Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/20/2016 7:58:21 AM   
needlesandpins


Posts: 3901
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix

quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins

OMFG, seriously? We take a little credit that our athletes, for whom we have far less than you for our country size compared to yours, that compete purely on their own merits whilst working full time jobs most of the time because there is sod all funding here the way you lot get, and you say that WE are the ones whining when you post all that clap trap? Our athletes do 'step the fuck up' as opposed to the relative grease sliding that you lot get to do on scholarships, grants, and funding

Are you bloody kidding me? You can't let us have a little glory without bringing up WW2, which you stepped in at the end after pissing your pants for ages and refusing to enter, have taken credit for ever since, have twisted facts in god knows how many films to glorify America even when you weren't even fucking there!

Now you want to take credit for everything else we have too? Well please, at least get your facts straight. You see the USA does NOT pay out 78% of the NATO budget. My 7 year old Granddaughter can work this one out, man you should be ashamed of yourself! You lot may pay more than the 27 other countries, but then you are far larger than everyone else too, so on a percentage we all pay our relative share. The budget is split in to three sections, and in total you still a whopping 22%. Taking the 2014-15 budget, and making the really silly first grade mistake of adding three percentages together it still wouldn't have made 78%

Now for the UN, at one time the US paid 25%, but now it pays 22%, because again everything is worked out on a country value percentage. So I have no idea where the hell you plucked your figures from, but seriously, get a grip on that.

As for our police force, you pay fuck all towards it. The largest proportion of our budget comes from our council taxes, and we are about to be privatized. Now even if we worked of the figures from the UN, and from NATO, considering that your over all expenditure is 44%, you're still talking bollocks.

Policing and protecting our country ... Uuummmm we keep getting dragging in to illegal wars by the US for fuck all reason other than to line the pockets of the rich in both our countries. The US does naff all for the UK except charge us for Trident that we can't even fricking use, and that none of us except our leaching Government want. Most of us would be more than happy for the US to fuck right off with it's wars on other countries, and to leave us out of it, because actually we are well aware of the fact that when it comes right down to it the US is only concerned for itself.

However, what the hell ANY of this has to do with us claiming a little credit for our athletes I don't know, but the fact that it's got your panties in such a twist that you have to pull this crap, and then claim that any of us are the whiners is amazing.

Needles


Are you on CRACK?

I'm just wondering.....possibly you can inform me whose ships are patrolling the worlds seas?

We don't send a bill out for that....we just do it.

Do you have ANY concept what the (INCREASED policing) bill would be to EVERY government on EARTH if not for the U.S. patrolling the entire GLOBE????


Yeah, because non of our guys are out there doing exactly the same thing. I guess all our guys must have been recalled to sit on their arses here at home. That must be why my friend's son has just come back from his latest tour, but hey, who knew that only the Americans mattered so much.

That American ego needs putting on a serious choke chain.

Needles

_____________________________

I deserved better. Not than you, but from you.

(in reply to AtUrCervix)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/20/2016 8:04:07 AM   
needlesandpins


Posts: 3901
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

Haha!

But aren't you even an itsy bitsy embarrassed about your national soccer team? When was the last time they dominated at world class level? (PS: We call it football here too, but for the benefits of Americans, where football means a different sport, I'm just gonna go with soccer.)


You need to read back, Greta. I already said we suck. I mean you'd think that people paid so much money would play so much better than they do. However, if it's all down to who can play at being the biggest fairy on the pitch at falling on the floor because the wind blew in the wrong direction, well I think they have it made. May be if they were paid on performance they may have a bigger incentive to play better! As it is football bores me rigid. Give me Rugby any day.

Needles

_____________________________

I deserved better. Not than you, but from you.

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/20/2016 8:28:47 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins


Are you on CRACK?

I'm just wondering.....possibly you can inform me whose ships are patrolling the worlds seas?

We don't send a bill out for that....we just do it.

Do you have ANY concept what the (INCREASED policing) bill would be to EVERY government on EARTH if not for the U.S. patrolling the entire GLOBE????


Yeah, because non of our guys are out there doing exactly the same thing. I guess all our guys must have been recalled to sit on their arses here at home. That must be why my friend's son has just come back from his latest tour, but hey, who knew that only the Americans mattered so much.

That American ego needs putting on a serious choke chain.

