RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT

RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

WickedsDesire -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 10:57:16 AM)
Only i offer the world on here - the rest offer 0 reality and they back that up with shittery and sophistry I iffer the world all that is not I

BamaD -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 11:21:12 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird It would be immensely helpful in taking you seriously other than had you not claimed that Zimmerman had every right to ignore a police department-hired dispatcher while claiming that a 17 yr. old kid on his way back from the store while talking to his girl friend should have stopped in his tracks when somebody who obviously had no respect for the law, wearing a red sweatshirt and breathing heavily, was accosting him. That's not what I said. That's your opinion of what I said. K. You went on relentlessly to that effect for at least three months after Tayvon Martin's killing. If you don't want to own up to it, then so be it. I grew up with guys like Tayvon Martin. I did not at all appreciate people like you rubbing it in about his unfortunate demise, or that he should have bowed to massa, etc. when "massa" himself was a nutjob. Your and Bama's relentless insistence that being followed closely down the street by somebody else was nothing to be concerned about was about as disingenuous as it gets. It was supposed to be 'nothing to be concerned about' as long as the followed was a black guy and the follower was white, or close enough to being not black. Had it been one or two comments to that effect, 'no harm, no foul,' as they say. But you just kept on with it. You guys have guns, I don't, and never had. You guys are not born southerners, I am. You guys are scared shitless, I'm not. Your world is not my world, or anything close to it, safe to say. I got followed by people of ill intent when I was a teenager, by black guys, Puerto Rican guys, faggots, etc. but by far more so by white hetero guys up to no good. I displayed all this and all you guys did, instead of understanding real life situations, was to blow it away and play it down. You guys have no clue, and made that into a display of pride. I was 'afraid' when I was a kid, I have no trouble in admitting. But I grew up, and got a clue, and eventually understood that there were others much bigger than I was who were afraid too. I don't care if I get killed tomorrow, it only changes things by a few years. Most people do not have that understanding and live every day scared shitless. I don't make up shit in my head. I am not a teenager anymore. I enjoy life as it comes to me. Tayvon Martin reminded me of one of the few bright spots in my early years, he was just like a guy I knew way back when. I lost one of my brothers a year and a half ago too, who would have been custom made for a guy like Tayvon as a friend. Maybe that's why I got so upset about it. It doesn't bother me so much that one or another guy died. Shit happens. It was the barely disguised jumping up and down cheering about it that galled me. My neighborhood is overrun with people like Travon. If that is the kind of people you choose as friends then it is no wonder you don't want people to be able to defend themselves.

Chaska -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 11:23:13 AM)
Welcome to the Tom, Dick and Harry rerun show. Don't know what became of Mary, perhaps an alien abduction or off to fetch muffins, cake and popcorn morsels, To present on bended knees to the Gods.

Edwird -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 12:53:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD My neighborhood is overrun with people like Travon. So then, your neighborhood is overrun with guys going to the store and buying a pack of Skittles, and talking to their girlfriend on the cell phone on their way home. ... ... I keep looking but not finding what in this situation is supposed to put a sane and rational person in fear. quote: If that is the kind of people you choose as friends then it is no wonder you don't want people to be able to defend themselves. Actually, we didn't have Skittles back in the day, as I'm sure you are aware. But yes, there were still guys who walked to the store and then went back home, myself included. And yes, a few of them were friends, however much that condemns me in your estimation. As I said earlier, "You guys are scared shitless, I'm not." I am not an advocate of denying people firearms in their own home if that is their choice. But at the same time, I have no hesitation in pointing out that people who feel threatened by a teenager talking to his girlfriend on the cell phone in public are not the most mentally stable citizens, gun owner or not.

WhoreMods -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 1:13:16 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD My neighborhood is overrun with people like Travon. If that is the kind of people you choose as friends then it is no wonder you don't want people to be able to defend themselves. Presumably punching some guy who's stalking you doesn't come under self defence where you live, then.

