Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 7:52:29 AM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Believe it or not the US is not their biggest part of their market. Europe, India, they buy more. Middle east, not so much.

They can get along just fine without us, but the opposite is not true because we have lost the ability to manufacture many things. Think they don't know that ? So keep fucking with them and watch them get a whole lot more belligerent to us.

T^T

Not according to Wiki, (CIA World Fact book) as least in so far as trade but just don't know how that differs from IM/EX numbers.

Trade #1 $521 billion. Japan #2 at $312 billion.

Im/Ex Euro #1 $567+, US #2 $446+ total. both in a big minus.

HERE numbers are 3-5 years old.

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 7/17/2016 7:53:07 AM >


_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 10:08:56 AM   
RottenJohnny


Posts: 1677
Joined: 5/5/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
They can get along just fine without us, but the opposite is not true because we have lost the ability to manufacture many things.

Nonsense. The US is more than capable of spinning up factories to make whatever we need almost at will. We don't only because it's simply cheaper to buy most things elsewhere. The moment that were to change, we'd start retooling.

_____________________________

"I find your arguments strewn with gaping defects in logic." - Mr. Spock

"Give me liberty or give me death." - Patrick Henry

I believe in common sense, not common opinions. - Me

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 12:40:06 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
sorry, double post to add link below.

< Message edited by Nnanji -- 7/17/2016 12:43:53 PM >

(in reply to blnymph)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 12:42:25 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: blnymph


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
What's more, I doubt that there is much international law established about the whole issue of creating an island. So the whole premise for an attack is on very shaky ground in the first place.



Yes there is - and still disputed. It is more or less all about this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guano_Islands_Act


Not sure how manufacturing new islands has anything in comman with discovering existing natural islands covered in bird poop. I'll let you provide links.

However, here is a 1970's paper on International Law that shows China has been trying various methods to extend its legal international waters into the area for some time. This is the latest attempt at legitimacy. Which is weird since Chinese culture is strongly proud of the fact that in recorded history China is the only nation that has not tried to expand and implement a hegemony outside its natural territory.

http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=mjil

(in reply to blnymph)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 12:46:18 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

1) there is no meaningful (enforceable) international law

2) China is big. And powerful.

3) she's gonna wanna have dominance over her own waters (as she sees them) in her corner of the world (imagine China owned Cuba . . .)

4) while the US can rightfully say it dominants the seas, ships fuel and manpower cost money, and dedicating resources somewhere takes them from elsewhere.

Anything from there happens within that context.

There is actually quite a bit of international law regarding territorial waters and shipping that all nations adhere to, including China.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 3:57:49 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
Nothing to worry about with this dope in the W.H.
He'll just draw a ,...red line in the ocean.
Boy, I sense 17 "resolutions" coming up!
Years ago I read an article about the most hated things in gov't by The People, "Get out of the U.N." (96%) "End foreign aid" (93%)
Does anyone think our gov't is *listening* to The People?

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 4:39:35 PM   
Dvr22999874


Posts: 2849
Joined: 9/11/2008
Status: offline
China is claiming that area belongs to China by historical right and yet, historically, I believe they gave that all away back around 1428 or so, when then emperor of the day, closed down China. They executed most of their admirals destroyed all the charts and exploration documents and burned their fleet; the emperor of that time declaring that there was to be no more interest to be shown in the outside world on penalty of death. Could the Chinese be Indian-givers ?

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 5:06:15 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Believe it or not the US is not their biggest part of their market. Europe, India, they buy more. Middle east, not so much.

They can get along just fine without us, but the opposite is not true because we have lost the ability to manufacture many things. Think they don't know that ? So keep fucking with them and watch them get a whole lot more belligerent to us.

T^T

Not according to Wiki, (CIA World Fact book) as least in so far as trade but just don't know how that differs from IM/EX numbers.

Trade #1 $521 billion. Japan #2 at $312 billion.

Im/Ex Euro #1 $567+, US #2 $446+ total. both in a big minus.

HERE numbers are 3-5 years old.


You did not prove your point. However, there is another factor afoot. The Chinese see Moody's rating and they got figures on US debt. That includes consumer debt. They are not stupid people. They know the US economy is falling for real, not the propped up numbers that stupid US economists tell you. They know about quantitative easing and they know when a country does that they are in trouble. They are not Keynsians, they know real math.

