RE: Democratic National Convention (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


CreativeDominant -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 11:26:08 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: CreativeDominant


It’s not a revelation that the Democratic National Committee seeks to damage its perennial rival the Republican Party any chance it gets.

But an email dump courtesy of Wikileaks reveals the DNC interfering in the Republican nomination process by fueling protests at Trump events.
Dude, the Republican Party has Fox News. If you think you have the ethical high ground on this, you're fucking insane.

Good thing this comes from ABC then...

Regardless of who was behind the leak, the fallout for the DNC has been severe. Just one day before the Democratic convention was set to begin, DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz announced her resignation, effective at the end of the week. And as expected, Sanders supporters, hundreds of whom are delegates at the convention, are furious about the content of the emails.

Here are some of the most damaging finds from the leak:

DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz Calls Sanders Campaign Manager Jeff Weaver an "A--" and a "Liar"

In May the Nevada Democratic State Convention became rowdy and got out of hand in a fight over delegate allocation. When Weaver went on CNN and denied any claims violence had happened, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, once she was notified of the exchange, wrote "Damn liar. Particularly scummy that he never acknowledges the violent and threatening behavior that occurred."

In another instance, right before the Nevada Convention, Weaver publicly commented, "I think we should go to the [national] convention." The chairwoman was flagged about this comment and responded in an e-mail, "He is an a--."

Highlighting Sanders' Faith

One email shows that a DNC official contemplated highlighting Sanders' alleged atheism — even though he has said he is not an atheist — during the primaries as a possibility to undermine support among voters.

"It may make no difference but for KY and WA can we get someone to ask his belief," Brad Marshall, CFO of the DNC, wrote in an email on May 5, 2016. "He had skated on having a Jewish heritage. I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist."

Building a Narrative Against Sanders

"Wondering if there's a good Bernie narrative for a story which is that Bernie never ever had his act together, that his campaign was a mess," DNC National Secretary Mark Paustenbach wrote in an email to National Communications Director Luis Miranda on May 21. After detailing ways in which the Sanders camp was disorganized, Paustenbach concludes, "It's not a DNC conspiracy it's because they never had their act together."

The idea was nixed, though. "True," Miranda acknowledged in his response. "But the chair has been advised not to engage. So we'll have to leave it alone."

Lamentations That Sanders Is Not a Democrat

As the primary season wore on, Wasserman Schultz appeared to grow exasperated with Sanders' desire to stay in the race when the delegate math was against him — in one email lamenting the fact that he is an independent in the Senate but was running as a Democrat in the primaries. In an April 24 email she received with an article describing the ways Sanders felt the DNC was undermining his campaign, she wrote back, "Spoken like someone who has never been a member of the Democratic Party and has no understanding of what we do."

https://www.google.com/amp/abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/damaging-emails-dnc-wikileaks-dump/story%3fid=40852448?client=ms-android-verizon

No wonder Hillary hired DWS after she resigned from the DNC.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 12:24:20 PM)

quote:

But an email dump courtesy of Wikileaks reveals the DNC interfering in the Republican nomination process by fueling protests at Trump events.

So what?




DaddySatyr -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 1:08:56 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Michael, I'm completely with you on Hillary's corruption and single-minded focus on enriching herself at the expense of the people, however name games like that are stupid. They demean us when we use them.



Based upon the unwarranted, unprovoked, disgusting personal attacks I've endured from the libiots, here, your call for civility falls on deaf ears.

In my defense, though:

1) Even though you've engaged in name calling and attempts at character assault with me in the (distant) past, I have not attacked you. Why not just base your interactions with me upon my treatment of you, personally?

2) I think you might have missed that (in my mind and as I made clear in any earlier post) there's a difference between a "democrat" and a "dumbocrat". The first would be a member or follower of a particular political party and the second would be a blind follower/felcher/Pablum©-puker that uses the Daily Show and Facebook as their primary news source and simply regurgitates talking points which have been duly fed to them.

Either way, while I've come to respect your intelligence and start to put your abusive behavior toward me in the past, please understand that the only approval I've ever needed was from my God and my children. Anything else is kind of like pissing one's pants in a rain slicker; it will give a nice, warm feeling inside, but no one else notices.



Michael




WhoreMods -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 1:20:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

But an email dump courtesy of Wikileaks reveals the DNC interfering in the Republican nomination process by fueling protests at Trump events.

So what?

Protests are entirely unethical and shouldn't be allowed. If the Democrats are allowed to protest the other bunch nominating an evil wanker with tiny hands, they'll probably be disrupting townhall events with shouty idiots and shooting at a member of Congress next...
[8|]




Kirata -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 1:53:19 PM)


~ FR ~

[image]http://www.fury.news/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/13672384_1650638541930472_1774246936_n.jpg[/image]

Sorry, I couldn't resist.

K.




CreativeDominant -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 2:03:20 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

But an email dump courtesy of Wikileaks reveals the DNC interfering in the Republican nomination process by fueling protests at Trump events.

