|
Awareness -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/5/2016 5:39:56 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact
quote:
ORIGINAL: Awareness
Christ, you dumb bitches really haven't learned a goddamned thing.
Obviously, neither have you. The fact that you even have to open your comment with a term like 'bitches,' shows that you aren't exactly willing to have decent conversation on the matter. Show me the decent conversation which was already underway, because it sure as shit looked like a fucking lynch mob to me.
quote:
quote:
Apparently YourKinkIsNotMyKinkButYourKinkIsOK only goes one way... because there's sure as shit a bunch of 'onetruewayism' going on with you dumb cunts.
It also shows that you don't have a good grasp on what the heck it means, anyway. It's ok. I'm willing to help you out.
My personal definition of YKINMKBYKIOK is somebody saying that a certain relationship style or activity isn't for them, they don't want to engage in X, or whatever doesn't suit them.
The part you are skipping is the recognition that, even though something isn't for the individual, the recognition that it IS for somebody else, is the Your Kink Is OK part. Instead of that, it was all about how an entire group of people, were weak, pathetic, emasculated, and whatever other terms were used for it. *That* is an individual trying to tell other people that there kink is NOT ok because it doesn't jive with their personal wants. You can't figure that out? Fucking horseshit. Someone expressing an opinion of their own is not telling other people how to live. You need to learn the difference between oppression and fucking censorship. You've got mutually opposing viewpoints, but only ONE side is allowed to express their views? The side which dominates the entire conversation in this place?
Viewpoints around male subs are built around philosophical beliefs around men, women and gender (Countdown to Uggo's brain exploding in 5...4...) The idea that only ONE viewpoint is allowed to be espoused - and that people who disagree are bigots - is bullshit. I remember back in the 90's when NAMBLA was trying to argue they were the 'new gay community' which was being discriminated against and that people who did so were bigots. That was an unconvincing argument then and I still regard them as a bunch of sick fucks who need brain surgery.
quote:
quote:
There's a bunch of valid reasons to despise male subs - I can tell you that sure as shit, the vast majority of masculine men do. If you don't like it, then tough. Harden the fuck up instead of trying to engage in the lexical equivalent of gang-rape because someone espouses a view of which you disapprove.
No, there aren't, and I'm even going to tell you why. If you want to despise an individual, you can do that. However, if you want to despise a category of people, it makes a person a bigot. It's the very definition of the word and a person shouldn't be surprised when people say that what hits the screen is a repugnant point of view. Oh, I see, so despising - for example - padeophiles makes me a bigot, does it?
There are valid reasons, it's just that you don't think they're valid. And you're not a man, so you can't understand our instinctive response to men who emasculate themselves or let others do it for them. You'd probably just attribute it to "toxic masculinity" the way Uggo does. Mind you, she attributes every perceived negative outcome for women as "toxic masculinity", so this is not exactly a unique case.
I don't spend a whole bunch of time trying to convince anyone here that my views on male subs are valid. It's irrelevant. But this is the internet and expressing opinions which will annoy each other is par for the course. Pretending these views don't exist or that anyone who expresses them is a bigot is the kind of bullshit character assassination which is the hallmark of the left. And it's incredibly ironic given the progressive view on male subs in here is very much a minority opinion in the real world.
quote:
Oh, and just for the record, I didn't 'jump on the bandwagon'. (Better term than yours.) Wouldn't have mattered to me if I was the first, tenth, or one hundredth. Something a lot of folks don't have the fortitude to say unless they are just being a keyboard commando on the internet. I'd laugh my ass off if certain people walked into an event spewing some of the sewage they say on the net. That goes both ways. Ye Gods, have you ever noticed the masculine Dom mockery which is a constant fixture in this place? Do you seriously think the meth-heads spouting it would do so in person?
quote:
Hang tight, there. I didn't catch the profile mining and some bullsh^t about a thread brought up from ten years ago. That's *not* childish? That's what a person has to support their opinion? What kind of crap is that? Oh please. People feel free to mine my profile for what they think is ammunition. It's a waste of time, of course, because I don't give a shit, but Wayward5oul's disingenuous claims are pathetic. And please try and tell me you're suddenly deciding past posts aren't relevant in a discussion, because that shit is constantly trotted out by the progressinazi's in this place.
quote:
That's not an opinion. That's somebody digging for dirt.
*drily* Yes, I am somewhat familiar with people who try and use that technique.
|
|
|
|