Losing the US market will cost them of course, but not everything. But there is another factor, they KNOW they are losing this market because we simply won't have any money. They can look up on the internet and find out the trade deficit every day. They have common sense and know it is unsustainable.

They also know, other than our penny ante export of wheat, the only moneymaker is weapons. That means we can only keep making money when there is war. They do not want war. They want some expansion, like that island n shit, but they are not like the radical Muslims we created that actually WANT war with the west.

They don't want to waste the money on shit like that.

T^T

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 5:38:16 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
They can get along just fine without us, but the opposite is not true because we have lost the ability to manufacture many things.

Nonsense. The US is more than capable of spinning up factories to make whatever we need almost at will. We don't only because it's simply cheaper to buy most things elsewhere. The moment that were to change, we'd start retooling.



Fucking try it. I have been in business and very involved with other business and I can tell you why the US loses business. The environment is extremely unfriendly to business. Ad even if it was we do not have the skilled workers, even able to read a fucking tape measure !

When the economy collapses we will be sinking toward third world status until there is real education. And people get a real work ethic. I have been in business and involved as much more than a worker for a long time. I can tell you IT IS NOT COMING BACK. The people we have with the skills are in their fucking 60s and 70s. I KNOW THIS, it is not bullshit.

We build cars, OK, they are stamped out on what amounts to a big punch press and then welded by machine. We don't even have welders. The skills involved now are to screw in the tailights and dome light and shit like that. The engines and trannies, ALL CNC. And that includes all but a small part of the assembly process as well.

The people they need now are those who understand that process, and they only need one of them when they used to need ten. And the engineers make it so they don't even have to look at a print. So you could have a factory with 100 people making minimum wage and like three knowing what they're doing.

Certain processes do not work well that way.

Anyway, when I say we do not have the means to recover, that does not mean we cannot buy lathes and milling machines or punch presses. What I mean is we lack workers who are educated to respect the machine and not get their hands cut off n shit, and actually WORK. This country is full of slackerds. So remember about industry coming back, it is not just the government, it is the people.

If I ever start a business here all my employees will be here on an H1B visa. How does that grab ya ? Know why ? Because I am not bullshit, I do not run politics at the shop nor allow it. You are here to work, work. You don't like that guy I suggest you don't talk to him, because you might get fired. Know how hard it is to get a job these days boy ?

"If you do not like it get the fuck out, I got over 200 resumes' in the filing cabinet. And I throw them all out every month. "

This is what gives business power.

Now in China, the government is doing them a favor by limiting reproduction. There are too many people. They want you to just have one, but I think two might be acceptable, don't know. But beyond that, they should be penalized. What's more it is easier to raise less kids. And they burden the infrastructure less.

If anyone fucking around here thinks China is stupid, then splain to me how come we owe them money. We put a Man on the moon, but they do all these things we can't ? Or they can do them cheaper ?

How come Germany isn't bitching about this ?

They got good schools and skills. We used to have that.

And now, going to war with countries like China that can outproduce us without breaking a sweat, and their ally Russia that can design better jets, missiles and submarines than us look good to you ?

Start up a new business and get back to me.

T^T

(in reply to RottenJohnny)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 5:40:29 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

1) there is no meaningful (enforceable) international law

2) China is big. And powerful.

3) she's gonna wanna have dominance over her own waters (as she sees them) in her corner of the world (imagine China owned Cuba . . .)

4) while the US can rightfully say it dominants the seas, ships fuel and manpower cost money, and dedicating resources somewhere takes them from elsewhere.

Anything from there happens within that context.

There is actually quite a bit of international law regarding territorial waters and shipping that all nations adhere to, including China.



But not islandbuilding.

T^T

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 5:59:27 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
They can get along just fine without us, but the opposite is not true because we have lost the ability to manufacture many things.

Nonsense. The US is more than capable of spinning up factories to make whatever we need almost at will. We don't only because it's simply cheaper to buy most things elsewhere. The moment that were to change, we'd start retooling.



Fucking try it. I have been in business and very involved with other business and I can tell you why the US loses business. The environment is extremely unfriendly to business. Ad even if it was we do not have the skilled workers, even able to read a fucking tape measure !

