Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/17/2016 10:53:58 PM   
ifmaz


Posts: 844
Joined: 7/22/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

Your opinion is there is no "rational" reason for a civilian to own such a rifle and you state this opinion is "unchallenged" and "uncountered". I am merely asking what reasons you have for taking such a stance. What formed this "unchallenged" opinion of yours?

It's difficult to read when you're dizzy.

K.




I'm sitting down to my second glass of this incredible 20 year Tawny and have worked an ungodly amount of hours recently. Maybe I'm missing something, what with my thick skull, or I'm just not articulating properly.

(in reply to Kirata)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/17/2016 11:02:39 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

"Rational" in this context, if you read the OP, means that the government proscribes the ownership.

No it doesn't.

Niener niener, I'm rubber and you're glue. Whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you.

There, a comment to you that is about as rational as yours. If you'd has read the OP, and been able to understand it, you might be aware of that and spout something with a little more...shall we say...thoughtful, insight.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/17/2016 11:06:26 PM   
Kirata


Posts: 15477
Joined: 2/11/2006
From: USA
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz
quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata
quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

Your opinion is there is no "rational" reason for a civilian to own such a rifle and you state this opinion is "unchallenged" and "uncountered". I am merely asking what reasons you have for taking such a stance. What formed this "unchallenged" opinion of yours?

It's difficult to read when you're dizzy.

I'm sitting down to my second glass of this incredible 20 year Tawny and have worked an ungodly amount of hours recently. Maybe I'm missing something, what with my thick skull, or I'm just not articulating properly.


I wasn't referring to you.

K.

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/17/2016 11:09:52 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird


quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

... yet I don't recall seeing a list of rational reasons as to why civilians should not own a semi-automatic rifle with a "large capacity" magazine. Do you have any rational reasons?


Because they don't want one, as already stated.

Most people consider not buying what one doesn't want to be rational.

No...that's not gonna fly. "Rational" in this context, if you read the OP, means that the government proscribes the ownership. It has nothing to do with ability to afford or desire to own.


Actually, that's completely wrong.

The context was this:

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

If there is no reason a civilian should not own such a rifle, they can (and should) own it. Many, in fact, because there's no rational reason not to.




Okay, I'll give you that one. I'll lay the blame for my error on having to try and contend with the inane dribble coming from another source. I'll also hitch up my pants and climb on my high horse and point out to both you and ifmaz that that isn't germane to the original OP. Climbing down now from the horse and readjusting my briefs.

< Message edited by Nnanji -- 7/17/2016 11:11:47 PM >

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/17/2016 11:11:15 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

Your opinion is there is no "rational" reason for a civilian to own such a rifle and you state this opinion is "unchallenged" and "uncountered". I am merely asking what reasons you have for taking such a stance. What formed this "unchallenged" opinion of yours?

It's difficult to read when you're dizzy.

K.




I'm sitting down to my second glass of this incredible 20 year Tawny and have worked an ungodly amount of hours recently. Maybe I'm missing something, what with my thick skull, or I'm just not articulating properly.


Dizzy was asking you why you couldn't get something through your thick skull on the previous page.

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/17/2016 11:15:00 PM   
ifmaz


Posts: 844
Joined: 7/22/2015
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz


quote:

ORIGINAL: Kirata


quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz

Your opinion is there is no "rational" reason for a civilian to own such a rifle and you state this opinion is "unchallenged" and "uncountered". I am merely asking what reasons you have for taking such a stance. What formed this "unchallenged" opinion of yours?

It's difficult to read when you're dizzy.

K.




I'm sitting down to my second glass of this incredible 20 year Tawny and have worked an ungodly amount of hours recently. Maybe I'm missing something, what with my thick skull, or I'm just not articulating properly.


Dizzy was asking you why you couldn't get something through your thick skull on the previous page.


Yes, I'm aware. I'm also aware that perhaps I'm not presenting the discussion properly in a way Dizzy can understand (no personal insult implied).


(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/17/2016 11:15:22 PM   
Edwird


Posts: 3558
Joined: 5/2/2016
Status: offline
As to your inquiry regarding reasons not to buy a semi-automatic rifle;

For me personally, as for many millions of others, I've just never felt the need for, and have never had the urge to own a gun of any sort.

I've known gun owners all my life, so it's possible that long ago I might have given some bit of thought to it, but I don't consciously recall it.

In any case I just never gave much thought as to why. People usually give more thought to actions they are contemplating than those they are not.

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/17/2016 11:33:59 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

As to your inquiry regarding reasons not to buy a semi-automatic rifle;

For me personally, as for many millions of others, I've just never felt the need for, and have never had the urge to own a gun of any sort.

I've known gun owners all my life, so it's possible that long ago I might have given some bit of thought to it, but I don't consciously recall it.

In any case I just never gave much thought as to why. People usually give more thought to actions they are contemplating than those they are not.

