Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/12/2016 6:50:52 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Awareness
ORIGINAL: NorthernGent1


Refusing to see Islam clearly - and seeing it only for what you want it to be - is a dangerous blindness which inhibits the ability to see Islamic conflicts with Western societies for what they are.



Assuming Islam is such an intolerant, violent religion then why is it that I've never personally had any problem with any muslim.

Your personal experience is statistically insignificant.


As is your opinion

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/12/2016 7:01:07 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline 		Shutup Arpig. You clearly don't understand the difference between an opinion and a contention.

_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/12/2016 7:05:06 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Awareness
ORIGINAL: thompsonx

First off, Islam has had no comparative period of enlightenment -

"In mathematics they contributed and invented the present arithmetical decimal system and the fundamental operations connected with it: addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, exponentiation, and extracting the root.
They also introduced the 'zero' concept to the world."

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

You don't know what The Enlightement was, do you. If you did, you wouldn't be making a point which has no bearing on what I said.

Perhaps you might acquaint yourself with islam and it's history then your comments would not seem so puerile and provencial.

Also, the concept of zero was invented by an Indian, not a Muslim.

Please get a grown up to explane how to use a dictionary and look up the difference between introduce and invent.
India did not invent the zero. The zero was invented by the sumarians about four or five melinia ago and sustained by the babylonians (300bc). The mayans independently invented zero from whole cloth six hundred years later. A couple of hundred years later the indians come up with a zero.
Jesus you are phouqing stupid.

http://www.livescience.com/27853-who-invented-zero.html

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/12/2016 7:10:25 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Awareness

Shutup Arpig. You clearly don't understand the difference between an opinion and a contention.


http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/contention

Contention:contention noun (OPINION)



[ C ] an opinion expressed in an argument:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/12/2016 7:23:46 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline 		ORIGINAL: Greta75

There is Jew the Religion. And Jew the race.

That would be your ignorant,unsubstntiated opinion. How did you graduate gramar school?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.



The big problem is, Jews use the same word for people who are ethically Jew, as well as people who choose to worship Judaism.

Ethicaly and choosing to worship judaism are the same thing.
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

They both use the same word. So you can be Jew by race, but not practice Judaism.


Judaism is not a race.
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

You could be a Jew Muslims, a Jew Pagan, a Jew Christian, a Jew Buddhist!

What is your point?

I mean, if I was a chinese who practices Judaism by choice, then I'm gonna be a Chinese Jew!


Neither jew or chinese is a race.
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

Not ethically Jew, but simply someone who chooses to follow Judaism by choice.

That is pretty much the definition of ethically.

There is no such thing as "ethically" Muslim.

Perhaps you should get grownup to show you how to use a dictionary and look up the word ethically.
Jesus you are phoquing stupid



And I believe most Muslims aren't even Muslims in the history of whatever population races they came from.


Get someone with a three digit iq to explane what race means.
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

Malays weren't Muslims initially. Persians weren't Muslims initially.


Initially islam begins about 700 ad so what is your point?




HELL the whole of Meccans were Pagans and not even Muslims initially.


Who are meccans?


They were spread by force. Islam did not exist until Muhammad existed. Islam is simply a historical a war lord's ideology that people are following today.


How does this differ from other religions?
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.


Worst of all, this warlord *thinks* Angel Gabriel was talking to him directly and giving him the correct version of Christianity. So the entire group of people who follow Islam are simply following the hallucination of one individual.

Jesus was one hallucinating individual

Who the hell is ethically Muslim? Nobody!


Those who practice islam are ethically muslim.
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.






< Message edited by thompsonx -- 8/12/2016 7:25:08 PM >

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/12/2016 7:45:14 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline 		from just seven of your posts:

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

quote:

Jesus you are phoquing stupid.


im torn between saying you need help, or you are an embarrassment to humanity.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/12/2016 7:47:12 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: bounty44

im torn between saying you need help, or you are an embarrassment to humanity.


Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/12/2016 7:54:24 PM   
Dvr22999874


Posts: 2849
Joined: 9/11/2008
Status: offline 		Well, at least he and his baby brother ( awarenot) are consistent *LOL*

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/12/2016 8:01:07 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline 		ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

Well, at least he and his baby brother ( awarenot)


Sister.


are consistent *LOL*


As are you.

(in reply to Dvr22999874)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/12/2016 8:20:41 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
im torn between saying you need help, or you are an embarrassment to humanity.

His just getting the beginning of dementia. Explains everything. Keeps repeating himself like a bot.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/12/2016 8:21:26 PM   
Dvr22999874


Posts: 2849
Joined: 9/11/2008
Status: offline 		Oh dear, it looks as though the senior of the 'dolly-sisters' went for the second prize. I would guess it is as weak as any of his other responses but I really don't know, nor do I give a fiddlers bitch. I LOVE that little button on the lower left !!

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/12/2016 8:29:54 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Dvr22999874

Oh dear, it looks as though the senior of the 'dolly-sisters' went for the second prize. I would guess it is as weak as any of his other responses but I really don't know, nor do I give a fiddlers bitch. I LOVE that little button on the lower left !!


Oh yes another person who has me on hide but seems to read every post of mine.What is it about you that makes you think your ignoring me is important to me? If you do not like what I post don't read it. Now if you are too weak willed to look away then the button is not your friend but your crutch.

(in reply to Dvr22999874)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/12/2016 8:32:29 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Greta75


Keeps repeating himself like a bot.