Needles



First of all, just for the record, the US navy does not patrol the world's seas for any other reason than for our own protection, and primarily because we have pissed so many people off in the last 30 years that any 2nd and 3rd rate navy would love to take a shot at a US flagged vessel (albeit the target selection is limited when it comes to commercial shipping.)

Secondly, the only ships in the US Navy actually assigned a patrol grid are US SSN's or nuclear attack submarines, and those are patrolling the most likely route for Russian subs to enter into the Atlantic and known areas of Russian submarine activity in the Pacific.

Third, the final reason there are so many US navy ships at sea is because, thanks to the near trillion dollars annually we spend on the military, they have to do something with the damn things.

Fourth, absolutely no country, INCLUDING the UK has asked the US to patrol the oceans (except in areas where treaties require us to be there) for any reason whatsoever.

Fifth, those US bases in Europe and elsewhere, guess what? The US is paying rent on that property! And for the most part, the locals would prefer us to be somewhere else, thanks to the paranoid security procedures out military uses.

I mean, how would you like a farm bordering on a US base and because of whatever reason, you cant get within 400 feet of the security fence of that base, even if one of your cows gets stuck there before calling up the base and asking for a security team to escort you to your cow on YOUR FUCKING LAND.

Speaking as a former member of the US Army, and knowing that a full third of our defense budget is spent on maintaining bases in some of the stupidest locations around the planet (I mean all our bases in Germany would pretty much get blasted in the first 10 minutes of hostilities if Russia moved against the west.)



_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to needlesandpins)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/20/2016 8:49:52 AM   
needlesandpins


Posts: 3901
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins


quote:

Are you on CRACK?

I'm just wondering.....possibly you can inform me whose ships are patrolling the worlds seas?

We don't send a bill out for that....we just do it.

Do you have ANY concept what the (INCREASED policing) bill would be to EVERY government on EARTH if not for the U.S. patrolling the entire GLOBE????


Yeah, because non of our guys are out there doing exactly the same thing. I guess all our guys must have been recalled to sit on their arses here at home. That must be why my friend's son has just come back from his latest tour, but hey, who knew that only the Americans mattered so much.

That American ego needs putting on a serious choke chain.

Needles



First of all, just for the record, the US navy does not patrol the world's seas for any other reason than for our own protection, and primarily because we have pissed so many people off in the last 30 years that any 2nd and 3rd rate navy would love to take a shot at a US flagged vessel (albeit the target selection is limited when it comes to commercial shipping.)

Secondly, the only ships in the US Navy actually assigned a patrol grid are US SSN's or nuclear attack submarines, and those are patrolling the most likely route for Russian subs to enter into the Atlantic and known areas of Russian submarine activity in the Pacific.

Third, the final reason there are so many US navy ships at sea is because, thanks to the near trillion dollars annually we spend on the military, they have to do something with the damn things.

Fourth, absolutely no country, INCLUDING the UK has asked the US to patrol the oceans (except in areas where treaties require us to be there) for any reason whatsoever.

Fifth, those US bases in Europe and elsewhere, guess what? The US is paying rent on that property! And for the most part, the locals would prefer us to be somewhere else, thanks to the paranoid security procedures out military uses.

I mean, how would you like a farm bordering on a US base and because of whatever reason, you cant get within 400 feet of the security fence of that base, even if one of your cows gets stuck there before calling up the base and asking for a security team to escort you to your cow on YOUR FUCKING LAND.

Speaking as a former member of the US Army, and knowing that a full third of our defense budget is spent on maintaining bases in some of the stupidest locations around the planet (I mean all our bases in Germany would pretty much get blasted in the first 10 minutes of hostilities if Russia moved against the west.)




Thanks for that, Jeff. I think it safe to say that most of the world wishes both our respective countries would just butt the hell out, and go home. I don't think either one is doing the other any huge favours other than propping up the 1%

Needles

< Message edited by needlesandpins -- 8/20/2016 8:53:08 AM >


_____________________________

I deserved better. Not than you, but from you.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/20/2016 9:28:26 AM   
Chaska


Posts: 301
Joined: 7/15/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins


quote:

Are you on CRACK?

I'm just wondering.....possibly you can inform me whose ships are patrolling the worlds seas?

We don't send a bill out for that....we just do it.

Do you have ANY concept what the (INCREASED policing) bill would be to EVERY government on EARTH if not for the U.S. patrolling the entire GLOBE????