When the economy collapses we will be sinking toward third world status until there is real education. And people get a real work ethic. I have been in business and involved as much more than a worker for a long time. I can tell you IT IS NOT COMING BACK. The people we have with the skills are in their fucking 60s and 70s. I KNOW THIS, it is not bullshit.

We build cars, OK, they are stamped out on what amounts to a big punch press and then welded by machine. We don't even have welders. The skills involved now are to screw in the tailights and dome light and shit like that. The engines and trannies, ALL CNC. And that includes all but a small part of the assembly process as well.

The people they need now are those who understand that process, and they only need one of them when they used to need ten. And the engineers make it so they don't even have to look at a print. So you could have a factory with 100 people making minimum wage and like three knowing what they're doing.

Certain processes do not work well that way.

Anyway, when I say we do not have the means to recover, that does not mean we cannot buy lathes and milling machines or punch presses. What I mean is we lack workers who are educated to respect the machine and not get their hands cut off n shit, and actually WORK. This country is full of slackerds. So remember about industry coming back, it is not just the government, it is the people.

If I ever start a business here all my employees will be here on an H1B visa. How does that grab ya ? Know why ? Because I am not bullshit, I do not run politics at the shop nor allow it. You are here to work, work. You don't like that guy I suggest you don't talk to him, because you might get fired. Know how hard it is to get a job these days boy ?

"If you do not like it get the fuck out, I got over 200 resumes' in the filing cabinet. And I throw them all out every month. "

This is what gives business power.

Now in China, the government is doing them a favor by limiting reproduction. There are too many people. They want you to just have one, but I think two might be acceptable, don't know. But beyond that, they should be penalized. What's more it is easier to raise less kids. And they burden the infrastructure less.

If anyone fucking around here thinks China is stupid, then splain to me how come we owe them money. We put a Man on the moon, but they do all these things we can't ? Or they can do them cheaper ?

How come Germany isn't bitching about this ?

They got good schools and skills. We used to have that.

And now, going to war with countries like China that can outproduce us without breaking a sweat, and their ally Russia that can design better jets, missiles and submarines than us look good to you ?

Start up a new business and get back to me.

T^T

I have a few differences with your comments even if, generally, I agree. First, years and years ago I used to work out with a guy who worked on an auto line. He was bitching because for years he'd operated four welding machines himself. The whole shift he had to hustle between them to keep up with the line. At that time he was bitching because the union now was forcing the plant to hire one person per welder. He said the kids coming in were all bitching that keeping up with the line on one welder was just too much. That was my generation. We did okay, albeit I'll admit half of the generation were whiny little punks. But, those people were just easy to advance beyond. Similarly, there are a few in the current generation that are not whiny little metrosexuals. It'll just, by natural selection, develop a new hierarchy.

If you think it's bad here, look at places in Europe were it's impossible, literally, to fire someone once you give them a job. I recently read where one country there, I've forgotten which, is trying to pass a law that you can fire a person up until the age of 25 or 30 because so many kids were coming into the work place and just sleeping on the job with no recourse to the company. So much for social liberalism. Yet, if that's the compition, we aren't that far down the ol' socialist/liberal rabbit hole yet and we can at least kick that butt.

The Chinese ever only strictly enforced the one child policy on the peasants in the countryside. But now, because everyone wanted sons, so many potential daughters were being aborted until the mom's got pregnant with sons, that they are calling that generation the little princes. So a generation of sons with no potential for finding a wife will probably have to go to war to kill a lot off. In the mean time the little princes are being so pampered they are turning into just what we have here.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 6:02:28 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

1) there is no meaningful (enforceable) international law

2) China is big. And powerful.

3) she's gonna wanna have dominance over her own waters (as she sees them) in her corner of the world (imagine China owned Cuba . . .)

4) while the US can rightfully say it dominants the seas, ships fuel and manpower cost money, and dedicating resources somewhere takes them from elsewhere.

Anything from there happens within that context.

There is actually quite a bit of international law regarding territorial waters and shipping that all nations adhere to, including China.



But not islandbuilding.

T^T

Concur.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 6:32:48 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
They can get along just fine without us, but the opposite is not true because we have lost the ability to manufacture many things.