As long as you keep posting stupid shit I will continue to point out that:
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/12/2016 8:38:49 PM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx
As long as you keep posting stupid shit I will continue to point out that:
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

Naw dude, you are just a desperate attention seeker. No content of value to contribute to any of these forums.
"Phoquing stupid" is probably the most eloquent thing you can think of.
Ad Hominem is the only way you know.
I can't be bothered to engage with a mentally insane person who is losing his mind anymore really. That's why you notice I can't be bothered to respond to all your nonsense anymore.



< Message edited by Greta75 -- 8/12/2016 8:41:59 PM >

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/13/2016 4:17:58 AM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: Greta75
ORIGINAL: thompsonx
As long as you keep posting stupid shit I will continue to point out that:
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.


Naw dude, you are just a desperate attention seeker.


You would be the one posting up new threads about how much you hate islam...that would be the marker of an attention seeker.


No content of value to contribute to any of these forums.


Only official singapore government sites saying you are as full of shit as a christmas goose.

"Phoquing stupid" is probably the most eloquent thing you can think of.


To bigoted morons like yourself timmy it must seem most eloquent.

Ad Hominem is the only way you know.


Is it ad hominem when it is true?

I can't be bothered to engage with a mentally insane person who is losing his mind anymore really.


Sweetie, in the ten years I have been here you have not been able to engage anyone with a three digit i.q.

That's why you notice I can't be bothered to respond to all your nonsense anymore.

You never have been able to respond to the facts I post that prove that:
Jesus you are phoquing stupid.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/13/2016 7:01:24 AM   
WickedsDesire


Posts: 9362
Joined: 11/4/2015
Status: offline 		dcnovice to difficult for me to answer...and a nice poll....gawd would it kill some of you lot to do a poll eg is she correct or employers: Yes, no, flog her, unsure.

realone is it an o or 0? tickled it a wee bit and awareness

My beliefs are my beliefs my opinions are my opinions I force them on no-one...is my best, and absolute answer. This would make her wholly in the wrong.


(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/13/2016 1:48:02 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline 		So, Arpig. You still don't know what the Enlightenment is, you don't understand that Sumer predates Islam by thousands of years, and you still don't get that a contention is an opinion supported by argument.

Basically, you're fucking stupid. And you're too much of a pussy to use the word "fucking" to boot.

You're welcome! Come again!

_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/13/2016 1:50:45 PM   
Awareness


Posts: 3918
Joined: 9/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

What about Amartya Sen? You don't mention him at all. Presumably you disagree with him, too?
If you're presuming that, then I can only assume you have nothing else to say. I replied because you at least TRIED to make a fist of a countering argument, even if you expected others to do the work for you.

However, your inability to respond suggests - once again - that you really don't have the skills for this. Regurgitating the ideas and words of others is all you're good for.

_____________________________

Ever notice how fucking annoying most signatures are? - Yes, I do appreciate the irony.

(in reply to PeonForHer)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/13/2016 2:09:05 PM   
PeonForHer


Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

What about Amartya Sen? You don't mention him at all. Presumably you disagree with him, too?
If you're presuming that, then I can only assume you have nothing else to say. I replied because you at least TRIED to make a fist of a countering argument, even if you expected others to do the work for you.

However, your inability to respond suggests - once again - that you really don't have the skills for this. Regurgitating the ideas and words of others is all you're good for.


Oh for fuck's sake, A. I asked you about your opinion of Amartya Sen's view because it was of the most interest to me. You had blatantly avoided Sen's view - despite his being the first and the most prominent of the views I'd presented to you. I assumed you hadn't responded to that question because so many others had hit you in the meantime.

As it goes, international politics is not really my thing. However, I took a job examining 17 year olds some years ago in International Politics, so I had to mug it up. The 'clash of civilizations' thesis is always key - as are its standard criticisms by the heavyweight theorists of international politics today.

It would *really* help any discussion between you and I if you could make a strenuous effort to see things beyond a competition about knob-size between us. Now, if you want to respond to Sen's view, as I asked you to, please do go ahead. But whatever: please stop being a monumentally egotistical prick, A. It's tiring me out.

< Message edited by PeonForHer -- 8/13/2016 2:18:18 PM >

_____________________________

http://www.domme-chronicles.com


(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom - 8/13/2016 2:12:29 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline 		ORIGINAL: Awareness

So, Arpig. You still don't know what the Enlightenment is,


You still don't know that the islamic enlightenment allowed the european enlightenment. Without the zero where exactly does des cartes work. If des cartes don't work perhaps it is because the horses ass is behind the cart and not in front.


you don't understand that Sumer predates Islam by thousands of years,


I pointed out your error (that the sumerians and not the indians) about who invented the zero several post ago. I also pointed out that the mayans also predate the indians in access to the zero. If you can't keep up ask a grown up for help.

and you still don't get that a contention is an opinion supported by argument.


You are entitled to your opinion but the dictionry is the one who says what the words mean. If you don't like the dictionary definition perhaps you might seek counseling from the chaplain they get paid to comfort the butt hurt.

Basically, you're fucking stupid. And you're too much of a pussy to use the word "fucking" to boot.


How is it that 'stupid' people have the ability to point out, with valid cites, your manifest ignorance on virtually everything you post?

You're welcome! Come again!


Always glad to disabuse you of your ignorance.

(in reply to Awareness)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: New Front in the Battle for Religious Freedom Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.092