RE: Losers and failures (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


longwayhome -> RE: Losers and failures (8/31/2016 6:32:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

Oh yes. Very much. I've had this conversation a few times lately, and I think you've touched on something very deep.


Thank you. I am, of course, a very deep person, as you so perceptively observe. [:)]

A long while ago, I got into Jungian psychology. It was all about myths - and, crucially, why certain myths *stick* and are pretty eternal, in this story, that story, this film, that film, etc, etc, etc.

One of these 'eternal stories' is that of the Enchantress, Circe, and the men she turns into pigs. These are men who - literally - are so enchanted by Circe that they cannot help but act like animals. They lose their human control ... and they're gone. Thousands of years later - the same theme, with Marlene Dietrich playing the nightclub singer who bewitches the professor in 'The Blue Angel'. All his intellectual's control dissipates. Forward again half a century: the episode of Star Trek in which Kirk and the usual team visit a planet run by women who control men with the 'power rings' on their fingers. The Queen forces Kirk to act like he's a braying horse.

Jung himself said that the 'feminine side' in a male can certainly take that turn. You must let it out and let it do its stuff - but you must *not* give it unlimited freedom. It isn't a real female - it's just your feminine side. You have to stay in command. Not suppress - big difference - but stay in control.

What that translates to is that you might whisper the words 'My Goddess' between the sheets, and let the rapture sweep over you ... but in the morning she will probably fart at some point, and then you'll be obliged fondly to take the piss out of her.


I largely agree but there's nothing wrong with being enchanted. It's just a problem if what you are enchanted by is the fantasy as opposed to the person.

Fantasy is great as an enhancement to reality or a route to discovery. After all we inhabit a rich dream realm as well as the "real" world.

Unfortunately many people project their fantasy onto others and they fall in love with the projection, be it the worthless worm to the princess or some other manufactured scene. It's not that scenes can't be fun but they are hardly a firm basis for something meaningful and truly life enhancing.

You can still feel a sense of wonder with another without idealising them or worshipping their image. Accepting that people are not images of kinky perfection but flawed human beings who succeed and fail, soar to heights and fall on their faces, transcend their reality, do the dishes and clean up shit is far more life affirming than constructing an icon to fetishise.

It's a logical inconsistency to want someone who is worthless. If that's your thing then their feelings of worthlessness must be worth something to you. If that's the game you both play that is good for both of you, but as a starting point it does have its risks in terms of how any relationship develops and how you get to know each other.

If you are an empty vessel then you have nothing to give. Pretending to be an empty vessel if it does something for the other person is another matter, but only for the right person.

From my point of view introducing myself as a worthless human being is unhelpful, unproductive and demeaning in all the wrong ways. Maybe it works for some but it does look a bit like a cliché searching for a purpose, rather than a human being seeking a connection.




NookieNotes -> RE: Losers and failures (9/1/2016 1:39:51 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

What that translates to is that you might whisper the words 'My Goddess' between the sheets, and let the rapture sweep over you ... but in the morning she will probably fart at some point, and then you'll be obliged fondly to take the piss out of her.


Well, it's unlikely you'll even get between the sheets, if your fantasy is determining how you interact.

EVERY decent woman I know feels incredibly uncomfortable when someone treats them as an avatar, instead of interacts with them as a genuine person.

It's like being forced into a skin that doesn't fit right, and every move chafes.

quote:

ORIGINAL: longwayhome

You can still feel a sense of wonder with another without idealising them or worshipping their image. Accepting that people are not images of kinky perfection but flawed human beings who succeed and fail, soar to heights and fall on their faces, transcend their reality, do the dishes and clean up shit is far more life affirming than constructing an icon to fetishise.


This is my greatest sense of wonder. How we can feel so amazingly deeply despite our flaws. How I love love despite knowing the cold, hard mechanics of it. How we can actually create love with people on purpose, and yet still believe in it.

THAT is the magic for me.




feir -> RE: Losers and failures (9/1/2016 3:09:39 AM)

never really realised that was why i was so unsatisfied with the BDSM scene online but it's true. loads of pathetic guys with nothing much to offer us except money and half of them begrudge us that.




TheMistressLucy -> RE: Losers and failures (9/1/2016 3:14:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

quote:

Forward again half a century: the episode of Star Trek in which Kirk and the usual team visit a planet run by women who control men with the 'power rings' on their fingers. The Queen forces Kirk to act like he's a braying horse.




Anyone know the name of this episode? I would like to see it :)




PeonForHer -> RE: Losers and failures (9/1/2016 4:16:40 AM)

'Spock's Brain'.

ETA It's considered one of the poorest episodes of Star Trek ever made. Just to warn you. ;)




Bhruic -> RE: Losers and failures (9/1/2016 5:40:24 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

'Spock's Brain'.

ETA It's considered one of the poorest episodes of Star Trek ever made. Just to warn you. ;)


"Brain and brain! What is brain?!"




PeonForHer -> RE: Losers and failures (9/1/2016 6:01:05 AM)

I've just been watching bits of it again. It really is shockingly bad. [;)]




WhoreMods -> RE: Losers and failures (9/1/2016 8:34:27 AM)

"My God, it's so simple! A child could do it!"
(Deforrest Kelly was always good for bringing some crap to OS Star Trek, wasn't he?)




TheMistressLucy -> RE: Losers and failures (9/1/2016 8:56:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

'Spock's Brain'.

ETA It's considered one of the poorest episodes of Star Trek ever made. Just to warn you. ;)


Ah yes, I have seen it after all. Also there is the Next Generation episode "Star One" when they visit a female led civilisation.




