RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/9/2016 5:09:09 PM)

We just get tired of being branded along with all the nutcases who scream and rant under the general banner of feminism.




thompsonx -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/9/2016 6:34:25 PM)


ORIGINAL: ManOeuvre

I'm sorry, thompsonx.

I meant undiminished, towards both John Wayne and yourself, in the same sense as Cate Blanchett spoke it to Vincent Cassel.


What you meant is abundantly unclear.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/9/2016 7:36:06 PM)

quote:

What you meant is abundantly unclear.

Maybe to you, but not to me. [:D]




LadyPact -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/10/2016 12:36:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Part of the problem with female privilege is the way in which women seek sanction for their violent behaviour and are enabled in their ongoing abuse. The constant refrain that they "can't possibly hurt a man" leads to excusing the violent tendencies of women. Decades of statistics have shown that women are as equally - if not more so - violent as men, yet the feminist victim-hood industry attempts to portray domestic violence as a male problem.

This story is the tragic result of that constant pandering and enabling of female violence:

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-36722114

Liam Fee was a two year old boy murdered by his lesbian mother and her female partner. They beat him so badly his heart ruptured, but not before they broke his leg and fractured his arm, then spent time googling the internet for "can wives be in prison together"?

This child is dead because the feminist movement's enabling of women's violent behaviour continues unabated. And yet despite this, you have feminist academics arguing - in all seriousness - "We should stop putting women in jail. For anything." -> https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/11/06/we-should-stop-putting-women-in-jail-for-anything/

This is why people fight against the cancer that is feminism. And yes, this IS feminism. This is the ugly, raw, truth of a movement dedicated to removing women's responsibility for themselves and replacing it with pandering and enabling of appalling behaviour.

Oh, and one other thing: Lesbian relationships are, by far, the most violent relationships. And yet, strangely, we don't have feminists calling for education programs for lesbians to teach them not to assault and murder. How astonishing.

OK. No, no, just no.

I'll try to find you a reference link in the morning. The last time I read up on it, gay males edged out in the intimate partner violence race. The gap was a bit wider when the AIDS epidemic first hit, along with some other factors. (Keep in mind, this was also when people were trying desperately to obtain medical care, so I have little faith in certain things being reported.)

Let's back the truck up a bit....

quote:

The constant refrain that they "can't possibly hurt a man" leads to excusing the violent tendencies of women.

Try another woman. My position on this has been irrevocably clear.

quote:

Decades of statistics have shown that women are as equally - if not more so - violent as men, yet the feminist victim-hood industry attempts to portray domestic violence as a male problem.

Not exactly. Women tend to use different tactics rather than physical.

The other part of this is that men under report. There is a HUGE social stigma about this that prevents males from going to the police.

For what it's worth, it would be my personal opinion that a lot of males who have a female abusing them, do the same thing as Dominants do when a submissive is abusing them. Because, oh, it can never happen like that.

I can't quote the next part because, frankly, it makes me sick. I do believe in the death penalty. (Oh, if nick calls me a leftist again, I might cream my jeans.) I don't care what gender you are, what your sexual orientation is, or any other thing. Kill your own child and you deserve the chair. You are a big person who ended a little person's life. I don't care what other category you happen to belong to.

quote:

"We should stop putting women in jail. For anything." -> https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/11/06/we-should-stop-putting-women-in-jail-for-anything/

Ummm... Yeah, no.

If people really believe in equality, you can't run your justice system based on whether someone has tits or not.

There's something else I want to say about this. I know you come from a different cultural background, so we may not see eye to eye.

Part of the reason that we are at this point with domestic violence laws in the here and now is because, in the past, a lot of people were ending up dead. Too often, calls to police were ignored, domestic disputes were brushed off, or the person being hurt wouldn't sign the complaint. This is an area that we failed at for so long that we had to adjust the law to stop people from being harmed.

