Jasmyn
Posts: 1234
Joined: 2/6/2004 From: New Zealand Status: offline
|
quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: Jasmyn ..but my gut tells me it could say more about the dominant than the submissive... but I could be wrong ... Personal opinion is NEVER wrong! lol What do you think this is really saying about the Dominant who uses it? Umm... they have an incredibly annoying sub who refuses to learn how to fold their socks the right way? lol I don't know ... but I read on these boards sometime ago, that the opposite of dominance and the opposite of submission isn't each other, the opposites being indecisiveness and stubborness...and it pretty much summed up how I feel about someone who is subservient to me .. d/s is a relationship of trust, trust that the sub is willingly and capable and in turn they trust (as said in my previous post) I have their best interests at heart...they might not quite understand why is it important that I have my socks folded in this fashion, just that they are to be .. I am sure there is a possible scenario where a not so idle threat of release could be merited once, or as a consequence in a contractual relationship (ie a three month training contract or similar) where the sub has agreed to the negotiations set out for that period including release before the three months is up for behaviour unbecoming... but as a blanket threat in an established d/s relationship, I think it would say the dom isn't wearing their domly undies that week ... or that the dom in question is reacting to something that is emotional...like say the sub is not stopping contact with an ex partner/ex dominant when they agreed to do so, or the sub has a gambling problem and the dom is at a point of exasperation while trying to play rescuer ... Puella asked a great question...and it's easy for us to all to state from our own personal reality what we would or wouldn't do, or pass judgement on it as a technique...those who raised the issues of fear by using the threat of release over deal breakers were spot on too ...or it could be that the dom who uses this is simply too inexperienced to know any different and *thinks* this is what they should do to try and bring their submissive back on course ... So yeah, I don't think the dominant employing this technique is necessarily an indecisive fool that should be stripped of their domly stripes, as each situation will have it's own circumstances and reasons for getting to this point, with both parties carrying some responsibility for the situation they find themselves in. A better technique, similar in fashion, but not so final, that I have used...is the 'collar' is removed for a period of time ...or they are released from certain duties (for want of a better description) ...having to show a willingness to learn and evolve from that point, earning it back...not having to jump through a million hoops to appease me or anything...just to show an eagerness to once again trust that I have their best interest at heart.
< Message edited by Jasmyn -- 7/23/2006 6:57:56 AM >
_____________________________
quote:
"To learn the art of submission a slave must first give up the desires that drew him to submission in the first place." Mistress Jasmyn Jan 2005. Visit My Website
|