DesideriScuri
Posts: 12225
Joined: 1/18/2012 Status: offline
|
So, there are a couple things at play here. Yes, it's being shown that in email conversations, Hillary and staff are being shown to not live up to their public personae. You don't say?!? It should be accepted that pretty much all politicians would be found guilty of the same. Is it good to have true motivations and beliefs revealed? Yes, it is, imo. It would be great if we knew the true motivations and beliefs of all candidates. Now, here's another side of this story... The GOP (except Rubio, it seems) is exalting in the trove of information being put out from the hacked ema-.... wait.... what? Someone hacked into email server(s) and is now exposing that information? Maybe I'm wrong, but isn't hacking email server(s), um, illegal? And, that would apply regardless of whose email server(s) was hacked, wouldn't it? I don't know how much of this stuff would be available via FOIA requests, but if people had started that a year ago, I'm willing to bet the heavily redacted emails still wouldn't have been released, meaning they'd have no chance of having an impact on this election. It's truly a messed up situation. Hillary isn't as honest and upright as she wants voters to think. Her opponent and his supporters are enjoying the fruits of illegal actions. You won't get into too much trouble (if any) if you're caught with stolen merchandise, as long as it can't be shown you knew it was stolen, or should have known it was stolen, but if you do know it was stolen, you'll face much stiffer consequences. In this situation, those enjoying the email revelations know it is being released as a result of an illegal action.
_____________________________
What I support: - A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
- Personal Responsibility
- Help for the truly needy
- Limited Government
- Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
|