A current or former relationship should not be the basis of how we treat people differently according to law. If the same physical altercation happened on the sidewalk, nobody would believe the person swinging punches shouldn't be arrested.






crazyml -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/10/2016 1:07:57 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ManOeuvre

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml (edited for brevity)

<snipped>



Thank you, crazyml. I didn't want you to feel too much like you're holding my hand here, but it really helps to know that we're talking about the same thing. Per your comments, that gender equality speaks to equality of treatment and opportunity, I think I support the latter, but not the former.


Interesting. It may be that our understandings of equal treatment differ.

quote:


Consider the wikipedia snippet above. The phrase "discriminated against" requires that another one must be "discriminated in favour of" or the word discriminate, whose latin root leads also to the more plain english "Distinguish", makes no sense. I think that all but the most dogmatically egalitarian person would have a hard time invalidating every positive discrimination on any sort of ethical grounds.


I'm very sorry, but you've completely lost me here.

Worth noting though that the latin roots of distinguish and discriminate are quite different. Discriminate has a root in the latin verb discriminare, while Distinguish comes from distingere.

quote:


I also appreciated you posting those articles, though "It will blow your mind!" was a bit of an oversell.


Ah, well I'm glad you found them interesting, but I wasn't actually posting them for you. If you look at the bottom right of posts, you can see "in reply to xxxx" where xxxx is the person you're replying to. One you've seen some of this person's posts, you'll understand why I said "it will blow your mind".

quote:



Also the listicle you slipped in there gives my browser a bit of a headache. I am happy to recognize feminism's historical contributions to humanism in general, but all too often when someone points to some detrimental effect on society, and accuses feminism of being the cause of it, it is too easily for my taste dismissed with either "that has nothing to do with feminism", "That's not true feminism." or "That's only radical feminism." At least nobody says "Feminism works in mysterious ways..."


I don't think that the misconceptions that some have about feminism are easy to dismiss at all! I am sure you'll be very well aware that the tactic of picking up something that someone at the outer radical border of feminism has said or done and then using it to smear the whole idea of feminism is one that a lot of anti-feminists use? We have a couple of posters here that do it regularly. There's nothing "easy" about dismissing these claims, it's tedious.




tweakabelle -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/10/2016 1:55:11 AM)

On one level, feminism is an ideology and therefore suffers all the flaws inherent in all ideologies. One might then ask are these flaws of sufficient importance to invalidate the ideology? That is primarily an academic or theoretical argument and not likely to be resolved on the message boards of a kink site.

We might then shift the question to a practical one. Has feminism created more good than evil (if any)? Do feminist policies improve the situation when implemented or do they fail to achieve the goals they seek to achieve? This is relatively easy to evaluate. Feminism has been central in improving (both qualitatively and quantitatively) the lives of hundreds of millions of women across the planet. The true figure might even reach into the billions. If we compare the material and social status of women with those of say a century ago the difference is of stratospheric dimensions. A century ago, the debate was about universal suffrage. Today it's about smashing the glass ceiling.

Against these staggering gains, the criticisms of feminism (as articulated here by the RM-Awareness entity) are trivial. That is not to say that the problems are trivial, but in comparison to the upside created by feminism they appear minor and relatively inconsequential - carping and bitchy in everyday terms.

So the answer to the overall question 'Is the world better off with feminism than without it?' is a resounding yes.





thompsonx -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/10/2016 3:57:16 AM)


ORIGINAL: ManOeuvre

I'm sorry, thompsonx.

I meant undiminished, towards both John Wayne and yourself, in the same sense as Cate Blanchett spoke it to Vincent Cassel.


I am still unclear as to your meaning. Are you saying that john wayne is a cocksucker who's racist/bigoted views you approve of???and while you approve of his views you do not approve of his cocksucking? I am not trying to put words (or cocks) into your mouth but you are being rather evaisive as to what you believe?




thompsonx -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/10/2016 4:03:17 AM)


ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

What you meant is abundantly unclear.