Nonsense. The US is more than capable of spinning up factories to make whatever we need almost at will. We don't only because it's simply cheaper to buy most things elsewhere. The moment that were to change, we'd start retooling.



Fucking try it. I have been in business and very involved with other business and I can tell you why the US loses business. The environment is extremely unfriendly to business. Ad even if it was we do not have the skilled workers, even able to read a fucking tape measure !

When the economy collapses we will be sinking toward third world status until there is real education. And people get a real work ethic. I have been in business and involved as much more than a worker for a long time. I can tell you IT IS NOT COMING BACK. The people we have with the skills are in their fucking 60s and 70s. I KNOW THIS, it is not bullshit.

We build cars, OK, they are stamped out on what amounts to a big punch press and then welded by machine. We don't even have welders. The skills involved now are to screw in the tailights and dome light and shit like that. The engines and trannies, ALL CNC. And that includes all but a small part of the assembly process as well.

The people they need now are those who understand that process, and they only need one of them when they used to need ten. And the engineers make it so they don't even have to look at a print. So you could have a factory with 100 people making minimum wage and like three knowing what they're doing.

Certain processes do not work well that way.

Anyway, when I say we do not have the means to recover, that does not mean we cannot buy lathes and milling machines or punch presses. What I mean is we lack workers who are educated to respect the machine and not get their hands cut off n shit, and actually WORK. This country is full of slackerds. So remember about industry coming back, it is not just the government, it is the people.

If I ever start a business here all my employees will be here on an H1B visa. How does that grab ya ? Know why ? Because I am not bullshit, I do not run politics at the shop nor allow it. You are here to work, work. You don't like that guy I suggest you don't talk to him, because you might get fired. Know how hard it is to get a job these days boy ?

"If you do not like it get the fuck out, I got over 200 resumes' in the filing cabinet. And I throw them all out every month. "

This is what gives business power.

Now in China, the government is doing them a favor by limiting reproduction. There are too many people. They want you to just have one, but I think two might be acceptable, don't know. But beyond that, they should be penalized. What's more it is easier to raise less kids. And they burden the infrastructure less.

If anyone fucking around here thinks China is stupid, then splain to me how come we owe them money. We put a Man on the moon, but they do all these things we can't ? Or they can do them cheaper ?

How come Germany isn't bitching about this ?

They got good schools and skills. We used to have that.

And now, going to war with countries like China that can outproduce us without breaking a sweat, and their ally Russia that can design better jets, missiles and submarines than us look good to you ?

Start up a new business and get back to me.

T^T

I have a few differences with your comments even if, generally, I agree. First, years and years ago I used to work out with a guy who worked on an auto line. He was bitching because for years he'd operated four welding machines himself. The whole shift he had to hustle between them to keep up with the line. At that time he was bitching because the union now was forcing the plant to hire one person per welder. He said the kids coming in were all bitching that keeping up with the line on one welder was just too much. That was my generation. We did okay, albeit I'll admit half of the generation were whiny little punks. But, those people were just easy to advance beyond. Similarly, there are a few in the current generation that are not whiny little metrosexuals. It'll just, by natural selection, develop a new hierarchy.

If you think it's bad here, look at places in Europe were it's impossible, literally, to fire someone once you give them a job. I recently read where one country there, I've forgotten which, is trying to pass a law that you can fire a person up until the age of 25 or 30 because so many kids were coming into the work place and just sleeping on the job with no recourse to the company. So much for social liberalism. Yet, if that's the compition, we aren't that far down the ol' socialist/liberal rabbit hole yet and we can at least kick that butt.

The Chinese ever only strictly enforced the one child policy on the peasants in the countryside. But now, because everyone wanted sons, so many potential daughters were being aborted until the mom's got pregnant with sons, that they are calling that generation the little princes. So a generation of sons with no potential for finding a wife will probably have to go to war to kill a lot off. In the mean time the little princes are being so pampered they are turning into just what we have here.


Let me get this straight, he was bitching because of too much workload and then bitching because the help they got him was worth shit. Right ?

Sounds about right.