BamaD -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 1:44:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD My neighborhood is overrun with people like Travon. So then, your neighborhood is overrun with guys going to the store and buying a pack of Skittles, and talking to their girlfriend on the cell phone on their way home. ... ... I keep looking but not finding what in this situation is supposed to put a sane and rational person in fear. quote: If that is the kind of people you choose as friends then it is no wonder you don't want people to be able to defend themselves. Actually, we didn't have Skittles back in the day, as I'm sure you are aware. But yes, there were still guys who walked to the store and then went back home, myself included. And yes, a few of them were friends, however much that condemns me in your estimation. As I said earlier, "You guys are scared shitless, I'm not." I am not an advocate of denying people firearms in their own home if that is their choice. But at the same time, I have no hesitation in pointing out that people who feel threatened by a teenager talking to his girlfriend on the cell phone in public are not the most mentally stable citizens, gun owner or not. No I am surrounded by people who will punch you out for walking on the public sidewalk and noticing you slinking through peoples back yards. Martin attacked Zimmerman, not the other way around.

BamaD -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 1:46:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD My neighborhood is overrun with people like Travon. If that is the kind of people you choose as friends then it is no wonder you don't want people to be able to defend themselves. Presumably punching some guy who's stalking you doesn't come under self defence where you live, then. If you could attack everyone who walked behind you talking on their phone it would be anarchy.

Edwird -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 2:33:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD My neighborhood is overrun with people like Travon. So then, your neighborhood is overrun with guys going to the store and buying a pack of Skittles, and talking to their girlfriend on the cell phone on their way home. No I am surrounded by people who will punch you out for walking on the public sidewalk and noticing you slinking through peoples back yards. Martin attacked Zimmerman, not the other way around. It's an apartment complex, there weren't any back yards. In any apartment complex I've lived in or visited, lots of people walk any side of any building on a regular basis. Trayvon was winding a path that many other dwellers did, nothing unusual about it at all to anyone but Zimmerman, otherwise there would likely have been calls from apartment dwellers.The mouth breather Zimmerman was stalking, by any legal definition of the term, an innocent citizen and Trayvon had every legal right to defend himself. Zimmerman called 911 before Martin even got to the property grounds, saying "these assholes always get away" as he ignored the instructions of proper authority and commenced stalking and harassing a teenager talking on a cell phone on his way home. And yes, I grew up in a neighborhood where guys big enough to do it would unhesitatingly punch your lights out if you were stalking them, whether the stalker or stalkee be black or white or Latino. I'm sorry you apparently feel 'threatened' by the fact you can't just stalk anyone you like with out bringing potential harm upon yourself for that most basic social stupidity as considered in any neighborhood.

Kirata -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 3:06:18 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird It's an apartment complex, there weren't any back yards. In any apartment complex I've lived in or visited, lots of people walk any side of any building on a regular basis. The apartments have terraces and patios that open onto a back yard area, a grassy mall, that runs between the rows of buildings. Google Maps K.

Edwird -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 3:18:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird It's an apartment complex, there weren't any back yards. In any apartment complex I've lived in or visited, lots of people walk any side of any building on a regular basis. The apartments have terraces and patios that open onto a back yard area, a grassy mall, that runs between the rows of buildings. Google Maps K. Prominent in that map is the sidewalk running along the backside separation of the buildings. Custom made for the residents to "slink around backyards." "In any apartment complex I've lived in or visited, lots of people walk any side of any building on a regular basis." Perhaps your experience is different. But I think that the norm at Martin's father's complex was as I described. I saw the map at the time, and it looked like the same layout I've experienced and witnessed many times. Martin was walking on a lengthwise sidewalk between a row of buildings when he finally confronted his molester. Whatever the layout, stalking is still stalking.

