|
PeonForHer -> RE: Don't Women Want The Same Things As Men? (11/10/2016 3:41:56 PM)
|
I'm not sure if you were around at the time, WM ... but back in the days of yore, this sort of subject was hammered out repeatedly, and everyone would devote their profoundest thought to it. One of the assumptions was that, yes, if he was a submissive in the bedroom department, he was labelled a 'submissive'. I think that was pretty much taken for granted. He could be world heavyweight boxing champion, but he'd still be a sub.
One of the common conclusions though - and perhaps of more interest to tamaka - was the commonly-stated preference from femdoms in their 'ideal sub male'. This was of a male who was strong (howsoever defined) but who would submit to the femdom in question. They got off on a strong man who'd 'give up their strength' for them. A few femdoms would actually want to 'take' the man's strength from him forcibly, or by wile, but that was rare. Most of them seemed to want the man to give it away to them, willingly. Inspire it, that is.
For me, I worked it out long ago that being a sub male was inherently a paradoxical thing. There were two sides of you, that couldn't be homogenised into one, comfy, easy and logical state. Beneath that: I never have worked out how being a sub male is 'rational'. But, then, an awful lot of things we do that get our dicks hard or our growlers wet seem pretty damned impervious to rational explanation. Fortunately, one doesn't always have to explicate a thing one does in order to enjoy it.
|
|
|
|