This country is in even more trouble than that. When the manufacturing moved to Japan and China and whatever, at least the stuff was designed here. Now the schools cannot put out good engineers. They got 80 year old guys doing it. What happens when they die ? We're fucking done.

i have known/know people who do this stuff, manufacturing and engineering. They are all saying it is hard to get competent people. One is 68 years old and they can't get enough of him.

Anyway, when I was young I might say ATTACK ATTACK, but I have changed. I was very proactive in solving problems, but now I just refuse to care because caring doesn't work. Get this population down to a reasonable level and I would consider trying. In other words, let them have their war. And I hope they lose. Fucking half trillion a year for goddamn nothing. Never once defended this country successfully. Not once.

T^T

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 6:41:53 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


quote:

ORIGINAL: RottenJohnny


quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
They can get along just fine without us, but the opposite is not true because we have lost the ability to manufacture many things.

Nonsense. The US is more than capable of spinning up factories to make whatever we need almost at will. We don't only because it's simply cheaper to buy most things elsewhere. The moment that were to change, we'd start retooling.



Fucking try it. I have been in business and very involved with other business and I can tell you why the US loses business. The environment is extremely unfriendly to business. Ad even if it was we do not have the skilled workers, even able to read a fucking tape measure !

When the economy collapses we will be sinking toward third world status until there is real education. And people get a real work ethic. I have been in business and involved as much more than a worker for a long time. I can tell you IT IS NOT COMING BACK. The people we have with the skills are in their fucking 60s and 70s. I KNOW THIS, it is not bullshit.

We build cars, OK, they are stamped out on what amounts to a big punch press and then welded by machine. We don't even have welders. The skills involved now are to screw in the tailights and dome light and shit like that. The engines and trannies, ALL CNC. And that includes all but a small part of the assembly process as well.

The people they need now are those who understand that process, and they only need one of them when they used to need ten. And the engineers make it so they don't even have to look at a print. So you could have a factory with 100 people making minimum wage and like three knowing what they're doing.

Certain processes do not work well that way.

Anyway, when I say we do not have the means to recover, that does not mean we cannot buy lathes and milling machines or punch presses. What I mean is we lack workers who are educated to respect the machine and not get their hands cut off n shit, and actually WORK. This country is full of slackerds. So remember about industry coming back, it is not just the government, it is the people.

If I ever start a business here all my employees will be here on an H1B visa. How does that grab ya ? Know why ? Because I am not bullshit, I do not run politics at the shop nor allow it. You are here to work, work. You don't like that guy I suggest you don't talk to him, because you might get fired. Know how hard it is to get a job these days boy ?

"If you do not like it get the fuck out, I got over 200 resumes' in the filing cabinet. And I throw them all out every month. "

This is what gives business power.

Now in China, the government is doing them a favor by limiting reproduction. There are too many people. They want you to just have one, but I think two might be acceptable, don't know. But beyond that, they should be penalized. What's more it is easier to raise less kids. And they burden the infrastructure less.

If anyone fucking around here thinks China is stupid, then splain to me how come we owe them money. We put a Man on the moon, but they do all these things we can't ? Or they can do them cheaper ?

How come Germany isn't bitching about this ?

They got good schools and skills. We used to have that.

And now, going to war with countries like China that can outproduce us without breaking a sweat, and their ally Russia that can design better jets, missiles and submarines than us look good to you ?

Start up a new business and get back to me.

T^T

I have a few differences with your comments even if, generally, I agree. First, years and years ago I used to work out with a guy who worked on an auto line. He was bitching because for years he'd operated four welding machines himself. The whole shift he had to hustle between them to keep up with the line. At that time he was bitching because the union now was forcing the plant to hire one person per welder. He said the kids coming in were all bitching that keeping up with the line on one welder was just too much. That was my generation. We did okay, albeit I'll admit half of the generation were whiny little punks. But, those people were just easy to advance beyond. Similarly, there are a few in the current generation that are not whiny little metrosexuals. It'll just, by natural selection, develop a new hierarchy.

If you think it's bad here, look at places in Europe were it's impossible, literally, to fire someone once you give them a job. I recently read where one country there, I've forgotten which, is trying to pass a law that you can fire a person up until the age of 25 or 30 because so many kids were coming into the work place and just sleeping on the job with no recourse to the company. So much for social liberalism. Yet, if that's the compition, we aren't that far down the ol' socialist/liberal rabbit hole yet and we can at least kick that butt.