So what?

Funny how the part you zeroed in on is the ONE part I've said nothing about.

Funny how you ignored the rest...




CreativeDominant -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 2:06:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

But an email dump courtesy of Wikileaks reveals the DNC interfering in the Republican nomination process by fueling protests at Trump events.

So what?

Protests are entirely unethical and shouldn't be allowed. If the Democrats are allowed to protest the other bunch nominating an evil wanker with tiny hands, they'll probably be disrupting townhall events with shouty idiots and shooting at a member of Congress next...
[8|]
Funny how you went right along with her. Of course, maybe it doesn't matter to you that the DNC was only supporting Hillary and doing what it could to hamper their other candidate.




BamaD -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 2:27:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

But an email dump courtesy of Wikileaks reveals the DNC interfering in the Republican nomination process by fueling protests at Trump events.

So what?

Protests are entirely unethical and shouldn't be allowed. If the Democrats are allowed to protest the other bunch nominating an evil wanker with tiny hands, they'll probably be disrupting townhall events with shouty idiots and shooting at a member of Congress next...
[8|]

Close, but totally missing the point.
BLM has every right to protest Trump, just like the 2nd amendment sisters have every right to protest Hillary. However the DNC helping set up "protests" to infulence the Republican process is just as bad as if the Republicans had people following Hillary around disrupting her rallies. You don't seem to understand the difference between protest and harrasment disguised as legetimate protest, this is the sort of thing Nixon and LBJ did.




WhoreMods -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 2:38:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
BLM has every right to protest Trump, just like the 2nd amendment sisters have every right to protest Hillary. However the DNC helping set up "protests" to infulence the Republican process is just as bad as if the Republicans had people following Hillary around disrupting her rallies. You don't seem to understand the difference between protest and harrasment disguised as legetimate protest, this is the sort of thing Nixon and LBJ did.

Nobody more recent than that?
And of course I understand the difference between legitimate protest and harrassment: the former is done by somebody of whom you approve. You've made your double standard on this sort of issue very clear by now.




BamaD -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 3:12:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
BLM has every right to protest Trump, just like the 2nd amendment sisters have every right to protest Hillary. However the DNC helping set up "protests" to infulence the Republican process is just as bad as if the Republicans had people following Hillary around disrupting her rallies. You don't seem to understand the difference between protest and harrasment disguised as legetimate protest, this is the sort of thing Nixon and LBJ did.

Nobody more recent than that?
And of course I understand the difference between legitimate protest and harrassment: the former is done by somebody of whom you approve. You've made your double standard on this sort of issue very clear by now.

Yes it has been done since then, but they are great examples of people you shouldn't want to copy.
BTW Gifford was shot because she didn't support open borders, don't think that is something the Republicans would be pushing.
I have never supported disruption of anyone's rallies, your claim that I support it if people I agree with do it is a fantasy on your part. Just another attempt to dismiss the truth with a fantasy.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 4:26:15 PM)

quote:

Funny how the part you zeroed in on is the ONE part I've said nothing about.

Funny, if you aid nothing about it, how did I manage to quote you saying something about it?




BamaD -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 4:33:46 PM)

FR

Did anyone notice there were no American flags at the Dem Convention?
I hope that this information is wrong but I have heard it from several sources.
Some one please provide a pic of an American flag as part of the DNC decoration.




angelikaJ -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 4:43:49 PM)

http://www.snopes.com/flags-banned-at-dnc/




Awareness -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 4:51:22 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Did anyone notice there were no American flags at the Dem Convention?
Feminists want the flag changed because the original flag was designed by a man and is a symbol of federal patriarchy.




Marini -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 5:14:47 PM)

I've had a long day, I can only take so much tonight.
So if anyone hears anything NEW, please post it.
[;)]

I am enjoying the entertainment, the Democrats give us good entertainment.




mnottertail -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 5:34:21 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

FR

Did anyone notice there were no American flags at the Dem Convention?
I hope that this information is wrong but I have heard it from several sources.
Some one please provide a pic of an American flag as part of the DNC decoration.

if you look on the stage there are several on the stage wings, there are people waving them, they do hang from the walls. Even townhall says the felching on that is nutsuckerism, but you will remain ignorant.




mnottertail -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 5:40:36 PM)

I did see a muslim prayer curtain behind St. Wrinklemeat all the time though.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 5:57:55 PM)

quote:

Did anyone notice there were no American flags at the Dem Convention?

Who the fuck cares?
You people get your panties bunched up over the stupidest shit.




BamaD -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 6:44:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDizzyChick

quote:

Did anyone notice there were no American flags at the Dem Convention?

Who the fuck cares?
You people get your panties bunched up over the stupidest shit.

They are picking someone to run for President of the U S. It seems that they should not be ashamed to fly the flag.
BTW thanks, I knew I could count on you.




BamaD -> RE: Democratic National Convention (7/26/2016 6:59:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: angelikaJ

http://www.snopes.com/flags-banned-at-dnc/

Thank you




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875