Yeah, because non of our guys are out there doing exactly the same thing. I guess all our guys must have been recalled to sit on their arses here at home. That must be why my friend's son has just come back from his latest tour, but hey, who knew that only the Americans mattered so much.

That American ego needs putting on a serious choke chain.

Needles



First of all, just for the record, the US navy does not patrol the world's seas for any other reason than for our own protection, and primarily because we have pissed so many people off in the last 30 years that any 2nd and 3rd rate navy would love to take a shot at a US flagged vessel (albeit the target selection is limited when it comes to commercial shipping.)

Secondly, the only ships in the US Navy actually assigned a patrol grid are US SSN's or nuclear attack submarines, and those are patrolling the most likely route for Russian subs to enter into the Atlantic and known areas of Russian submarine activity in the Pacific.

Third, the final reason there are so many US navy ships at sea is because, thanks to the near trillion dollars annually we spend on the military, they have to do something with the damn things.

Fourth, absolutely no country, INCLUDING the UK has asked the US to patrol the oceans (except in areas where treaties require us to be there) for any reason whatsoever.

Fifth, those US bases in Europe and elsewhere, guess what? The US is paying rent on that property! And for the most part, the locals would prefer us to be somewhere else, thanks to the paranoid security procedures out military uses.

I mean, how would you like a farm bordering on a US base and because of whatever reason, you cant get within 400 feet of the security fence of that base, even if one of your cows gets stuck there before calling up the base and asking for a security team to escort you to your cow on YOUR FUCKING LAND.

Speaking as a former member of the US Army, and knowing that a full third of our defense budget is spent on maintaining bases in some of the stupidest locations around the planet (I mean all our bases in Germany would pretty much get blasted in the first 10 minutes of hostilities if Russia moved against the west.)




Thanks for that, Jeff. I think it safe to say that most of the world wishes both our respective countries would just butt the hell out, and go home. I don't think either one is doing the other any huge favours other than propping up the 1%

Needles


As a retired US Navy Veteran I have one word for both of you, EXACTLY!

(in reply to needlesandpins)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/20/2016 2:42:03 PM   
AtUrCervix


Posts: 2111
Joined: 1/15/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins


quote:

ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix

quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins

OMFG, seriously? We take a little credit that our athletes, for whom we have far less than you for our country size compared to yours, that compete purely on their own merits whilst working full time jobs most of the time because there is sod all funding here the way you lot get, and you say that WE are the ones whining when you post all that clap trap? Our athletes do 'step the fuck up' as opposed to the relative grease sliding that you lot get to do on scholarships, grants, and funding

Are you bloody kidding me? You can't let us have a little glory without bringing up WW2, which you stepped in at the end after pissing your pants for ages and refusing to enter, have taken credit for ever since, have twisted facts in god knows how many films to glorify America even when you weren't even fucking there!

Now you want to take credit for everything else we have too? Well please, at least get your facts straight. You see the USA does NOT pay out 78% of the NATO budget. My 7 year old Granddaughter can work this one out, man you should be ashamed of yourself! You lot may pay more than the 27 other countries, but then you are far larger than everyone else too, so on a percentage we all pay our relative share. The budget is split in to three sections, and in total you still a whopping 22%. Taking the 2014-15 budget, and making the really silly first grade mistake of adding three percentages together it still wouldn't have made 78%

Now for the UN, at one time the US paid 25%, but now it pays 22%, because again everything is worked out on a country value percentage. So I have no idea where the hell you plucked your figures from, but seriously, get a grip on that.

As for our police force, you pay fuck all towards it. The largest proportion of our budget comes from our council taxes, and we are about to be privatized. Now even if we worked of the figures from the UN, and from NATO, considering that your over all expenditure is 44%, you're still talking bollocks.

Policing and protecting our country ... Uuummmm we keep getting dragging in to illegal wars by the US for fuck all reason other than to line the pockets of the rich in both our countries. The US does naff all for the UK except charge us for Trident that we can't even fricking use, and that none of us except our leaching Government want. Most of us would be more than happy for the US to fuck right off with it's wars on other countries, and to leave us out of it, because actually we are well aware of the fact that when it comes right down to it the US is only concerned for itself.

However, what the hell ANY of this has to do with us claiming a little credit for our athletes I don't know, but the fact that it's got your panties in such a twist that you have to pull this crap, and then claim that any of us are the whiners is amazing.