The Chinese ever only strictly enforced the one child policy on the peasants in the countryside. But now, because everyone wanted sons, so many potential daughters were being aborted until the mom's got pregnant with sons, that they are calling that generation the little princes. So a generation of sons with no potential for finding a wife will probably have to go to war to kill a lot off. In the mean time the little princes are being so pampered they are turning into just what we have here.


Let me get this straight, he was bitching because of too much workload and then bitching because the help they got him was worth shit. Right ?

Sounds about right.

This country is in even more trouble than that. When the manufacturing moved to Japan and China and whatever, at least the stuff was designed here. Now the schools cannot put out good engineers. They got 80 year old guys doing it. What happens when they die ? We're fucking done.

i have known/know people who do this stuff, manufacturing and engineering. They are all saying it is hard to get competent people. One is 68 years old and they can't get enough of him.

Anyway, when I was young I might say ATTACK ATTACK, but I have changed. I was very proactive in solving problems, but now I just refuse to care because caring doesn't work. Get this population down to a reasonable level and I would consider trying. In other words, let them have their war. And I hope they lose. Fucking half trillion a year for goddamn nothing. Never once defended this country successfully. Not once.

T^T

No he didn't bitch about the work load. He was in his forties when I was a teenager. This was something like 40 years ago. He was happy to have a good job that took care of his family. He was bitching about the little primadonnas who were bitching about having to do a quarter of the work he'd done for twenty years.

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 7:18:58 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Greta75
ORIGINAL: thompsonx

This is very interesting actually.

My country is in a precarious position because we are trying not to take sides.

Is tht why that third world shithole called singapore buys it's military hardware from amerika?


Purchasing weapons from the US has nothing to do with taking sides.


Yes it does.


US has the best military weapons for sale, we will buy from them.


Who are you going to use them on?


We will buy from China whatever they do good at as well.


Roflmfao...china does not cary spare parts of the f 15 the f 16 or the f 35.

Anyway, I have no idea why are you so bitter that we can afford to spend multi millions on military weapons. If we can afford them without putting our own country in debt, what's the problem?


Why would you think me bitter that that third world shithole called singapore threw it's money down an amerikan military industrial money pit. Do you know how many 350 million dollar aircraft you own...you do realize the spare parts exceed the cost of the aircraft
Perhaps that is why the tax rate is what it is in that third world shithole called sigapore.




Why do you think china should give up some of it's country?
Which part of that third world shithole singapore would you be willing to give up?
Where do you get off telling someone that they ought to give up some of their stuff? How would you feel if you were told you had to loose weight,give up your skates and never chew gum again?


Because the people inside of Taiwan and Hong Kong wants their independence, and have been independent FROM China for so many years without needing China. China is just being greedy.


You have failed to tell us which part of that third world shit hole called singapore can seceed ?Why are you being so stingy?


< Message edited by thompsonx -- 7/17/2016 7:20:50 PM >

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 7:39:55 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
I have seen that. Little prissy wannabes who will never make it because they won't work for it, even if they happen to have the skills.

China has a very motivated population. You think they are beating people into submission ? Well maybe some but others are sent all over the world to the best schools. The Chinese want things. They already have more of a middle class than we do. They are not living in grass huts and riding mules. they are living in apartments or even houses, driving air conditioned cars to work on roads that are better than those in the US.

As far as I have seen, they do not have much proclivity for innovation, like new inventions. But it seems they do have a knack for manufacturing, like setting up the line, making dies or whatever, and that is a valuable task. And that is not the commoners usually. The people who do that went to college. Next question is did they go there or go overseas ?

All I know is they are not to be fucked with. THEY BUILD OUR TECHNOLOGY, so that means they got it. They got three times as many people. They got some strong allies.

This is going to be an interesting decade if I survive it.

I laughed when I saw the planes hit the WTC and said "Well I knew sooner or later they were going to get kicked in the balls". What is going to happen next ? All these methods only reduce the possibility of that. What about other things ? What about poisoning big lakes with something that is impossible to filter out ?

They did not do that because they are not after us, they are after the government and the Jews.

