greta is. You should direct your disagreement towards her. It was not directed towards you - the post just followed yours in time.

Shandirra -> RE: What's going on in Florida! (6/17/2016 12:47:13 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: blnymph It was not directed towards you - the post just followed yours in time. It is customary to quote the individual you're replying to/about or is applicable to. If using the "Fast Reply" function, it is customary to indicate such at the beginning of your post otherwise it's seen as a reply to the person prior to yours. Less confusion.

blnymph -> RE: What's going on in Florida! (6/17/2016 1:00:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Shandirra quote: ORIGINAL: blnymph It was not directed towards you - the post just followed yours in time. It is customary to quote the individual you're replying to/about or is applicable to. If using the "Fast Reply" function, it is customary to indicate such at the beginning of your post otherwise it's seen as a reply to the person prior to yours. Less confusion. When I quote someone, I quote - like now. When a post is written without quoting another, the bottomline "in reply to (the one just before)" is added automatically.

Shandirra -> RE: What's going on in Florida! (6/17/2016 3:04:34 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: blnymph When a post is written without quoting another, the bottomline "in reply to (the one just before)" is added automatically. Oy vey. I get it. Obviously, you didn't. Damn, you are dim.

blnymph -> RE: What's going on in Florida! (6/17/2016 3:17:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Shandirra Oy vey. I get it. ... Gor nischt herzele, you didn't. It was not directed at you. At all. You feel, well what? addressed? bothered? misinterpreted? ... by an automatic subscript - blame the programmer.

Shandirra -> RE: What's going on in Florida! (6/17/2016 3:39:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: blnymph ...blame the programmer. Fade, wenig, mädchen. Sie sind wirklich so dumm. Ich erklärte den prozess der "Schnelle Antwort". Handel die brüste und blondes haar für ein gehirn. Willkommen auf der fucntion ignorieren.

stef -> RE: What's going on in Florida! (6/17/2016 3:49:23 PM)
For fucks sake, lighten up Francis.

vincentML -> RE: What's going on in Florida! (6/17/2016 4:41:35 PM)
FR quote: ORIGINAL: blnymph quote: ORIGINAL: Shandirra quote: ORIGINAL: blnymph It was not directed towards you - the post just followed yours in time. It is customary to quote the individual you're replying to/about or is applicable to. If using the "Fast Reply" function, it is customary to indicate such at the beginning of your post otherwise it's seen as a reply to the person prior to yours. Less confusion. When I quote someone, I quote - like now. When a post is written without quoting another, the bottomline "in reply to (the one just before)" is added automatically. It is sometimes helpful to use FR in the upper left hand corner to avoid confusion. It means you are not directing your message at any one individual, especially the one immediately preceding you. FYI

Shandirra -> RE: What's going on in Florida! (6/17/2016 4:53:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: stef For fucks sake, lighten up Francis. Why? Because you say so? chuckles Use that clue by four on yourself. I was making a point. Go crawl back to your hole. quote: ORIGINAL: vincentML FR It is sometimes helpful to use FR in the upper left hand corner to avoid confusion. It means you are not directing your message at any one individual, especially the one immediately preceding you. FYI DING! Someone got the point.

stef -> RE: What's going on in Florida! (6/17/2016 5:47:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Shandirra DING! Someone got the point. Your only point is on the top of your head. It was clear who she was replying to by the context of her reply. If you honestly thought she was replying to you, then she isn't the dim one here.

Shandirra -> RE: What's going on in Florida! (6/17/2016 6:37:39 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: stef Your only point is on the top of your head. It was clear who she was replying to by the context of her reply. If you honestly thought she was replying to you, then she isn't the dim one here. I've always known you were a rude, acerbic twat from your previous posts. However, you've proven beyond any shadow of a doubt how blatantly stupid you are. Thank you. Now wallow in the ignominy of blocked silence.

dcnovice -> RE: What's going on in Florida! (6/17/2016 8:14:41 PM)
quote: Guess where that leaves you? Your posts leave me pitying you.

Wayward5oul -> RE: What's going on in Florida! (6/17/2016 8:17:31 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Shandirra quote: ORIGINAL: blnymph When a post is written without quoting another, the bottomline "in reply to (the one just before)" is added automatically. Oy vey. I get it. Obviously, you didn't. Damn, you are dim. Damn. Bit touchy today?

stef -> RE: What's going on in Florida! (6/17/2016 10:42:12 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Shandirra quote: ORIGINAL: stef Your only point is on the top of your head. It was clear who she was replying to by the context of her reply. If you honestly thought she was replying to you, then she isn't the dim one here. I've always known you were a rude, acerbic twat from your previous posts. However, you've proven beyond any shadow of a doubt how blatantly stupid you are. You are a master of irony, Shandumbass. It's a good thing you wear a mask, you wouldn't want people to know just how fucking moronic you are.

Page: << < prev 3 4 5 6 [7]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

4.699707E-02