RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


Awareness -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 7:00:37 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

You dont want to know, you just want to attack, so you can go and cut yourself a nice slice of fruitcake, careful of your nuts

Watching you lose your shit and babble incoherently is one of life's minor pleasures.




dcnovice -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 7:03:39 PM)

FR

We're gonna need a Fruitcake Anti-Defamation League at this rate.

[image]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/1c/64/4a/1c644ab569b80bdad59bd628c2a64c21.jpg[/image]




itsSIRtou -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 7:14:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen
If you are a victim of anything, violent crime, rape, a natural disaster, discrimination, society will sympathise and do more for the opposite sex compared to you being a white male. While not receiving this support that you are entitled to as women are, as a white male, you get told that you are privileged so shut up.

Allow me to assure you that isn't a given.

Oh, but you think it does, because it suits your purposes.

Please, do go on and tell me, exactly how privileged I am compared to you.


*ahem* Courtesy of Karen Straughan, here is the female privilege list. It's not necessarily comprehensive, although I do believe it covers the main bases.

quote:

Women are requested to consider whether they can answer "yes" to these questions:


1) People are likely to assume I am a warm and empathetic person.


2) People are likely to assist me when I must perform a physically arduous task.


3) If my car breaks down or I am otherwise in distress, people will be more likely to stop and help me.


4) If I am being physically assaulted, no matter the gender of my assailant, it is more likely that passersby will intervene.


5) People are likely to assume I am a competent parent, unless and until I prove otherwise.


6) People are more likely to respect my right to be offended by inappropriate or impolite behavior.


7) If I yell, people are not likely to believe I am going to hurt them.


8) Dress codes in the workplace and in leisure contexts are more likely to allow me to choose clothing that emphasize my most attractive features and minimize those I am unhappy with.


9) I am allowed by society to wear make-up to make myself more attractive without anyone questioning my sexual orientation. I am given a large social leeway in the kinds of hairstyles I can choose that will flatter my facial features.


10) If I work in a profession that is dominated by the opposite gender, people are likely to see it as "heroic", or a sign of social progress, rather than that I am deficient in some way.


11) If I show weakness, the first response of most people will be to console or help me, not criticize me, ignore me, or dismiss me as pathetic.


12) I am not expected to make the "first move" when meeting members of the opposite sex for the purposes of dating.


13) Members of the opposite gender are expected to make the first move; therefore, it is less likely I will be sexually rejected by those I come into close contact with in a dating context.


14) I am not expected to spend a significant portion of my yearly income on a token that accompanies a marriage proposal.


15) I am less likely to be expected to spend a significant amount of money on gifts, tokens, and activities during courtship and dating.


16) If I am having dinner with a member of the opposite gender in a dating context, and I do not reach for the check, people are unlikely to assume I am cheap.


17) If I am having dinner with a member of the opposite gender in a non-dating context, and I do not reach for the check, people are still unlikely to assume I am cheap.


18) If I earn less than my partner, no one will look at me funny.


19) If I earn nothing and my partner supports me, no one will look at me funny.


20) If I am unemployed and my partner is supporting me, people other than my partner are unlikely to pressure me because I am "not trying hard enough" to find employment.


21) If I earn less than my partner, people are unlikely to expect me to contribute equally to our living expenses.


22) If I am skilled in activities/hobbies that are commonly attributed to the opposite gender (kick boxing, operating power tools, shingling a roof, knitting, scrap-booking, floral arranging), people will see me as admirable. No one is likely to think I am a weirdo or wonder if I'm gay.


23) If I am completing a task with a member of the opposite gender, it will be expected that they take the greater physical burden--such as carrying the heavier boxes.


24) If I cry or am hurt, men and women are unlikely to tell me to "suck it up".


25) If I choose to stay at home with my children while my partner works, people are unlikely to think I am a deadbeat, unskilled, or shirking my responsibility to my family.


26) If I choose discontinue, temporarily leave, or reduce my participation in a high-status career in order to spend time at home caring for children, people are likely to consider it a "noble sacrifice" rather than a waste of my talents.


27) If I work and have a family, my employer will be less likely to require me to work overtime or bring work home with me. This will be the case even if I equally share domestic duties with my partner, or have outside domestic help (housekeeper, nanny).


28) If an employer claims to have "non-sexist" hiring policies, I can assume this to mean that members of my gender will be more likely to be hired, rather than less.