Maybe to you, but not to me. [:D]

Would you care to share or is it a secret between thee and he?





thompsonx -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/10/2016 4:08:33 AM)


ORIGINAL: ManOeuvre

Consider the wikipedia snippet above. The phrase "discriminated against" requires that another one must be "discriminated in favour of" or the word discriminate, whose latin root leads also to the more plain english "Distinguish", makes no sense. I think that all but the most dogmatically egalitarian person would have a hard time invalidating every positive discrimination on any sort of ethical grounds.

Should one wonder why you would intentionally seek to mislead us as to the roots and meanings of words?[8|]




Kaliko -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/10/2016 4:38:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

As do I. Now, it would be interesting to see how many male prison inmates are the sole carers for small children. I'm going to take a wild guess and say I bet that male prison inmates who are the sole carers for small children are outnumbered significantly by female prison inmates that are the sole carers for small children.

Now, what if nether of us can find an example of a program that provides a similar option? What should we do about it? Should we simply close the current programs down? Or should we work change the existing programs or to set up programs that are more inclusive? Or should we flap and whine about the evils of feminism? Which approach do you think is most likely to result in the best outcome?




Oh my goodness, I hope that here are rehabilitation and assistance programs that men can turn to when they leave prison. But my guess is (and a quick Google check confirms my guess) that these programs are open to men and women. My issue is not that these programs exist. It's that these particular ones exist specifically for women based on the fact that they need nurturing and support in a different way than men, presumably, and because they have young children to care for - as if men don't.

And it's hardly flapping and whining. It's... a discussion board. I've made the argument before that we all can't fight every injustice. It's impossible. So though I am here talking about this with you, I'm not out picketing these programs in real life, and I'm not inflicting strangers with my or anyone else's view of feminism. My issues of choice to focus my energy on do not include feminism. This is just a conversation in a place designed specifically for it.




crazyml -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/10/2016 7:03:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko


quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml

As do I. Now, it would be interesting to see how many male prison inmates are the sole carers for small children. I'm going to take a wild guess and say I bet that male prison inmates who are the sole carers for small children are outnumbered significantly by female prison inmates that are the sole carers for small children.

Now, what if nether of us can find an example of a program that provides a similar option? What should we do about it? Should we simply close the current programs down? Or should we work change the existing programs or to set up programs that are more inclusive? Or should we flap and whine about the evils of feminism? Which approach do you think is most likely to result in the best outcome?




Oh my goodness, I hope that here are rehabilitation and assistance programs that men can turn to when they leave prison. But my guess is (and a quick Google check confirms my guess) that these programs are open to men and women. My issue is not that these programs exist. It's that these particular ones exist specifically for women based on the fact that they need nurturing and support in a different way than men, presumably, and because they have young children to care for - as if men don't.


I'm not quite clear on your objection here. I made a point of acknowledging male lone parents, I can't find stats specifically for prison inmates but according to the UK's ONS (http://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/families/bulletins/familiesandhouseholds/2015-01-28#lone-parents) male lone parents are outnumbered 9 to 1 by female lone parents. That's quite a disparity!

I think that give the size of that disparity that there's a fairly strong case for programs that are specifically targetted at female lone parents. That isn't to say that I would oppose programs that specifically target male lone parents but.... whew! 9 to 1... that's a really bug difference.

quote:



And it's hardly flapping and whining.


I am sorry, I should have made it clearer, I wasn't implying that you were flapping and whining - I think it's pretty clear that you've not been doing anything of the sort. I made the point because it has certainly been my experience that some advocate for mens' rights do like to resort to flapping and whining, rather than constructive conversation.

quote:




It's... a discussion board. I've made the argument before that we all can't fight every injustice. It's impossible. So though I am here talking about this with you, I'm not out picketing these programs in real life, and I'm not inflicting strangers with my or anyone else's view of feminism. My issues of choice to focus my energy on do not include feminism. This is just a conversation in a place designed specifically for it.