WhoreMods -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 4:28:05 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD My neighborhood is overrun with people like Travon. If that is the kind of people you choose as friends then it is no wonder you don't want people to be able to defend themselves. Presumably punching some guy who's stalking you doesn't come under self defence where you live, then. If you could attack everyone who walked behind you talking on their phone it would be anarchy. Because, of course, the cop groupie didn't accost the dead thug and demand to to know where he was going or anything.

Edwird -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 5:01:13 PM)
There certainly wasn't anarchy in my neighborhood from that situation of "If you could attack everyone who walked behind you," which however was a rare event because most people weren't that stupid. In any real world experience, the only reason a guy stalks you closely is because he estimates that he can get the better of you, and that would be every stalkee's assessment of the situation. Bama is essentially defending the rights of child molesters to defend themselves against their victims.

BamaD -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 5:07:23 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD My neighborhood is overrun with people like Travon. So then, your neighborhood is overrun with guys going to the store and buying a pack of Skittles, and talking to their girlfriend on the cell phone on their way home. No I am surrounded by people who will punch you out for walking on the public sidewalk and noticing you slinking through peoples back yards. Martin attacked Zimmerman, not the other way around. It's an apartment complex, there weren't any back yards. In any apartment complex I've lived in or visited, lots of people walk any side of any building on a regular basis. Trayvon was winding a path that many other dwellers did, nothing unusual about it at all to anyone but Zimmerman, otherwise there would likely have been calls from apartment dwellers.The mouth breather Zimmerman was stalking, by any legal definition of the term, an innocent citizen and Trayvon had every legal right to defend himself. Zimmerman called 911 before Martin even got to the property grounds, saying "these assholes always get away" as he ignored the instructions of proper authority and commenced stalking and harassing a teenager talking on a cell phone on his way home. And yes, I grew up in a neighborhood where guys big enough to do it would unhesitatingly punch your lights out if you were stalking them, whether the stalker or stalkee be black or white or Latino. I'm sorry you apparently feel 'threatened' by the fact you can't just stalk anyone you like with out bringing potential harm upon yourself for that most basic social stupidity as considered in any neighborhood. Read my post, I didn't say a word about stalking people. Although I have questioned people about messing around my neighbors yards when I knew the neighbors were out of town, I guess you think they should have tried to beat my head into the ground for that. Zimmerman wasn't stalking him, you know that. And not only did Zimmerman not, regardless of the initial propaganda, ignore the dispatcher, but rather said ok and the rest of his conversation was about where he would meet that cops. The recordings of both his and Trayvons gf showed that both of he and Trayvon said at almost the same time that Trayvon had lost Zimmerman had lost track of Martin. There would have been no confrontation had Martin not doubled back and attacked Zimmerman. But you wish to believe the left wing propaganda fantasy about what happened rather than the evidence and what the prosecution had to admit to. They even admitted that Martin doubled back on Zimmerman and that is the reason the confrontaion occured. The prosecution proved that they had no case whatsoever. Find a better case, they are out there. The guy in Georgia who shot the kid driving away in his SUV is a good one, but of course he was convicted so you wouldn't want to use it would you.

Kirata -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 5:44:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird Bama is essentially defending the rights of child molesters to defend themselves against their victims. Yeah, no. But you're essentially begging for someone to throw a net over you. K.

Edwird -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 5:58:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD Read my post, I didn't say a word about stalking people. Of course you didn't. Reality is something you avoid like the plague. But there is no legal dispute that that's exactly what Zimmerman was doing. quote: Although I have questioned people about messing around my neighbors yards when I knew the neighbors were out of town, I guess you think they should have tried to beat my head into the ground for that. Comparing apples to lamp shades, that's all you got. quote: Zimmerman wasn't stalking him, you know that. You and the other racist bitches are the only ones who don't know what any lawyer or judge would recognize as stalking. If Zimmerman hadn't had a gun, he would have gotten the crap beaten out of him in any city in the world if trying to pull that stunt. But like you, Zimmerman was a complete chicken shit, he knew in advance that he was in the wrong in any social sense, so so he carried a weapon in anticipation of the expected negative response to his aggressive actions. Tell you what, Bama, forget the lawyers' opinions, how about you test for yourself what people in the real world consider stalking or not. Try it with out your weapon, out in the neighborhood. See how well behaved you are now? Zimmerman armed himself in anticipation of negative reaction to his anti-social belligerence.

