RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Awareness -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 9:04:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

A 12 guage with buckshot will do the trick everytime. A .45 is also a great weapon.
You really wanna be doing a bunch of drywall work because someone wanted to take your TV?




BamaD -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 9:47:44 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

A 12 guage with buckshot will do the trick everytime. A .45 is also a great weapon.
You really wanna be doing a bunch of drywall work because someone wanted to take your TV?


No because they came in willing to do whatever harm they needed to in order to take my TV. And how do you know that they are going to stop at the TV? Unless, of course, you wait until they start shooting you and your familiy before you do anything.




Kirata -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 12:35:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

You really wanna be doing a bunch of drywall work because someone wanted to take your TV?

No....

Yes.

K.





blnymph -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 12:49:50 PM)

use a flame-thrower - nothing left to worry about




mnottertail -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 12:52:56 PM)

But they have no bayonet lugs, those flammenwerfers.




blnymph -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 12:56:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

But they have no bayonet lugs, those flammenwerfers.

nothing is perfect [:(]




mnottertail -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 1:00:21 PM)

Ja, ich weiBe. Fiel und Danke.




blnymph -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 1:08:37 PM)

that's why I mentioned a rocket-launcher as an alternative before - whenever you feel like it you could solder a bayonet to the tip of any rocket and get the little extra satisfaction




BamaD -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 1:13:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

You really wanna be doing a bunch of drywall work because someone wanted to take your TV?

No....

Yes.

K.



Right, once he has broken in he has forfieted cirtain rights, like breathing.




Baldrick -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 1:17:43 PM)

I really want a Lahti 20mm light anti tank rifle.... But they are classified as a destructive device




thompsonx -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 1:43:33 PM)


ORIGINAL: mrevibo

Actually, you can still own a cannon, they're entirely unregulated. Flame throwers and rocket launchers aren't for inside.

I have indeed fired a 1911 inside without my ears on. I didn't have to change my panties. It was in the garage, where a raccoon had taken up residence. Unfortunately, I was loaded with FMJs from the range, so I wasn't doing the damage I could have. One shot flushed her, second from about 6m left her right leg hanging, then she charged me. Third was a headshot in motion; I missed the thinky bits but left her unable to bite me. Fourth finally did her in. This episode illustrates a few of the limitations I mentioned earlier, low light, moving target, shots that don't kill, variable range. To this I can add, know wtf your bullets are good for. What I carry now are Critical Duties, those FMJs are for paper.


Perhps you might invest a little more time at the range. Four rounds at less than 20' to kill a overgrown rat??? that sux[8|]




thompsonx -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 1:44:37 PM)


ORIGINAL: Baldrick

I really want a Lahti 20mm light anti tank rifle.... But they are classified as a destructive device

Aren't they?




Termyn8or -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 8:13:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: mrevibo

Actually, you can still own a cannon, they're entirely unregulated. Flame throwers and rocket launchers aren't for inside.

I have indeed fired a 1911 inside without my ears on. I didn't have to change my panties. It was in the garage, where a raccoon had taken up residence. Unfortunately, I was loaded with FMJs from the range, so I wasn't doing the damage I could have. One shot flushed her, second from about 6m left her right leg hanging, then she charged me. Third was a headshot in motion; I missed the thinky bits but left her unable to bite me. Fourth finally did her in. This episode illustrates a few of the limitations I mentioned earlier, low light, moving target, shots that don't kill, variable range. To this I can add, know wtf your bullets are good for. What I carry now are Critical Duties, those FMJs are for paper.


I believe that hollowpoints or exploding bullets should be REQUIRED in cities. There are rounds that can go right through a person and then a wall and then another wall and then someone in another room or even apartment. The ones that expand on impact stop ad are safer for everyone, except of course the person you are trying to kill. And always shoot to kill.

There is a guy on Usenet right now looking for rounds like that for a little .22 that is his varmint gun. He actually felt guilty that he only wounded something that was creeping around there. It is more humane to just kill immediately than to have the critter crawl off and suffer. And that is what happened.

Also, when used for self defense, the guy down the street cannot tell you enough about shoot to kill, ALWAYS. He shot an armed robber at the gas station he owned but he did not shoot for center mass because he was trying to be a good guy. He shot the punk in the arm and the leg and the punk turned around and killed him and shot his son. And it was not that he could not shoot, they were less than ten feet away from each other and the guy had the CCW which requires some degree of being able to aim. Bottom line, you pull a loaded gun something must die. And right away. you do not try to keep people at gunpoint while the cops come, you just kill them RIGHT NOW. The caught the punk and he is probably never going to gt out of prison, but this upstanding member of the community, business owner, employer and taxpayer is still just as dead. They should go and kill that motherfucking punks Parents.