Absotootely. No problem with that at all.




ManOeuvre -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/10/2016 6:20:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml
Worth noting though that the latin roots of distinguish and discriminate are quite different. Discriminate has a root in the latin verb discriminare, while Distinguish comes from distingere.


Thank you, crazyml. I have been thinking the wrong way about this for some decades. I grew up using the word distinguish simply as the English translation for discriminer in my native tongue.

Thanks for disabusing me of this rotten chunk of folk-etym.

Also worth noting, in their etymologies is that the distinction beyond the initial three letters, between what they both meant to Caesar is almost exactly in the opposite direction, compared to the distance between them in common usage today.




crazyml -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/10/2016 9:25:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ManOeuvre

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml
Worth noting though that the latin roots of distinguish and discriminate are quite different. Discriminate has a root in the latin verb discriminare, while Distinguish comes from distingere.


Thank you, crazyml. I have been thinking the wrong way about this for some decades. I grew up using the word distinguish simply as the English translation for discriminer in my native tongue.

Thanks for disabusing me of this rotten chunk of folk-etym.


No thanks required, it was a pleasure.

quote:



Also worth noting, in their etymologies is that the distinction beyond the initial three letters, between what they both meant to Caesar is almost exactly in the opposite direction, compared to the distance between them in common usage today.


How interesting!




DesideriScuri -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/11/2016 1:52:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml
quote:

ORIGINAL: DesideriScuri
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick
Really? Does this equality you are happy with also include say; income equality, or financial equality? I am sure you favour equality of opportunity, but what about equality of outcome? Is that included in your equality?
No, I didn't think so, but that just goes to show that sometimes we need to be specific about just what sort of equality we are discussing.

Equality of outcome can not be guaranteed without near complete loss of liberty.

I agree. There have been plenty of wonderfully optimistic attempts to create societies and social systems that promise equality of outcome, I've not seen any that didn't turn into complete frikken disasters though.

Most of the definitions of gender equality speak to equality of treatment and opportunity

Here's what came up in my google on searching "what is gender equality"
quote:

noun
1.the state of having the same rights, status, and opportunities as others, regardless of one's gender.

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/gender-equality
quote:

Gender equality is achieved when women and men enjoy the same rights and opportunities across all sectors of society, including economic participation and decision-making, and when the different behaviours, aspirations and needs of women and men are equally valued and favoured.

http://www.genderequality.ie/en/ge/pages/whatisge
quote:

Gender equality, also known as sex equality, gender egalitarianism, sexual equality, or equality of the genders, is the view that everyone should receive equal treatment and not be discriminated against based on their gender.[1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_equality


I'm not in disagreement with any of your quotes, crazy.




ManOeuvre -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/11/2016 7:23:28 PM)

DesideriScuri,

Sorry amigo, I just realized you shared a link with me before JeffBC while I was plumbing the depths of American legislators' ignorance. I don't want you to think I ignored yours and read his on account of us being neighbours and all.

Next time I'll be sure to read more carefully.




ManOeuvre -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/11/2016 9:30:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml
I don't think that the misconceptions that some have about feminism are easy to dismiss at all!


crazyml, I promise I won't make a habit of quoting little snippets of your text, but one of the words you use makes an impression.

I appreciate that you don't take reasoned arguments lightly, and that from time to time arguments may come down the pipe which aren't exactly reasoned, and I get the feeling you'll give anyone who uses media apart from brown cardboard and body odour to make their point a fair shake.

This is why the word has bounced about my head a few times. The word is misconceptions.

I brought up the idea that someone would level some charge or other at feminism, as well my own grievance that those charges are too easily dismissed, along with a crude caricature of what those dismissals read like. I may be right, I may be wrong.

Now I'm not exactly sure what an ideology really is. To keep things interesting, I'll not look it up, and be enlightened instead in this forum. I get the impression that ideologies aren't flawless. There is no position, ideological or otherwise which I could hold where I can confidently say, before hearing the arguments against it, that any such arguments are misconceptions of the position.

