RE: Meanwhile in other gun news

RE: Meanwhile in other gun news (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

mnottertail -> RE: Meanwhile in other gun news (6/24/2016 2:01:10 PM)
LOL. there is no conspiracy afoot to grab guns.

thompsonx -> RE: Meanwhile in other gun news (6/24/2016 2:02:23 PM)
ORIGINAL: BamaD ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant So now...where's YOUR cite for your snark? Thank you for proving that bamad is a liar and that what I said was correct. The senator never said "then we will be all set" now did he? I didn't get the exact words off the top of my head. No you put in words to make it sound better for your point of view which makes you a liar.

WhoreMods -> RE: Meanwhile in other gun news (6/24/2016 2:03:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: mnottertail LOL. there is no conspiracy afoot to grab guns. Maybe "gun" is euphemism, and this is why he claims to have trained his, and is worried about having it grabbed?

thompsonx -> RE: Meanwhile in other gun news (6/24/2016 2:05:52 PM)
ORIGINAL: BamaD ORIGINAL: thompsonx My problem isn't with keeping terrorists from having guns, that is an admiralble goal, but not with something who's goal is just to grab as many guns as possible while ignoring half of the Bill of Rights. Heads up dude the 2nd. ammendment is not half of the constitution. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. Heads up dude I said the bill of rights, not the constitution so you are a liar liar liar. Wow...not since the third grade have I been so approched[8\|]what the phoque are you talking about? Since they would do in the 4th 5th 8th and 10th in addition to the 2nd that is half the BILL OF RIGHTS. You, of course have some sort of creditable citation for such an accusation?

mnottertail -> RE: Meanwhile in other gun news (6/24/2016 2:06:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant So now...where's YOUR cite for your snark? Thank you for proving that bamad is a liar and that what I said was correct. The senator never said "then we will be all set" now did he? I didn't get the exact words off the top of my head. But as has been pointed out my point was right on target, that was that he considers due process to be a problem to be overcome not a reason to drop this. No, the top of your head is missing, it was pulled out of your ass, like all your illegitimate propaganda out of Limbaugh. not on point at all. It was no problem and didnt even come up when the nutsuckers made the no fly list into law, thats where your bill of rights comes in. And the nutsuckers are not bitching about the lack of due process in the no fly list now. There are laws aplenty that work 'accomodations' in and around due process. The nutsucker supreme court has stamped them legal. Do something about that.

CreativeDominant -> RE: Meanwhile in other gun news (6/24/2016 3:24:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant So now...where's YOUR cite for your snark? Thank you for proving that bamad is a liar and that what I said was correct. The senator never said "then we will be all set" now did he?

thompsonx -> RE: Meanwhile in other gun news (6/24/2016 9:37:10 PM)
ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant No ticky no laundry...[8\|]

BamaD -> RE: Meanwhile in other gun news (6/24/2016 10:13:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: BamaD ORIGINAL: thompsonx My problem isn't with keeping terrorists from having guns, that is an admiralble goal, but not with something who's goal is just to grab as many guns as possible while ignoring half of the Bill of Rights. Heads up dude the 2nd. ammendment is not half of the constitution. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. Heads up dude I said the bill of rights, not the constitution so you are a liar liar liar. Wow...not since the third grade have I been so approched[8\|]what the phoque are you talking about? Since they would do in the 4th 5th 8th and 10th in addition to the 2nd that is half the BILL OF RIGHTS. You, of course have some sort of creditable citation for such an accusation? Lets just start with it dawning on you that he did say that due process was the problem. If you can't see that you won't be able to see anything. You didn't say you had to agree with my cite you just asked for me to give it.] Now cough up your cite. Of course you will dodge it and come up with excuses not to because there is no such cite so just go ahead and admit it you lied. I summerized, you lied. But then you have proven repeatedly that you don't even know what a lie is.

thompsonx -> RE: Meanwhile in other gun news (6/25/2016 3:12:26 AM)
ORIGINAL: BamaD ORIGINAL: thompsonx My problem isn't with keeping terrorists from having guns, that is an admiralble goal, but not with something who's goal is just to grab as many guns as possible while ignoring half of the Bill of Rights. Heads up dude the 2nd. ammendment is not half of the constitution. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. Heads up dude I said the bill of rights, not the constitution so you are a liar liar liar. Wow...not since the third grade have I been so approched[8\|]what the phoque are you talking about? Since they would do in the 4th 5th 8th and 10th in addition to the 2nd that is half the BILL OF RIGHTS. You, of course have some sort of creditable citation for such an accusation? Lets just start with it dawning on you that he did say that due process was the problem. I read what he said and understand it quite clearly it is you who have sought to pervert his meaning. You didn't say you had to agree with my cite you just asked for me to give it. Your cite did not validate your post. Now cough up your cite. No ticky no laundry

mnottertail -> RE: Meanwhile in other gun news (6/25/2016 5:12:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: thompsonx ORIGINAL: BamaD ORIGINAL: thompsonx My problem isn't with keeping terrorists from having guns, that is an admiralble goal, but not with something who's goal is just to grab as many guns as possible while ignoring half of the Bill of Rights. Heads up dude the 2nd. ammendment is not half of the constitution. Jesus you are phoquing stupid. Heads up dude I said the bill of rights, not the constitution so you are a liar liar liar. Wow...not since the third grade have I been so approched[8\|]what the phoque are you talking about? Since they would do in the 4th 5th 8th and 10th in addition to the 2nd that is half the BILL OF RIGHTS. You, of course have some sort of creditable citation for such an accusation? Lets just start with it dawning on you that he did say that due process was the problem. If you can't see that you won't be able to see anything. You didn't say you had to agree with my cite you just asked for me to give it.] Now cough up your cite. Of course you will dodge it and come up with excuses not to because there is no such cite so just go ahead and admit it you lied. I summerized, you lied. But then you have proven repeatedly that you don't even know what a lie is. You ain't no Sumerian, bruv.

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 4 [5]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125