29) If I choose a career in early childhood or elementary level education, or volunteer to work with youth, no one will wonder if it's because I am a pedophile. They will trust me, even if they are aware that members of my own gender can and sometimes do use these positions to facilitate their sexual abuse of children.


30) If I commit a crime against children, even before details come out, people are likely to want to believe I have been falsely accused, was "failed by the system", or was somehow "driven to it" by factors outside my control (such as mental illness, poverty, lack of social services, childhood abuse), because members of my gender "just don't do stuff like that". It is unlikely they will automatically attribute my actions to unprovoked aggression or hold me entirely responsible for them.


31) If I am a victim of domestic violence, there are many services in my community that will help people of my gender. It is unlikely I will be denied services based on my gender.


32) If my partner physically abuses me, I will be believed by the authorities. Their belief will not depend on whether I have physical signs of injury.


33) If I physically abuse my partner, people--including the authorities and victim's services personnel--are likely to assume it was in self defence. Even if I tell them I hit first and my partner is non-violent, they are likely to wonder if my partner did something to instigate the assault, like cheating on me, yelling at me, or otherwise provoking me to lose control.


34) If I physically abuse my partner, and they reciprocate, they are as likely or more likely to be the one arrested as I am, even if my partner's reciprocation was in self-defence.


35) If my partner physically abuses me, and I reciprocate--even if I admit my reciprocation was not in self-defence but out of anger--it is unlikely that I will be arrested.


36) If I am divorced, and my ex-partner earns more than I do, it is more likely I will be awarded spousal support, even if am employed and self-supporting, than if our positions were reversed.


37) If I am divorced, the default assumption in the family court system is that I will have primary custody of my children. This will be the case, even if my ex-partner and I shared breadwinning and childcare duties roughly equally during the marriage.


38) If my ex-partner sues me for custody, they are unlikely to be as successful as I would be were our positions reversed. The burden will be on them to prove I am an unfit parent, rather than that they are more fit, before this likelihood tips in their favor.


39) If I am divorced, I will in almost every case be awarded child support. If my ex-partner does not abide by the terms of the custody/child support order, they will face legal consequences as serious as a prison sentence. They will face these consequences even if their reason for not paying is that their financial situation has changed since the marriage. They will face these consequences even if I do not fulfill my own legal obligations spelled out in the custody order to permit or facilitate their access to my children--my right to distance myself from my ex-partner is likely to take precedence over my children's right to involvement with their non-custodial parent.


40) If I am divorced and my partner is awarded primary custody of my children, I will only rarely be required to pay child support, even if I can afford it. If I am required to pay child support and I do not, for whatever reason, it is unlikely that I will face any legal consequences.


41) If I abuse the legal process during my divorce by obtaining a fraudulent temporary restraining order, misrepresenting my financial status, hiding assets, or otherwise perjuring myself, it is very unlikely I will be charged with a crime. In fact, my abuse of the legal process--even after it has been discovered by the court--is likely to benefit me in matters such as custody. Moreover, "the good of the children" will be treated as a reason to not penalize me monetarily--such as by reducing my share of joint assets.


42) If my ex-partner abuses the legal process in the above ways, they are more likely to be penalized criminally by being charged, or monetarily through reduction of their share of our joint assets.


43) If I have consensual sex with my partner and we are both underage, and a charge of statutory rape is filed, I will never be the one charged. This will be the case even if I pressured my partner to have sex and they objected.


44) If I am raped by a member of the opposite gender, and I am not below the age of consent, no one will tell me such a crime does not exist.


45) If I am raped by a member of the opposite gender, knowledgeable members of the medical and criminal justice communities are unlikely to consider my body's involuntary and automatic responses to sexual stimuli as "proof" that I gave consent.


46) If I am the victim of a statutory rape committed by a member of the opposite gender, and it results in a pregnancy, I will have a choice as to what my parental responsibilities to that child will be. I will not be legally required to be financially responsible for a child that results if I have been raped by an adult.



So in regards to your female privilege... well, there's that for a start.

Now I don't necessarily have a problem with this, because I'm a gender essentialist. I have privileges which women don't and vice versa. It's swings and roundabouts and it generally all evens out. However, I do have a problem with women whining about male privilege and forgetting to take a long, hard, look at themselves.

It gets back the fundamentals of men and women being biologically and therefore psychologically different. Unless we start to seriously mess with our DNA, we're pretty much always going to be different, so people need to suck it up and get on with their lives. Throwing all their effort into a fake cause ("women are oppressed!!!") because they have a need to believe in a fucking conspiracy theory is pathetic.