It seems this would put one over an epistemic event horizon.

I have a hunch that that is not what you want to do, and though it would be boring of me to speculate as to why you chose that word, could you understand why it doesn't come across as a synonym for "criticisms" or "arguments"?

Ms. Lastic, who may in real life be the second or third most reasoned head on Earth, laid down the dichotomy of feminist/misogynist.

Could you see how despite your best efforts, these overtures give the impression of a mind tattooed rather than made up? Please note that I don't want to equate your positions/opinions/beliefs/ideologies.

As you pointed out, it is impossible to be a neutral observer. I contend that this doomed enterprise is forever a worthwhile pursuit.

Yes, the other side is often belligerent, but it's not all tin-foil fashions, slobberguards and claims that feminists faked the moon landing. The most debilitating assumption I could make about myself would be to assume I don't have any assumptions.

Thanks again, crazyml, for taking the time.




crazyml -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/12/2016 12:23:29 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ManOeuvre

quote:

ORIGINAL: crazyml
I don't think that the misconceptions that some have about feminism are easy to dismiss at all!


crazyml, I promise I won't make a habit of quoting little snippets of your text, but one of the words you use makes an impression.


I understand the difficulty of not wanting to repost a slew of text, the problem with clipping snippets is that context is important sometimes.

quote:




I appreciate that you don't take reasoned arguments lightly, and that from time to time arguments may come down the pipe which aren't exactly reasoned, and I get the feeling you'll give anyone who uses media apart from brown cardboard and body odour to make their point a fair shake.

This is why the word has bounced about my head a few times. The word is misconceptions.

I brought up the idea that someone would level some charge or other at feminism, as well my own grievance that those charges are too easily dismissed, along with a crude caricature of what those dismissals read like. I may be right, I may be wrong.

Now I'm not exactly sure what an ideology really is. To keep things interesting, I'll not look it up, and be enlightened instead in this forum. I get the impression that ideologies aren't flawless. There is no position, ideological or otherwise which I could hold where I can confidently say, before hearing the arguments against it, that any such arguments are misconceptions of the position.


Yes of course, It would be foolish person who held that any argument against a particular point of view was a misconception. I am quite sure that you will never witness me arguing that any ideology is flawless, and I am equally sure that you'll find me willing and able to engage in debate, even about beliefs and values that I hold strongly.



quote:


It seems this would put one over an epistemic event horizon.

I have a hunch that that is not what you want to do, and though it would be boring of me to speculate as to why you chose that word, could you understand why it doesn't come across as a synonym for "criticisms" or "arguments"?


I don't mind what hunches you have, you're very welcome to your hunches. I have a couple about you, as it happens.

With regard to your hunch. I am not sure why misconception should come across as a synonym for "criticisms" or "arguments". As the word means something quite different.

I chose the word, as opposed to "arguments" or "criticisms" quite deliberately to refer to the often repeated misconceptions about feminism that get bandied about. If I had wished to talk more generally about "criticisms" or "arguments" I would have used those words. I am glad to have set your mind to rest.



quote:



Ms. Lastic, who may in real life be the second or third most reasoned head on Earth, laid down the dichotomy of feminist/misogynist.

Could you see how despite your best efforts, these overtures give the impression of a mind tattooed rather than made up? Please note that I don't want to equate your positions/opinions/beliefs/ideologies.


No, not really. I can see how some people might draw that conclusion, sure, but no I don't think that it would be generally true.

Equally, I hope you don't mind if I observe that some might view your remark as deliberately provocative?

quote:


As you pointed out, it is impossible to be a neutral observer. I contend that this doomed enterprise is forever a worthwhile pursuit.

Yes, the other side is often belligerent, but it's not all tin-foil fashions, slobberguards and claims that feminists faked the moon landing. The most debilitating assumption I could make about myself would be to assume I don't have any assumptions.