I, actually, owned guns for probably twenty years before I bought a semi-automatic rifle. I bought one...or so...specifically because the government was going to ban them. Which just shows you how well liberal policies ever work. Come to think of it, until then I didn't even own semi-auto pistols. I had revolvers, bolt and lever action rifles and shotguns. Clinton's (the rapist not the rape justifier and crook) gun ban inspired me to own that which I had never before desired.

< Message edited by Nnanji -- 7/17/2016 11:34:41 PM >

(in reply to Edwird)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/17/2016 11:46:52 PM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

As to your inquiry regarding reasons not to buy a semi-automatic rifle;

For me personally, as for many millions of others, I've just never felt the need for, and have never had the urge to own a gun of any sort.

I've known gun owners all my life, so it's possible that long ago I might have given some bit of thought to it, but I don't consciously recall it.

In any case I just never gave much thought as to why. People usually give more thought to actions they are contemplating than those they are not.

I, actually, owned guns for probably twenty years before I bought a semi-automatic rifle. I bought one...or so...specifically because the government was going to ban them. Which just shows you how well liberal policies ever work. Come to think of it, until then I didn't even own semi-auto pistols. I had revolvers, bolt and lever action rifles and shotguns. Clinton's (the rapist not the rape justifier and crook) gun ban inspired me to own that which I had never before desired.

I got my first automatic rifle when I was 18, as a grauduation/Christmas present. This was long enough ago that it was legal. My preference is a lever action, and I prefer revolvers. I carry and automatic most of the time because they are easier to conceal but my handgun of preference is a colt sa clone.
As I see it, if someone doesn't want to own a firearm that is their business, I have no right to tell them to get one, just as they have no right to tell me I can't.
Also a revolver, a lever, or a pump, are just as deadly as an automatic, and that harping about automatics is just a smoke screen to go after all guns.

< Message edited by BamaD -- 7/17/2016 11:50:55 PM >


_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/18/2016 12:10:13 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

As to your inquiry regarding reasons not to buy a semi-automatic rifle;

For me personally, as for many millions of others, I've just never felt the need for, and have never had the urge to own a gun of any sort.

I've known gun owners all my life, so it's possible that long ago I might have given some bit of thought to it, but I don't consciously recall it.

In any case I just never gave much thought as to why. People usually give more thought to actions they are contemplating than those they are not.

I, actually, owned guns for probably twenty years before I bought a semi-automatic rifle. I bought one...or so...specifically because the government was going to ban them. Which just shows you how well liberal policies ever work. Come to think of it, until then I didn't even own semi-auto pistols. I had revolvers, bolt and lever action rifles and shotguns. Clinton's (the rapist not the rape justifier and crook) gun ban inspired me to own that which I had never before desired.

I got my first automatic rifle when I was 18, as a grauduation/Christmas present. This was long enough ago that it was legal. My preference is a lever action, and I prefer revolvers. I carry and automatic most of the time because they are easier to conceal but my handgun of preference is a colt sa clone.
As I see it, if someone doesn't want to own a firearm that is their business, I have no right to tell them to get one, just as they have no right to tell me I can't.
Also a revolver, a lever, or a pump, are just as deadly as an automatic, and that harping about automatics is just a smoke screen to go after all guns.

Since the gun ban of '94 my tastes have changed more than once. Sometimes I buy something I'd in the past sworn I'd never own. Now, pretty much I prefer a gun suited to the task. The places I hunt aren't conducive to lever guns, the shots tend to be longer. As you said, concealing a revolver is difficult. But I tell you there is nothing like the feel of a SAA and I hunt with a Freedom Arms. And I consider "nothing like the feel" to be a task which deserves to be suited. Lately I've been doing a lot of long distance shooting and frankly an AR is a 400 yard rifle and not sufficient out to and past 1000 yards. So I've been loading for and shooting diminutive 6.5mm rounds that have bullets with a high BC. (BC said just to be a snob and confuse people but I know you'll understand.)

(in reply to BamaD)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/18/2016 12:10:38 AM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

Another person being robbed by their ESL teacher.

Nope, none of those reasons are a necessity, therefore no needs given, only reasons one may want to. Looks like you were the one robbed.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/18/2016 12:13:57 AM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

Dizzy was asking you why you couldn't get something through your thick skull on the previous page.

No I wasn't. You guys seem to have trouble recognizing a question. I told him to get it through his thick skull, I never asked him anything.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/18/2016 12:17:25 AM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

And your rational premis for a thick skull is that you don't understand him or he doesn't understand you?

His continued insistence that I hold a position I have clearly stated several times I do not hold. :)

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/18/2016 12:20:28 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Another person being robbed by their ESL teacher.

Nope, none of those reasons are a necessity, therefore no needs given, only reasons one may want to. Looks like you were the one robbed.

Actually Dizz, that wasn't my statement in your quote. I believe that was a Kirata statement. I'm assuming you were trying to quote me since my name is down in the bottom right hand corner of your quote. Boy, you just keep stepping in it don't you. I guess being a bartender it's not past your bed time, but maybe you should just give it up and try again another day. And...oh...it may be proper for you to say that those reasons listed are not necessities "TO ME". Because they certainly are necessities and you probably meant not to you and that you can't see past your narcissistic order in the world. But then, there we are back again to your poor communication skills.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/18/2016 12:22:09 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Dizzy was asking you why you couldn't get something through your thick skull on the previous page.