Let's see.... White men are responsible for:

The slavery of blacks in America

the genocide of Native Americans

the American civil war ...and the lynching of thousands of black men,women and children after the war was over.

the war of 1812

Spanish-American war

the first world war

the second world war

largely responsible for the Vietnam War

the Cold War.... On all sides.

The atomic bomb, nuclear bombs, chemical weapons, biological weapons, the concept of neutron bombs,(as opposed to the neutron dance.). So-called Dirty bombs, and just about every other weapon of molecular mass destruction.

The Ku Klux Klan..... And the myriad number of spinoff hate groups..

Organized crime. .... (I'm pretty sure if the ax has to fall, Italians will be considered white men. After all, Hitler was cool with Mussolini.)

Both the Great Depression, in the near Great Depression of 2007.

The assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King Junior, Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield, William McKinley, and the numerous assassination attempts by others.

Racial, economic, and sexual, inequality in America.... And in the rest of the world if there is a white man who is a leader of that country, those inequalities follows him.

The use of Christianity to eradicate the culture of every indigenous people they came across.

Every form of bullet firing mass killing machine starting with the Gatling gun.
( isn't it a bit ironic that their own invention is being used against them to strike fear in the land they stole from the Natives?)

Being the overwhelming majority of serial killers, and serial rapists

being the overwhelming reason for almost every law regarding consumer safety, workplace practice, environmental protection, and sexual harassment, is because of white men behaving badly.


Now don't get me wrong I hate no one. My white woman laughed mightily when I read ur comment,

But if you're going to continue to say white men are victim's, I consider that the most stupid and idiotic statement ever made. and turning the usual white male blind eye to ur own history.

Because really? While there are great things that white men have done, for instance inventing the very computers that we are using to type this with, white men are STILL single-handedly THE most destructive human beings on this planet, even to their own race, and amongst the good they do, there are too many white men continuing to refine better, more efficient, and more complete ways to destroy THEMSELVES and their fellow human beings.

And that does not allow you white men to play yourselves off as victims..... other than ur own greed, that is the last thing any of u are.

I also think that the OP just hopes nobody remembers how much shit his type has dumped on everyone else so his pissing whining might gain some traction.

....someday.





Lucylastic -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 7:14:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Awareness


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

You dont want to know, you just want to attack, so you can go and cut yourself a nice slice of fruitcake, careful of your nuts

Watching you lose your shit and babble incoherently is one of life's minor pleasures.


As I said, you only want to attack, and not know what Ive actually done in my life...
Im getting worried about you, letting me into your head ...are you going to start wondering about my vaj again?
dood, thats just weird and creepy, Ive told you that before.




Awareness -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 7:54:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

FR

We're gonna need a Fruitcake Anti-Defamation League at this rate.

[image]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/1c/64/4a/1c644ab569b80bdad59bd628c2a64c21.jpg[/image]
I am actually rather fond of fruitcake, but haven't eaten it in years.

What would such a league be called? Let's see... F.A. - oh come on, that's just TOO convenient!






respectmen -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 8:11:14 PM)

itsSIRtou

All these things you said, others are guilty of such types of evil too. Why is it only noteworthy when white men do it? Slavery for example. Slavery in the arab world was far worse than slavery in the western world. Yet, all that fucking gets talked about is slavery in the western world.

I know you're a black person, itsSIRto. I'm bringing this up because I want to ask you a question. How do you feel about someone placing shame on black people as a group for what examples there are of black people doing evil?

Why is it okay to do it to white men but not to your own kind?


Why should a white male be disqualified from expressing what he feels that are issues that affect his demographic and his problem with female privileges simply because other white men who the said complainer has nothing to do with have done evil?

So I can feel that black men aren't entitled to complain because other black men have done evil and other black men have privileged lives?