And I thinkk it is cool that the Jews cannot buy the Chinese because thre Chinese have enough money. Same with Russia. Putin will not let them have too much power there, and he used to work for them during the USSR days. And don't give me that the USSR was not Jews. First of all anti-Semitism was a death sentence. Second of all, all the money was gone when they got put out. This all had to do with banking, just like in Germany before WW2. Everyone forgets the "connections" between the Jews and the soon to be Soviets around the time of WW1.

And what is happening now ? Tell you this, without Russia we could never have handled Germany in WW2. Now, we got China which is what, ten times bigger ? And can get Russian weaponry which is mostly better than ours. And has a solid economy, while the US has to borrow money to pay the fucking electric bill.

The US DOES NOT have better weapons, just more of them. Get that through your head.

Still want war ? Go right ahead. I got no kids and I am ready to get of the planet anytime. But you might not think that way and if you don't I suggest you stop fooling yourself that we can just take anyone on. Lost in Korea. Lost in Nam. Lost in Iraq. Lost in Afghanistan. Lost even in fucking Venezuela. Pisse doff the rest of South America so now we have HFCS instead of sugar in foods and drinks.

Good going there.

I want them to STOP. Just stop doing anything. They fuck up everything they do so logically the less they do the better off we are. Defund them. If you got the ability, get jobs cash under the table, stop paying them. Don't buy new shit. The PC on which I type right now is eight years old. Do you have a problem reading the text ? Fuck no.

No more taxes no more nothing.

I do not hate the country, I do not hate anything really, but this government has to go.

I almost think we would be better off letting the Chinese rule this country. You know, legal drugs kill more than illegal drugs here. Tens of thousands die just from drugs, and I don't even mean interactions. They say drugs are so expensive here because of the testing. Well if they tested them how come people are dying ?

In China, the head of their equivalent of the FDA took a bribe and seven people died. THEY EXECUTED HIM. Here, they give you a bonus. They talk about gun control when ten times as many are killed by medical mistakes. And this is not including people who were going to die today anyway. And it is the numbers from the AMA.

There is no law unless people obey it. Truthfully, I don't. I have rebuilt houses without a permit, driven without a license for decades, smoke pot, have unregistered guns and even a machette.

I have no love for the Chinese. (or anyone) however I do question who the fuck has jurisdiction over what they do ? If I were they I would say to go fuck yourself.

Now that I think of it, that is pretty much what they did.

T^T

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 8:02:57 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

In China, the head of their equivalent of the FDA took a bribe and seven people died. THEY EXECUTED HIM. Here, they give you a bonus.

I actually applaud China for this! I think our entire country did. We really believe in death penalty for all the irrelevant people who seriously, I don't give a shit if they lived or died if their job is to bring harm to others.
But the story on our end is a little different. As he was the one who allowed mercury content in baby milk powders or children's toys made with chemicals that are hazards to children. Children died. They executed him as an example that such incompetence is not acceptable.
But thanks to this scandal, even today, Australian Milk Powders are in extreme high demands. Singaporeans make good business, buying Milk powder from Australia and selling them to China people. Like, we can sell them at stupid prices like 50bux a Tin, and they'll pay the premium for it.


(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 8:09:51 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
Who are you going to use them on?

On Indonesia or Malaysia, when they attack us. We are surrounded by Muslim countries. We need protection.
quote:

Roflmfao...china does not cary spare parts of the f 15 the f 16 or the f 35.

So you just proven that we aren't taking sides. China doesn't have what we need.
quote:


Perhaps that is why the tax rate is what it is in that third world shithole called sigapore.

Showed you tax rate from IRAS being super low, and you refuse to believe facts but choose to believe one of your crappy websites instead.
quote:

You have failed to tell us which part of that third world shit hole called singapore can seceed ?Why are you being so stingy?

Your question is irrelevant for Singapore, because if you know our history. We wanted to be part of Malaysia. We didn't even want to own Singapore AT ALL. While other countries like Hong Kong and Taiwan are fighting for their Independence. We didn't want our independence, but we had no choice. We used to be a part of Malaysia, but Malaysia cast us out!
We wanted to be part of country with natural resources. Which is Malaysia. They kicked us out, because we were campaigning for equality between Muslims and non-Muslims, and up till today, Malaysia practices First Rights to Muslims, non-Muslims second class citizens, is always their philosophy, that's why they kick us out, because we wanted equality for all races and religions, that's why we are independent but against our will. Our Prime Minister even cried when Malaysia kicked us out. We never wanted independence.

