quote:

I've watched the video and read (most of) that thread, and my opinion hasn't changed that RM isn't arguing against women. In that video, whether you agree with him or not, he is providing what he feels to be an example of female privilege, which is something I assume he feels feminists don't often acknowledge and/or feminism has helped propagate.

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

quote:

I've watched the video and read (most of) that thread, and my opinion hasn't changed that RM isn't arguing against women. In that video, whether you agree with him or not, he is providing what he feels to be an example of female privilege, which is something I assume he feels feminists don't often acknowledge and/or feminism has helped propagate.

Thank you, Kaliko.

Unfortunately, whatever I say that opposes the feminist narrative, I'm a misogynist, period.

If I point out female privilege, it's misogyny,

If anyone points out male privilege, it's progressive thinking and a positive move to equality.

It's a no win situation when dealing with the left.

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

Peon, my essential point is that feminists don't give a fuck about female privilege and will ridicule anyone who will point it out. Yet they expect eveeyone to give a fuck about male privilege.

Feminists need to clean up their own back yard before criticising others.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

Peon, my essential point is that feminists don't give a fuck about female privilege and will ridicule anyone who will point it out. Yet they expect eveeyone to give a fuck about male privilege.

Feminists need to clean up their own back yard before criticising others.

I do not think you know what you just posted

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

There are plenty of people on this thread who believe in gender equality - which, as you've just implied, is the opposite of feminism. These people have questioned what might be argued to be female privilege.

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

http://www.afr.com/news/policy/education/paul-hanson-gets-her-wish-child-support-to-be-audited-20160920-grkvm9

The feminazis will be whinging about this one.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

There are plenty of people on this thread who believe in gender equality - which, as you've just implied, is the opposite of feminism. These people have questioned what might be argued to be female privilege.

Fixed that for you.

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

http://www.afr.com/news/policy/education/paul-hanson-gets-her-wish-child-support-to-be-audited-20160920-grkvm9

The feminazis will be whinging about this one.

Since you're the only one here whinging, does that make you a feminazi?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kaliko
From what I've seen, RM argues against feminism, not against women.

I get the impression that he sees the two as identical, myself.

I think he confuses things.. I think he sees any female rights moves as against male rights moves, and while that is true, he takes it out of proportion.

I actually do believe that Men should run the country, and the home. But not to be a fucking dictator. The Man should be out making the money to pay the bills and the Woman should be taking care of the kids. In old days he decided where to plant what crops, how many pigs, chickens or cows to buy and those things bring in the rewards later, much later. Since she has tits and there was no Enfamil or whatever, she takes care of the kids. So she n in the house, cabin, hut or whatever cooking up food for them and he is out plowing or hunting or whatever.

This seems to have resulted in different mindsets, but that is disappearing with our modern lifestyle. I still say Men should run the world but Man does not just mean a grown up boy. The people who run the world are mostly grown up boys, and the ones I consider exceptions might surprise you. The difference is who thinks about the future. There are very few Men.

Maybe RM is one and maybe not. but being boss is a job. Being a leader is really being a servant. It is just that the People you lead trust your wisdom and judgement. You are supposed to analyse everything and make the best decision possible for those you lead. Otherwise you have let them down. If you can let them down, who works for whom ? But like real Men, we lack true leaders as well. We got mostly self serving despots and other nefarious types all over the place.

Years ago my mailman told me some things. we got along, and really did sit on the porch alot, having cookouts n shit. One day we are talking and he tells me about his divorce. They got kids, but they just wanted, well, I guess to fuck other people. They got along fine.

In divorce court, she refused child support. First of all she has a good job, plus the fact the guy said that anytime she wanted some money he would give it to her. There were no financial problems and what child support was supposed to protect the child from just wasn't happening.

She flat out refused to have them take it out of his paycheck, telling the judge straight out "He is a good Man, you don't have to order anything". The judge did not like that and she got adamant about it and almost got a contempt of court charge.

Why ?

They get 10 %.

Not to mention that juvenile court judge who got busted selling kids to a detention home. People in other places just don't fucking understand how it is here.

T^T

quote:

ORIGINAL: PeonForHer

There are plenty of people on this thread who believe in gender equality - which, as you've just implied, is the essence of feminism. These people have questioned what might be argued to be female privilege.