MrRodgers
Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers How about the outlandish cost overruns at the Pentagon, $9 billion aircraft carrier that turns into over $13 billion ? The F35 10 year acquisition that goes from $1.3 trillion to $1.9 trillion and climbing ? The ever-escalating cost of the B2 bomber ? How about cutting the brass ? It's now so top heavy we won WWII on two fronts with 1000 generals total. We now have over 2000. Add to that the very generous military retirement for officers that see no action at all. Much more than private industry and in addition to soc. sec and any other fed benefits and retirement. You don't understand much about the military do you. A lot of officers who were never under fire did things that kept many of those who were alive. By your standard Gen Marshall would not have gotten a retirement, or at least a greatly reduced one. Not only that but the retirement is one of the ways they excuse the pay they give people. Well Marshall's life was never threatened and not only was his retirement going be very nice anyway, who's to say that for example...Patton and others like him, shouldn't had gotten more ? As for officers, their active duty pay is just fine and there are far too many of the highest ranks anyway active and then of course now, many...retired and on several $1,000/month. Plus many 'retire' and then go work in private MIC jobs and make 6 figures being straight from the inside. I know an admiral who over 30 years ago, retired on $5,000 a month on top of soc. sec. and went to work for a def. contractor at $200,000/yr. Officers, let alone enlisted, get a minute fraction of what anyone in civilian life would get for comprable responsibility. You do know that because they are on retirement they can be called back on a moments notice, as can enlisted people don't you? You are correct but only partially so: Only in times of grave national emergency, the president can authorize a partial mobilization of the reserves, which would involve up to 1,000,000 troops for a 24-month stretch. A full mobilization, which can occur only if Congress has declared war or during a national emergency, would call up all reserves and military retirees younger than 60 for the duration of the crisis. HERE But not all of that is a done deal: In keeping with the haphazard aura that has traditionally enveloped the IRR, even the military's legal authority to force IRR vets back into active duty is hazy. Those troops are not typically subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice, so it's unclear exactly how IRR recall notices can be enforced. During the spate of IRR mobilizations a few years ago, some veterans reportedly avoided the orders simply by passively ignoring them, refusing to answer their phones or sign certified letters. In October 2014, many veterans were stunned to learn that President Obama signed an executive order authorizing the recall of IRR reservists in case they were needed for Operation United Assistance, the military mission to curtail spread of the Ebola virus in West Africa. That mission ended earlier than expected and no IRR troops were recalled. HERE
_____________________________
You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite. J K Galbraith
|