WhoreMods -> RE: Losers and failures (9/1/2016 9:10:29 AM)

I always wonder whether the OS or Next Gen looks the best when considered as a whole. There was some mind numbingly bad shite in both, but how does The Measure of a Man or The Best of Both Wolds compare to The Trouble With Tribbles or The City On The Edge of Forever? Is the distinction purely down to preferring the large ham to Professor X, or vice versa?




AtUrCervix -> RE: Losers and failures (9/1/2016 4:25:10 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheMistressLucy

I have had a lot of male subs approach me here and in their first message tell me they are a loser or a failure or are not worthy and need to be controlled. At what point is this attractive to me and worthy of my time?

I prefer my subs to be successful and have made something of their lives, it doesn't mean you have to be CEO of a company but someone intelligent enough to know there is always more to learn, more to aspire to and be the best they can.

Any thoughts on this?

------------------------------------------------------
And before anyone points out, I know all subs are not like this :)


Baby...I've been successful for decades and....I'm a sub.

My thoughts are..find that guy.




Numerans -> RE: Losers and failures (9/7/2016 4:27:56 PM)

I disagree. It is not porn. Per se. Porn is a reflection of needs and the needs/feelings etc, essentially the market. So there is a market for it.


'I thought a lot of girls wanted to @save@ and @change@ their man...'


Regardless, these people have internalized their weaknesses and their suffering. Some manage to transform it into something better, the third camp turn it into rage.
So out of the first camp a few of them express themselves this way through their sexuality.


It's really all fucked up, but then again the world IS positively fucked up today.




WhoreMods -> RE: Losers and failures (9/7/2016 4:47:07 PM)

I'm dubious that cynicism is even a palliative, never mind a solution.




Awareness -> RE: Losers and failures (9/8/2016 10:24:18 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheMistressLucy

I have had a lot of male subs approach me here and in their first message tell me they are a loser or a failure or are not worthy and need to be controlled. At what point is this attractive to me and worthy of my time?

I prefer my subs to be successful and have made something of their lives, it doesn't mean you have to be CEO of a company but someone intelligent enough to know there is always more to learn, more to aspire to and be the best they can.

Any thoughts on this?

------------------------------------------------------
And before anyone points out, I know all subs are not like this :)
If someone is a success in their lives, why on earth would they want to hand over any part of that success to a leech who does nothing to deserve it?

Honestly, I think "Dommes" complaining about the pool of male submissives is the height of irony. You all use sex to sell yourselves, then wonder why the men who approach you are looking for sexual gratification. You posture with an arrogance you haven't earned, then wonder why only losers seem to approach you.

Here's a clue for free: Posturing doesn't work. If you haven't earned every statement you make on your profile, then you're a fraud. Frauds attract other frauds.




WhoreMods -> RE: Losers and failures (9/8/2016 10:25:50 AM)

What does any of that smug drivel have to do with Star Trek?




Awareness -> RE: Losers and failures (9/8/2016 10:28:08 AM)

Read between the lines. There are secret messages in my posts - you just have to work hard to find them.




WhoreMods -> RE: Losers and failures (9/8/2016 10:47:59 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

Read between the lines. There are secret messages in my posts - you just have to work hard to find them.

No there's not. You're too stupid to manage a subtext.




JeffBC -> RE: Losers and failures (9/8/2016 11:14:32 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: needlesandpins
I find the male chastity thing just as unappealing. So you're a loser, and pathetic, then why the hell would I want you? You can't leave your dick alone, or stay loyal to me? again, I'd want you why exactly? Your whole experience is based on porn, or 50 shades of Guff, how dull.

Is this really fair.... not what you like and dislike... but the specific way you characterize it?

I used to say the same thing about bondage. If I wanted Carol to stay in a certain position I could just tell her to do so. Why would i need ropes and whatnot? And honestly, if she couldn't obey such a simple command then why the hell would I want to be her dominant at all?

Clearly I was missing important parts of that picture.




MrRodgers -> RE: Losers and failures (9/8/2016 11:37:32 AM)

I tell them that they are not worthless, nobody is 'worthless.' They are always 'worth' their effort, their sincerity, their passion and of course...their pleasure.

Worth is definitive...loser is subjective.




LadyPact -> RE: Losers and failures (9/8/2016 11:58:05 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: TheMistressLucy

I have had a lot of male subs approach me here and in their first message tell me they are a loser or a failure or are not worthy and need to be controlled. At what point is this attractive to me and worthy of my time?

I prefer my subs to be successful and have made something of their lives, it doesn't mean you have to be CEO of a company but someone intelligent enough to know there is always more to learn, more to aspire to and be the best they can.

Any thoughts on this?

------------------------------------------------------
And before anyone points out, I know all subs are not like this :)
If someone is a success in their lives, why on earth would they want to hand over any part of that success to a leech who does nothing to deserve it?

Honestly, I think "Dommes" complaining about the pool of male submissives is the height of irony. You all use sex to sell yourselves, then wonder why the men who approach you are looking for sexual gratification. You posture with an arrogance you haven't earned, then wonder why only losers seem to approach you.

Here's a clue for free: Posturing doesn't work. If you haven't earned every statement you make on your profile, then you're a fraud. Frauds attract other frauds.

For someone as intelligent as you are, how can you make such a stupid statement?

I'm with you on not allowing a person who is a drain to share your life. However, not the same thing.

Hon, it's the internet, and the internet is full of tourists, fantasists, and wannbe's. Ninety percent will never DO anything but create a profile and send random email.

For what it's worth, I, and other Dominant women don't complain about a lack of s-men. [;)]







Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.09375