Edwird -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 6:03:00 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Kirata Yeah, no. But you're essentially begging for someone to throw a net over you. K. [/font] I'm ready to throw a net over that "Yeah, no" thing. Sounded OK the first fifty times.

lovmuffin -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 6:20:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD Read my post, I didn't say a word about stalking people. Of course you didn't. Reality is something you avoid like the plague. But there is no legal dispute that that's exactly what Zimmerman was doing. quote: Although I have questioned people about messing around my neighbors yards when I knew the neighbors were out of town, I guess you think they should have tried to beat my head into the ground for that. Comparing apples to lamp shades, that's all you got. quote: Zimmerman wasn't stalking him, you know that. You and the other racist bitches are the only ones who don't know what any lawyer or judge would recognize as stalking. If Zimmerman hadn't had a gun, he would have gotten the crap beaten out of him in any city in the world if trying to pull that stunt. But like you, Zimmerman was a complete chicken shit, he knew in advance that he was in the wrong in any social sense, so so he carried a weapon in anticipation of the expected negative response to his aggressive actions. Good grief, give it a rest. I don't know what you're mad at exactly but you just pulled out the liberal play book and threw the race card. That would in fact make YOU the racist. Following is not the same thing as Stalking. Zimmerman may have been a dumb ass for being so obvious and for not being able to think on his feet to defuse the situation after thug wannabe Travon Martin doubled back Stalking Zimmerman so he could pound his ass thus committing a crime (assault and battery). Zimmerman did not actually break the law. Shit happens when you assault people. ETA: And Zimmerman did get the crap beat out of him. Reality and the narrative in your mind are 2 different things.

BamaD -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 6:21:10 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD quote: ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote: ORIGINAL: BamaD My neighborhood is overrun with people like Travon. If that is the kind of people you choose as friends then it is no wonder you don't want people to be able to defend themselves. Presumably punching some guy who's stalking you doesn't come under self defence where you live, then. If you could attack everyone who walked behind you talking on their phone it would be anarchy. Because, of course, the cop groupie didn't accost the dead thug and demand to to know where he was going or anything. Didn't get to, Martin attacked him as soon as they met, as verified by Martins phone call. Martin double back and accosted Zimmerman while Zimmerman was returning to his truck. You don't remember, do you, that the locals said there was no case against Zimmerman so the state came in and tried to force a conviction. And when they went to court, with their judge, they couldn't mount a case that would convience anyone who hadn't already made up their minds.

BamaD -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 6:28:47 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Edwird There certainly wasn't anarchy in my neighborhood from that situation of "If you could attack everyone who walked behind you," which however was a rare event because most people weren't that stupid. In any real world experience, the only reason a guy stalks you closely is because he estimates that he can get the better of you, and that would be every stalkee's assessment of the situation. Bama is essentially defending the rights of child molesters to defend themselves against their victims. I told you about questioning two or three people I saw messing around in my neighbors yard at night when they were out of town. I asked you if you think that this gave them the right to try to pound my head into the ground, after all that is than Zimmerman did.

Edwird -> RE: AW SHIT, ANOTHER SENSELESS KILLING BY A WIDE-EYED 2ND AMENDMENT NUT (7/21/2016 6:39:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lovmuffin ETA: And Zimmerman did get the crap beat out of him. Not nearly enough, for his stupidity. Martin was just a 17 yr. old kid. I'm not. Had Zimmerman tried to pull that crap on me, he'd have never gotten anywhere near his gun, and his face would have needed reconstructive surgery.

Page: << < prev 9 10 [11] 12 13 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875