Taiwan and Hong Kong are different. They have been running independently without China for years! Since I was born, I always remembered them to be their own country. Suddenly China taking ownership of them back, is just a recent historical thing. It was awful for them. They are forced to be part of a country they want nothing to do with and they don't share similar beliefs with. On top of that, Hong Kong and Taiwanese Chinese, really HATE China Chinese. Being forced to be part of something you hate is horrible and wrong!

Whereas Singapore was forced to part with a country they want to be a part of. We love Malaysian Chinese.


< Message edited by Greta75 -- 7/17/2016 8:20:05 PM >

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 10:09:38 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or


quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

Believe it or not the US is not their biggest part of their market. Europe, India, they buy more. Middle east, not so much.

They can get along just fine without us, but the opposite is not true because we have lost the ability to manufacture many things. Think they don't know that ? So keep fucking with them and watch them get a whole lot more belligerent to us.

T^T

Not according to Wiki, (CIA World Fact book) as least in so far as trade but just don't know how that differs from IM/EX numbers.

Trade #1 $521 billion. Japan #2 at $312 billion.

Im/Ex Euro #1 $567+, US #2 $446+ total. both in a big minus.

HERE numbers are 3-5 years old.


You did not prove your point. However, there is another factor afoot. The Chinese see Moody's rating and they got figures on US debt. That includes consumer debt. They are not stupid people. They know the US economy is falling for real, not the propped up numbers that stupid US economists tell you. They know about quantitative easing and they know when a country does that they are in trouble. They are not Keynsians, they know real math.

Losing the US market will cost them of course, but not everything. But there is another factor, they KNOW they are losing this market because we simply won't have any money. They can look up on the internet and find out the trade deficit every day. They have common sense and know it is unsustainable.

They also know, other than our penny ante export of wheat, the only moneymaker is weapons. That means we can only keep making money when there is war. They do not want war. They want some expansion, like that island n shit, but they are not like the radical Muslims we created that actually WANT war with the west.

They don't want to waste the money on shit like that.

T^T

T8r, first my point was that the US is 1 or 2 in terms of economic activity with China in a partial refutation of your point. China does not want to see any end or reduction in that.

But. you keep writing about the decline of America's economy and others in similar fashion mostly on youtube have posited that the US economy/ dollar was supposed to have failed I think every year since about 2000. QA was supposed to bring in inflation and a great devaluation of the dollar. It has not. Historically low interest rates...the same. It has not.

There is American economic Armageddon predicted constantly right around the corner. Yet you here and others elsewhere also constantly fail to point out just why it hasn't happen, how it will happen and just exactly when it truly by god...will actually happen.

The reason you and others haven't, is because it is not, will not for many years to come and like I've written, unless there is some economic, false-flag, banking op that shuts down our accounts, it will be 40-50 years before anything like any of the predictions may...may come true and it will likely be gradual. (ok, maybe say 2050)

All borrowing is down and has been on a steady decline for 8 years or more. Household debt is down and is still being reduced at near record rates. Just because prognosticators can throw out terms, the banking readjustment and other economic news, does mean anything radical is right around the corner. If things were so bad, then tell me dude, why have 10 year Treasuries gone from over 2% to under 2% meaning the world is still eager to buy up US debt ?

In fact every year, the US is rebuilding economic stability into the American economy with the only drag being the persistent lack of anything resembling our historical record of past distribution of wealth. Plus still, there are many trillion$ left for the 1%ers to fleece from the great capitalist proletariat. Maybe when that happens and they finish the job...shit will begin to go downhill.

< Message edited by MrRodgers -- 7/17/2016 10:31:14 PM >


_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea - 7/17/2016 11:29:03 PM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
Debt is down because they just refuse to loan more.

What, you think one of the most liberal regimes in this country WILLINGLY reduced the deficit ?

Oh wait...

T^T

(in reply to MrRodgers)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Testing the Rule of Law in the South China Sea Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109