bounty44
Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx
"Their policies are ridiculous. They charged a little girl with a felony for mixing Draino and aluminum foil in a jar in the parking lot. This zero tolerance is bullshit.
Yes you are posting bullshit. Why don't you post the whole story? "
http://www.livescience.com/29238-bottle-bomb-felony-chargers.html
For some one who has spent several pages telling us how smart he is you do not seem to know much.
It was not the school. The principal and vice principal stood up for the girl.
Perhapos you should consider putting your brian in gear before opening your mouth at wot.
http://newsone.com/2440220/kiera-wilmot-florida-science-experiment-2/
"Assistant State Attorney Tammy Glotfelty, who advised Officer Gregory Rhoden to charge 16-year-old Kiera Wilmot with a felony, has some explaining to do. Just days after doling out a stiff charge for Kiera, Glotfelty decided not to bring any charges against White 13-year-old Taylor Richardson, who mistakenly killed his younger brother with a BB gun, because she deemed his case was a “tragic accident.”
http://abcnews.go.com/US/cleared-charges-honor-student-space-camp/story?id=19236561
here, lets do a little more "Thompson look in the mirror" work:
termy says "their policies are ridiculous. they charged..." which might lead one to confuse the "their" and the "they" as being the same entities. its bad writing. however, since the "they" is followed by "charged with a felony..." he can only be referring to law enforcement acting consistent with school policy. so, your saying "it was not the school" is meaningless. no duh it was not the school. school's don't charge people with felonies.
that said, the quote from your reference has nothing whatsoever to do with contradicting termy's claim that she was charged with a felony. it has to do with the same state attorney NOT charging someone else who committed, seemingly, a worse crime, because it was an accident.
those two small things out of the way---now, the principal did indeed "vouch for her character," however, it was the vice principal who turned her in in the first place (ohh, got that one wrong too!)
quote:
The disturbance prompted Assistant Principal Dan Durham to alert authorities
she was nevertheless suspended, termy's citation quotes the school system [so someone OTHER than the principal and vice principal---got that??] standing by their decision, and from YOUR reference (you know, the WHOLE STORY you left out [any of that language sounding familiar??]):
quote:
Indeed, Wilmot would be arrested at the school and charged with the aforementioned charges. Then to add insult to injury, the teen was reportedly expelled from Bartow High; she is currently completing her education through an “expulsion program.”
and
quote:
“However, she was arrested and charged with adult felonies, which means the arrest will follow her for the remainder of her life. According to Haas [the chief assistant state attorney], they are still determining whether to go forward in Kiera’s case or drop the charges as they did in the Richardson case.
put another way, "being cleared of charges" doesn't negate the fact she was charged in the first place.
the short of it all being---the citations you thought was defending your position of calling termy's position "bullshit" actually corroborates what he was saying. oooooh, that's gotta smart.
as for this gem of yours, i'll let the visible irony do its own work:
quote:
Perhapos you should consider putting your brian in gear before opening your mouth at wot.
< Message edited by bounty44 -- 10/14/2016 5:19:49 PM >
|
RE: GUNS AND THE USA. HA HA - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread