|
BamaD -> RE: The world without the US (10/24/2016 10:53:20 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Edwird
quote:
ORIGINAL: BamaD
quote:
ORIGINAL: Edwird
Switzerland, with a population of 4 million at the time, would by your account have held sway over the Germans, the French, and the British, with each population of 30-60 million at the time.
Put that on a game map plan for us, if you will.
... if the Allies had won without us Germany would have been crippled,
The Germans were well and truly crippled long before WW II, thanks to the Versailles treaty being attended by Clemenceau, who was actually around when the Prussians kicked the French arse in 1871. Can you believe that? That cane walker was out for blood and compensating for his inherent impotence in life, and somehow got his way. It is definitely on the Brits and the USA that they allowed the senile bitter bastard to have his way about it. Welcome WW II.
quote:
France would have been destroyed.
The French have always found a way to destroy themselves, no outside intervention needed. Read some inter-war French history and get a clue.
quote:
And you forget that without us the Japanese would have been unstoppable so the Russians would have to divert huge number of troops to defend the back door.
What? Because the Japanese beat up on a weakling corrupt and utterly impotent China (at the time) you consider the Japanese of the time as being 'unstoppable'?
Here, let me just counter your idiocy with my own:
"If the US had not killed 30 million people in South Asia, then Thailand would have ruled over all of China."
You say that the Swiss or the Swedes 'ruling' over Europe as if it would be a bad thing, just as, as counterpart, you apparently prefer China rather than Thailand hold the roost in the Orient.
So the Germans were unable to proceed with with WWII wow, then Russia and western Europe must have been real wimps.
France, as a great power died at Verdun.
With out the US in the war the Chinese would have been the biggest threat to the Japanese, before we got into the war they had whipped the Brits pretty good, taken all of their holdings in the east and sent their navy packing,
The Australian navy would have stood up to them for about 10 minutes, nothing against the Aussies but they simply didn't have the ships.
That leaves the Chinese.
When did I say that the Swiss and Swedes ruling the roost would be a bad thing. I doubt they would have screwed up any worse than the Brits French and Germans have.
You want to go back to WWI do you think the allies would have gotten the deal they did without the threat of literally 1,000,000s of US troops on the way?
And the Europeans didn't have the backbone to keep Hitler from rearming, do you really think that our none existence would have lead to them growing one.
|
|
|
|