Awareness -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 8:18:48 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: itsSIRtou
Let's see.... White men are responsible for:

The slavery of blacks in America
No. Slavery was a common practice in many cultures and the vast majority of slaves which were brought to America were sold by other Africans or Muslims. The real question is whether those sold into slavery in America would have been slaves if America didn't exist.. because Africa was a big participant in the slave trade and the various tribes took slaves in war.

quote:

the genocide of Native Americans
That's not white men, that's government. Not many people like to talk about George Washington's war crimes, but you certainly can't blame them on "white men".

quote:

the American civil war ...and the lynching of thousands of black men,women and children after the war was over.
A war is a political extension. War occurs because people compete for resources. That is not the fault of white men. Indeed, it was white men who felt slavery was an evil who fought in that war.

quote:


the war of 1812

Spanish-American war

the first world war

the second world war

largely responsible for the Vietnam War
You're an idiot. War is a continuation of politics by other means. All nations engage in war - it's not an attribute specific to white men.

quote:

the Cold War.... On all sides.
You're an idiot.

quote:

The atomic bomb, nuclear bombs, chemical weapons, biological weapons, the concept of neutron bombs,(as opposed to the neutron dance.). So-called Dirty bombs, and just about every other weapon of molecular mass destruction.
Wrong. Those devices are invented by everyone who has the technology to do so. The Japanese were attempting to make the bomb themselves.

quote:

The Ku Klux Klan..... And the myriad number of spinoff hate groups..
Hate groups occur across all races and ethnicities. You're clearly not a thinker.

quote:

Organized crime. .... (I'm pretty sure if the ax has to fall, Italians will be considered white men. After all, Hitler was cool with Mussolini.)
Oh, we got ourselves a scholar, here. Apparently, nobody in the history of the world ever 'organised' crime before the Mafia.

Dude, the Yakuza, the Hong Kong and Chinese triads and the 999 group would like a word with you.

quote:

Both the Great Depression, in the near Great Depression of 2007.
White men invented economic collapse? Are you for real?

quote:

The assassinations of John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King Junior, Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield, William McKinley, and the numerous assassination attempts by others.
Committed by INDIVIDUAL WHITE MEN, not white men as an amorphous group.

quote:


Racial, economic, and sexual, inequality in America.... And in the rest of the world if there is a white man who is a leader of that country, those inequalities follows him.
Wrong. Typically the corrupt African nations are led by military dictators who siphon off all the country's wealth. The military Junta in Burma was controlled by the Chinese.

quote:

The use of Christianity to eradicate the culture of every indigenous people they came across.
Which is odd, because all other conquering nations and creeds believe in peaceful coex-... what's that? Islam murders people if they refuse to convert? No! Say it ain't so!

quote:

Every form of bullet firing mass killing machine starting with the Gatling gun.
Yes, guns are terrible. People should just hold hands and hope that bad people just go away.

quote:

( isn't it a bit ironic that their own invention is being used against them to strike fear in the land they stole from the Natives?)
Conquered, not stole. England was conquered multiple times - hell, at some points in history you needed fucking traffic lights to manage the hordes of unclean foreigners sweeping across the land. My ancestry is Scottish and Irish, which is probably why I have a genetic dislike for pompous Poms, but regardless - history is written by the winners and conquering is something which everybody does... well, presuming their technological advancement includes sailing.

quote:

Being the overwhelming majority of serial killers, and serial rapists
The overwhelming majority of CONVICTED serial killers and rapists. We know perfectly well that women are equally capable of being serial killers and they're less likely to be caught doing it. And women rape at rates equal to men. So this argument is null and void.

quote:

being the overwhelming reason for almost every law regarding consumer safety, workplace practice, environmental protection, and sexual harassment, is because of white men behaving badly.
Actually no. Chinese manufacturers have absolutely zero conscience when it comes to consumer safety. Zip. Nada. None. There was a manufacturer of baubles for kids who replaced one ingredient with another because it was cheaper.

It also happened to be radioactive, but they didn't care.

The reason we have regulation is because human beings tend to maximise their advantage. Something which occurs across all demographics. Claiming this is the province of white men is... what's the phrase again? Oh, yes. "Fucking stupid".

quote:

Now don't get me wrong I hate no one. My white woman laughed mightily when I read ur comment,
Why? Do you slap her if she doesn't?

quote:

But if you're going to continue to say white men are victim's, I consider that the most stupid and idiotic statement ever made. and turning the usual white male blind eye to ur own history.
I said white women are privileged. And they are. Perhaps your stunted intelligence has trouble reading the words.

quote:


Because really? While there are great things that white men have done, for instance inventing the very computers that we are using to type this with, white men are STILL single-handedly THE most destructive human beings on this planet, even to their own race, and amongst the good they do, there are too many white men continuing to refine better, more efficient, and more complete ways to destroy THEMSELVES and their fellow human beings.
No. You're babbling insane nonsense. Men and women of all races will do everything to see their progeny succeed. Some of them will start wars. Some of them will plot, scheme and murder to make it happen. Some won't.