Needles


Are you on CRACK?

I'm just wondering.....possibly you can inform me whose ships are patrolling the worlds seas?

We don't send a bill out for that....we just do it.

Do you have ANY concept what the (INCREASED policing) bill would be to EVERY government on EARTH if not for the U.S. patrolling the entire GLOBE????


Yeah, because non of our guys are out there doing exactly the same thing. I guess all our guys must have been recalled to sit on their arses here at home. That must be why my friend's son has just come back from his latest tour, but hey, who knew that only the Americans mattered so much.

That American ego needs putting on a serious choke chain.

Needles


I believe I said that....more than stringently.

See previous.

(in reply to needlesandpins)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/22/2016 12:11:12 PM   
NorthernGent1


Posts: 218
Joined: 6/27/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

Haha!

But aren't you even an itsy bitsy embarrassed about your national soccer team? When was the last time they dominated at world class level? (PS: We call it football here too, but for the benefits of Americans, where football means a different sport, I'm just gonna go with soccer.)


Soccer is an English term. It was a means of distinguishing the game from rugby.

Football, football as we know it, was called Association Football. Rugby was called Rugby football.

Both games sprang up around the same time, and so Association Football was shortened to 'soccer' by English public schools in an attempt to identify it as a game different to rugby football.

As always, we invent these things.

The fact that other countries do it better in later years doesn't mean anything to us because we'll always be an arrogant (or confident depending upon point of view) lot who don't give a fuck what the rest of the world does because it's our game and no matter how good you are you'll always be out of your depth with us - win, lose or draw.

Come to think of it, why do you people outside of this island copy pretty much everything we do? 'Time you lot stood on your own two feet - what are we? your fuckin' mothers?

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/22/2016 12:16:00 PM   
NorthernGent1


Posts: 218
Joined: 6/27/2016
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaska


quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins


quote:

Are you on CRACK?

I'm just wondering.....possibly you can inform me whose ships are patrolling the worlds seas?

We don't send a bill out for that....we just do it.

Do you have ANY concept what the (INCREASED policing) bill would be to EVERY government on EARTH if not for the U.S. patrolling the entire GLOBE????


Yeah, because non of our guys are out there doing exactly the same thing. I guess all our guys must have been recalled to sit on their arses here at home. That must be why my friend's son has just come back from his latest tour, but hey, who knew that only the Americans mattered so much.

That American ego needs putting on a serious choke chain.

Needles



First of all, just for the record, the US navy does not patrol the world's seas for any other reason than for our own protection, and primarily because we have pissed so many people off in the last 30 years that any 2nd and 3rd rate navy would love to take a shot at a US flagged vessel (albeit the target selection is limited when it comes to commercial shipping.)

Secondly, the only ships in the US Navy actually assigned a patrol grid are US SSN's or nuclear attack submarines, and those are patrolling the most likely route for Russian subs to enter into the Atlantic and known areas of Russian submarine activity in the Pacific.

Third, the final reason there are so many US navy ships at sea is because, thanks to the near trillion dollars annually we spend on the military, they have to do something with the damn things.

Fourth, absolutely no country, INCLUDING the UK has asked the US to patrol the oceans (except in areas where treaties require us to be there) for any reason whatsoever.

Fifth, those US bases in Europe and elsewhere, guess what? The US is paying rent on that property! And for the most part, the locals would prefer us to be somewhere else, thanks to the paranoid security procedures out military uses.

I mean, how would you like a farm bordering on a US base and because of whatever reason, you cant get within 400 feet of the security fence of that base, even if one of your cows gets stuck there before calling up the base and asking for a security team to escort you to your cow on YOUR FUCKING LAND.

Speaking as a former member of the US Army, and knowing that a full third of our defense budget is spent on maintaining bases in some of the stupidest locations around the planet (I mean all our bases in Germany would pretty much get blasted in the first 10 minutes of hostilities if Russia moved against the west.)




Thanks for that, Jeff. I think it safe to say that most of the world wishes both our respective countries would just butt the hell out, and go home. I don't think either one is doing the other any huge favours other than propping up the 1%

Needles


As a retired US Navy Veteran I have one word for both of you, EXACTLY!


It is a strange quirk of fate that the two countries in this world that have given most in terms of the development of ideas surrounding freedom, are the two countries that are spending time destroying any claim they can lay to respecting sovereignty.