Thanks again, crazyml, for taking the time.


Well, it is certainly true that, in general, critiques of feminism are not all slobberguards and tin-foil fashions, but here in the dungeon, a remarkably high proportion of them are.




Awareness -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/12/2016 4:51:23 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75
The problem with all human beings, male or female is the test comes when they are bigger and stronger, will they be kind? Unfortunately male usually are the physically stronger and bigger one, so there is more female victims than male victims in marriages.
First off, why are you linking kindness to size? Are you saying women don't have to be kind? You sound like you're giving women excuses to behave like pieces of shit.

And there are not more female victims than male victims. Decades of domestic violence statistics have disabused anyone with a rational mind of this notion. Male victims almost invariably do not report because everyone - men and women included - will look down on him socially if he does.

quote:


This cannot possibly be a female specific problem since many men have physically abused their own child as well. This is again, a problem of being bigger and stronger and abusing your powers. And this isn't a gender thing!
Well, of course it is. We already have an awful lot of public discourse about 'toxic masculinity' with rallies in the streets to "stop violence against women" because only violence against women matters. The fact that men are victims of violence at far greater rates than women is irrelevant to man-hating feminists.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness
"We should stop putting women in jail.

quote:

I seriously do not believe any sane woman believes in this!
Oh, I'm afraid they do. One of the things you'll learn about feminists is that they tend to live in a fucking fantasy world.

quote:


Every mother will want those lesbian child abusers on an electric chair! Every woman who is not insane! I have never heard any women within my circle ever claim that women are infallible of crimes.
They're lesbians and Britain is dominated by unrepentant lunatic leftists. In all probability, someone will construct a rationale claiming these women are victims and they'll be out of prison in less than a year. Remember the prime principle of feminism: Women only have agency until they're deemed responsible for something terrible - then they magically morph into victims of patriarchy.

quote:


Not true in my country. Lesbian relationships are often extremely sweet, and they are exaggerated romantic version of the perfect male. I've been chased by lesbians twice in my life and they are seriously super sweet and loving. And would play the role of like a "gentleman", offering to chauffeur you everywhere, offering to pay all the time, buying you gifts, bring you flowers etc. One of them always checked on me when I'm still in office late if I needed dinner and she'll deliver it to me. I always find that, they work harder to make you love them, because they are so afraid to lose you to males. But unfortunately I am straight and it can get quite uncomfortable to turn them down and explain that you're totally straight. But they sure take rejection better than men. No abuse, tantrum, nothing. They will just look sad and try not to bother you again.
We're talking about lesbian relationships, not vague attempts at seducing a straight girl. Lesbian relationships suffer higher rates of domestic violence than any other pairing. That tallies with my own personal experience, because almost every lesbian I've known has been FUCKING unstable.






Awareness -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/12/2016 4:55:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer
Funny really. Absolutely against everything that the likes of respectmen and Awareness have so energetically been pumping at us all here, and for so long ... I've never come across a self-professed, female feminist, who's been anything but supportive of me, and who I am, and how I want to carve out my own life. They've all *got it*.
News flash! Feminist encourages emasculated man to behave like a fucking pussy - film at 11.

Of course they do Peon, of course they do. Feminists hate masculinity and will encourage every pathetic beta they see to destroy their own masculinity because it's actual masculinity which they fear.

quote:


The reason I'm a feminist isn't primarily because of the feminist theories I've read (and had to read, given what I do). It's because I've liked the real-life feminists I've met. The women I've know who've called themselves feminists have, without exception, been good women; their hearts have been in the right place, and they've not bullshitted me.
And there you have the classic male feminist rationale. You're a feminist, not because you've actually done any research and have a view of the world, but because you're desperate for female approval.

Pathetic.




Awareness -> RE: Milo says: "Lesbians are terrifying!" (7/12/2016 4:57:20 AM)

LOL!




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
6.304932E-02