This is human psychology at work, not "white culture". Claiming otherwise is just racism on your part.




Awareness -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 8:19:52 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

itsSIRtou

All these things you said, others are guilty of such types of evil too. Why is it only noteworthy when white men do it?
I can answer that. He's a racist.




Kirata -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 8:25:24 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: itsSIRtou

Now don't get me wrong I hate no one.

And you're always good for a laugh, too.

K.





tamaka -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 8:36:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen
Painting everything black and white by placing all things by what gender or race people are is being way overly simplistic.



Isn't that what YOU do every time you start one of these threads?





dcnovice -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 8:57:58 PM)

quote:

I am actually rather fond of fruitcake, but haven't eaten it in years.

Same here.

I made a pair of them one year, but they weren't great. The cake batter was too light, and I should have used more fruit. Maybe I'll try again this year.

I later moved on to plum pudding--a tradition from my Irish great-grandmother--before concluding it's a lot of work for something few Americans actually like.




Awareness -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 9:04:31 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

quote:

I am actually rather fond of fruitcake, but haven't eaten it in years.

Same here.

I made a pair of them one year, but they weren't great. The cake batter was too light, and I should have used more fruit. Maybe I'll try again this year.

I later moved on to plum pudding--a tradition from my Irish great-grandmother--before concluding it's a lot of work for something few Americans actually like.
My wife informs me that Americans do not like it and I - and other people who like fruitcake - are weird.

The classic fruitcake is a Boiled Fruitcake which involves boiling the fruit in a pan with some alcohol. It burns off the alcohol and leaves the taste behind.

Plum pludding is a classic Christmas dessert. I don't understand how this worthwhile piece of culture has failed to infiltrate the Americas




AtUrCervix -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 9:20:13 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: respectmen

Me as a white male, I've never felt any fucking privilege over others different to me in my whole bloody life. Sure, I may have in times before I was born. If we are so uber super privileged like the loony left keeps claiming, all white males would strongly feel this invisible privilege. I can't be angry or frightened of having privileges taken away from my demographic when I have never felt any to begin with.

Privilege is a class issue, not a gender or race issue. The only white males who are privileged are the ones at top. The powerlessness of the other white men, the other 99.999 percent of the white male population are just as powerless as the next woman or person of colour.

Privilege isn't specific to white males. It's racist and sexist to believe it's a white male specific phenomenon. It's also racist and sexist to imply that just because a small subset of white males are privileged, you paint all white males as privileged. It's also racist and sexist to imply that just because a small subset of white males have done evil to women and people of colour, that means the whole demographic of white males should have guilt, shame, blame placed on them.

If white males are so privileged, how come both asian men and jewish men on a general basis both out earn white men?

White male privilege my fucking arse.

So I would just like to say a big fuck you to you leftist/feminazi cuntbags.



(Gawwwwd....this guy is going to get eviscerated....for.....absolutely.....no reason...but for....butt hurt comments).





Lucylastic -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 9:21:11 PM)

I prefer to soak my raisins sultanas and currants in the alcohol for about six hours, before I mix them in.
I only use citrus peel and cherries, lots of spice, I like mine dark, rich, with almonds.
I usually buy a plum pudding every year. But I always make my own cake...its cathartic.




vincentML -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 9:22:33 PM)

quote:

Slavery in the arab world was far worse than slavery in the western world. Yet, all that fucking gets talked about is slavery in the western world.

A figment of your ignorance, RM. Slavery in Islamic lands was nowhere as extensive as that in the West.

Perhaps Twelve Million Africans were transported as slaves to South and Central America and to the the Caribbean Islands. Maybe another Three Million were brought to North America to serve primarily on the Southern plantations. Many Africans died of disease during the crossing while others were simply tossed overboard. Columbus enslaved the indigenous people of the lower islands. Cortes and Pizarro lead movements that destroyed pre-Columbian indigenous civilizations in Central and South America.

The English setters and French traders lead the assault on the First Peoples along the eastern seaboard of North America, and inland. Our President Andrew Jackson drove the Cherokees out from their lands in North Carolina and forced them on the long march across the southern winter to settle on the dry plains of Oklahoma. A journey we call the "Trail of Tears" Many died during the forced march.