Strange that.

I suppose Liberalism can't function without what are really two sides of the same coin. Or can it?

(in reply to Chaska)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/22/2016 12:31:16 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: NorthernGent1



Well, we were very fortunate during WW2.

Thanks to the russians.

The Germans made only a half-hearted attempt to invade England - their real business was elsewhere.

With the russians.

Had they put their weight into it then no doubt we would have been conquered.

Not likely. Churchill's "ww2" points out that germany had no way to get her troops to england.


As it were, we remained undefeated on home soil since 1066, a thousand years; which ain't a bad record by anyone's standards.

What you have to remember though, is that while the Germans had been preparing for war since the 1920s, we had spent our time demilitarising during the same period.

Churchill says you are mistaken. In his book WW2 he points out that all the heavy coastal artillary that was supposed to have been destroyed was not.
G.b. had radar and a superior fighter and bomber.
The germans lost more me 109 to pilot error than to allied pilots


So, we had to put cardboard cut-out tanks into fields to give the Germans the impression that we actually had something to fight them with.

Since they could not get there it was a waste of time and effort.

As ever though, it's doing what it takes to win and we are far more adept than the Germans ever have been at getting powerful allies to fight our corner.

Like russia.

As for the Americans, all politics aside, a lot of American Mothers lost their sons in Europe and that's all that needs to be said.

Amerika lost about a quarter of a million men on all fronts for the whole war.

Funny though how the English usually come out on the winning side, even when in the face of adversity, such as having a much bigger country on our doorstep that had prepared for war for a long time while we had demilitarised. Funny that. Is it luck or craft?


Ignorance of history on your part.



(in reply to NorthernGent1)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/22/2016 12:47:21 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Okay, the UK is not too shabby, but let me ask you a couple of questions, considering history.

1) How long would the UK (and by extension, its colonies) would have survived dependent on convoys from Canada across the Atlantic with Karl Dönitz's Uboats playing havoc with those life dependent convoys?

2) Considering that, during the Battle of Britain, while the RAF was shooting down more Germans than the Germans were shooting down RAF planes, (even if the Brits bred like rabbits) how long would it have been before the number of pilots lost or put out of action would have crippled air operations?

While it is not true that the Americans won the war single handed, it is true that the British Empire could not have lasted more than a couple of years before being forced to sue for peace due to attrition.

So, with that being said, do you really want to stand by:

Did your history book not have the part where the rusians killed a quarter of a million germans in front of moscow...before amerika was even in the war?

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/22/2016 12:50:46 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Good points, and while England has remained unconquered since 1066 (gotta admire great great great great etc Grand dad for that,) I do seem to recall a certain British commander so embarrassed by losing to a bunch of colonial rabble he had a subordinate give his sword to the winning general.

The winning general was french.

Not to mention a bunch of colonials and uncivilized riff raff opened a can of whupass on some Brits near a town called New Orleans a few years later....


A thorough study of the battle might cause you to reconsider your bragging. It was not as you suggest.


< Message edited by thompsonx -- 8/22/2016 12:51:18 PM >

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/22/2016 12:51:52 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix



the REST of the world needs to step the FUCK up because without the U.S. (paying for 87% of the U.N. budget......78% of NATO)


that is not true.


http://www.reuters.com/article/us-un-usa-idUSTRE69D67220101014



And while all you fucking whiners.....whine.....about how awful the U.S. is....realize THIS; 64% of the World's police force is paid for by...none other than....


Once again you are mistaken.

Now...we can argue a shitload of stuff.

Is the U.S, an integrity filled government...with truly altruistic means to an end in mind?

Ehhhhhh.....not terribly likely.

Now....while you consider that thought.....please (without including Norway, Denmark or Sweden....none of which provide anything as to world peace

Like not starting wars?


other than saying....."well....we just don't think that's really our gig").....identify for me....just 5.....5 will do just nicely....please name them.....who are....policing and protecting YOUR country?

Not the u.s.

So....yeah...the U.S. sucks at a lot of things...we have black ops (so do 99% of the 1st world governments),


Get an adult to show you how to use google and then look up 1st world governments.


they steal from their parishioners (taxpayers)......(so do 99% of GOVERMENTS).......they lie (to EVERYONE)..........(so do 99%of ALLLLLLLLL governments)....and in the end...