No I wasn't. You guys seem to have trouble recognizing a question. I told him to get it through his thick skull, I never asked him anything.


So, in your defensive state of mind, he became you guys. There you go. Same inability to articulate a salient point.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/18/2016 12:23:45 AM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

And your rational premis for a thick skull is that you don't understand him or he doesn't understand you?

His continued insistence that I hold a position I have clearly stated several times I do not hold. :)

Okay, you can have that one. You see, it really isn't that hard to make a cogent point if you really really try.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/18/2016 1:28:53 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Another person being robbed by their ESL teacher.

Nope, none of those reasons are a necessity, therefore no needs given, only reasons one may want to. Looks like you were the one robbed.

I live in a neighborhood where odds are that if I have a problem there will be multiple assaliants. This not only provides a need for a firearm but for more firepower that your basic single shot will allow.
I know a number of people who couldn't control a larger more powerful firearm making the AR a very good home defense weapon for them.
Others lack the use of one hand which means they need enough firepower in a handgun to provide security without hand to hand.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to ThatDizzyChick)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/18/2016 1:32:34 AM   
DesideriScuri


Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ifmaz
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick
quote:

You've stated there is no "rational reason" for a civilian to own such a firearm,

Correct
quote:

thus implying there were reasons a civilian should not own one.

Only in your mind. Like I said, you are extrapolating a position I have not only never taken, one I have specifically said I do not hold.
quote:

What are those reasons?

Hell, you tell me, after all, you are making up my position, so you may as well keep on making shit up.

If there is no reason a civilian should not own such a rifle, they can (and should) own it. Many, in fact, because there's no rational reason not to.


"I don't want one."

There IS a rational reason not to own such a rifle.

As far as a rational reason to own one: if those that I want to be prepared to defend against are either going to be in a group of several, have these types of rifles themselves, or both, I have a rational reason to own one such rifle.


_____________________________

What I support:

  • A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  • Personal Responsibility
  • Help for the truly needy
  • Limited Government
  • Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)

(in reply to ifmaz)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/18/2016 1:34:34 AM   
BamaD


Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird

As to your inquiry regarding reasons not to buy a semi-automatic rifle;

For me personally, as for many millions of others, I've just never felt the need for, and have never had the urge to own a gun of any sort.

I've known gun owners all my life, so it's possible that long ago I might have given some bit of thought to it, but I don't consciously recall it.

In any case I just never gave much thought as to why. People usually give more thought to actions they are contemplating than those they are not.

I, actually, owned guns for probably twenty years before I bought a semi-automatic rifle. I bought one...or so...specifically because the government was going to ban them. Which just shows you how well liberal policies ever work. Come to think of it, until then I didn't even own semi-auto pistols. I had revolvers, bolt and lever action rifles and shotguns. Clinton's (the rapist not the rape justifier and crook) gun ban inspired me to own that which I had never before desired.

I got my first automatic rifle when I was 18, as a grauduation/Christmas present. This was long enough ago that it was legal. My preference is a lever action, and I prefer revolvers. I carry and automatic most of the time because they are easier to conceal but my handgun of preference is a colt sa clone.
As I see it, if someone doesn't want to own a firearm that is their business, I have no right to tell them to get one, just as they have no right to tell me I can't.
Also a revolver, a lever, or a pump, are just as deadly as an automatic, and that harping about automatics is just a smoke screen to go after all guns.

Since the gun ban of '94 my tastes have changed more than once. Sometimes I buy something I'd in the past sworn I'd never own. Now, pretty much I prefer a gun suited to the task. The places I hunt aren't conducive to lever guns, the shots tend to be longer. As you said, concealing a revolver is difficult. But I tell you there is nothing like the feel of a SAA and I hunt with a Freedom Arms. And I consider "nothing like the feel" to be a task which deserves to be suited. Lately I've been doing a lot of long distance shooting and frankly an AR is a 400 yard rifle and not sufficient out to and past 1000 yards. So I've been loading for and shooting diminutive 6.5mm rounds that have bullets with a high BC. (BC said just to be a snob and confuse people but I know you'll understand.)

Any shot over 100 yards here is really unlikely so a lever is fine.
Of course you do know that Browning make a model 95 in 30-06 with a detachable magazines and marlin has developed the .308 express with a soft tip so it can be used in tube magazines.
But I agree nothing feels as good as a SAA.

_____________________________

Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine

People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit - 7/18/2016 3:23:41 AM   
ThatDizzyChick


Posts: 5490
Status: offline
quote:

I'm assuming you were trying to quote me since my name is down in the bottom right hand corner of your quote. Boy, you just keep stepping in it don't you.

Nope, I must have used the fast reply function.

_____________________________

Not your average bimbo.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: MD FSA Decision - 2nd Circuit Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109