If I have to kill someone and am in court I will look their Mother right in the eyes and say "Next time you have a litter teach them to respect other people's stuff". No fucking remorse. Sorry I had to do it yeah, but it is not my fault so I feel zero guilt.

T^T




mrevibo -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 8:14:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: mrevibo

Actually, you can still own a cannon, they're entirely unregulated. Flame throwers and rocket launchers aren't for inside.

I have indeed fired a 1911 inside without my ears on. I didn't have to change my panties. It was in the garage, where a raccoon had taken up residence. Unfortunately, I was loaded with FMJs from the range, so I wasn't doing the damage I could have. One shot flushed her, second from about 6m left her right leg hanging, then she charged me. Third was a headshot in motion; I missed the thinky bits but left her unable to bite me. Fourth finally did her in. This episode illustrates a few of the limitations I mentioned earlier, low light, moving target, shots that don't kill, variable range. To this I can add, know wtf your bullets are good for. What I carry now are Critical Duties, those FMJs are for paper.


Perhps you might invest a little more time at the range. Four rounds at less than 20' to kill a overgrown rat??? that sux[8|]


Heh, I was getting good hits on a moving target, I examined them afterward. It just wasn't a deep enough target for the FMJs to be effective. In & out, all 4. I finally got a direct hit on a vital organ.




Termyn8or -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 8:22:33 PM)

You need better ammo. I mean you actually DID hit right ?

Know what the problem is ? Cleaning up all the blood and guts afterward. The other problem is such ammo costs more so you better aim right.

Actually you need a spade and a flat shovel, like a snow shovel. Gawd I hope I can continue to scare whatever creeps into my garage out without having to shoot it. There is so much stuff there, tools, a stereo, I don't even know what all is out there but if blood ever sprays in there I will have days of work cleaning it up.

T^T




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 9:23:38 PM)

quote:

You need better ammo.

Yeah, he already came to that conclusion.




thompsonx -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 10:41:26 PM)


ORIGINAL: mrevibo
ORIGINAL: thompsonx




Actually, you can still own a cannon, they're entirely unregulated. Flame throwers and rocket launchers aren't for inside.

I have indeed fired a 1911 inside without my ears on. I didn't have to change my panties. It was in the garage, where a raccoon had taken up residence. Unfortunately, I was loaded with FMJs from the range, so I wasn't doing the damage I could have. One shot flushed her, second from about 6m left her right leg hanging, then she charged me. Third was a headshot in motion; I missed the thinky bits but left her unable to bite me. Fourth finally did her in. This episode illustrates a few of the limitations I mentioned earlier, low light, moving target, shots that don't kill, variable range. To this I can add, know wtf your bullets are good for. What I carry now are Critical Duties, those FMJs are for paper.


Perhps you might invest a little more time at the range. Four rounds at less than 20' to kill a overgrown rat??? that sux[8|]


Heh, I was getting good hits on a moving target, I examined them afterward. It just wasn't a deep enough target for the FMJs to be effective. In & out, all 4. I finally got a direct hit on a vital organ.


Maybe you should have considered shooting it in the foot[:D] I am thinking two shots here for a quadraped. The image of a overgrown rat trying to motivate on two legs is leg wettin' funny...well to some[:D]




thompsonx -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 10:43:17 PM)


ORIGINAL: blnymph

nothing is perfect [:(]

I may not be perfect but parts of me are rather fine.[;)]




thompsonx -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/21/2016 10:44:43 PM)


ORIGINAL: Baldrick

I really want a Lahti 20mm light anti tank rifle.... But they are classified as a destructive device


You can get a license for that...your big problem is finding a mate who will help you carry and operate that lil shoulder cannon.




DesideriScuri -> RE: Why are anti-regulation folk such poor shots? (6/22/2016 12:11:33 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph
that's why I mentioned a rocket-launcher as an alternative before - whenever you feel like it you could solder a bayonet to the tip of any rocket and get the little extra satisfaction


Don't need no bayonet lug. Just duct tape the knife in place. No problem. A lot more adaptable, too. Think about it. You could tape up marshmallow holders and with a tiny squeeze, you're almost at s'mores!




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875