It sucks to be the world's Daddy

You (and your country) are not the worlds daddy .


but you know what? Someone has to....because otherwise....all the kiddies would run rampant.

That would be your ignorant unsubstantiated peurile opinion worth about the price of used shit paper.

Wanna see the world go to TOTAL shit?

Cite please or is this from your crystal ball?

WATCH the world as it decays while we (the collective U.S. are about to) say...."fuck ALL of you....no more checks.....fuck you and the horse you rode in on....have fun beating yourselves up".



< Message edited by thompsonx -- 8/22/2016 1:08:40 PM >

(in reply to AtUrCervix)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/22/2016 12:59:21 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Needles, I was commenting on the "Put them on the fuckin' moon or somewhere equally unimportant because they're contaminating our excellence." statement.

As for stepping in at the "end" of ww2, well considering it lasted another 4 years after we got involved, add to the fact that the US did have the biggest part of the burden of dealing with the Japanese in the Pacific


You are wrong. The russians killed and captured more japs than the anglo amerikan alliance.

https://www.amazon.com/Racing-Enemy-Stalin-Truman-Surrender/dp/0674022416


(yes, the brits and anzacs did have a large part of the CBI theater) and consider that even before we declared war, we were already putting US lives on the line escorting convoys in the North Atlantic to suppliment the fact that the RN and RCN was getting their asses handed to them due to the overwhelming number of uboats the germans were sending out, trying to make it like the UK and its empire was winning the war is pretty much BULLSHIT.

At best, the UK could have lasted maybe another year, possibly two, and the simple reason is that the supply lines to the UK stretched across the Atlantic and that was a German controlled pond.

How were the germans going to get to g.b....swim?

As for your athletes, by all means, celebrate their achievements, however, you are operating under the delusion that the athletes we have are state supported.

The US government contributes practically nothing to the Olympic effort, as for scholarships and grants, hate to bust your bubble, but with the exception of basketball, all sports colleges give scholarships for are not Olympic sports.

I am gonna have to ask you to validate that statement.

Grants are not awarded based on athletic ability, but on academic ability.

Grants do not always require any serious academic ability.

And it was not until recent years, that the US even allowed professional athletes to be eligible for the Olympic team, which was not the same in every other country on the planet.

Google could disabuse you of this bit of ignorance.

Finally, thanks to numerous scandals at the bigger schools, students on athletic scholarships actually have to study a legitimate course and major.

What was arnold swartzenager's major?



(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/22/2016 1:00:14 PM   
keptinchains


Posts: 10
Joined: 6/18/2013
Status: offline
Why can't this remain as a tongue-in-cheek thread about the Olympics? (where the US swimming team won the Gas Station Vandalism gold, silver AND bronze...)

(in reply to WickedsDesire)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/22/2016 1:02:25 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix


Are you on CRACK?


Have you a clue what crack is?

I'm just wondering.....possibly you can inform me whose ships are patrolling the worlds seas?

We don't send a bill out for that....we just do it.

Why would you send a bill for protecting your own shit to someone else?

Do you have ANY concept what the (INCREASED policing) bill would be to EVERY government on EARTH if not for the U.S. patrolling the entire GLOBE????


Amerika does not police the world. That is part of your imagination and not any part of reality.

(in reply to AtUrCervix)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/22/2016 1:04:59 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix



Without "Lend Lease"....there would have BEEN NO UK to support. With it....there was a chance. And....together....with the world's assistance....Hitler and Tojo was (were) contained.

No sweetie the russians did the heavy lifting get someone to show you how to use the library.



< Message edited by thompsonx -- 8/22/2016 1:09:25 PM >

(in reply to AtUrCervix)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/22/2016 1:19:10 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent1


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

Haha!

But aren't you even an itsy bitsy embarrassed about your national soccer team? When was the last time they dominated at world class level? (PS: We call it football here too, but for the benefits of Americans, where football means a different sport, I'm just gonna go with soccer.)


Soccer is an English term. It was a means of distinguishing the game from rugby.

Football, football as we know it, was called Association Football. Rugby was called Rugby football.

Both games sprang up around the same time, and so Association Football was shortened to 'soccer' by English public schools in an attempt to identify it as a game different to rugby football.

As always, we invent these things.

The fact that other countries do it better in later years doesn't mean anything to us because we'll always be an arrogant (or confident depending upon point of view) lot who don't give a fuck what the rest of the world does because it's our game and no matter how good you are you'll always be out of your depth with us - win, lose or draw.