The piece d'resistance was the wholesale slaughter of the buffalo by white men shooting from trains to deprive the Plains Indians of their food source. The plains were carpeted with bison skeletons. Indian women and children were massacred at their settlement at Wounded Knee Creek by white soldiers.

The white evil did not stop there. The Civil War between the States was begun by the secession of the Southern Renegades. The War lead to the killing of near to 700,000 young lives on both sides total. After the war the Northern army turned and began the route of the Plains Indians reneging on treaties in order to drive the Sioux out of the Dakotas after gold was discovered. To this very week the Dakota Sioux are peacefully battling an oil pipeline that threatens to disrupt their water sources and their holy burial grounds.

I would be remiss to ignore the ninety year history of Jim Crow Laws and Segregation in the Southland following the 1865 surrender that shackled the freed blacks to lives of share cropping in the most dismal poverty on cotton plantations and forced labor on prison farms from which they worked on chain gangs for the county or rented out to labor on private farms. Free in name only.

What of I have written is just a sketch of the racial genocide that occurred in the New World. It was written in haste and some of it is not in chronological order, but as far as I know what I have written is valid.

You whine because a "few" white men did terrible things and you feel a victim of the feminist movement. I just don't have time to get involved in the justifiable complaints women have had during our history here in the states. Their complaints have not been insubstantial.

What I find inexcusable in your whiny, lamenting, man-pussy, cry baby position of victimhood is that you are totally ignorant of the history of the historical reign and privilege of white men. You just don't know what the fuck you are talking about BIG TIME.

You are a shallow, pitiful excuse for a man and obviously poorly read in history.

Buy a pizza sometime and lighten up. Be thankful for the accident of your birth. Read a book with your pizza. Get a fucking education.





vincentML -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 9:35:44 PM)

quote:

No. Slavery was a common practice in many cultures and the vast majority of slaves which were brought to America were sold by other Africans or Muslims. The real question is whether those sold into slavery in America would have been slaves if America didn't exist.. because Africa was a big participant in the slave trade and the various tribes took slaves in war.

No, excusing slavery as a common practice in other civilizations at much lower numbers is a pissant excuse. The real quest we must not loose sight of is that these people of color were trapped into lifetimes of forced labor. Their women were raped by white masters and the men were punished fiercely. Their families were disrupted and their progeny were sold as merchandise at auction. They lead lives of the worse debasement not seen again until the victimization of Jews in Nazi Germany and occupied Poland.




respectmen -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 9:42:09 PM)

vincentML

Wanna talk about the slave trade that happened in the arab world? Which is far fucking worse than what whites ever done?

No, that's right. It's only noteworthy when white males do it.

Rolls eyes




Awareness -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 9:47:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Slavery in the arab world was far worse than slavery in the western world. Yet, all that fucking gets talked about is slavery in the western world.

A figment of your ignorance, RM. Slavery in Islamic lands was nowhere as extensive as that in the West.
Wrong. The Arab slave trade is known to have peaked around 7th century BC which predates the Atlantic slave trade by 700 years. Western involvement in the slave trade lasted for 3 or 4 centuries. Arab involvement in the slave trade lasted for a good 1,500 years and IS CONTINUING in the Muslim world today. Of course our progressive friends in Saudi Arabia were ahead of the curve. They banned slavery way back in 1962.

You're full of shit.




respectmen -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (10/31/2016 10:10:15 PM)

It seems that nearly everything is worse when white men do it. Muslim rape for example.




Kirata -> RE: White male privilege theory is a sham (11/1/2016 12:01:16 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

Perhaps Twelve Million Africans were transported as slaves to South and Central America and to the the Caribbean Islands. Maybe another Three Million were brought to North America to serve primarily on the Southern plantations.

Or perhaps, maybe not.

Approximately 11,863,000 Africans were shipped across the Atlantic, with a death rate during the Middle Passage reducing this number by 10-20 percent. As a result between 9.6 and 10.8 million Africans arrived in the Americas . . . Only about 6 percent of imports went directly to British North America. ~The Gillder Lehrman Institute of American History

Moreover, blacks in Africa were only too happy to enrich themselves by enslaving their fellows and offering them for sale. So it wasn't a pretty picture on either side of the equation; and while two wrongs don't make a right, they do make two wrongs.

Slavery in Africa has existed throughout the continent for many centuries, and still continues in the current day in some countries. ~Source

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

The white evil did not stop there.

Yeah, white people are devils. What shall we do about them?

K.





Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625