Come to think of it, why do you people outside of this island copy pretty much everything we do? 'Time you lot stood on your own two feet - what are we? your fuckin' mothers?


While much of what you said is true, the US's three biggest sports were all invented here. Baseball, American football and basketball. Money only goes to those players through ticket sales. Our track people mostly make money competing on the European circuit where, apparently, it's a big spectator sport.

The final medal count was US 121 UK 67. Good on you guys.

(in reply to NorthernGent1)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/22/2016 1:36:45 PM   
NorthernGent1


Posts: 218
Joined: 6/27/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Okay, the UK is not too shabby, but let me ask you a couple of questions, considering history.

1) How long would the UK (and by extension, its colonies) would have survived dependent on convoys from Canada across the Atlantic with Karl Dönitz's Uboats playing havoc with those life dependent convoys?

2) Considering that, during the Battle of Britain, while the RAF was shooting down more Germans than the Germans were shooting down RAF planes, (even if the Brits bred like rabbits) how long would it have been before the number of pilots lost or put out of action would have crippled air operations?

While it is not true that the Americans won the war single handed, it is true that the British Empire could not have lasted more than a couple of years before being forced to sue for peace due to attrition.

So, with that being said, do you really want to stand by:

Did your history book not have the part where the rusians killed a quarter of a million germans in front of moscow...before amerika was even in the war?


The Russians were extremely fortunate.

Outside Moscow, the Germans outnumbered the Russians for the first time, unknown to many, and the Russians were there for the taking - considering the Germans had steamrollered them.

Problem was that the Germans hadn't prepared for a protracted war and so ran out of supplies, and their machinery was bogged down in the autumn rain and mud - meaning they were at a standstill at the most important point and had to wait.

Otherwise the Russians would have been done in. They couldn't stop them when they held a numerical advantage so they certainly wouldn't have stopped them when the Russians were numerically inferior and had ran out of reserves.

Fortunately, the weather and a lack of supplies meant that while the Germans stalled, the Russians could ship Siberian regiments, who were generally made of sterner stuff than the average Russian, West.

They were lucky.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/22/2016 1:37:55 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent1



Well, we were very fortunate during WW2.

Thanks to the russians.

The Germans made only a half-hearted attempt to invade England - their real business was elsewhere.

With the russians.

Had they put their weight into it then no doubt we would have been conquered.

Not likely. Churchill's "ww2" points out that germany had no way to get her troops to england.


As it were, we remained undefeated on home soil since 1066, a thousand years; which ain't a bad record by anyone's standards.

What you have to remember though, is that while the Germans had been preparing for war since the 1920s, we had spent our time demilitarising during the same period.

Churchill says you are mistaken. In his book WW2 he points out that all the heavy coastal artillary that was supposed to have been destroyed was not.
G.b. had radar and a superior fighter and bomber.
The germans lost more me 109 to pilot error than to allied pilots


So, we had to put cardboard cut-out tanks into fields to give the Germans the impression that we actually had something to fight them with.

Since they could not get there it was a waste of time and effort.

As ever though, it's doing what it takes to win and we are far more adept than the Germans ever have been at getting powerful allies to fight our corner.

Like russia.

As for the Americans, all politics aside, a lot of American Mothers lost their sons in Europe and that's all that needs to be said.

Amerika lost about a quarter of a million men on all fronts for the whole war.

Funny though how the English usually come out on the winning side, even when in the face of adversity, such as having a much bigger country on our doorstep that had prepared for war for a long time while we had demilitarised. Funny that. Is it luck or craft?


Ignorance of history on your part.




Let's not forget Stalin's non-aggression pact with his fellow socialist country, Germany. In which pact the two countries determined how they were going to devide Eastern Europe between them. The pact lasted for years allowing Germany freedom to invade Europe. The Soviet Union's, not Russia, contribution after Germany broke the pact was not what they'd intended, it was necessary for survival. Hitler fucked up with two fronts. Stalin had every intention of later aggression. To praise them now is silly. Sure, a lot of their soldiers died. A lot of that was due to Stalin's policy of sacrificing men rather than material.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best - 8/22/2016 1:39:04 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline
But, that doesn't detract from the fact that GB took home a medal count more than half of the U.S.

(in reply to Nnanji)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: Pound For Pound The Very Best Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109